Preterm InfantNCT01649362
Effects of Prefeeding Oral Stimulation on Feeding Performance in Preterm Infants
A study testing prefeeding oral stimulation program in people with Preterm Infant and Oral Feeding Performance, run by Centre Hospitalier du Luxembourg at 1 site in Luxembourg.
Trial summary
The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of an oral stimulation program on the length of the transition period in preterm infants (primary outcome), the length of hospital stay and the breastfeeding rates at discharge (secondary outcomes). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age
- Conditions the study is for
- Preterm Infant, Oral Feeding Performance
- What is being tested?
- prefeeding oral stimulation program
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 101 participants
- Where
- 1 siteLuxembourg
- Study dates
- Jun 2011to Dec 2012
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- preterm infants from 26 to 33+6 weeks' gestational age, as determined by date of last menstruation and first-trimester ultrasound, hospitalized in our neonatal unit.
Who cannot join
- Congenital malformations (chromosomal disorders, malformations of head and face, neurological, cardiac, digestive or pulmonary malformations)
- Severe asphyxia (hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy)
- Presence of third or fourth degree intracranial haemorrhage
- Severe periventricular leukomalacia
- Severe chronic lung disease
- Severe hospital infection during the study period
Show all 10Show fewer
- Necrotising enterocolitis during the study period
- Feeding interruption for more than 10 days during the study period
- Death during the study period
- Transfer to another hospital before discharge.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Luxembourg1 site
Service de néonatologie, Centre Hospitalier de Luxembourg
Luxembourg, 1210
About this study
Official title: Effects of Prefeeding Oral Stimulation on Feeding Performance in Preterm Infants Born Between 26 and 33+6 Weeks' Gestational Age: a Case-control Study
The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of an oral stimulation program on the length of the transition period in preterm infants (primary outcome), the length of hospital stay and the breastfeeding rates at discharge (secondary outcomes).
Read the detailed description
Oral feeding issues in preterm infants are a growing concern for neonatologists because the difficulties preterm infants show in transitioning from tube to independent oral feeding lead to delayed hospital discharge, maternal stress and rising financial burden.
Safety in infant oral feeding implies minimal risk of aspiration and requires the adequate coordination of sucking, swallowing and respiration.
Sucking and swallowing are present in early foetal life, but the coordination of sucking with swallowing and breathing is not thought to occur before 34 weeks post-menstrual age (PMA). Thus, preterm infants tend to suck, swallow and breathe in an alternate, rather than coordinated fashion.
Accelerated maturation of sucking reflex and earlier readiness for bottle-feeding is reported when preterm neonates were given non-nutritive sucking (NNS) opportunities during gavage feeding. Recent evidence suggests that the sensory consequences associated with the production of NNS have beneficial effects on oral feeding performance and the development of specific sucking skills.
At present, it is customary for infants who have stable cardiopulmonary status to be introduced to oral feeding around 33 to 34 weeks PMA. They usually take days or weeks in the transition period of combined gavage and oral feeding before reaching full oral feeding.
Recent studies suggest that an oral stimulation program associated to NNS applied to preterm infants for at least 10 days in the period of full gavage feeding can facilitate their oral feeding progress, improves breastfeeding rates among preterm infants and decreases the length of stay.
A meta-analysis found that NNS decreases significantly the length of hospital stay in preterm infants with an acceleration of the transition from tube to bottle feeds and better bottle feeding performance, without any negative outcomes reported.
Actually, in our neonatal intensive care unit, preterm infants don't receive any oral stimulation or a pacifier to develop NNS before oral feeding introduction and they show frequently, even for the infants born after 32 weeks' gestational age, difficulties in the transitioning from tube to independent oral feeding.
In a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial, prefeeding oral stimulation will be compared with the conventional approach for oral feeding initiation.
Considering a 15 days follow-up for each patient after the introduction of oral feeding, an expected rate of patients performing the full oral feeding after 15 days of 95% in the stimulated group and of 70% in the non stimulated group, the minimal sample size needed to observe a difference between the two groups would be 37 patients in each group with a power of 80% and an alpha level of 5%.
A total of 74 preterm infants are going to be included from the neonatal intensive care unit at the Children's Hospital of the Centre Hospitalier de Luxembourg, Luxembourg.
The investigators are going to include preterm infants from 26 to 33+6 weeks' gestational age, as determined by date of last menstruation and first-trimester ultrasound. Prior informed consent is going to be obtained from the parents/guardians of the newborns for their participation in the study.
Infants' randomization, into an experimental and a control group, is going to be done when they reach 32 weeks PMA for the infants born before 32 weeks, and at birth for the infants born after 32 weeks' gestational age. The process is done using sequential numbers, kept in sealed, opaque, non-translucid envelopes. Randomization is going to be stratified based on gestational age ranges (26-27+6, 28-29+6, 30-31+6, 32-33+6) to ensure a similar gestational age distribution in the two groups.
Infants in the interventional group are going to receive a prefeeding oral stimulation (group 1), the infants in the control group (group 2) are neither being stimulated nor will them be proposed a pacifier before or gavage feeding.
The intervention will start at 32 weeks PMA in a medically stable infant feed by gavage feeding for the infants born before 32 weeks' gestational age, and, as soon as clinical stability is acquired, for the infants born after 32 weeks.
The investigators defined as a complete oral feeding a minimal quantity of 5 millilitres that the preterm infant has to drink in less than 10 minutes by bottle or by breastfeeding. These 5 millilitres are the usual quantity that a preterm baby born at 34 weeks' gestational age is able to drink by himself at each meal.
The program is going to be interrupted if infants are medically unstable and/or have any episodes of oxygen desaturation, apnoea and/or bradycardia during the intervention.
Gavage feeding will begin when the preterm infant is clinically stable in terms of hemodynamics and has presented peristalsis according to criteria established by the caretaker staff. Oral diet progress depends on infant's tolerance and will be about 20 ml/kg/day.
The change from gavage to oral feeding is going to be initiated at 34 weeks PMA, after the beginning of oral stimulation program in group 1.
The gavage feeding will be stopped and the orogastric tube removed, when the infant attains an oral feeding volume of more than 120 ml/kg/day. A weight lost of 5 % is authorized after stopping gavage feeding.
Full oral diet is defined by an oral intake of milk > 150 ml/kg/day, by bottle or by breastfeeding, for 3 consecutive days.
The expected benefits of this study are a reduction in the length of stay in our neonatal unit in the stimulated group, due to the reduction in the length of the transition period in these preterm infants. A minimisation of the hospitalization cost and a reduction in the parental stress can by expected with an earlier hospital discharge.
An increase of the breastfeeding rates at discharge is expected. With the improved feeding performance in the stimulated group, the maternal stress concerning breastfeeding is reduced and the risk of failure is smaller. A better mother-child attachment can be expected with this study.
- Conditions
- Preterm Infant, Oral Feeding Performance
- Being tested
- prefeeding oral stimulation program
- Keywords
- preterm infant, feeding difficulties, prefeeding oral stimulation
- Medical subject headings
- Premature Birth
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
prefeeding oral stimulation programOther
The intervention will start at 32 weeks PMA in a medically stable infant feed by gavage feeding for the infants born before 32 weeks' gestational age, and, as soon as clinical stability is acquired, for the infants born after 32 weeks.
The prefeeding oral stimulation program consists of a 15-minute stimulation program, delivered by the nurse or the medical staff, according to the stimulation program proposed by Fucile, Gisel and Lau. The program is going to be administered once a day for 14 consecutive days (for infants born before 32 weeks' gestational age), 15 to 30 minutes before a tube feeding. In infants born after 32 weeks' gestational age, stimulation program is going to be stopped when the infant attains 3 complete oral feedings by day.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Control group | No intervention | No prefeeding oral stimulation Infants in the control group received neither oral stimulation nor a pacifier before or during gavage feeding. |
| Oral stimulation, interventional group | Experimental | Infants in the interventional group received pre-feeding oral stimulation. The intervention started on infants born within 32 gestational weeks when the patients were stable and tube-fed, receiving more than 100 ml/kg/day of milk. On infants born after 32 weeks, the intervention started immediately after clinical stability was achieved.
The pre-feeding oral stimulation program consisted of a 15-minute stimulation program delivered by one of the eight trained nurses or one trained member from the medical staff in accordance with the stimulation program proposed by Fucile, Gisel and Lau.
The stimulation program was administered 15 to 30 minutes prior to tube feeding, once daily for at least 10 days. The program was stopped when the infants attained more than three oral feedings per day. The program was interrupted if the infants were medically unstable and/or had episodes of desaturation, apnoea and/or bradycardia during the intervention Receives: Other: prefeeding oral stimulation program |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Length of Transition Period
transition period was defined as the period from the introduction of enteral feeding to full enteral feeding
Measured: participants were followed from date of randomization until full enteral feeding was acquired,an expected average of 5 weeks
Secondary outcomes (2)
Length of Hospital Stay
Measured: participants were followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 5 weeks
Breastfeeding Rate at Discharge
Measured: hospital discharge, an expected average of 5 weeks from the beginning of oral feeding introduction
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 Jul 2012 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2011
- Primary completionNov 2012
- Study completionDec 2012
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (14)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Preterm InfantStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 101 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Centre Hospitalier du Luxembourg
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Luxembourg Institute of Health
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Dr Manon BACHE, Centre Hospitalier du Luxembourg
- Investigators
- Marie-Lise Lair, Study chair, Luxembourg Institute of Health
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01649362
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 201105/04
- Status last verified
- Feb 2014
- First submitted
- 18 Jul 2012
- Last updated
- 12 Mar 2014
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Amaizu N, Shulman R, Schanler R, Lau C. Maturation of oral feeding skills in preterm infants. Acta Paediatr. 2008 Jan;97(1):61-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2007.00548.x. Epub 2007 Dec 3.
PubMed 18052999Arvedson J, Clark H, Lazarus C, Schooling T, Frymark T. Evidence-based systematic review: effects of oral motor interventions on feeding and swallowing in preterm infants. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2010 Nov;19(4):321-40. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2010/09-0067). Epub 2010 Jul 9.
PubMed 20622046Barlow SM, Finan DS, Lee J, Chu S. Synthetic orocutaneous stimulation entrains preterm infants with feeding difficulties to suck. J Perinatol. 2008 Aug;28(8):541-8. doi: 10.1038/jp.2008.57. Epub 2008 Jun 12.
PubMed 18548084Bingham PM, Ashikaga T, Abbasi S. Prospective study of non-nutritive sucking and feeding skills in premature infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2010 May;95(3):F194-200. doi: 10.1136/adc.2009.164186. Epub 2009 Nov 29.
PubMed 19948525Boiron M, Da Nobrega L, Roux S, Henrot A, Saliba E. Effects of oral stimulation and oral support on non-nutritive sucking and feeding performance in preterm infants. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2007 Jun;49(6):439-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2007.00439.x.
PubMed 17518930Fucile S, Gisel E, Lau C. Oral stimulation accelerates the transition from tube to oral feeding in preterm infants. J Pediatr. 2002 Aug;141(2):230-6. doi: 10.1067/mpd.2002.125731.
PubMed 12183719Fucile S, Gisel EG, Lau C. Effect of an oral stimulation program on sucking skill maturation of preterm infants. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2005 Mar;47(3):158-62. doi: 10.1017/s0012162205000290.
PubMed 15739719Pickler RH, Reyna BA. Effects of non-nutritive sucking on nutritive sucking, breathing, and behavior during bottle feedings of preterm infants. Adv Neonatal Care. 2004 Aug;4(4):226-34. doi: 10.1016/j.adnc.2004.05.005.
PubMed 15368215Pimenta HP, Moreira ME, Rocha AD, Gomes SC Jr, Pinto LW, Lucena SL. Effects of non-nutritive sucking and oral stimulation on breastfeeding rates for preterm, low birth weight infants: a randomized clinical trial. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2008 Sep-Oct;84(5):423-7. doi: 10.2223/JPED.1839. English, Portuguese.
PubMed 18923786Pinelli J, Symington A. Non-nutritive sucking for promoting physiologic stability and nutrition in preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Oct 19;(4):CD001071. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001071.pub2.
PubMed 16235279Poore M, Zimmerman E, Barlow SM, Wang J, Gu F. Patterned orocutaneous therapy improves sucking and oral feeding in preterm infants. Acta Paediatr. 2008 Jul;97(7):920-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2008.00825.x. Epub 2008 May 7.
PubMed 18462468Rocha AD, Moreira ME, Pimenta HP, Ramos JR, Lucena SL. A randomized study of the efficacy of sensory-motor-oral stimulation and non-nutritive sucking in very low birthweight infant. Early Hum Dev. 2007 Jun;83(6):385-8. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2006.08.003. Epub 2006 Sep 18.
PubMed 16979854Stumm S, Barlow SM, Estep M, Lee J, Cannon S, Carlson J, Finan D. Respiratory Distress Syndrome Degrades the Fine Structure of the Non-Nutritive Suck In Preterm Infants. J Neonatal Nurs. 2008;14(1):9-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jnn.2007.11.001.
PubMed 19122873Lau C. [Development of oral feeding skills in the preterm infant]. Arch Pediatr. 2007 Sep;14 Suppl 1:S35-41. doi: 10.1016/s0929-693x(07)80009-1. French.
PubMed 17939956
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Mar 2014. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effects of Prefeeding Oral Stimulation on Feeding Performance in Preterm Infants Born Between 26 and 33+6 Weeks' Gestational Age: a Case-control Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01649362
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 201105/04
- Conditions
- Preterm Infant, Oral Feeding Performance
- Keywords
- preterm infant, feeding difficulties, prefeeding oral stimulation
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 101 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Centre Hospitalier du LuxembourgUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Luxembourg Institute of Health
- Study start
- Jun 2011
- Primary completion
- Nov 2012 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2012 (actual)
- First posted
- 25 Jul 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 18 Dec 2013
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of an oral stimulation program on the length of the transition period in preterm infants (primary outcome), the length of hospital stay and the breastfeeding rates at discharge (secondary outcomes).
Detailed description
Oral feeding issues in preterm infants are a growing concern for neonatologists because the difficulties preterm infants show in transitioning from tube to independent oral feeding lead to delayed hospital discharge, maternal stress and rising financial burden.
Safety in infant oral feeding implies minimal risk of aspiration and requires the adequate coordination of sucking, swallowing and respiration.
Sucking and swallowing are present in early foetal life, but the coordination of sucking with swallowing and breathing is not thought to occur before 34 weeks post-menstrual age (PMA). Thus, preterm infants tend to suck, swallow and breathe in an alternate, rather than coordinated fashion.
Accelerated maturation of sucking reflex and earlier readiness for bottle-feeding is reported when preterm neonates were given non-nutritive sucking (NNS) opportunities during gavage feeding. Recent evidence suggests that the sensory consequences associated with the production of NNS have beneficial effects on oral feeding performance and the development of specific sucking skills.
At present, it is customary for infants who have stable cardiopulmonary status to be introduced to oral feeding around 33 to 34 weeks PMA. They usually take days or weeks in the transition period of combined gavage and oral feeding before reaching full oral feeding.
Recent studies suggest that an oral stimulation program associated to NNS applied to preterm infants for at least 10 days in the period of full gavage feeding can facilitate their oral feeding progress, improves breastfeeding rates among preterm infants and decreases the length of stay.
A meta-analysis found that NNS decreases significantly the length of hospital stay in preterm infants with an acceleration of the transition from tube to bottle feeds and better bottle feeding performance, without any negative outcomes reported.
Actually, in our neonatal intensive care unit, preterm infants don't receive any oral stimulation or a pacifier to develop NNS before oral feeding introduction and they show frequently, even for the infants born after 32 weeks' gestational age, difficulties in the transitioning from tube to independent oral feeding.
In a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial, prefeeding oral stimulation will be compared with the conventional approach for oral feeding initiation.
Considering a 15 days follow-up for each patient after the introduction of oral feeding, an expected rate of patients performing the full oral feeding after 15 days of 95% in the stimulated group and of 70% in the non stimulated group, the minimal sample size needed to observe a difference between the two groups would be 37 patients in each group with a power of 80% and an alpha level of 5%.
A total of 74 preterm infants are going to be included from the neonatal intensive care unit at the Children's Hospital of the Centre Hospitalier de Luxembourg, Luxembourg.
The investigators are going to include preterm infants from 26 to 33+6 weeks' gestational age, as determined by date of last menstruation and first-trimester ultrasound. Prior informed consent is going to be obtained from the parents/guardians of the newborns for their participation in the study.
Infants' randomization, into an experimental and a control group, is going to be done when they reach 32 weeks PMA for the infants born before 32 weeks, and at birth for the infants born after 32 weeks' gestational age. The process is done using sequential numbers, kept in sealed, opaque, non-translucid envelopes. Randomization is going to be stratified based on gestational age ranges (26-27+6, 28-29+6, 30-31+6, 32-33+6) to ensure a similar gestational age distribution in the two groups.
Infants in the interventional group are going to receive a prefeeding oral stimulation (group 1), the infants in the control group (group 2) are neither being stimulated nor will them be proposed a pacifier before or gavage feeding.
The intervention will start at 32 weeks PMA in a medically stable infant feed by gavage feeding for the infants born before 32 weeks' gestational age, and, as soon as clinical stability is acquired, for the infants born after 32 weeks.
The investigators defined as a complete oral feeding a minimal quantity of 5 millilitres that the preterm infant has to drink in less than 10 minutes by bottle or by breastfeeding. These 5 millilitres are the usual quantity that a preterm baby born at 34 weeks' gestational age is able to drink by himself at each meal.
The program is going to be interrupted if infants are medically unstable and/or have any episodes of oxygen desaturation, apnoea and/or bradycardia during the intervention.
Gavage feeding will begin when the preterm infant is clinically stable in terms of hemodynamics and has presented peristalsis according to criteria established by the caretaker staff. Oral diet progress depends on infant's tolerance and will be about 20 ml/kg/day.
The change from gavage to oral feeding is going to be initiated at 34 weeks PMA, after the beginning of oral stimulation program in group 1.
The gavage feeding will be stopped and the orogastric tube removed, when the infant attains an oral feeding volume of more than 120 ml/kg/day. A weight lost of 5 % is authorized after stopping gavage feeding.
Full oral diet is defined by an oral intake of milk > 150 ml/kg/day, by bottle or by breastfeeding, for 3 consecutive days.
The expected benefits of this study are a reduction in the length of stay in our neonatal unit in the stimulated group, due to the reduction in the length of the transition period in these preterm infants. A minimisation of the hospitalization cost and a reduction in the parental stress can by expected with an earlier hospital discharge.
An increase of the breastfeeding rates at discharge is expected. With the improved feeding performance in the stimulated group, the maternal stress concerning breastfeeding is reduced and the risk of failure is smaller. A better mother-child attachment can be expected with this study.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Control group | No intervention | –No prefeeding oral stimulation Infants in the control group received neither oral stimulation nor a pacifier before or during gavage feeding. |
| Oral stimulation, interventional group | Experimental | Other: prefeeding oral stimulation programInfants in the interventional group received pre-feeding oral stimulation. The intervention started on infants born within 32 gestational weeks when the patients were stable and tube-fed, receiving more than 100 ml/kg/day of milk. On infants born after 32 weeks, the intervention started immediately after clinical stability was achieved. The pre-feeding oral stimulation program consisted of a 15-minute stimulation program delivered by one of the eight trained nurses or one trained member from the medical staff in accordance with the stimulation program proposed by Fucile, Gisel and Lau. The stimulation program was administered 15 to 30 minutes prior to tube feeding, once daily for at least 10 days. The program was stopped when the infants attained more than three oral feedings per day. The program was interrupted if the infants were medically unstable and/or had episodes of desaturation, apnoea and/or bradycardia during the intervention |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- preterm infants from 26 to 33+6 weeks' gestational age, as determined by date of last menstruation and first-trimester ultrasound, hospitalized in our neonatal unit.
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Congenital malformations (chromosomal disorders, malformations of head and face, neurological, cardiac, digestive or pulmonary malformations)
- Severe asphyxia (hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy)
- Presence of third or fourth degree intracranial haemorrhage
- Severe periventricular leukomalacia
- Severe chronic lung disease
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| prefeeding oral stimulation programThe intervention will start at 32 weeks PMA in a medically stable infant feed by gavage feeding for the infants born before 32 weeks' gestational age, and, as soon as clinical stability is acquired, for the infants born after 32 weeks. The prefeeding oral stimulation program consists of a 15-minute stimulation program, delivered by the nurse or the medical staff, according to the stimulation program proposed by Fucile, Gisel and Lau. The program is going to be administered once a day for 14 consecutive days (for infants born before 32 weeks' gestational age), 15 to 30 minutes before a tube feeding. In infants born after 32 weeks' gestational age, stimulation program is going to be stopped when the infant attains 3 complete oral feedings by day. | Other | Oral stimulation, interventional group |
Primary outcome
Length of Transition Period
Time frame: participants were followed from date of randomization until full enteral feeding was acquired,an expected average of 5 weeks
transition period was defined as the period from the introduction of enteral feeding to full enteral feeding
2 secondary outcomes
Length of Hospital Stay
Time frame: participants were followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 5 weeks
Breastfeeding Rate at Discharge
Time frame: hospital discharge, an expected average of 5 weeks from the beginning of oral feeding introduction
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Mar 2014.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 18052999Amaizu N, Shulman R, Schanler R, Lau C. Maturation of oral feeding skills in preterm infants. Acta Paediatr. 2008 Jan;97(1):61-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2007.00548.x. Epub 2007 Dec 3.
- Background: PubMed 20622046Arvedson J, Clark H, Lazarus C, Schooling T, Frymark T. Evidence-based systematic review: effects of oral motor interventions on feeding and swallowing in preterm infants. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2010 Nov;19(4):321-40. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2010/09-0067). Epub 2010 Jul 9.
- Background: PubMed 18548084Barlow SM, Finan DS, Lee J, Chu S. Synthetic orocutaneous stimulation entrains preterm infants with feeding difficulties to suck. J Perinatol. 2008 Aug;28(8):541-8. doi: 10.1038/jp.2008.57. Epub 2008 Jun 12.
- Background: PubMed 19948525Bingham PM, Ashikaga T, Abbasi S. Prospective study of non-nutritive sucking and feeding skills in premature infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2010 May;95(3):F194-200. doi: 10.1136/adc.2009.164186. Epub 2009 Nov 29.
- Background: PubMed 17518930Boiron M, Da Nobrega L, Roux S, Henrot A, Saliba E. Effects of oral stimulation and oral support on non-nutritive sucking and feeding performance in preterm infants. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2007 Jun;49(6):439-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2007.00439.x.
- Background: PubMed 12183719Fucile S, Gisel E, Lau C. Oral stimulation accelerates the transition from tube to oral feeding in preterm infants. J Pediatr. 2002 Aug;141(2):230-6. doi: 10.1067/mpd.2002.125731.
- Background: PubMed 15739719Fucile S, Gisel EG, Lau C. Effect of an oral stimulation program on sucking skill maturation of preterm infants. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2005 Mar;47(3):158-62. doi: 10.1017/s0012162205000290.
- Background: PubMed 15368215Pickler RH, Reyna BA. Effects of non-nutritive sucking on nutritive sucking, breathing, and behavior during bottle feedings of preterm infants. Adv Neonatal Care. 2004 Aug;4(4):226-34. doi: 10.1016/j.adnc.2004.05.005.
- Background: PubMed 18923786Pimenta HP, Moreira ME, Rocha AD, Gomes SC Jr, Pinto LW, Lucena SL. Effects of non-nutritive sucking and oral stimulation on breastfeeding rates for preterm, low birth weight infants: a randomized clinical trial. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2008 Sep-Oct;84(5):423-7. doi: 10.2223/JPED.1839. English, Portuguese.
- Background: PubMed 16235279Pinelli J, Symington A. Non-nutritive sucking for promoting physiologic stability and nutrition in preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Oct 19;(4):CD001071. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001071.pub2.
- Background: PubMed 18462468Poore M, Zimmerman E, Barlow SM, Wang J, Gu F. Patterned orocutaneous therapy improves sucking and oral feeding in preterm infants. Acta Paediatr. 2008 Jul;97(7):920-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2008.00825.x. Epub 2008 May 7.
- Background: PubMed 16979854Rocha AD, Moreira ME, Pimenta HP, Ramos JR, Lucena SL. A randomized study of the efficacy of sensory-motor-oral stimulation and non-nutritive sucking in very low birthweight infant. Early Hum Dev. 2007 Jun;83(6):385-8. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2006.08.003. Epub 2006 Sep 18.
Related trials for Preterm Infant
Not yet recruiting
nCPAP-NAVA-Backup Versus Standard nCPAP for Severe Apnea in Preterm Infants ≤28 Weeks
Apnea of Prematurity
Recruiting
Study of the Influence of Intraperitoneal Insufflation of CO2 by Laparoscopy on the Short-term Evolution of Premature Infants With Ulcerative Necrotizing Enterocolitis
Preterm Birth, Enterocolitis, Necrotizing
Recruiting
Comparing Surfactant Administration Through Supraglottic Airway and Thin Catheter for Preterm Infants
Surfactant, Respiratory Distress Syndrome (Neonatal)
Recruiting
Optimization of Saturation Targets And Resuscitation Trial (OptiSTART)
Premature Infants, Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia
RecruitingObservational study
Growing Little PEAPODS Study
Premature Birth, Premature Infant
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Marie-Lise Lair study chair
Luxembourg Institute of Health
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing prefeeding oral stimulation program in people with Preterm Infant and Oral Feeding Performance, run by Centre Hospitalier du Luxembourg at 1 site in Luxembourg.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Mar 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Luxembourg. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 18 Dec 2013). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Length of Transition Period (time frame: participants were followed from date of randomization until full enteral feeding was acquired,an expected average of 5 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01649362, which also lists 14 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Mar 2014.