AzTrials
AzTrials

Cerebral Small Vessel DiseasePhase 3RIPC-SVDNCT01658306

Clinical Trial on Remote Ischemic Preconditioning and Cerebral Small Vessel Disease

A Phase 3 study testing remote ischemic preconditioning in people with Cerebral Small Vessel Disease, run by Capital Medical University at 1 site in China.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The hypothesis of this study is that remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) might have a beneficial effect on outcomes of cerebral small vessel disease (CSV). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 40 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Cerebral Small Vessel Disease
What is being tested?
remote ischemic preconditioning
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
30 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
Jul 2012to Jun 2014
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 40 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Subjects aged 40-80 years;
  • Ischemic cerebrovascular event onset, if any, must be within 6 months;
  • TCD and carotid ultrasound exclude vascular narrow that can cause hemodynamic changes (usually >50% narrow lumen);
  • MRI confirmed the presence of lacunar infarction and / or generalized white matter lesions;
  • Written consent was obtained from the subject.

Who cannot join

  • History of intracranial hemorrhage;
  • Significant bleeding from other parts of the body;
  • History of atrial fibrillation;
  • History of myocardial infarction within six months;
  • Moyamoya disease or vasculitis;
  • Hereditary small vessel disorders, such as CADASIL, FABRY, and mitochondrial encephalo-myopathy;
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Significant bleeding-coagulation dysfunction;
  • Abnormal blood pressure, glucose and/or lipids after restrict treatment regimen;
  • Severe liver/kidney disease, cancer or critical illness of internal medicine and surgery.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

China1 site
  • Xuan Wu Hospital

    Beijing, 100053

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: A Random Controlled, Double-Blind Clinical Trial: Remote Ischemic Preconditioning and Cerebral Small Vessel Disease

The hypothesis of this study is that remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) might have a beneficial effect on outcomes of cerebral small vessel disease (CSV).

Read the detailed description

CSV constitutes an important type of ischemic stroke due to a generalized hypo-perfusion of brain. Few treatment methods are available except some beneficial effect shown with nimodipine. The potential treatment effect of RIPC on protection of brain from cerebral small vessel disease has not been investigated. The investigators designed this randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial to examine (1) whether RIPC has a beneficial effect on brain lesions of CSV, and (2) whether RIPC can protect patients of CSV from cognitive deterioration. There are 2 arms in this trial: One arm is RIPC treatment, the other one is sham RIPC treatment. Brain lesions will be quantified by volumetric MRI, and Xe-CT will be used to evaluate cerebral blood perfusion. Cognitive function will be evaluated by mini-mental state examination (MMSE) and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA).

Being tested
remote ischemic preconditioning, sham remote ischemic preconditioning
Keywords
remote ischemic preconditioning, random-controlled, double blind, RIPC
Medical subject headings
Cerebral Small Vessel Diseases

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • remote ischemic preconditioningProcedure or surgery

    RIPC consists of five 5-min cycles of right upper arm ischemia/reperfusion, induced by an automated cuff-inflator placed on the right upper arm which is inflated to 200 mmHg for 5mins followed by deflating the cuff for 5mins, each patient in the RIPC group will have the treatment twice a day for two weeks.

  • sham remote ischemic preconditioningProcedure or surgery

    Sham RIPC consists of five 5-min cycles of right upper arm ischemia/reperfusion, induced by an automated cuff-inflator placed on the right upper arm which is inflated to 50 mmHg for 5mins followed by deflating the cuff for 5mins, each patient in the placebo RIPC group will have the treatment twice a day for two weeks.

Study groups in NCT01658306
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
remote ischemic preconditioningExperimentalReceiving remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) treatment with pressure set at 200 mmHg.
Receives: Procedure: remote ischemic preconditioning
placebo remote ischemic preconditioningSham comparatorReceiving sham RIPC treatment with pressure set at 50 mmHg
Receives: Procedure: sham remote ischemic preconditioning

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. changes in brain lesions

    Volumetric MRI will be used for calculating changes in the number of lacunar infarctions and the total volume of white matter lesions

    Measured: 0-24 months

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Changes in the cognitive function

    Cognitive function will be evaluated by mini-mental state examination (MMSE) and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA).

    Measured: 0-24 months

  2. Changes in the cerebral blood perfusion

    Cerebral blood perfusion will be evaluated by Xe-CT.

    Measured: 0-24 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 Aug 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study startJul 2012
  3. Primary completionJun 2014
  4. Study completionJun 2014

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
30 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01658306
Sponsor's protocol ID
D111107003111008
Acronym
RIPC-SVD
Status last verified
Nov 2014
First submitted
26 Jul 2012
Last updated
26 Nov 2014
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Wang Y, Meng R, Song H, Liu G, Hua Y, Cui D, Zheng L, Feng W, Liebeskind DS, Fisher M, Ji X. Remote Ischemic Conditioning May Improve Outcomes of Patients With Cerebral Small-Vessel Disease. Stroke. 2017 Nov;48(11):3064-3072. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.017691. Epub 2017 Oct 17.

    PubMed 29042490
  • Mi T, Yu F, Ji X, Sun Y, Qu D. The Interventional Effect of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning on Cerebral Small Vessel Disease: A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial. Eur Neurol. 2016;76(1-2):28-34. doi: 10.1159/000447536. Epub 2016 Jun 29.

    PubMed 27351719

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing remote ischemic preconditioning in people with Cerebral Small Vessel Disease, run by Capital Medical University at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Nov 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

changes in brain lesions (time frame: 0-24 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01658306, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Nov 2014.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in