AzTrials
AzTrials

Rectal CancerPhase 3INTERACTNCT01653301

Preoperative Downstaging of Extraperitoneal T3 Rectal Cancer: XELOXRT Versus XELACRT. A Multicenter, Phase III Study

A Phase 3 study testing XELAC RT and XELOX RT in people with Rectal Cancer, run by Catholic University of the Sacred Heart at 1 site in Italy.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

INTERACT study: to evaluate the pathological response rate in cT3 rectal cancer LEADER study: to evaluate the impact on local control of local excision Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Rectal Cancer
What is being tested?
XELAC RT and XELOX RT
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
616 participants
Where
1 siteItaly
Study dates
Oct 2005to Dec 2012
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Histologically confirmed primary adenocarcinoma of the rectum.
  • Tumour within 12 cm of the anal verge by proctoscopic examination or within 10 cm of the anorectal ring by MRI.
  • Clinical stages (UICC 1997): cT2N0-2 low located tumour, cT3 N0-2.
  • Resectable disease at the routine examination.
  • Age > 18 years.
  • Karnofsky Performance Status > 60.
Show all 15Show fewer
  • WBC > 4,000 cells/ml, platelets > 100,000 cells/ml.
  • Provision of written informed consent.
  • Stage at the diagnosis: cT3N0. T3 patients at the diagnosis with 3 or less enlarged nodes, evaluated by imaging, and without evidence of the same nodes after radiochemotherapy, could be accrued according to Center decision, but will be analyzed separately.
  • Patients with cT2N0, low located tumour, otherwise candidates to a Miles surgical procedure, treated by neoadjuvant chemoradiation and with written consensus;
  • Major clinical response after chemoradiation, yT0-1N0; yT2N0 could be accrued according to Center decision, but will be analyzed separately.
  • Circumferential extension less than 2 quarters;
  • Deep ulcer < 2 cm of diameter;
  • Provision of written informed consent;
  • Biopsies are discouraged for the higher risk of following fistulae in irradiated rectum;

Who cannot join

  • Evidence of metastatic (M1) disease. If there were any suspicious findings (i.e. liver metastasis, lung nodule, retroperitoneal adenopathy, etc.) the patient is to be considered as ineligible, unless malignancy is ruled out by tissue documentation (biopsy) before trial therapy is started.
  • Previous chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or radiation therapy to the pelvis.
  • Multiple primary cancers involving both the colon and rectum that would preclude a patient from being classified as having only rectal cancer.
  • Incomplete healing from or other surgery.
  • Active inflammatory bowel disease.
  • Other co-existing malignancies or malignancies diagnosed within the last 5 years with the exception of basal cell carcinoma or cervical cancer in situ.
Show all 18Show fewer
  • Cardiovascular disease with a New York Heart Association Functional Status > 2.
  • Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) < 4 x 108/L or platelets < 50 x 108/L.
  • Measured Creatinine clearance less than 65ml/min. (no drug dose reduction for lower GFR is allowed).
  • ALT or AST > 2.5 times the ULRR
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding (women of child-bearing potential).
  • Any evidence of severe or uncontrolled systemic disease (e.g. unstable or uncompensated respiratory, cardiac, hepatic or renal disease).
  • Any other significant clinical disorder or laboratory finding that makes it undesirable for the patient to participate in the trial.
  • LEADER STUDY
  • pT3;
  • Positive margins;
  • TRG 3-5;
  • Major adverse features: lymphatic vessel invasion, vascular vessel invasion, perineural invasion;

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Vincenzo Valentini, MD contact

+390630155226

vvalentini@rm.unicatt.it

Italy1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Catholic University of Sacred Heart

    Rome, Italy, 00168

    Vincenzo Valentini, MD, +390630155226, vvalentini@rm.unicatt.it

    Vincenzo Valentini, MD

    Recruiting

Other trials in Italy

About this study

Official title: INTEnsification Radiotherapy With Accelerated Fractionation or ChemoTherapy And Local Excision After 3D External Radio-chemotherapy

  • INTERACT study: to evaluate the pathological response rate in cT3 rectal cancer
  • LEADER study: to evaluate the impact on local control of local excision
Read the detailed description
  • INTERACT study: to evaluate the pathological response rate evaluated according to TRG scale comparing accelerated radiotherapy on the gross tumour combined plus standard radiotherapy to the pelvis in association with chronomodulated capecitabine (XELACRT arm) versus oxaliplatin added to standard pelvis radiotherapy and same chronomodulated Capecitabine (XELOXRT arm)
  • LEADER study: to evaluate the impact on local control of local excision in patients who had a major clinical response evaluated by MRI and confirmed by TRG 1-2 score.
Conditions
Rectal Cancer
Being tested
XELAC RT, XELOX RT
Medical subject headings
Rectal Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • XELAC RTDrug

    Xeloda 1650mg/m2 chronomodulated (h 8.00 a.m. 25% of total dose ; h 6.00 p.m. 25% of total dose; h 11.00 p.m. 50% of total dose) during the whole treatment time.

    RT: pelvic treatment is the same for both arms: 45 Gy are delivered to the whole pelvis at 1.8 Gy daily, 5 times per week.

    In the XEL-ACRT arm a boost of 10 Gy is delivered to the mesorectum corresponding to the GTV, at 1 Gy for fraction to a total dose of 55 Gy, in 10 fractions over 5 weeks, 2 times a week. The daily dose of the boost will be delivered twice a week immediately after the daily dose administered to the pelvis (concomitant boost).

  • XELOX RTDrug

    • Xeloda: 1300 mg/m2 chronomodulated (h 8.00 a.m. 25% of total dose ; h 6.00 p.m. 25% of total dose; h 11.00 p.m. 50% of total dose), during the whole treatment time;
    • Oxaliplatin: 130mg/m2, days 1, 19, 38

    RT: pelvic treatment is the same for both arms: 45 Gy are delivered to the whole pelvis at 1.8 Gy daily, 5 times per week; In the XELOX-RT arm a boost of 5.4 Gy is delivered to the mesorectum corresponding to GTV, at 1.8 Gy daily, in 3 fractions, to a total dose of 50.4 Gy. The boost will be delivered at the end of the irradiation of the pelvis (sequential boost).

Study groups in NCT01653301
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
XELOX-RTExperimental* Xeloda: 1300 mg/m2 chronomodulated (h 8.00 a.m. 25% of total dose ; h 6.00 p.m. 25% of total dose; h 11.00 p.m. 50% of total dose), during the whole treatment time; * Oxaliplatin: 130mg/m2, days 1, 19, 38 RT: pelvic treatment is the same for both arms: 45 Gy are delivered to the whole pelvis at 1.8 Gy daily, 5 times per week; In the XELOX-RT arm a boost of 5.4 Gy is delivered to the mesorectum corresponding to GTV, at 1.8 Gy daily, in 3 fractions, to a total dose of 50.4 Gy. The boost will be delivered at the end of the irradiation of the pelvis (sequential boost).
Receives: Drug: XELOX RT
XELAC-RTActive comparatorXeloda 1650mg/m2 chronomodulated (h 8.00 a.m. 25% of total dose ; h 6.00 p.m. 25% of total dose; h 11.00 p.m. 50% of total dose) during the whole treatment time. RT: pelvic treatment is the same for both arms: 45 Gy are delivered to the whole pelvis at 1.8 Gy daily, 5 times per week. In the XEL-ACRT arm a boost of 10 Gy is delivered to the mesorectum corresponding to the GTV, at 1 Gy for fraction to a total dose of 55 Gy, in 10 fractions over 5 weeks, 2 times a week. The daily dose of the boost will be delivered twice a week immediately after the daily dose administered to the pelvis (concomitant boost).
Receives: Drug: XELAC RT

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Pathological major downstaging

    INTERACT study:

    evaluation of T pathological major downstaging, considered as the overall rate of any TRG1 or TRG 2 scored patients;

    LEADER study (optional):

    To evaluate the impact on local control of local excision in patients who had a major clinical response, evaluated by EUS/ MRI, yN0 evaluated by multislice CT / MRI, and confirmed by TRG 1-2 score.

    Measured: 15-20 weeks after the randomization

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Tumor downstaging

    Secondary objectives:

    • Tumour downstaging, evaluated by the comparison of clinical staging before combined modality treatment toward pathological staging.
    • feasibility of a sphincter saving surgical procedure;
    • evaluation of activity of preoperative treatment (clinical response, facultative)
    • post-surgical functional outcome;
    • evaluation of the local control of the disease;
    • estimates (Kaplan-Meier, product limit method) of the disease free survival;
    • Evaluation of adverse events and adverse reactions to treatment, according to both the RTOG and NCI-CTC criteria.

    Measured: 15-20 weeks after the randomization

  2. sphincter saving surgery

    Secondary objectives:

    • Tumour downstaging, evaluated by the comparison of clinical staging before combined modality treatment toward pathological staging.
    • feasibility of a sphincter saving surgical procedure;
    • evaluation of activity of preoperative treatment (clinical response, facultative)
    • post-surgical functional outcome;
    • evaluation of the local control of the disease;
    • estimates (Kaplan-Meier, product limit method) of the disease free survival;
    • Evaluation of adverse events and adverse reactions to treatment, according to both the RTOG and NCI-CTC criteria.

    Measured: 15-20 weeks after the randomization

  3. local control

    Secondary objectives:

    • Tumour downstaging, evaluated by the comparison of clinical staging before combined modality treatment toward pathological staging.
    • feasibility of a sphincter saving surgical procedure;
    • evaluation of activity of preoperative treatment (clinical response, facultative)
    • post-surgical functional outcome;
    • evaluation of the local control of the disease;
    • estimates (Kaplan-Meier, product limit method) of the disease free survival;
    • Evaluation of adverse events and adverse reactions to treatment, according to both the RTOG and NCI-CTC criteria.

    Measured: 15-20 weeks after the randomization

  4. survival

    Secondary objectives:

    • Tumour downstaging, evaluated by the comparison of clinical staging before combined modality treatment toward pathological staging.
    • feasibility of a sphincter saving surgical procedure;
    • evaluation of activity of preoperative treatment (clinical response, facultative)
    • post-surgical functional outcome;
    • evaluation of the local control of the disease;
    • estimates (Kaplan-Meier, product limit method) of the disease free survival;
    • Evaluation of adverse events and adverse reactions to treatment, according to both the RTOG and NCI-CTC criteria.

    Measured: 15-20 weeks after the randomization

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted31 Jul 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study startOct 2005
  3. Primary completionDec 2012 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
616 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01653301
Sponsor's protocol ID
515(A1144)/2005
Acronym
INTERACT
Status last verified
Jul 2012
First submitted
30 Apr 2012
Last updated
31 Jul 2012
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Valentini V, Gambacorta MA, Cellini F, Aristei C, Coco C, Barbaro B, Alfieri S, D'Ugo D, Persiani R, Deodato F, Crucitti A, Lupattelli M, Mantello G, Navarria F, Belluco C, Buonadonna A, Boso C, Lonardi S, Caravatta L, Barba MC, Vecchio FM, Maranzano E, Genovesi D, Doglietto GB, Morganti AG, La Torre G, Pucciarelli S, De Paoli A. The INTERACT Trial: Long-term results of a randomised trial on preoperative capecitabine-based radiochemotherapy intensified by concomitant boost or oxaliplatin, for cT2 (distal)-cT3 rectal cancer. Radiother Oncol. 2019 May;134:110-118. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.11.023. Epub 2019 Feb 7.

    PubMed 31005204

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing XELAC RT and XELOX RT in people with Rectal Cancer, run by Catholic University of the Sacred Heart at 1 site in Italy.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 15 inclusion and 18 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 Jul 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Vincenzo Valentini, MD (+390630155226, vvalentini@rm.unicatt.it), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Pathological major downstaging (time frame: 15-20 weeks after the randomization). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01653301, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 Jul 2012.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in