AzTrials
AzTrials

Stress Urinary IncontinenceNCT01657916

5-Year Objective and Subjective Results of a Mid-Urethral Sling

An observational study of Stress Urinary Incontinence, run by Atlantic Health System at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Evaluate 5-year objective and subjective cure rates after implant of the retropubic Align Urethral Support System. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older, women only
Conditions the study is for
Stress Urinary Incontinence
How many people
90 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Jun 2012to Jul 2015
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: women who suffered from stress urinary incontinence (leakage of urine will laughing/coughing/sneezing/exercising)

Who may be able to join

  • women
  • complaint of stress urinary incontinence
  • underwent Align urethral support system from June 2007-December 2008

Who cannot join

  • concommitant procedures

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Atlantic Health System

    Morristown, New Jersey, 07960

Other trials in United States

About this study

Evaluate 5-year objective and subjective cure rates after implant of the retropubic Align Urethral Support System.

Read the detailed description

Between June 2007 and December 2008, the investigators performed 155 Align mid-urethral slings in patients who were only receiving this operation. Very few studies have outcomes at 5 years of greater. The aim of this prospective cohort study is to evaluate five-year objective and subjective cure rates. Secondary endpoints will assess failure risk factors and describe any complications of the retropublic Align Urethral Support System five years postoperatively.

Keywords
mid-urethral sling, Align urethral support system, tension free vaginal tape, cough stress test, pelvic exam, PFDI-20, PFIQ, SSQ, Urinary retention, mesh erosion, urodynamics
Medical subject headings
Urinary Incontinence, Stress, Urinary Retention

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT01657916
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
5 year sling implantsPatients who underwent implant of the Align Urethral Support System between June 2007 and December 2008

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Cough stress test

    Patient will void and their post-void residual amount of urine will be obtained by a catheter. That same catheter will be left in place and used to fill the bladder with 250ml sterile saline. The patient will then be asked to vigorously cough in the upright sitting and standing positions. A positive "cough test" will be defined as any leakage of urine that is visualized during coughing in the sitting or standing position.

    Measured: 5 year follow up appt

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Pelvic exam

    Standardized pelvic exam will be performed to assess healing, palpability, mesh related pain and erosion of the sling.

    Measured: 5 year follow up appt

  2. Stress urinary incontinence related symptoms

    Validated stress urinary incontinence related questionnaires were completed prior to surgery by all of these patients, and will be completed 5 years after surgery as well. The specific forms used will be PFDI-20 and incontinence severity index. Question 17 of the pelvic floor distress inventory will be used to assess subjective cure.

    Measured: 5 year follow up appointment

  3. Urgency incontinence related symptoms

    Patients will be assessed for de novo, stable and improved urgency incontinence using the IIQ-7 subject of PFDI-20 (questions 15, 16, and 18).

    Measured: 5 year follow up appointment

  4. Quality of life and self-reported data

    Validated questionnaires (Incontinence outcome questionnaire, surgical satisfaction questionaire) will be used to assess patient's surgery satisfaction, subjective self-assessment before and 5 years after the surgery.

    Measured: 5 year follow up appointment

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted6 Aug 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study startJun 2012
  3. Primary completionJul 2015
  4. Study completionJul 2015

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
90 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01657916
Sponsor's protocol ID
R12-01-005
Status last verified
Jun 2017
First submitted
2 Aug 2012
Last updated
9 Jun 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Stress Urinary Incontinence, run by Atlantic Health System at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Jun 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Cough stress test (time frame: 5 year follow up appt). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Jun 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in