AzTrials
AzTrials

Congestive Heart FailureNCT01653938

A Trial of a CPR Video in Heart Failure Patients

A study testing video decision aid in people with Congestive Heart Failure, run by Massachusetts General Hospital at 1 site in United States.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a randomized controlled trial of a CPR video decision aid in patients with advanced congestive heart failure (CHF). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 65 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Congestive Heart Failure
What is being tested?
video decision aid
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
50 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Apr 2011to Sep 2012
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 65 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • A diagnosis of advanced heart failure:
  • New York Heart Association Class III or IV (III: marked limitation in activity due to symptoms, even during less-than-ordinary activity; IV: severe limitations, experiences symptoms while at rest). AND
  • Two or more hospitalizations for heart failure in the last year. AND
  • Either a systolic blood pressure ≤ 120 mm Hg OR Na ≤ 135 mEq/L.
  • Ability to provide informed consent.
  • Ability to communicate in English.
  • Age 65 or older.

Who cannot join

None listed.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Massachusetts General Hospital

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02114

    Angelo Volandes, 617-643-4266, avolandes@partners.org

    Angelo Volandes

    Recruiting

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A Randomized Controlled Trial of a CPR Video in Heart Failure Patients

This is a randomized controlled trial of a CPR video decision aid in patients with advanced congestive heart failure (CHF).

Read the detailed description

Aim 1: To compare the care preferences for CPR and intubation among subjects randomized to video and subjects randomized to the current standard of care without the video.

Hypothesis 1: Subjects randomized to the video intervention will be significantly more likely to opt against CPR and intubation compared to those who do not see the video.

Aim 2: To compare code-status documentation in the electronic medical records between subjects randomized to the video and those who are receiving the current standard of care without the video.

Hypothesis 2: Subjects randomized to the video are more likely to have their code status correctly documented in the electronic medical records compared to those who do not see the video.

Aim 3: To compare knowledge and decisional conflict of subjects randomized to video and subjects randomized to the current standard of care without the video.

Hypothesis 3: When compared to subjects randomized to the current standard of care, subjects in the video intervention group will have higher knowledge and lower decisional conflict (lower decisional conflict scores) when asked to choose CPR and intubation preferences.

Being tested
video decision aid
Keywords
CHF
Medical subject headings
Heart Failure

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • video decision aidBehavioural

Study groups in NCT01653938
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
control groupNo interventionNot described
Video ArmExperimentalUse of video decision aid in the experimental arm.
Receives: Behavioral: video decision aid

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. preferences

    preferences for cpr and intubation

    Measured: 5 minutes after survey

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. knowledge

    knowledge of cpr and intubation

    Measured: 5 minutes after survey

  2. decisional conflict

    decisional conflict

    Measured: 5 minutes after survey

  3. advance care planning documentation

    advance care planning in medical record

    Measured: by the end of one year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted31 Jul 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study startApr 2011
  3. Primary completionSep 2012

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
50 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01653938
Sponsor's protocol ID
2009-P-002083
Status last verified
Nov 2020
First submitted
24 Jul 2012
Last updated
18 Nov 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing video decision aid in people with Congestive Heart Failure, run by Massachusetts General Hospital at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Nov 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Each site lists its own contact: choose the nearest one under Trial locations. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

preferences (time frame: 5 minutes after survey). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Nov 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in