AzTrials
AzTrials

Head and Neck CancerNCT01661062

A Study Using Cone Beam CT for Head and Neck Cancer

A study testing Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CT) Scan in people with Head and Neck Cancer, run by University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Cone beam CT (computed tomography) is a developing technology which allows CT images to be obtained while a patient is on the radiation treatment table.(A CT scan uses x-rays to produce detailed pictures of structures in the body.) In this study, cone beam CT scans will be obtained before individual radiation… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Head and Neck Cancer
What is being tested?
Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CT) Scan
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
23 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Jan 2009to Mar 2016
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients of all ages ≥18, both sexes, and all races will be included in this study. Pregnant females will be excluded. No other special classes of subjects (i.e., prisoners) will be entered.
  • Patients must be diagnosed with biopsy-proven squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.
  • Patients must be recommended treatment with definitive radiation therapy with concurrent chemotherapy, but without prior surgical resection of the primary tumor or lymph nodes
  • Patients must be recommended a treatment course of at least 30 radiation fractions
  • Patients must sign an informed consent form approved for this purpose by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the University of Michigan Hospital indicating that they are aware that undergoing cone beam CT of the head and neck is voluntary and has potential risks.

Who cannot join

  • Patients must not have a history of prior radiation to the head or neck

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center

    Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A Pilot Study of Tumor and Critical Normal Tissue Motion in Head and Neck Cancer Using Cone Beam CT

Cone beam CT (computed tomography) is a developing technology which allows CT images to be obtained while a patient is on the radiation treatment table.(A CT scan uses x-rays to produce detailed pictures of structures in the body.) In this study, cone beam CT scans will be obtained before individual radiation treatment sessions for head and neck cancer. The information gathered from these scans will be used by the researchers to look at patient movement as well as changes in the amount of normal and tumor tissue throughout the course of radiation therapy. The researchers will use this information to create hypothetical radiation treatment plans, which will be used as the basis for future research. The cone beam CT scan data will not be used to alter the actual radiation treatment of any of the patients enrolled on the study. In addition, tests of salivary output and swallowing and questionnaires about quality of life will be made to assess how the doses of radiation affect them.

Being tested
Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CT) Scan
Medical subject headings
Head and Neck Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CT) ScanOther

    Also called CBCT

    Cone beam CT scan is considered a noninvasive procedure (meaning that the procedure does not require breaking the skin or any tools that physically enter the body). It will add a small amount of additional radiation dose (less than 1%) to the head and neck. The increase in the amount of radiation is only a very small amount more than what patients who get standard daily imaging receive. The amount of radiation from the cone beam CT scans is not significant (less than 1%) when compared to the amount of radiation generally received for treatment of head and neck cancer.

Study groups in NCT01661062
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Cone Beam CTExperimentalAll patients will be included in the treatment arm of this study. For the purposes of this study patients will get CT scans every day for the length of their radiation therapy (in order to assess if CT every day provides additional information compared with CT scans performed less frequently). Although the exact amount of radiation patients get will be determined by their doctor, it is expected that they will get approximately 7 weeks, approximately 35 total cone beam CT scans.
Receives: Other: Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CT) Scan

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Rate of Movement of Normal Tissue

    The primary outcome measure of this study is to characterize patient-specific target and normal tissue movement.

    Measured: approximately 7 weeks

  2. Correlation Coefficient for the Association Between Delivered Mean Parotid Dose and Salivary Flow Rate

    Spearman rank-based correlation coefficients were calculated for the association between saliva flow rate and the delivered mean parotid doses at several timepoints (Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, and 24 months).

    Measured: 24 months

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Improvement of Image Quality

    Use acquired data to further improve cone beam CT reconstruction techniques and image quality.

    Measured: 36 months

  2. The Median Delivered Dose of Radiation to the Parotid Gland

    Measured: 7 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted9 Aug 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2009
  3. Primary completionMar 2011
  4. Study completionMar 2016

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
23 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01661062
Sponsor's protocol ID
2005.084
Other IDs
HUM 757
Status last verified
Jul 2016
First submitted
26 Sep 2011
Last updated
29 Aug 2016
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Hunter KU, Fernandes LL, Vineberg KA, McShan D, Antonuk AE, Cornwall C, Feng M, Schipper MJ, Balter JM, Eisbruch A. Parotid glands dose-effect relationships based on their actually delivered doses: implications for adaptive replanning in radiation therapy of head-and-neck cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013 Nov 15;87(4):676-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.07.040. Epub 2013 Sep 10.

    PubMed 24035328

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CT) Scan in people with Head and Neck Cancer, run by University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Aug 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 31 Oct 2014). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Rate of Movement of Normal Tissue (time frame: approximately 7 weeks). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01661062, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Aug 2016.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in