AzTrials
AzTrials

Multinodular GoiterTIMENCT01658085

Budget Impact of Harmonic FOCUS in Thyroidectomy

An observational study of Multinodular Goiter, run by Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge at 1 site in Spain.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Study Design Multinodular Goiter (MNG) patients requiring surgery were referred to the Endocrine Surgery Unit. Indirect laryngoscopy was routinely performed preoperatively to assess normal motility in vocal folds (VF). Ultrasounds (US) study was performed the month previous to surgery to evaluate thyroid volume. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Multinodular Goiter
What is being tested?
ACE14S and HARMONIC FOCUS®
Type of treatment
Medical device
How many people
56 participants
Where
1 siteSpain
Study dates
Feb 2009to Aug 2012
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Eligible patients met the following criteria: to have MNG, age between 18 and 80 and consent to be included in the study. Eligible patients were proposed to enter a randomized study with 2 arms in which we compared the use of two harmonic scalpel devices: ACE14S and Harmonic Focus (Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Cincinnati, OH, USA).

Who may be able to join

  • Multinodular goiter (MNG), age between 18 and 80 and consent to be included in the study

Who cannot join

  • previous neck surgery
  • vocal fold impairment
  • permanent or transitory NSAID or analgesic treatment,
  • coagulation disorders
  • any cognitive impairment.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Spain1 site
  • Hospital UIniversitari de Bellvitge

    L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, 08907

Other trials in Spain

About this study

Official title: Harmonic FOCUS Versus Conventional Technique in Total Thyroidectomy for Benign Thyroid Disease. A Randomized, Prospective Study

Study Design Multinodular Goiter (MNG) patients requiring surgery were referred to the Endocrine Surgery Unit.

Indirect laryngoscopy was routinely performed preoperatively to assess normal motility in vocal folds (VF). Ultrasounds (US) study was performed the month previous to surgery to evaluate thyroid volume. Eligible patients met the following criteria: to have MNG, age between 18 and 80 and consent to be included in the study. Exclusion criteria included previous neck surgery, vocal fold impairment, permanent or transitory NSAID or analgesic treatment, coagulation disorders and any cognitive impairment.

Read more

Eligible patients were proposed to enter a randomized study with 2 arms in which we compared the use of two harmonic scalpel devices: ACE14S and Harmonic Focus (Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Cincinnati, OH, USA).

The main endpoint was operative time. Secondary endpoints were total and relative (%) time of use of the device along thyroidectomy, recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) injury and hypocalcaemia (both persistent or temporary), number of ligatures, length of skin incision, postoperative pain according to a visual scale of pain, QOL after thyroidectomy (EuroQOL) and budget impact analysis.

All patients were operated on by 2 surgeons, one senior (responsible for the Endocrine Surgery Unit) and one junior under supervision.

Randomization Randomization was performed the same day of surgery at the OR by using a closed envelope. Patients were randomized to Group I (ACE14S) or Group II (HF) and allocated in a 1:1 proportion; they reminded blinded until the end of the study about the device used.

The haemostasis device was communicated to the surgeon previous to start surgery. Medical staff of the Endocrine Surgery Unit collected clinical data.

Surgical Technique Total thyroidectomy (TT), defined as total bilateral extracapsular lobectomy 9, was performed using HF or ACE14S for vessel division. Monopolar and bipolar forceps for cutting and coagulation were routinely used. Ties were used under surgeon's criteria according to size of the vessels and/or the need to obtain haemostasis in the vicinity of the RLN when bipolar forceps were not considered safe enough.

Read the detailed description

OBJECTIVE:

To disclose the potential advantages and outcomes of the new Harmonic Focus (HF) device compared to Harmonic Scalpel ACE14S (ACE-14S) in benign thyroid surgery.

STUDY DESIGN:

Controlled randomized study.

METHODS:

Harmonic Focus was compared to former ACE14S device in patients undergoing total thyroidectomy for Multinodular Goiter. The primary endpoint was time of surgery. Secondary endpoints were time of use of the device, % of use along the procedure, number of ligatures, blood loss, hypocalcaemia, recurrent laryngeal nerve impairment, postoperative pain and quality of life.

Being tested
ACE14S, HARMONIC FOCUS®
Keywords
Thyroidectomy, Multinodular goiter, Harmonic Focus, budget impact, Harmonic scalpel

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • ACE14SDevice

    Also called ACE® Curved Shears, Code: ACE14S (EES, Cincinnati, OH, USA)

    Total thyroidectomy (total bilateral extracapsular lobectomy) for Multinodular Goiter with ACE14S

  • HARMONIC FOCUS®Device

    Also called FOCUS Curved Shear, Code:FCS9 (EES, Cincinnati, OH, USA)

    Total thyroidectomy (total bilateral extracapsular lobectomy) for Multinodular Goiter with HARMONIC FOCUS®

Study groups in NCT01658085
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Study group: HARMONIC FOCUS®Total thyroidectomy (total bilateral extracapsular lobectomy) for Multinodular Goiter with HARMONIC FOCUS®
Receives: Device: HARMONIC FOCUS®
Control group: ACE14STotal thyroidectomy (total bilateral extracapsular lobectomy) for Multinodular Goiter with ACE14S
Receives: Device: ACE14S

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Operative time

    Operative time was measured from skin incision to removal of thyroid gland. The percentage of time using the device along TT was calculated as follows: time of use of the device x 100/ operative time.

    Measured: Surgical time from skin incision to closure (about 70 minutes)

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. Total and relative (%) time of use of the device along thyroidectomy

    The percentage of time using the device along surgery was calculated as follows: time of use of the device x 100/ operative time.

    Measured: From skin incision to removal of thyroid gland (about 30 minutes)

  2. Recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) injury

    Patients with laryngeal nerve injury were controlled monthly by indirect laryngoscopy till 6 months or healing.

    Measured: From surgery to 6 months

  3. hypocalcemia (both persistent or temporary)

    Temporary hypocalcemia was measured daily, from surgery to discharge.

    Persistent hypocalcemia was followed up as follows:

    • Non-complicated patients: one week and six months after the operation date.
    • Complicated patients: every month until cure or up to 6 months after surgery.

    Measured: Daily, from surgery to discharge (24h), or up to 6 months

  4. postoperative pain according to a visual scale of pain

    Pain evaluation was obtained at 24h and 7 days after surgery during postoperative control by using an analogue-visual scale reporting also the type of analgesic and the number of doses. If there was any complication (including reoperation) that increased hospital stay, pain evaluation was performed each 24h until discharge.

    Measured: From surgery to 7 days

  5. QOL after thyroidectomy (EuroQOL)

    QOL was evaluated by completing EQ-5D questionnaire when patients were scheduled for the study (1st and 7th postoperative day)

    Measured: 1st and 7th postoperative day

  6. Number of ligatures

    Number of ligatures during the procedure was measured to determine if its reduction would imply less surgical time consumption

    Measured: Day of surgery

  7. Length of skin incision

    Measured at the end of the operation, once the skin was closured.

    Measured: Day of surgery

  8. budget impact analysis

    costs of total thyroidectomy (all of them according to the prices of our center) and deducting those time-dependent costs saved with the reduction of OR time. The following concepts were considered: personnel (with the same surgical team composition for both alternatives), anesthesia drugs, medical devices, overheads, repayment of the Harmonic generator, hospital stay and admission/discharge fees.

    Measured: From surgery to discharge (24h)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted6 Aug 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study startFeb 2009
  3. Primary completionMar 2010
  4. Study completionAug 2012 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
56 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01658085
Sponsor's protocol ID
EO-0618
Acronym
TIME
Status last verified
Aug 2012
First submitted
17 Jul 2012
Last updated
6 Aug 2012
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Multinodular Goiter, run by Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge at 1 site in Spain.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Aug 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Operative time (time frame: Surgical time from skin incision to closure (about 70 minutes)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Aug 2012.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in