Community Acquired PneumoniaCAPTIMENCT01661920
Suitability of Antibiotic Treatment for CAP
A study testing Intervention group in people with Community Acquired Pneumonia, run by Hospital Galdakao-Usansolo at 4 sites in Spain.
Trial summary
The duration of antibiotic treatment in community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) lasts about 9-10 days, and is determined empirically. The last North American guideline for CAP recommends using clinical stability criteria as a reference to establish the duration of antibiotic treatment, which would result in about 5 days of… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Community Acquired Pneumonia
- What is being tested?
- Intervention group
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 602 participants
- Where
- 4 sitesSpain
- Study dates
- Jan 2012to Apr 2014
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- 18 or older,
- admitted with CAP will be included sequentially. Pneumonia is defined as pulmonary infiltrate shown in a thoracic X-ray not known to be old,
Who cannot join
- patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection,
- immunosupressed patients (with a solid organ transplant, spelenectomy, treated with a prednisone dose of 10 mg/day or equivalent for longer than 30 days or with other immunodepressors, with neutropenia),
- those hospitalized in the 14 days prior and those living in assisted care facilities.
- pneumonia cases caused by infrequent agents (i.e. P. aerouginosa, S. Aureus) will also be excluded, as well as infectious processes requiring an extended treatment with antibiotocs (i.e. bacterial endocarditis, abscesses),
- pneumonia cases with pleural effusion requiring a drainage tube,
- patients who were deceased or admitted to ICU before randomization and those not giving their informed consent.
Trial locations and contacts
4 sites in 1 country.
Spain4 sites
Hospital San Eloy
Barakaldo, Bizkaia, 48902
Hospital Basurto
Bilbao, Bizkaia, 48013
Hospital Galdakao
Galdakao, Bizkaia, 48960
Hospital Txagorritxu
Vitoria-Gasteiz, Alava, 01009
About this study
Official title: Suitability of Antibiotic Treatment for Community-acquired Pneumonia
The duration of antibiotic treatment in community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) lasts about 9-10 days, and is determined empirically. The last North American guideline for CAP recommends using clinical stability criteria as a reference to establish the duration of antibiotic treatment, which would result in about 5 days of antibiotic use for the majority of pneumonia cases. In order to validate this proposal we propose to carry out a randomized multicenter double-blind (until the 5th day) clinical trial with adult CAP patients admitted to 4 hospitals in Euskadi. A control group (with routine treatment) will be compared with an intervention group (antibiotic treatment for at least 5 days, which will be interrupted if temperature is =< 37,8ºC for at least 48 hours and no more than one sign of clinical instability is assessed), with regards to: mortality at 15 days, clinical recovery by days 10 and 30, clinical improvement after days 5 and 10 as evaluated by PRO scales, duration of antibiotic treatment. A non-inferiority dichotomous sequential analysis will be performed (for mortality after 15 days, clinical recovery by day 10 and in follow-up at 30 days, clinical improvement after days 5 and 10, with PRO scales) as well as a superiority analysis for the duration of the antibiotic treatment. A total of 1100 patients will be recruited, following their signed consent, during the inclusion period (18 months). Stability criteria will be measured daily. The rest of the variables will be measured at admission and by telephone on days 10 and 30.
Read the detailed description
Work hypothesis: We aim to carry out a comparative study between 2 groups of patients (control group, guideline group): in the control group the standard duration of antibiotic treatment will be applied; in the guideline group (intervention group) the duration of antibiotic treatment will be based upon the IDSA/ATS 2007 provisions (ref. 18), which are related to the time needed to reach clinical stability.
- - Patients who follow the treatment protocol of the so-called control group, with routine treatment, in comparison to the clinical guideline group, will show similar results (sequential dichotomous non-inferiority analysis) in the following clinical parameters: A. Adverse results: 1st, mortality for any cause within the first 15 days after admission; 2nd, development of (major or minor) complications during the first 15 days after admission; B. Beneficial results: 1st, clinical recovery by the 10th day of treatment and in follow-up at 30 days; 2nd, clinical improvement on the 5th and 10th days of treatment, as evaluated by PRO scales.
- - Patients who follow the treatment protocol of the so-called guideline group (intervention group), in comparison with the control group, with routine treatment, will show better results (superiority analysis) in the following parameters: c. Duration of antibiotic treatment as measured using 2 variables: 1.- the "duration of antibiotic treatment" after admission, expressed in days; 2.- "antibiotic-free days", defined as a period of at least 24 hours in which antibiotics are not given in the 30 day period after admission.
Goals: To validate the recommendations of the latest IDSA/ATS clinical guideline on duration of antibiotic treatment in pneumonia.
Main goals. To compare two treatment routines (control group with routine treatment vs clinical guideline group) based on results in the following clinical parameters:
- Adverse results: 1st, mortality for any cause within the first 15 days after admission; 2nd, development of (major or minor) complications during the first 15 days after admission; B. Beneficial results: 1st, clinical recovery by the 10th day of treatment and in follow-up at 30 days; 2nd, clinical improvement on the 5th and 10th days of treatment, as evaluated by PRO scales.
2.- Patients who follow the treatment schema of the so-called guideline group (intervention group), in comparison with the control group, with routine treatment, will show better results (superiority analysis) in the following parameters: c. Duration of antibiotic treatment as measured using 2 variables: 1.- the "duration of antibiotic treatment" after admission, expressed in days; 2.- "antibiotic-free days", defined as a period of at least 24 hours in which antibiotics are not given in the 30 day period after admission.
Secondary goals: To compare a control group with routine treatment vs the clinical guideline group based on the following parameters:
- In-hospital mortality for any cause. Mortality within 30 days after admission, whether related or unrelated to pneumonia.
- Readmission within 30 days after admission for reasons related or unrelated to pneumonia.
- Duration of hospital stay.
- Days to return to normal activity.
- Recurrence of initial infection or superinfection with need for additional or alternative antibiotics, within 30 days after admission.
Study design - Population under study. Inclusion/exclusion criteria - Main and secondary variables - Data analysis - Ethical and legal aspects (BCP compliance, insurance…) - Aspects related to the research medication (manufacturing, labeling, distribution…) - Funding sources of the medication Randomized multicenter double-blind (until the 5th day) clinical trial involving adult PAC patients (≥18 years of age) admitted to 4 teaching hospitals in Euskadi. All CAP patients hospitalized within a period of 18 months (October-April) will be evaluated for their eligibility. The study involves an intervention and will be undertaken in 2 parallel groups, where the duration of antibiotic treatment following routine clinical practice (control group) will be compared with its duration under the IDSA/ATS provisions for CAP (ref. 18) ("clinical guideline" group). Patients will be randomly assigned to the control group or the "clinical guideline" group on the third day of their hospital stay. Researchers will not be notified of the random assignment until day 5. In the control group patients will be treated according to routine practice for 9 days or longer. In this group there is no interference with the duration of antibiotic treatment. In the "clinical guideline" group patents will receive antibiotics for a minimum of 5 days, antibiotics will be discontinued if temperature is at ≤ 37,8ºC for 48 hours and no more than one sign of clinical instability (see section on definitions) is attested. Once this situation of stability is attained, at each of the participating hospitals a research team doctor will instruct the physician in charge of each patient to drop antibiotic treatment from that moment on.
In patients of the "clinical guideline" group the degree of compliance with the study algorythm will be noted and the reasons that justify skipping it if the case presents itself. The evolution of the clinical trial will be monitored by an independent monitoring team.
Research team members will not be involved in decisions related to discharge from the hospital. After hospital discharge all patient care will depend on the correspoding family physicians. A control visit will be scheduled for the 30th day after admission.
Study location. Multicenter study that will take place in 4 public network Bizkaian hospitals: Galdakao-Usansolo Hospital, Basurto Hospital, Txagorritxu Hospital and San Eloy Hospital.
Study subjects. For a period of 18 months all adult patients, 18 or older, admitted with CAP will be included sequentially. Pneumonia is defined as pulmonary infiltrate shown in a thoracic X-ray not known to be old, plus symptoms consistent with pneumonia, such as cough, dysnea, fever and/or pleuritic chest pain. The following patients will be excluded: patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection, immunosupressed patients (with a solid organ transplant, spelenectomy, treated with a prednisone dose of 10 mg/day or equivalent for longer than 30 days or with other immunodepressors, with neutropenia), those hospitalized in the 14 days prior and those living in assisted care facilities. Pneumonia cases caused by infrequent agents (i.e. P. aerouginosa, S. Aureus) will also be excluded, as well as infectious processes requiring an extended treatment with antibiotocs (i.e. bacterial endocarditis, abscesses), pneumonia cases with pleural effusion requiring a drainage tube, patients who were deceased or admitted to ICU before randomization and those not giving their informed consent.
A total of 1100 cases will be included during the period of study. Losses: those cases not registering the data corresponding to the main goals (loss estimate <5%). A comparative analysis between lost and non-lost patients. For that purpose socio-demographic and clinical variables will be included, as well as those related to severity at admission and the Charlson index (Charlson ME et al. J Chronic Dis 1987;40:373-83).
Ethical aspects. All patients will be informed about the study and they will be asked to give their informed consent (see annex 2). All data will be treated following the law for the protection of personal data (Organic Law 15/1999, 13-12). The study database will be protected with security access measures and the patients' identification data will stay separate from the rest of the information included in the database.
Sample size. We have chosen the equivalence hypothesis in mortality rates between the control group (with conventional guideline) and the intervention group ("clinical guideline group", with treatment template following clinical guideline recommendations). For a unilateral (non-inferiority) contrast (a=0.05, 1- b=0.80) 545 patients will be needed for each group, so as to be able to reject the null hypothesis of non-equivalence of the treatment following the new clinical guidelines as opposed to conventional guidelines. We have assumed an equivalence margin of 1% (http://people.ucalgary.ca/~patten/blackwelder.html). Sample size has been calculated assuming a 5% rate of losses during follow-up.
Independent variables. 1- severity at admission time. During the 24 hours following arrival at the hospital's Emergency Service the requisite variables will be gathered so as to calculate risk class as established by the Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI) (Fine MJ, et al. N Engl J Med 1997;36:243-50) and the CURB65 scale (Confusion, Urea nitrogen, Respiratory rate, Blood pressure, Age) (Lim WS, et al. Thorax 2003;58:377-82); 2- comorbidities; 3-Charlson index; 4- treatment given: antibiotic prior to admission; adherence of antibiotic treatment to SEPAR provisions; initiation of antibiotic treatment in the first 8 hours; transition from intravenous to oral medication; use of non-invasive mechanical ventilation; 5- bacteriological diagnosis. During the acute phase two hemocultures, a sputum culture and urinary antigen tests will be included, while blood tests for atypical bacteria will be performed during the acute and remission phases.
Dependent variables. 1- mortality for any cause in a 15 day period after admission. The in-hospital mortality and at 30 days will also be analyzed. 2- clinical recovery on the 10th (recovery test - see definitions section) and 30th days; 3- clinical evolution on the 5th and 10th treatment days, measured by PRO scales; a specific validated 18-item questionnaire will be used (Lamping DL, et al. Chest 2002;122:920-9); 4- duration of antibiotic treatment after the time of hospitalization (in days) and days without antibiotic (periods of 24 hours without antibiotic) until the 30th day. 5- hospital readmission within 30 days. 6- duration of hospital stay. 7- clinical recovery (number of days); 8- recurrence of the initial infection or superinfection with need for additional or alternative antibiotic treatment (within 30 days); 9- number of days off work due to disease (within 30 days); 10- number of days with adverse effects from the medication (within 30 days); 11- number of days with the usual (recreation or work) activity restricted by pneumonia (within 30 days); 12- in-hospital complications and at 30 days; 13- need for additional medication.
Information collection. Patients will be included in the study once they are admitted with PAC. A protocol for data collection in both study groups will be designed. Clinical stability criteria will be collected daily twice a day during the admission period. The other study variables will be collected during hospital stay and by means of a structured telephone interview on the 10th (unless the patient is still hospitalized) and 30th days. All the data will be collected by trained blinded staff.
Antibiotic treatment. All patients shall be treated according to SEPAR recommendations (Arch Bronconeumol 2010;46:543-58): group inpatients, not in ICU. Intravenous beta-lactam (amoxicillin/clavulanate or cefotaxime or ceftriasone) plus intravenous macrolide (azitromicyn or claritromicyn), or intravenous levofloxacine; group ICU-admitted patients. Intravenous beta-lactam (cefotaxime or ceftriasone) plus intravenous macrolide (azitromycin or claritromycin), or intravenous beta-lactam (cefotaxime or ceftriasone) plus intravenous levofloxacine. The Research Team will insist on starting antibiotic treatment as soon as possible and on patients being treated with fluoroquinolone or beta-lactam with macrolides. The ultimate decision corresponds to the physician in charge of the patient.
Definitions. Clinical instability: systolic arterial pressure <90 mmHg; breathing rate > 24 breath/min; heart rate >100 heartbeats/min; O2 saturation <90% or O2 arterial pressure <60mmHg. Patients receiving oxygen supplement will be considered stable with O2 ≥95% saturation. Clinical recovery (cure test): resolution or improvement of symptoms and clinical signs related to pneumonia without a need for additional or alternative antibiotic treatment. Clinical recovery on follow-up at 30 days: when there is a continuance of resolution or improvement of symptoms and clinical signs related to pneumonia without a need for additional or alternative antibiotic treatment. Recurrence: new (or worsening) symptoms and signs related to pneumonia and with a new infection of the respiratory tract in a patient considered cured on the 10th day visit.
Statistical analysis: For the descriptive analysis we will use averages, standard deviations, medians and ranks for the quantitave variables and percentages for the qualitative ones. The fundamental analyses will include: 1) first, and in order to make sure that randomization has been done correctly, the fundamental basal variables of the study will be compared between the intervention group and the control group to verify that there are no statistically significant differences between both groups in those variables. Intermediate analyses will be performed every three months of follow-up to see whether there are differences between both groups that may justify discontinuing the study. 2) To respond to the fundamental goals and hypotheses of the study univariate analyses will be performed comparing all the main and secondary dependent variables between the two groups of patients (main independent variable). A subanalysis with the most severe patients will also be conducted (PSI IV and V).
For the comparison of the quantitative variables between the control group and the intervention group Student's t test or Wilcoxon's non-parametric test will be used, depending on whether the studied variable follows a normal distribution or not. For the comparison of the qualitative variables a Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test will be used. In adition a comparative analysis of the basal characteristics of the lost and non-lost patients will be performed, using the same statistical tests previously mentioned.
Problems and Limitations of the Study: 1- As in every clinical trial, the main problem may be our patients' lack of interest to become a part of our study, although we will attempt to reduce the impact of this factor by explaining the study objectives, with its possible benefits and risks and its general interest, both for them and for the rest of pneumonia patients; 2- In the "clinical guideline" group the ultimate decision to discontinue antibiotic treatment after reaching clinical stability criteria will depend on the physician in charge of each patient. It is possible we may find occasional resistance to conform with the established protocol. In order to neutralize protocol transgressions as much as possible, the decision to discontinue antibiotic treatment will be analyzed previously at each hospital by a member of the research team, who will relay it to the physician in charge. This way we will on the one hand ensure the compliance of each case to what is established in the clinical trial, and on the other, encourage the individual physician's cooperation. At any rate, if the protocol is skipped, the reasons surrounding the case will be recorded. 3- Multicenter studies are complicated from an operational point of view. There is the possibility that the ratio between eligible and included patients might differ from one location to the other(s), or that the number of cases included bears no relationship with the size of the service population. In order to neutralize this effect we will introduce the hospital factor in our statistical analyses, besides studying each hospital's caseload separately and comparing them all.
- Conditions
- Community Acquired Pneumonia
- Being tested
- Intervention group, Control group
- Keywords
- Community Acquired Pneumonia., Treatment duration
- Medical subject headings
- Community-Acquired Pneumonia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Intervention groupOther
Shorten the duration of antibiotic treatment from 7-10 days to 5 days.
Control groupOther
Those antibiotic duration treatments which are not modified by their doctors.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| INTERVENTION GROUP | Experimental | Patients with diagnosis of CAP with shorten treatment, defined as 5 days antibiotic treatment. Receives: Other: Intervention group |
| CONTROL GROUP | Active comparator | Patients with diagnosis of CAP which antibiotic treatment duration will be not modified by their doctors. Receives: Other: Control group |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
duration of the antibiotic treatment
days taht the patient takes an antibiotic treatment, adding intravenous and oral
Measured: 30 days
mortality
the mortality in fifteen days
Measured: 15 days
clinical cure
resolution or improvement of symptoms and clinical signs related to pneumonia without a need for additional or alternative antibiotic treatment.
Measured: 10 days
clinical cure
resolution or improvement of symptoms and clinical signs related to pneumonia without a need for additional or alternative antibiotic treatment.
Measured: 30 days
Secondary outcomes (6)
1- In-hospital mortality for any cause
Mortality within 30 days after admission, whether related or unrelated to pneumonia.
Measured: 30 days
Readmission
Readmission within 30 days after admission for reasons related or unrelated to pneumonia.
Measured: 30 days
Days needed to reach clinical stability
Days off work due to disease. Days with restricted regular activity (work or recreation) due to pneumonia. Days with adverse effects due to medication.
Measured: 30 days
Recurrence
new (or worsening) symptoms and signs related to pneumonia and with a new infection of the respiratory tract in a patient considered cured on the 10th day visit.
Measured: 30 days
Duration of hospital stay
days the patient needs to be hospitalized for pneumonia
Measured: 30 days
days to return to normal activity
days the patient needs to carry out their daily lives
Measured: 30 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Aug 2012 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2012
- Primary completionMar 2014
- Study completionApr 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (26)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Community Acquired PneumoniaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 602 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hospital Galdakao-Usansolo
- Sponsor type
- Other government
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, ALBERTO CAPELASTEGUI SAIZ, Hospital Galdakao-Usansolo
- Investigators
- ALBERTO CAPELASTEGUI, PhD, MD, Principal investigator, Osakidetza
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01661920
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CAPTIME
- Other IDs
- 2011-001067-51
- Acronym
- CAPTIME
- Status last verified
- Aug 2015
- First submitted
- 26 Jul 2012
- Last updated
- 20 Aug 2015
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
File TM Jr. Clinical efficacy of newer agents in short-duration therapy for community-acquired pneumonia. Clin Infect Dis. 2004 Sep 1;39 Suppl 3:S159-64. doi: 10.1086/421354.
PubMed 15546111File TM Jr, Niederman MS. Antimicrobial therapy of community-acquired pneumonia. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2004 Dec;18(4):993-1016, xi. doi: 10.1016/j.idc.2004.07.011.
PubMed 15555836Nicolau DP. Predicting antibacterial response from pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic profiles. Infection. 2001 Dec;29 Suppl 2:11-5.
PubMed 11785851Mandell LA, File TM Jr. Short-course treatment of community-acquired pneumonia. Clin Infect Dis. 2003 Sep 15;37(6):761-3. doi: 10.1086/377567. Epub 2003 Aug 28. No abstract available.
PubMed 12955635Durrington HJ, Summers C. Recent changes in the management of community acquired pneumonia in adults. BMJ. 2008 Jun 21;336(7658):1429-33. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a285. No abstract available.
PubMed 18566081Nobre V, Harbarth S, Graf JD, Rohner P, Pugin J. Use of procalcitonin to shorten antibiotic treatment duration in septic patients: a randomized trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008 Mar 1;177(5):498-505. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200708-1238OC. Epub 2007 Dec 20.
PubMed 18096708Bouadma L, Luyt CE, Tubach F, Cracco C, Alvarez A, Schwebel C, Schortgen F, Lasocki S, Veber B, Dehoux M, Bernard M, Pasquet B, Regnier B, Brun-Buisson C, Chastre J, Wolff M; PRORATA trial group. Use of procalcitonin to reduce patients' exposure to antibiotics in intensive care units (PRORATA trial): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2010 Feb 6;375(9713):463-74. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61879-1. Epub 2010 Jan 25.
PubMed 20097417Chastre J, Wolff M, Fagon JY, Chevret S, Thomas F, Wermert D, Clementi E, Gonzalez J, Jusserand D, Asfar P, Perrin D, Fieux F, Aubas S; PneumA Trial Group. Comparison of 8 vs 15 days of antibiotic therapy for ventilator-associated pneumonia in adults: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2003 Nov 19;290(19):2588-98. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.19.2588.
PubMed 14625336Montravers P, Fagon JY, Chastre J, Lecso M, Dombret MC, Trouillet JL, Gibert C. Follow-up protected specimen brushes to assess treatment in nosocomial pneumonia. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1993 Jan;147(1):38-44. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/147.1.38.
PubMed 8420428Li JZ, Winston LG, Moore DH, Bent S. Efficacy of short-course antibiotic regimens for community-acquired pneumonia: a meta-analysis. Am J Med. 2007 Sep;120(9):783-90. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2007.04.023.
PubMed 17765048el Moussaoui R, de Borgie CA, van den Broek P, Hustinx WN, Bresser P, van den Berk GE, Poley JW, van den Berg B, Krouwels FH, Bonten MJ, Weenink C, Bossuyt PM, Speelman P, Opmeer BC, Prins JM. Effectiveness of discontinuing antibiotic treatment after three days versus eight days in mild to moderate-severe community acquired pneumonia: randomised, double blind study. BMJ. 2006 Jun 10;332(7554):1355. doi: 10.1136/bmj.332.7554.1355.
PubMed 16763247Dunbar LM, Wunderink RG, Habib MP, Smith LG, Tennenberg AM, Khashab MM, Wiesinger BA, Xiang JX, Zadeikis N, Kahn JB. High-dose, short-course levofloxacin for community-acquired pneumonia: a new treatment paradigm. Clin Infect Dis. 2003 Sep 15;37(6):752-60. doi: 10.1086/377539. Epub 2003 Aug 28.
PubMed 12955634Slama TG, Amin A, Brunton SA, File TM Jr, Milkovich G, Rodvold KA, Sahm DF, Varon J, Weiland D Jr; Council for Appropriate and Rational Antibiotic Therapy (CARAT). A clinician's guide to the appropriate and accurate use of antibiotics: the Council for Appropriate and Rational Antibiotic Therapy (CARAT) criteria. Am J Med. 2005 Jul;118 Suppl 7A:1S-6S. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2005.05.007.
PubMed 15993671Schrag SJ, Pena C, Fernandez J, Sanchez J, Gomez V, Perez E, Feris JM, Besser RE. Effect of short-course, high-dose amoxicillin therapy on resistant pneumococcal carriage: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2001 Jul 4;286(1):49-56. doi: 10.1001/jama.286.1.49.
PubMed 11434826Guillemot D, Carbon C, Balkau B, Geslin P, Lecoeur H, Vauzelle-Kervroedan F, Bouvenot G, Eschwege E. Low dosage and long treatment duration of beta-lactam: risk factors for carriage of penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae. JAMA. 1998 Feb 4;279(5):365-70. doi: 10.1001/jama.279.5.365.
PubMed 9459469
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Aug 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Suitability of Antibiotic Treatment for Community-acquired Pneumonia
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01661920
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CAPTIME / CAPTIME
- Conditions
- Community Acquired Pneumonia
- Keywords
- Community Acquired Pneumonia., Treatment duration
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 602 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Hospital Galdakao-UsansoloOther government
- Study start
- Jan 2012
- Primary completion
- Mar 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- Apr 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 10 Aug 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The duration of antibiotic treatment in community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) lasts about 9-10 days, and is determined empirically. The last North American guideline for CAP recommends using clinical stability criteria as a reference to establish the duration of antibiotic treatment, which would result in about 5 days of antibiotic use for the majority of pneumonia cases. In order to validate this proposal we propose to carry out a randomized multicenter double-blind (until the 5th day) clinical trial with adult CAP patients admitted to 4 hospitals in Euskadi. A control group (with routine treatment) will be compared with an intervention group (antibiotic treatment for at least 5 days, which will be interrupted if temperature is =< 37,8ºC for at least 48 hours and no more than one sign of clinical instability is assessed), with regards to: mortality at 15 days, clinical recovery by days 10 and 30, clinical improvement after days 5 and 10 as evaluated by PRO scales, duration of antibiotic treatment. A non-inferiority dichotomous sequential analysis will be performed (for mortality after 15 days, clinical recovery by day 10 and in follow-up at 30 days, clinical improvement after days 5 and 10, with PRO scales) as well as a superiority analysis for the duration of the antibiotic treatment. A total of 1100 patients will be recruited, following their signed consent, during the inclusion period (18 months). Stability criteria will be measured daily. The rest of the variables will be measured at admission and by telephone on days 10 and 30.
Detailed description
Work hypothesis: We aim to carry out a comparative study between 2 groups of patients (control group, guideline group): in the control group the standard duration of antibiotic treatment will be applied; in the guideline group (intervention group) the duration of antibiotic treatment will be based upon the IDSA/ATS 2007 provisions (ref. 18), which are related to the time needed to reach clinical stability.
- - Patients who follow the treatment protocol of the so-called control group, with routine treatment, in comparison to the clinical guideline group, will show similar results (sequential dichotomous non-inferiority analysis) in the following clinical parameters: A. Adverse results: 1st, mortality for any cause within the first 15 days after admission; 2nd, development of (major or minor) complications during the first 15 days after admission; B. Beneficial results: 1st, clinical recovery by the 10th day of treatment and in follow-up at 30 days; 2nd, clinical improvement on the 5th and 10th days of treatment, as evaluated by PRO scales.
- - Patients who follow the treatment protocol of the so-called guideline group (intervention group), in comparison with the control group, with routine treatment, will show better results (superiority analysis) in the following parameters: c. Duration of antibiotic treatment as measured using 2 variables: 1.- the "duration of antibiotic treatment" after admission, expressed in days; 2.- "antibiotic-free days", defined as a period of at least 24 hours in which antibiotics are not given in the 30 day period after admission.
Goals: To validate the recommendations of the latest IDSA/ATS clinical guideline on duration of antibiotic treatment in pneumonia.
Main goals. To compare two treatment routines (control group with routine treatment vs clinical guideline group) based on results in the following clinical parameters:
- Adverse results: 1st, mortality for any cause within the first 15 days after admission; 2nd, development of (major or minor) complications during the first 15 days after admission; B. Beneficial results: 1st, clinical recovery by the 10th day of treatment and in follow-up at 30 days; 2nd, clinical improvement on the 5th and 10th days of treatment, as evaluated by PRO scales.
2.- Patients who follow the treatment schema of the so-called guideline group (intervention group), in comparison with the control group, with routine treatment, will show better results (superiority analysis) in the following parameters: c. Duration of antibiotic treatment as measured using 2 variables: 1.- the "duration of antibiotic treatment" after admission, expressed in days; 2.- "antibiotic-free days", defined as a period of at least 24 hours in which antibiotics are not given in the 30 day period after admission.
Secondary goals: To compare a control group with routine treatment vs the clinical guideline group based on the following parameters:
- In-hospital mortality for any cause. Mortality within 30 days after admission, whether related or unrelated to pneumonia.
- Readmission within 30 days after admission for reasons related or unrelated to pneumonia.
- Duration of hospital stay.
- Days to return to normal activity.
- Recurrence of initial infection or superinfection with need for additional or alternative antibiotics, within 30 days after admission.
Study design - Population under study. Inclusion/exclusion criteria - Main and secondary variables - Data analysis - Ethical and legal aspects (BCP compliance, insurance…) - Aspects related to the research medication (manufacturing, labeling, distribution…) - Funding sources of the medication Randomized multicenter double-blind (until the 5th day) clinical trial involving adult PAC patients (≥18 years of age) admitted to 4 teaching hospitals in Euskadi. All CAP patients hospitalized within a period of 18 months (October-April) will be evaluated for their eligibility. The study involves an intervention and will be undertaken in 2 parallel groups, where the duration of antibiotic treatment following routine clinical practice (control group) will be compared with its duration under the IDSA/ATS provisions for CAP (ref. 18) ("clinical guideline" group). Patients will be randomly assigned to the control group or the "clinical guideline" group on the third day of their hospital stay. Researchers will not be notified of the random assignment until day 5. In the control group patients will be treated according to routine practice for 9 days or longer. In this group there is no interference with the duration of antibiotic treatment. In the "clinical guideline" group patents will receive antibiotics for a minimum of 5 days, antibiotics will be discontinued if temperature is at ≤ 37,8ºC for 48 hours and no more than one sign of clinical instability (see section on definitions) is attested. Once this situation of stability is attained, at each of the participating hospitals a research team doctor will instruct the physician in charge of each patient to drop antibiotic treatment from that moment on.
In patients of the "clinical guideline" group the degree of compliance with the study algorythm will be noted and the reasons that justify skipping it if the case presents itself. The evolution of the clinical trial will be monitored by an independent monitoring team.
Research team members will not be involved in decisions related to discharge from the hospital. After hospital discharge all patient care will depend on the correspoding family physicians. A control visit will be scheduled for the 30th day after admission.
Study location. Multicenter study that will take place in 4 public network Bizkaian hospitals: Galdakao-Usansolo Hospital, Basurto Hospital, Txagorritxu Hospital and San Eloy Hospital.
Study subjects. For a period of 18 months all adult patients, 18 or older, admitted with CAP will be included sequentially. Pneumonia is defined as pulmonary infiltrate shown in a thoracic X-ray not known to be old, plus symptoms consistent with pneumonia, such as cough, dysnea, fever and/or pleuritic chest pain. The following patients will be excluded: patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection, immunosupressed patients (with a solid organ transplant, spelenectomy, treated with a prednisone dose of 10 mg/day or equivalent for longer than 30 days or with other immunodepressors, with neutropenia), those hospitalized in the 14 days prior and those living in assisted care facilities. Pneumonia cases caused by infrequent agents (i.e. P. aerouginosa, S. Aureus) will also be excluded, as well as infectious processes requiring an extended treatment with antibiotocs (i.e. bacterial endocarditis, abscesses), pneumonia cases with pleural effusion requiring a drainage tube, patients who were deceased or admitted to ICU before randomization and those not giving their informed consent.
A total of 1100 cases will be included during the period of study. Losses: those cases not registering the data corresponding to the main goals (loss estimate <5%). A comparative analysis between lost and non-lost patients. For that purpose socio-demographic and clinical variables will be included, as well as those related to severity at admission and the Charlson index (Charlson ME et al. J Chronic Dis 1987;40:373-83).
Ethical aspects. All patients will be informed about the study and they will be asked to give their informed consent (see annex 2). All data will be treated following the law for the protection of personal data (Organic Law 15/1999, 13-12). The study database will be protected with security access measures and the patients' identification data will stay separate from the rest of the information included in the database.
Sample size. We have chosen the equivalence hypothesis in mortality rates between the control group (with conventional guideline) and the intervention group ("clinical guideline group", with treatment template following clinical guideline recommendations). For a unilateral (non-inferiority) contrast (a=0.05, 1- b=0.80) 545 patients will be needed for each group, so as to be able to reject the null hypothesis of non-equivalence of the treatment following the new clinical guidelines as opposed to conventional guidelines. We have assumed an equivalence margin of 1% (http://people.ucalgary.ca/~patten/blackwelder.html). Sample size has been calculated assuming a 5% rate of losses during follow-up.
Independent variables. 1- severity at admission time. During the 24 hours following arrival at the hospital's Emergency Service the requisite variables will be gathered so as to calculate risk class as established by the Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI) (Fine MJ, et al. N Engl J Med 1997;36:243-50) and the CURB65 scale (Confusion, Urea nitrogen, Respiratory rate, Blood pressure, Age) (Lim WS, et al. Thorax 2003;58:377-82); 2- comorbidities; 3-Charlson index; 4- treatment given: antibiotic prior to admission; adherence of antibiotic treatment to SEPAR provisions; initiation of antibiotic treatment in the first 8 hours; transition from intravenous to oral medication; use of non-invasive mechanical ventilation; 5- bacteriological diagnosis. During the acute phase two hemocultures, a sputum culture and urinary antigen tests will be included, while blood tests for atypical bacteria will be performed during the acute and remission phases.
Dependent variables. 1- mortality for any cause in a 15 day period after admission. The in-hospital mortality and at 30 days will also be analyzed. 2- clinical recovery on the 10th (recovery test - see definitions section) and 30th days; 3- clinical evolution on the 5th and 10th treatment days, measured by PRO scales; a specific validated 18-item questionnaire will be used (Lamping DL, et al. Chest 2002;122:920-9); 4- duration of antibiotic treatment after the time of hospitalization (in days) and days without antibiotic (periods of 24 hours without antibiotic) until the 30th day. 5- hospital readmission within 30 days. 6- duration of hospital stay. 7- clinical recovery (number of days); 8- recurrence of the initial infection or superinfection with need for additional or alternative antibiotic treatment (within 30 days); 9- number of days off work due to disease (within 30 days); 10- number of days with adverse effects from the medication (within 30 days); 11- number of days with the usual (recreation or work) activity restricted by pneumonia (within 30 days); 12- in-hospital complications and at 30 days; 13- need for additional medication.
Information collection. Patients will be included in the study once they are admitted with PAC. A protocol for data collection in both study groups will be designed. Clinical stability criteria will be collected daily twice a day during the admission period. The other study variables will be collected during hospital stay and by means of a structured telephone interview on the 10th (unless the patient is still hospitalized) and 30th days. All the data will be collected by trained blinded staff.
Antibiotic treatment. All patients shall be treated according to SEPAR recommendations (Arch Bronconeumol 2010;46:543-58): group inpatients, not in ICU. Intravenous beta-lactam (amoxicillin/clavulanate or cefotaxime or ceftriasone) plus intravenous macrolide (azitromicyn or claritromicyn), or intravenous levofloxacine; group ICU-admitted patients. Intravenous beta-lactam (cefotaxime or ceftriasone) plus intravenous macrolide (azitromycin or claritromycin), or intravenous beta-lactam (cefotaxime or ceftriasone) plus intravenous levofloxacine. The Research Team will insist on starting antibiotic treatment as soon as possible and on patients being treated with fluoroquinolone or beta-lactam with macrolides. The ultimate decision corresponds to the physician in charge of the patient.
Definitions. Clinical instability: systolic arterial pressure <90 mmHg; breathing rate > 24 breath/min; heart rate >100 heartbeats/min; O2 saturation <90% or O2 arterial pressure <60mmHg. Patients receiving oxygen supplement will be considered stable with O2 ≥95% saturation. Clinical recovery (cure test): resolution or improvement of symptoms and clinical signs related to pneumonia without a need for additional or alternative antibiotic treatment. Clinical recovery on follow-up at 30 days: when there is a continuance of resolution or improvement of symptoms and clinical signs related to pneumonia without a need for additional or alternative antibiotic treatment. Recurrence: new (or worsening) symptoms and signs related to pneumonia and with a new infection of the respiratory tract in a patient considered cured on the 10th day visit.
Statistical analysis: For the descriptive analysis we will use averages, standard deviations, medians and ranks for the quantitave variables and percentages for the qualitative ones. The fundamental analyses will include: 1) first, and in order to make sure that randomization has been done correctly, the fundamental basal variables of the study will be compared between the intervention group and the control group to verify that there are no statistically significant differences between both groups in those variables. Intermediate analyses will be performed every three months of follow-up to see whether there are differences between both groups that may justify discontinuing the study. 2) To respond to the fundamental goals and hypotheses of the study univariate analyses will be performed comparing all the main and secondary dependent variables between the two groups of patients (main independent variable). A subanalysis with the most severe patients will also be conducted (PSI IV and V).
For the comparison of the quantitative variables between the control group and the intervention group Student's t test or Wilcoxon's non-parametric test will be used, depending on whether the studied variable follows a normal distribution or not. For the comparison of the qualitative variables a Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test will be used. In adition a comparative analysis of the basal characteristics of the lost and non-lost patients will be performed, using the same statistical tests previously mentioned.
Problems and Limitations of the Study: 1- As in every clinical trial, the main problem may be our patients' lack of interest to become a part of our study, although we will attempt to reduce the impact of this factor by explaining the study objectives, with its possible benefits and risks and its general interest, both for them and for the rest of pneumonia patients; 2- In the "clinical guideline" group the ultimate decision to discontinue antibiotic treatment after reaching clinical stability criteria will depend on the physician in charge of each patient. It is possible we may find occasional resistance to conform with the established protocol. In order to neutralize protocol transgressions as much as possible, the decision to discontinue antibiotic treatment will be analyzed previously at each hospital by a member of the research team, who will relay it to the physician in charge. This way we will on the one hand ensure the compliance of each case to what is established in the clinical trial, and on the other, encourage the individual physician's cooperation. At any rate, if the protocol is skipped, the reasons surrounding the case will be recorded. 3- Multicenter studies are complicated from an operational point of view. There is the possibility that the ratio between eligible and included patients might differ from one location to the other(s), or that the number of cases included bears no relationship with the size of the service population. In order to neutralize this effect we will introduce the hospital factor in our statistical analyses, besides studying each hospital's caseload separately and comparing them all.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| INTERVENTION GROUP | Experimental | Other: Intervention groupPatients with diagnosis of CAP with shorten treatment, defined as 5 days antibiotic treatment. |
| CONTROL GROUP | Active comparator | Other: Control groupPatients with diagnosis of CAP which antibiotic treatment duration will be not modified by their doctors. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- 18 or older,
- admitted with CAP will be included sequentially. Pneumonia is defined as pulmonary infiltrate shown in a thoracic X-ray not known to be old,
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection,
- immunosupressed patients (with a solid organ transplant, spelenectomy, treated with a prednisone dose of 10 mg/day or equivalent for longer than 30 days or with other immunodepressors, with neutropenia),
- those hospitalized in the 14 days prior and those living in assisted care facilities.
- pneumonia cases caused by infrequent agents (i.e. P. aerouginosa, S. Aureus) will also be excluded, as well as infectious processes requiring an extended treatment with antibiotocs (i.e. bacterial endocarditis, abscesses),
- pneumonia cases with pleural effusion requiring a drainage tube,
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention groupShorten the duration of antibiotic treatment from 7-10 days to 5 days. | Other | INTERVENTION GROUP |
| Control groupThose antibiotic duration treatments which are not modified by their doctors. | Other | CONTROL GROUP |
Primary outcome
duration of the antibiotic treatment
Time frame: 30 days
days taht the patient takes an antibiotic treatment, adding intravenous and oral
mortality
Time frame: 15 days
the mortality in fifteen days
clinical cure
Time frame: 10 days
resolution or improvement of symptoms and clinical signs related to pneumonia without a need for additional or alternative antibiotic treatment.
clinical cure
Time frame: 30 days
resolution or improvement of symptoms and clinical signs related to pneumonia without a need for additional or alternative antibiotic treatment.
6 secondary outcomes
1- In-hospital mortality for any cause
Time frame: 30 days
Readmission
Time frame: 30 days
Days needed to reach clinical stability
Time frame: 30 days
Recurrence
Time frame: 30 days
Duration of hospital stay
Time frame: 30 days
days to return to normal activity
Time frame: 30 days
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Aug 2015.
- Results publication: PubMed 15546111File TM Jr. Clinical efficacy of newer agents in short-duration therapy for community-acquired pneumonia. Clin Infect Dis. 2004 Sep 1;39 Suppl 3:S159-64. doi: 10.1086/421354.
- Results publication: PubMed 15555836File TM Jr, Niederman MS. Antimicrobial therapy of community-acquired pneumonia. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2004 Dec;18(4):993-1016, xi. doi: 10.1016/j.idc.2004.07.011.
- Results publication: PubMed 11785851Nicolau DP. Predicting antibacterial response from pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic profiles. Infection. 2001 Dec;29 Suppl 2:11-5.
- Results publication: PubMed 12955635Mandell LA, File TM Jr. Short-course treatment of community-acquired pneumonia. Clin Infect Dis. 2003 Sep 15;37(6):761-3. doi: 10.1086/377567. Epub 2003 Aug 28. No abstract available.
- Results publication: PubMed 18566081Durrington HJ, Summers C. Recent changes in the management of community acquired pneumonia in adults. BMJ. 2008 Jun 21;336(7658):1429-33. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a285. No abstract available.
- Results publication: PubMed 18096708Nobre V, Harbarth S, Graf JD, Rohner P, Pugin J. Use of procalcitonin to shorten antibiotic treatment duration in septic patients: a randomized trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008 Mar 1;177(5):498-505. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200708-1238OC. Epub 2007 Dec 20.
- Results publication: PubMed 20097417Bouadma L, Luyt CE, Tubach F, Cracco C, Alvarez A, Schwebel C, Schortgen F, Lasocki S, Veber B, Dehoux M, Bernard M, Pasquet B, Regnier B, Brun-Buisson C, Chastre J, Wolff M; PRORATA trial group. Use of procalcitonin to reduce patients' exposure to antibiotics in intensive care units (PRORATA trial): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2010 Feb 6;375(9713):463-74. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61879-1. Epub 2010 Jan 25.
- Results publication: PubMed 14625336Chastre J, Wolff M, Fagon JY, Chevret S, Thomas F, Wermert D, Clementi E, Gonzalez J, Jusserand D, Asfar P, Perrin D, Fieux F, Aubas S; PneumA Trial Group. Comparison of 8 vs 15 days of antibiotic therapy for ventilator-associated pneumonia in adults: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2003 Nov 19;290(19):2588-98. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.19.2588.
- Results publication: PubMed 8420428Montravers P, Fagon JY, Chastre J, Lecso M, Dombret MC, Trouillet JL, Gibert C. Follow-up protected specimen brushes to assess treatment in nosocomial pneumonia. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1993 Jan;147(1):38-44. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/147.1.38.
- Results publication: PubMed 17765048Li JZ, Winston LG, Moore DH, Bent S. Efficacy of short-course antibiotic regimens for community-acquired pneumonia: a meta-analysis. Am J Med. 2007 Sep;120(9):783-90. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2007.04.023.
- Results publication: PubMed 16763247el Moussaoui R, de Borgie CA, van den Broek P, Hustinx WN, Bresser P, van den Berk GE, Poley JW, van den Berg B, Krouwels FH, Bonten MJ, Weenink C, Bossuyt PM, Speelman P, Opmeer BC, Prins JM. Effectiveness of discontinuing antibiotic treatment after three days versus eight days in mild to moderate-severe community acquired pneumonia: randomised, double blind study. BMJ. 2006 Jun 10;332(7554):1355. doi: 10.1136/bmj.332.7554.1355.
- Results publication: PubMed 12955634Dunbar LM, Wunderink RG, Habib MP, Smith LG, Tennenberg AM, Khashab MM, Wiesinger BA, Xiang JX, Zadeikis N, Kahn JB. High-dose, short-course levofloxacin for community-acquired pneumonia: a new treatment paradigm. Clin Infect Dis. 2003 Sep 15;37(6):752-60. doi: 10.1086/377539. Epub 2003 Aug 28.
Related trials for Community Acquired Pneumonia
Not yet recruiting
Expanded Diagnostic Strategy in Older Adults Hospitalized With Community-Acquired Acute Respiratory Infection
Acute Respiratory Infection
RecruitingObservational study
Cardiovascular Disease Progression in Survivors of Community Acquired Pneumonia and Lung Infection by Covid-19.
Pneumonia, Community-Acquired, COVID-19 Pneumonia
Active, not recruitingPhase 2/3
Local Antibiotic Delivery for Community Acquired Pneumonia
Community Acquired Pneumonia (CAP)
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Ceftriaxone Dosage for Non-Critical Community-Acquired Pneumonia
Community Acquired Pneumonia (CAP)
Active, not recruitingPhase 2/3
Inhaled Lexofloxacin vs Usual Care for Treatment of Community-Acquired Pneumonia
Community-acquired Pneumonia, CAP
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
ALBERTO CAPELASTEGUI, PhD, MD principal investigator
Osakidetza
4 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Intervention group in people with Community Acquired Pneumonia, run by Hospital Galdakao-Usansolo at 4 sites in Spain.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Aug 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 4 sites in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
duration of the antibiotic treatment (time frame: 30 days). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01661920, which also lists 26 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Aug 2015.