AzTrials
AzTrials

Breast DiseasesNCT01654432

A Randomized Controlled Comparative Study of Ultrasound-guided Paravertebral Blocks as Part of a Multimodal Regimen for Ambulatory Breast Cancer Surgery

A study testing Paravertebral Blocks (PVB) in people with Breast Diseases, run by Women's College Hospital at 1 site in Canada.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

General anesthesia and morphine based pain medicine analgesia has been the mainstay of practice in breast cancer surgery at Women's College Hospital. There is evidence to suggest that patients have a better recovery, with less pain and nausea and vomiting when nerve blocks or freezing of nerves are given in addition… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 85 years, women only
Conditions the study is for
Breast Diseases
What is being tested?
Paravertebral Blocks (PVB)
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
60 participants
Where
1 siteCanada
Study dates
Jul 2011to Dec 2013
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 85 years
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients diagnosed with breast cancer at stage T1-3, N0-2, M0, presenting for unilateral complete or partial mastectomy with or without sentinel lymph node dissection, with or without implant insertion
  • ASA physical status I-II
  • 18-85 years of age, inclusive
  • BMI ≤ 35

Who cannot join

  • Contraindications to paravertebral nerve block (e.g., allergy to local anesthetics, coagulopathy, malignancy or infection in the back area)
  • Pregnancy
  • History of alcohol or drug dependency/abuse
  • History of significant psychiatric conditions that may affect patient assessment

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Canada1 site
  • Women's College Hospital

    Toronto, Ontario, M5S 1B2

Other trials in Canada

About this study

General anesthesia and morphine based pain medicine analgesia has been the mainstay of practice in breast cancer surgery at Women's College Hospital. There is evidence to suggest that patients have a better recovery, with less pain and nausea and vomiting when nerve blocks or freezing of nerves are given in addition to a general anesthetic. Specifically for breast cancer surgery, evidence has suggested that the use of paravertebral blocks provide patients with a better quality of recovery after surgery. The aim of this study is to examine whether patients who receive the nerve blocks using an ultrasound machine in addition to general anesthesia have a better quality of recovery than patients who receive a general anesthetic alone. The hypothesis is that patients receiving ultrasound-guided paravertebral blocks (PVB) with propofol-based general anesthesia (GA) will have a better quality of recovery than patients receiving general anesthesia-opioid-analgesia. Quality of recovery will be assessed using a modification of the QoR-27, a validated instrument to assess postoperative recovery in an ambulatory surgical population.

Conditions
Breast Diseases
Being tested
Paravertebral Blocks (PVB)
Medical subject headings
Breast Diseases

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Paravertebral Blocks (PVB)Other

Study groups in NCT01654432
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
General anaesthesia and sham nerve blockPlacebo comparatorBreast cancer surgery under general anaesthesia
Paravertebral Blocks (PVB)Active comparatorBreast cancer surgery under ultrasound-guided paravertebral blocks plus general anesthesia
Receives: Other: Paravertebral Blocks (PVB)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The primary outcome measure is the quality of recovery at discharge as assessed by the QoR27

    The patient will be met with by the study coordinator, just before discharge to administer the Quality of Recovery Questionnaire (QoR27)

    Measured: Within 24 hours postoperatively

  2. The primary outcome measure is the quality of recovery post operatively, as assessed by the QoR27

    The patient will be contacted by the study coordinator, 2 days following their surgery to administer the Quality of Recovery Questionnaire (QoR27)

    Measured: on average between 24-48 hours postoperatively

  3. The primary outcome measure is the quality of recovery at discharge as assessed by the QoR27

    The patient will be contacted by the study coordinator, 4 days following their surgery to administer the Quality of Recovery Questionnaire (QoR27)

    Measured: On average 72-96 hours post operatively

  4. The primary outcome measure is the quality of recovery post operatively as assessed by the QoR27

    The patient will be contacted by the study coordinator, 7 days following their surgery to administer the Quality of Recovery Questionnaire (QoR27)

    Measured: On average 7-8 days postoperatively

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Neuropathic pain

    DN4

    Measured: 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted31 Jul 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study startJul 2011
  3. Primary completionMay 2013
  4. Study completionDec 2013 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
60 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01654432
Sponsor's protocol ID
2011-0004-B
Status last verified
Nov 2013
First submitted
27 Jul 2012
Last updated
19 Nov 2013
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Paravertebral Blocks (PVB) in people with Breast Diseases, run by Women's College Hospital at 1 site in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Nov 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The primary outcome measure is the quality of recovery at discharge as assessed by the QoR27 (time frame: Within 24 hours postoperatively). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Nov 2013.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in