AzTrials
AzTrials

AlopeciaThaiScalpBxNCT01651689

Hair Counts From Vertical and Horizontal Sections of Scalp Biopsy SPecimens in Thai Population With Alopecia

An observational study of Alopecia, run by Siriraj Hospital at 1 site in Thailand.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Hair disorders, expecialy scarring alopecia were diagnosed by scalp biopsy specimens in horizontal and vertical sections.(1-4) Data on hair density in Thais are lacking, although in Asians have more fewer hairs than whites.(5-7)Howevery, previous study from East Asian just had only one study and the data was more… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Alopecia
How many people
50 participants
Where
1 siteThailand
Study dates
Oct 2010to May 2013
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Thai patients who have alopecia and on scadule for hair transplantation

Who may be able to join

  • Thai
  • Age >= 18 years
  • Diagnosis alopecia and on list for hair transplantation in Siriraj hospital

Who cannot join

  • Alopecia areata or positive hair pulling test
  • Underlying disease : DM, chronic renal failure, chronic liver disease

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Thailand1 site
  • Siriraj hospital

    Bangkok, Bangkok, 10700

Other trials in Thailand

About this study

Hair disorders, expecialy scarring alopecia were diagnosed by scalp biopsy specimens in horizontal and vertical sections.(1-4) Data on hair density in Thais are lacking, although in Asians have more fewer hairs than whites.(5-7)Howevery, previous study from East Asian just had only one study and the data was more differently from West Asian and whites. Then this study was performed to evaluate hair density in Thais, and compared to previous study.

Conditions
Alopecia
Keywords
Scalp biopsy, Hair count, Vertical section, Horizontal section, Thais
Medical subject headings
Alopecia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT01651689
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Scalp biopsySubjects are on scadule list for hair transplantation in Siriraj hospital. Scalp biopsy with punch biopsy No.4 Scalp biopsy by punch biopsy No.4 at occipital area was done in subjects who have hair transplantaion.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted27 Jul 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study startOct 2010
  3. Primary completionApr 2013 (estimated)
  4. Study completionMay 2013 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
50 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01651689
Sponsor's protocol ID
SirirajH-003
Other IDs
553/2553(EC3)
Acronym
ThaiScalpBx
Status last verified
Jul 2012
First submitted
25 Jul 2012
Last updated
27 Jul 2012
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Elston DM, McCollough ML, Angeloni VL. Vertical and transverse sections of alopecia biopsy specimens: combining the two to maximize diagnostic yield. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1995 Mar;32(3):454-7. doi: 10.1016/0190-9622(95)90068-3.

    PubMed 7868715
  • Elston DM, Ferringer T, Dalton S, Fillman E, Tyler W. A comparison of vertical versus transverse sections in the evaluation of alopecia biopsy specimens. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2005 Aug;53(2):267-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2005.03.007.

    PubMed 16021122
  • Garcia C, Poletti E. Scalp biopsy specimens: transverse vs vertical sections. Arch Dermatol. 2007 Feb;143(2):268. doi: 10.1001/archderm.143.2.268-a. No abstract available.

    PubMed 17310014
  • Elston DM. Vertical vs. transverse sections: both are valuable in the evaluation of alopecia. Am J Dermatopathol. 2005 Aug;27(4):353-6. doi: 10.1097/01.dad.0000164602.10908.92. No abstract available.

    PubMed 16121061
  • Sperling LC. Hair density in African Americans. Arch Dermatol. 1999 Jun;135(6):656-8. doi: 10.1001/archderm.135.6.656.

    PubMed 10376692
  • Lee HJ, Ha SJ, Lee JH, Kim JW, Kim HO, Whiting DA. Hair counts from scalp biopsy specimens in Asians. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2002 Feb;46(2):218-21. doi: 10.1067/mjd.2002.119558.

    PubMed 11807433
  • Aslani FS, Dastgheib L, Banihashemi BM. Hair counts in scalp biopsy of males and females with androgenetic alopecia compared with normal subjects. J Cutan Pathol. 2009 Jul;36(7):734-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0560.2008.01149.x.

    PubMed 19519605

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Alopecia, run by Siriraj Hospital at 1 site in Thailand.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Jul 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Thailand. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01651689, which also lists 7 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Jul 2012.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in