Anemia in Chronic Kidney Disease Patients Not on DialysisPhase 3START-CKDNCT01652872
Strategies Using Darbepoetin Alfa to Avoid Transfusions in Chronic Kidney Disease
A Phase 3 study testing Darbepoetin alfa in people with Anemia in Chronic Kidney Disease Patients Not on Dialysis, run by Amgen at 249 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
A phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel group study. Anemic subjects with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and not on dialysis will be randomized 1:1 to 1 of 2 dosing strategies to evaluate the proportion of subjects receiving at least one red blood cell (RBC) transfusion. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Anemia in Chronic Kidney Disease Patients Not on Dialysis
- What is being tested?
- Darbepoetin alfa
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 756 participants
- Where
- 249 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- 30 Jul 2012to 19 Oct 2017
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Clinical history of advanced CKD not on dialysis with at least 1 historic estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 45.0 mL/mi)/1.73 m2 at least 12 weeks prior to screening
- Not currently receiving dialysis with an eGFR < 45.0 mL/min/1.73m2, per the central laboratory during screening
- Chronic anemia due to renal failure
- Two Hb concentrations < 10.0 g/dL, at least 2 weeks apart during screening using the modified Hb point of care (POC) device
- Iron replete, defined as a transferrin saturation (TSAT) ≥ 20% and a ferritin ≥ 100 ng/mL, per the central laboratory during screening
- Vitamin B12 and folate replete, defined as a vitamin B12 level > 180 pg/mL and a folate concentration > 7 nmol/L, per the central laboratory during screening
- Clinically stable in the opinion of the investigator
- Subject has provided written informed consent
Who cannot join
- Systemic hematologic disease (eg, sickle cell anemia, myelodysplastic syndrome, hematologic malignancy)
- Current or prior malignancy within 5 years of screening, with the exception of non-melanoma skin cancers and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia
- Treatment for any malignancy (eg, radiation, chemotherapy, hormone therapy, or biologics) within 5 years of screening, with the exception of locally excised non-melanoma skin cancer or cervical intraepithelial neoplasia
- Female subject not willing to use highly effective methods of birth control during treatment and for 4 weeks after the end of treatment
- Subject is pregnant or breast feeding, or might become pregnant during the study or within 4 weeks after the end of treatment
- Currently receiving intravenous (IV) antibiotics for treatment of an active infection
Show all 30Show fewer
- Known Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) positive
- Currently receiving systemic immunosuppressive therapy with the exception of prednis(ol)one ≤ 10 mg per day (or the steroid equivalent)
- History of any organ transplant
- Currently enrolled in another interventional study (eg, studies which require medical device use or drug therapy or with protocol required procedures), or less than 4 weeks since ending another interventional study(s) or receiving investigational agent(s)
- Known neutralizing anti-erythropoietic protein antibodies
- Known sensitivity to any of the products to be administered during dosing
- Previously enrolled in this study
- Not expected to be available for protocol required study visits or procedures to the best of the subject and investigator's knowledge
- Subject has any kind of disorder that, in the opinion of the investigator, may compromise the ability of the subject to give written informed consent and/or comply with all required study procedures
- Occurrence of stroke or myocardial infarction (MI) within 24 weeks of screening
- Receipt of RBC transfusion within 8 weeks of screening
- Occurrence of seizure, clinically relevant active bleeding (eg, gastrointestinal [GI] bleed) or any hospitalization within 8 weeks of screening
- Receipt of any IV iron therapy within 4 weeks of screening
- Changes in oral iron therapy within 4 weeks of screening
- Receipt of ESA therapy within 4 weeks of screening
- Diagnosis or treatment of malignancy, with the exception of non-melanoma skin cancers and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia during screening
- Receipt of ESA therapy, RBC transfusions, IV iron therapy during screening
- Changes in oral iron therapy during screening
- Occurrence of stroke, MI, seizure, clinically relevant active bleeding (eg, GI bleed), any hospitalization or outpatient surgery during screening
- Uncontrolled hypertension during screening. Defined in this study, as a mean systolic blood pressure > 140 mmHg at both screening visits, or a mean systolic blood pressure >/= 160 mmHg at any screening visit, or a mean diastolic blood pressure >/= 90 mmHg at any screening visit.
- Expected or scheduled change in oral iron therapy or receipt of IV iron therapy within 4 weeks after randomization
- Expected or scheduled receipt of a RBC transfusion within 8 weeks after randomization
- Expected or scheduled organ transplant within 24 weeks after randomization
- Expected or scheduled initiation of dialysis within 24 weeks after randomization
Trial locations and contacts
249 sites in 2 countries.
249 sites in 2 countries
United States243 sites
Research Site
Albany, New York, 12208
Research Site
Alexandria, Virginia, 22304
Research Site
Alhambra, California, 91801
Research Site
Ames, Iowa, 50010
Research Site
Anaheim, California, 92805
Research Site
Anderson, South Carolina, 29621
Research Site
Anniston, Alabama, 36207
Research Site
Arlington, Texas, 76015
Research Site
Arvada, Colorado, 80002
Research Site
Asheville, North Carolina, 28801
Research Site
Atlanta, Georgia, 30342
Research Site
Augusta, Georgia, 30909
Research Site
Austin, Texas, 78705
Research Site
Austin, Texas, 78751
Research Site
Austin, Texas, 78758
Research Site
Azusa, California, 91702
Research Site
Bakersfield, California, 93301
Research Site
Bakersfield, California, 93309
Research Site
Baton Rouge, Louisiana, 70808
Research Site
Beaver, Pennsylvania, 15009
Research Site
Bell Gardens, California, 90201
Research Site
Bethesda, Maryland, 20814
Research Site
Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, 18017
Research Site
Beverly Hills, California, 90211
Research Site
Birmingham, Alabama, 35235
Research Site
Bluefield, West Virginia, 24701
Research Site
Boynton Beach, Florida, 33472
Research Site
Bristol, Tennessee, 37620
Research Site
Brooklyn, New York, 11203
Research Site
Buffalo, New York, 14215
Research Site
Burlington, Vermont, 05401
Research Site
Canton, Georgia, 30114
Research Site
Cerritos, California, 90703
Research Site
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599
Research Site
Chesapeake, Virginia, 23320
Research Site
Chicago, Illinois, 60612
Research Site
Chicago, Illinois, 60616
Research Site
Chicago, Illinois, 60637
Research Site
Chula Vista, California, 91910
Research Site
City of Saint Peters, Missouri, 63376
Research Site
Columbia, South Carolina, 29203
Research Site
Columbia, Tennessee, 38401
Research Site
Columbus, Indiana, 47201
Research Site
Columbus, Mississippi, 39705
Research Site
Columbus, Ohio, 43210
Research Site
Columbus, Ohio, 43215
Research Site
Coral Springs, Florida, 33071
Research Site
Corsicana, Texas, 75110
Research Site
Cudahy, California, 90201
Research Site
Dallas, Texas, 75390
Research Site
Daytona Beach, Florida, 32117
Research Site
DeLand, Florida, 32720
Research Site
Doylestown, Pennsylvania, 18901
Research Site
Duncansville, Pennsylvania, 16635
Research Site
Durham, North Carolina, 27704
Research Site
Dyersburg, Tennessee, 38024
Research Site
Eatontown, New Jersey, 07724
Research Site
Edinburg, Texas, 78539
Research Site
El Centro, California, 92243
Research Site
El Paso, Texas, 79905
Research Site
Evanston, Illinois, 60201
Research Site
Fairfax, Virginia, 22030
Research Site
Fairfax, Virginia, 22033
Research Site
Fargo, North Dakota, 58103
Research Site
Fargo, North Dakota, 58122
Research Site
Flint, Michigan, 48504
Research Site
Flushing, New York, 11355
Research Site
Fort Lauderdale, Florida, 33308
Research Site
Fort Worth, Texas, 76104
Research Site
Fountain Valley, California, 92708
Research Site
Framingham, Massachusetts, 01702
Research Site
Franklin, Tennessee, 37064
Research Site
Frisco, Texas, 75035
Research Site
Fullerton, California, 92835
Research Site
Garden Grove, California, 92844
Research Site
Glendale, California, 91204
Research Site
Goodyear, Arizona, 85395
Research Site
Granada Hills, California, 91344
Research Site
Grand Forks, North Dakota, 58201
Research Site
Grand Rapids, Michigan, 49525
Research Site
Great Neck, New York, 11021
Research Site
Greensboro, North Carolina, 27408
Research Site
Greenville, North Carolina, 27834
Research Site
Greenville, South Carolina, 29605
Research Site
Greenville, Texas, 75402
Research Site
Gulfport, Mississippi, 39501
Research Site
Hampton, Virginia, 23666
Research Site
Henderson, Nevada, 89052
Research Site
Hollywood, Florida, 33021
Research Site
Honolulu, Hawaii, 96817
Research Site
Houston, Texas, 77004
Research Site
Houston, Texas, 77008
Research Site
Houston, Texas, 77030
Research Site
Houston, Texas, 77031
Research Site
Houston, Texas, 77036
Research Site
Houston, Texas, 77054
Research Site
Houston, Texas, 77057
Research Site
Houston, Texas, 77074
Research Site
Houston, Texas, 77099
Research Site
Hudson, Florida, 34667
Research Site
Huntington Beach, California, 92648
Research Site
Huntsville, Alabama, 35801
Research Site
Inglewood, California, 90301
Research Site
Jackson, Tennessee, 38305
Research Site
Jacksonville, Florida, 32216
Research Site
Jacksonville Beach, Florida, 32250
Research Site
Kalamazoo, Michigan, 49007
Research Site
Kansas City, Kansas, 66160
Research Site
Kansas City, Missouri, 64111
Research Site
Kansas City, Missouri, 64114
Research Site
Kingsport, Tennessee, 37660
Research Site
Kinston, North Carolina, 28504
Research Site
Knoxville, Tennessee, 37923
Research Site
La Jolla, California, 92037
Research Site
La Mesa, California, 91942
Research Site
Lafayette, Louisiana, 70503
Research Site
Laguna Hills, California, 92653
Research Site
Lakewood, California, 90712
Research Site
Lancaster, California, 93534
Research Site
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89106
Research Site
Lauderdale Lakes, Florida, 33313
Research Site
Lexington, Kentucky, 40504
Research Site
Lincoln, Nebraska, 68510
Research Site
Little Rock, Arkansas, 72204
Research Site
Livingston, New Jersey, 07039
Research Site
Lomita, California, 90717
Research Site
Long Beach, California, 90813
Research Site
Los Angeles, California, 90015
Research Site
Los Angeles, California, 90017
Research Site
Los Angeles, California, 90022
Research Site
Los Angeles, California, 90025
Research Site
Lubbock, Texas, 79430
Research Site
Lufkin, Texas, 75904
Research Site
Lynwood, California, 90262
Research Site
Macon, Georgia, 31217
Research Site
Manassas, Virginia, 20110
Research Site
Marion, Ohio, 43302
Research Site
McAllen, Texas, 78503
Research Site
McKinney, Texas, 75069
Research Site
Mechanicsville, Virginia, 23116
Research Site
Melbourne, Florida, 32901
Research Site
Melbourne, Florida, 32935
Research Site
Memphis, Tennessee, 38163
Research Site
Meridian, Idaho, 83642
Research Site
Metairie, Louisiana, 70006
Research Site
Miami, Florida, 33144
Research Site
Miami, Florida, 33150
Research Site
Miami, Florida, 33166
Research Site
Miami, Florida, 33173
Research Site
Miami Beach, Florida, 33140
Research Site
Michigan City, Indiana, 46360
Research Site
Middlebury, Connecticut, 06762
Research Site
Midland, Michigan, 48640
Research Site
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53226
Research Site
Mineola, New York, 11501
Research Site
Mission Hills, California, 91345
Research Site
Mobile, Alabama, 36608
Research Site
Mobile, Alabama, 36617
Research Site
Modesto, California, 95350
Research Site
Montgomery, Alabama, 36106
Research Site
Mooresville, North Carolina, 28117
Research Site
Naples, Florida, 34110
Research Site
Natchitoches, Louisiana, 71457
Research Site
New Bern, North Carolina, 28562
Research Site
New Haven, Connecticut, 06511
Research Site
New Orleans, Louisiana, 70112
Research Site
New Port Richey, Florida, 34652
Research Site
New Port Richey, Florida, 34653
Research Site
New York, New York, 10037
Research Site
Newnan, Georgia, 30265
Research Site
Norfolk, Virginia, 23502
Research Site
North Haven, Connecticut, 06473
Research Site
North Platte, Nebraska, 69101
Research Site
Northridge, California, 91324
Research Site
Northridge, California, 91325
Research Site
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73116
Research Site
Orange, California, 92868
Research Site
Orangeburg, South Carolina, 29118
Research Site
Orchard Park, New York, 14127
Research Site
Orlando, Florida, 32804
Research Site
Oxon Hill, Maryland, 20745
Research Site
Paducah, Kentucky, 42003
Research Site
Pembroke Pines, Florida, 33028
Research Site
Peoria, Arizona, 85381
Research Site
Peoria, Illinois, 61603
Research Site
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19102
Research Site
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19118
Research Site
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19140
Research Site
Phoenix, Arizona, 85004
Research Site
Phoenix, Arizona, 85012
Research Site
Phoenix, Arizona, 85032
Research Site
Plymouth, Massachusetts, 02360
Research Site
Poland, Ohio, 44514
Research Site
Pontiac, Michigan, 48341
Research Site
Port Charlotte, Florida, 33952
Research Site
Portland, Oregon, 97210
Research Site
Portland, Oregon, 97213
Research Site
Quincy, Illinois, 62301
Research Site
Rancho Mirage, California, 92270
Research Site
Redondo Beach, California, 90277
Research Site
Richmond, Virginia, 23219
Research Site
Richmond, Virginia, 23229
Research Site
Richmond, Virginia, 23298-0160
Research Site
Riverside, California, 92505
Research Site
Rochester, New York, 14642
Research Site
Rockport, Maine, 04856
Research Site
Roseburg, Oregon, 97471
Research Site
Rosedale, New York, 11422
Research Site
Royal Oak, Michigan, 48073
Research Site
Ruston, Louisiana, 71270
Research Site
Sacramento, California, 95825
Research Site
San Antonio, Texas, 78205
Research Site
San Antonio, Texas, 78215
Research Site
San Antonio, Texas, 78224
Research Site
San Antonio, Texas, 78228
Research Site
San Antonio, Texas, 78229
Research Site
San Dimas, California, 91773
Research Site
Shreveport, Louisiana, 71101
Research Site
Silverdale, Washington, 98383
Research Site
Southgate, Michigan, 48195
Research Site
Springfield, Massachusetts, 01107
Research Site
Statesville, North Carolina, 28625
Research Site
Summerfield, Florida, 34491
Research Site
Tampa, Florida, 33603
Research Site
Tampa, Florida, 33612
Research Site
Tampa, Florida, 33614
Research Site
Tempe, Arizona, 85284
Research Site
Temple, Texas, 76502
Research Site
The Bronx, New York, 10461
Research Site
Toledo, Ohio, 43606
Research Site
Toms River, New Jersey, 08755
Research Site
Tulsa, Oklahoma, 74120
Research Site
Voorhees Township, New Jersey, 08043
Research Site
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20037
Research Site
Westminster, Colorado, 80031
Research Site
Whittier, California, 90602
Research Site
Whittier, California, 90603
Research Site
Wichita, Kansas, 67214-2998
Research Site
Willoughby Hills, Ohio, 44094
Research Site
Wilmington, North Carolina, 28401
Research Site
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27103
Research Site
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27157
Research Site
Yuba City, California, 95991
Puerto Rico6 sites
Research Site
Caguas, 00725
Research Site
Ponce, 00716
Research Site
Ponce, 00717
Research Site
Rio Piedras, 00935
Research Site
San Juan, 00909
Research Site
San Juan, 00918
About this study
A phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel group study. Anemic subjects with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and not on dialysis will be randomized 1:1 to 1 of 2 dosing strategies to evaluate the proportion of subjects receiving at least one red blood cell (RBC) transfusion. In the haemoglobin (Hb)-based titration group, darbepoetin alfa doses will be titrated to maintain Hb ≥ 10.0 grams/deciliter (g/dL). In the fixed dose group, subjects will receive a fixed dose of darbepoetin alfa. Treatment group, darbepoetin alfa doses, and protocol specified Hb concentrations will be blinded. Subjects will be followed for approximately 2 years from the date of randomization.
Read the detailed description
The study is a phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel group study designed to describe the benefits and potential risks of a new treatment strategy using a fixed dose of darbepoetin alfa in subjects with CKD and not on dialysis. Anemic subjects without recent use of an erythropoiesis stimulating agent (ESA) will be randomly allocated 1:1 to treatment with a fixed dose of darbepoetin alfa or to treatment with darbepoetin alfa using a Hb-based titration strategy, which has been the conventional dosing strategy. In the Hb-based titration group, darbepoetin alfa doses will be titrated to maintain Hb ≥ 10.0 g/dL. This study aims to estimate the incidence of RBC transfusions (administered as deemed clinically necessary) in each group and the difference in incidence of RBC transfusions between the 2 groups. In addition, multiple aspects, such as cumulative darbepoetin alfa dose, total number of units of transfusions, Hb concentration, Hb-related parameters (eg, Hb variability, excursions, rate of change), and adverse (eg, cardiovascular) events, will also be considered in order to determine a preferred dosing regimen. Treatment group, darbepoetin alfa doses, and protocol specified Hb concentrations will be blinded to the investigator, subjects and study team. Subjects will be followed for approximately 2 years from the date of randomization.
- Being tested
- Darbepoetin alfa, Placebo
- Keywords
- anemia, chronic kidney disease, kidney disease, renal failure
- Medical subject headings
- Anemia, Renal Insufficiency, Chronic, Kidney Diseases, Renal Insufficiency
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Darbepoetin alfaBiological
Also called Aranesp
Darbepoetin alfa was presented as single use prefilled syringes (PFS). Investigational product was administered SC Q4W for the duration of the treatment period.
PlaceboOther
Placebo was presented as single use PFS. Participants received a SC placebo injection in place of darbepoetin alfa therapy when the dose of study drug was withheld per the dosing algorithm for the duration of the treatment period.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Hb-Based Titration Group | Active comparator | Participants received darbepoetin alfa as a subcutaneous (SC) injection once every 4 weeks (Q4W) for up to 96 weeks. The dose of darbepoetin alfa was titrated based on the Hb concentration on the date of the visit, the corresponding Hb rate of rise (ROR), and the previously assigned dose. Doses were reduced if Hb exceeded 10.5 g/dL or Hb ROR exceeded 1.0 g/dL/4W. When darbepoetin alfa therapy was withheld per the dosing algorithm, placebo was administered. The starting dose of darbepoetin alfa was 0.45 micrograms/kilogram (mcg/kg) and the protocol specified doses ranged from 10 to 300 mcg. Receives: Biological: Darbepoetin alfa; Other: Placebo |
| Fixed Dose Group | Experimental | Participants received darbepoetin alfa as a SC injection Q4W at the same dose as assigned at the time of randomization for the duration of the 96 week treatment period. There was 1 exception to the fixed dose strategy: if the Hb was > 12.0 g/dL, darbepoetin alfa therapy was withheld and placebo administered. Once the Hb fell to < 10.0 g/dL, darbepoetin alfa therapy resumed at the same dose. The starting dose of darbepoetin alfa was 0.45 mcg/kg and the protocol specified doses ranged from 10 to 300 mcg. Receives: Biological: Darbepoetin alfa; Other: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Participants in Receipt of 1 or More RBC Transfusions
The percentage of participants receiving at least 1 RBC transfusion during the evaluation period was recorded for each treatment group. The evaluation period began from the date of randomization, and participants were censored at the last dose of investigational product plus 3 months or end of study, whichever was earlier (on-treatment approach).
Measured: From randomization until the end of study, up to week 101.
Secondary outcomes (4)
Mean Number of Units of RBC Transfused
The total number of units of RBC transfused per participant during the evaluation period was recorded for each treatment group. The evaluation period began from the date of randomization, and participants were censored at the last dose of investigational product plus 3 months or end of study, whichever was earlier (on-treatment approach). The mean total number of RBC units transfused per participant is presented.
Measured: From randomization until the end of study, up to week 101.
Time to First RBC Transfusion
Time to first RBC transfusion during the evaluation period was recorded for each treatment group. The evaluation period began from the date of randomization, and participants were censored at the last dose of investigational product plus 3 months or end of study, whichever was earlier (on-treatment approach). The time to first RBC transfusion is presented using Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimates at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months.
Measured: From randomization until the end of study, up to week 101.
Mean Achieved Hb Concentration While Receiving Investigational Product
Average achieved Hb concentration while receiving investigational product was recorded as mean Hb using the area under the curve (AUC) method for each treatment group. The AUC of Hb was calculated according to the trapezoidal method, standardized as daily AUC. Participants with available Hb values from study day 85 (week 13) to the last dose date were included in the calculation.
Measured: From week 13 until the end of study, up to week 101.
Geometric Mean Cumulative Dose of Darbepoetin Alfa Per 4 Weeks
Cumulative doses of darbepoetin alfa adjusted for investigation product exposure time (e.g. mean cumulative darbepoetin alfa dose per 4 weeks) were calculated for each treatment group using the total cumulative dose during the study divided by total number of weeks dosed then multiplied by 4. The geometric mean cumulative dose is presented.
Measured: From randomization until the end of study, up to week 101.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 Jul 2012 (estimated)
- Study start30 Jul 2012
- Primary completion19 Oct 2017
- Study completion19 Oct 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Anemia in Chronic Kidney Disease Patients Not on DialysisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by AmgenThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 756 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Amgen
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- MD, Study director, Amgen
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01652872
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 20110226
- Acronym
- START-CKD
- Status last verified
- Sep 2022
- First submitted
- 7 Jun 2012
- Last updated
- 21 Sep 2022
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Toto R, Petersen J, Berns JS, Lewis EF, Tran Q, Weir MR. A Randomized Trial of Strategies Using Darbepoetin Alfa To Avoid Transfusions in CKD. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2021 Feb;32(2):469-478. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2020050556. Epub 2020 Dec 7.
PubMed 33288629
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 Sep 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Strategies Using Darbepoetin Alfa to Avoid Transfusions in Chronic Kidney Disease
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01652872
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- START-CKD / 20110226
- Keywords
- anemia, chronic kidney disease, kidney disease, renal failure
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 756 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- AmgenIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 30 Jul 2012 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 19 Oct 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 19 Oct 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 30 Jul 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 8 Nov 2018
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
A phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel group study. Anemic subjects with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and not on dialysis will be randomized 1:1 to 1 of 2 dosing strategies to evaluate the proportion of subjects receiving at least one red blood cell (RBC) transfusion. In the haemoglobin (Hb)-based titration group, darbepoetin alfa doses will be titrated to maintain Hb ≥ 10.0 grams/deciliter (g/dL). In the fixed dose group, subjects will receive a fixed dose of darbepoetin alfa. Treatment group, darbepoetin alfa doses, and protocol specified Hb concentrations will be blinded. Subjects will be followed for approximately 2 years from the date of randomization.
Detailed description
The study is a phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel group study designed to describe the benefits and potential risks of a new treatment strategy using a fixed dose of darbepoetin alfa in subjects with CKD and not on dialysis. Anemic subjects without recent use of an erythropoiesis stimulating agent (ESA) will be randomly allocated 1:1 to treatment with a fixed dose of darbepoetin alfa or to treatment with darbepoetin alfa using a Hb-based titration strategy, which has been the conventional dosing strategy. In the Hb-based titration group, darbepoetin alfa doses will be titrated to maintain Hb ≥ 10.0 g/dL. This study aims to estimate the incidence of RBC transfusions (administered as deemed clinically necessary) in each group and the difference in incidence of RBC transfusions between the 2 groups. In addition, multiple aspects, such as cumulative darbepoetin alfa dose, total number of units of transfusions, Hb concentration, Hb-related parameters (eg, Hb variability, excursions, rate of change), and adverse (eg, cardiovascular) events, will also be considered in order to determine a preferred dosing regimen. Treatment group, darbepoetin alfa doses, and protocol specified Hb concentrations will be blinded to the investigator, subjects and study team. Subjects will be followed for approximately 2 years from the date of randomization.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, care provider, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Hb-Based Titration Group | Active comparator | Biological: Darbepoetin alfa, Other: PlaceboParticipants received darbepoetin alfa as a subcutaneous (SC) injection once every 4 weeks (Q4W) for up to 96 weeks. The dose of darbepoetin alfa was titrated based on the Hb concentration on the date of the visit, the corresponding Hb rate of rise (ROR), and the previously assigned dose. Doses were reduced if Hb exceeded 10.5 g/dL or Hb ROR exceeded 1.0 g/dL/4W. When darbepoetin alfa therapy was withheld per the dosing algorithm, placebo was administered. The starting dose of darbepoetin alfa was 0.45 micrograms/kilogram (mcg/kg) and the protocol specified doses ranged from 10 to 300 mcg. |
| Fixed Dose Group | Experimental | Biological: Darbepoetin alfa, Other: PlaceboParticipants received darbepoetin alfa as a SC injection Q4W at the same dose as assigned at the time of randomization for the duration of the 96 week treatment period. There was 1 exception to the fixed dose strategy: if the Hb was > 12.0 g/dL, darbepoetin alfa therapy was withheld and placebo administered. Once the Hb fell to < 10.0 g/dL, darbepoetin alfa therapy resumed at the same dose. The starting dose of darbepoetin alfa was 0.45 mcg/kg and the protocol specified doses ranged from 10 to 300 mcg. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Clinical history of advanced CKD not on dialysis with at least 1 historic estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 45.0 mL/mi)/1.73 m2 at least 12 weeks prior to screening
- Not currently receiving dialysis with an eGFR < 45.0 mL/min/1.73m2, per the central laboratory during screening
- Chronic anemia due to renal failure
- Two Hb concentrations < 10.0 g/dL, at least 2 weeks apart during screening using the modified Hb point of care (POC) device
- Iron replete, defined as a transferrin saturation (TSAT) ≥ 20% and a ferritin ≥ 100 ng/mL, per the central laboratory during screening
Key exclusion criteria (30 listed)
- Systemic hematologic disease (eg, sickle cell anemia, myelodysplastic syndrome, hematologic malignancy)
- Current or prior malignancy within 5 years of screening, with the exception of non-melanoma skin cancers and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia
- Treatment for any malignancy (eg, radiation, chemotherapy, hormone therapy, or biologics) within 5 years of screening, with the exception of locally excised non-melanoma skin cancer or cervical intraepithelial neoplasia
- Female subject not willing to use highly effective methods of birth control during treatment and for 4 weeks after the end of treatment
- Subject is pregnant or breast feeding, or might become pregnant during the study or within 4 weeks after the end of treatment
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Darbepoetin alfaAlso: AranespDarbepoetin alfa was presented as single use prefilled syringes (PFS). Investigational product was administered SC Q4W for the duration of the treatment period. | Biological | Fixed Dose Group, Hb-Based Titration Group |
| PlaceboPlacebo was presented as single use PFS. Participants received a SC placebo injection in place of darbepoetin alfa therapy when the dose of study drug was withheld per the dosing algorithm for the duration of the treatment period. | Other | Fixed Dose Group, Hb-Based Titration Group |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Participants in Receipt of 1 or More RBC Transfusions
Time frame: From randomization until the end of study, up to week 101.
The percentage of participants receiving at least 1 RBC transfusion during the evaluation period was recorded for each treatment group. The evaluation period began from the date of randomization, and participants were censored at the last dose of investigational product plus 3 months or end of study, whichever was earlier (on-treatment approach).
4 secondary outcomes
Mean Number of Units of RBC Transfused
Time frame: From randomization until the end of study, up to week 101.
Time to First RBC Transfusion
Time frame: From randomization until the end of study, up to week 101.
Mean Achieved Hb Concentration While Receiving Investigational Product
Time frame: From week 13 until the end of study, up to week 101.
Geometric Mean Cumulative Dose of Darbepoetin Alfa Per 4 Weeks
Time frame: From randomization until the end of study, up to week 101.
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 Sep 2022.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 33288629Toto R, Petersen J, Berns JS, Lewis EF, Tran Q, Weir MR. A Randomized Trial of Strategies Using Darbepoetin Alfa To Avoid Transfusions in CKD. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2021 Feb;32(2):469-478. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2020050556. Epub 2020 Dec 7.
- AmgenTrials clinical trials websiteLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Anemia in Chronic Kidney Disease Patients Not on Dialysis
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Daprodustat and Epoetin Alpha on Anemia in Patients Not Undergoing Dialysis
Chronic Kidney Disease (Stages 3b-5), Anemia Associated With Chronic Kidney Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
MD study director
Amgen
249 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Darbepoetin alfa in people with Anemia in Chronic Kidney Disease Patients Not on Dialysis, run by Amgen at 249 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 30 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Sep 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 249 sites in United States, Puerto Rico. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 8 Nov 2018). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Participants in Receipt of 1 or More RBC Transfusions (time frame: From randomization until the end of study, up to week 101.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01652872, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Sep 2022.