Celiac DiseasePhase 1/2NaCeDNCT01661933
Desensitising Celiac Disease Patients With the Human Hookworm
A Phase 1/2 study testing Necator americanus in people with Celiac Disease, run by The Prince Charles Hospital at 1 site in Australia.
Trial summary
We have established that the hookworm Necator americanus (Na) dramatically alters the local and systemic immune landscape of the infected human host. Consistent with the principle of desensitisation, diet managed celiac disease subjects previously infected by us with Na will be invited to receive small incremental… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Celiac Disease
- What is being tested?
- Necator americanus
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 12 participants
- Where
- 1 siteAustralia
- Study dates
- Aug 2012to Mar 2014
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Previously enrolled adults who received an experimental hookworm infection with diet treated celiac disease.
Who cannot join
- Immune suppressive therapies
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Combining Necator Americanus With Trace Gluten to Restore Tolerance in Coeliac Disease: a Pilot Clinical and a Detailed in Vitro Immunological Study.
We have established that the hookworm Necator americanus (Na) dramatically alters the local and systemic immune landscape of the infected human host. Consistent with the principle of desensitisation, diet managed celiac disease subjects previously infected by us with Na will be invited to receive small incremental doses of gluten as pasta (3-25 mm straw of spaghetti) over 16 weeks. Each participant will then be carefully re-assessed to determine if it is appropriate to undertake a 12-week gluten challenge.
Read the detailed description
Hypothesis The adaptive Th2/regulatory profile imposed by Na will promote gluten tolerance following a micro-dose desensitising programme.
Primary Aim: To determine the safety and efficacy of Na as a tolerising agent in celiac subjects
Specific Aim 1. Undertake a therapeutic pilot study comparing mucosal histopathology before and after a gluten challenge, to be preceded by a programmed desensitising micro-challenge using Na as a tolerising agent.
Specific Aim 2. Assess systemic and mucosal immune responses to gluten micro-challenge, Na infection, and gluten re-challenge throughout the pilot study, to be referenced against hookworm-naive people with treated and untreated celiac disease.
Specific Aim 3. Utilising blood and tissue from hookworm-naive celiac disease volunteers, undertake in vitro studies focusing on the effects of Na-derived excretory/secretory (ES) products on gluten-stimulated gut mucosal cell apoptosis, cytokine and gene profiles.
- Conditions
- Celiac Disease
- Being tested
- Necator americanus
- Keywords
- celiac disease, hookworm, probiotic
- Medical subject headings
- Celiac Disease, Ancylostomiasis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Necator americanusBiological
Also called Hookworm
Previously inoculated subjects will be further inoculated as previously undertaken with 20 3rd stage infective Na larvae (10 + 10 over 4 weeks). Four weeks after the 2nd inoculation, each participant will receive a micro-dose of gluten (10 mg daily) as pasta for 8 weeks, to be followed by a low-dose of gluten (50 mg daily) for 8 weeks. After this, a detailed assessment involving upper endoscopy and duodenal biopsy will be performed before deciding on an individual case basis that it is safe for the participant to proceed to challenge. A gluten challenge of 1 G (15-20 G of pasta or a ½ slice of standard white bread) twice weekly for 12 weeks will commence.
Necator americanusBiological
Also called Hookworm
After completion of the previously planned challenge, volunteers will be invited to extend the gluten challenge. The extension is for 4 weeks total. The gluten challenge is stepwise: gluten 10 mg daily for one week, 50 mg daily for one week and finally 3 grams daily for 2 weeks. The outcome measure is serum tissue transglutaminase to be compared before and after the intervention.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Necator americanus, gluten challenge | Experimental | Single arm, vertical. Receives: Biological: Necator americanus |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Duodenal Villus Height:Crypt Depth
Biopsies were fixed in neutral buffered formalin, processed and carefully orientated and embedded in paraffin wax. Sections (3 µm) were stained with H\&E. Slides from both time-points were de-identified, shuffled and graded by Dr John Croese after which results from poorly orientated slides were verified by Dr Andrew Clouston. The Vh:Cd ratios were measured on 5 randomly selected well-orientated sites. The null hypothesis is that hookworm infection will not protect against mucosal damage following 12-week exposure to gluten in celiac disease.
Measured: Week -24 to -36
Secondary outcomes (3)
Intraepithelial Lymphocyte Count
Biopsies were fixed in neutral buffered formalin, processed and carefully orientated and embedded in paraffin wax. Sections (3 µm) were stained with anti-CD3. All slides were de-identified and graded by Dr John Croese. The IEL percentages were measured on 2 or more randomly selected well-orientated villi. The null hypothesis is that hookworm infection will not protect against mucosal IEL influx following 12-week exposure to gluten in celiac disease.
Measured: Week-24 and -36
Number of Participants With 2 Points Increase in Marsh Score Post GC-1g
The Marsh score is a defined but qualitative assessment assigned a value to allow for comparison. The scores were evaluated by consensus between the primary (chief) investigator and the study pathologist. The Marsh score was graded 0, 1, 2, 3A (assigned-4), 3B (-5) and 3C (-6); rage 1-6 with normal=0 and severe inflammation=6. Because the scoring is vulnerable to artefact, only a 2-point shift was regarded as a significant intra-individual change. The scores were graded after week-36 on biopsies de-identified shuffled. An upward shift was interpreted to reflect a significant worsening of gluten-associated inflammation. The comparison reported evaluated changes from baseline (week-24) to post-low-dose gluten challenge (week-24; GC-1g). The objective for using the Marsh score was to identify individuals who might have experienced a severe worsening in pathology due to GC-1g that might not be reflected in the Vh:Cd group analysis.
Measured: Longitudinal change between week-24 and week-36
Serum Anti-tissue Transglutaminase Antibodies Measured as International Units/mL (IU/mL)
The trial was extended with pre-trial and mid-trial anti-tTG antibody levels used to compare with the post-trial levels. Anti-tTG is a serological measure of tissue transglutaminase-2 antibodies. In active celiac disease, levels are increased. In treated disease, levels are low (normal cut-off was <15 IU/mL). A significant increase compared to baseline in tTG can be expected 2 weeks after consuming 3g of gluten daily for 2 weeks in people with celiac disease who have been maintaining a gluten-free diet, but who are not taking other treatment.
Measured: Anti-tTG IU/mL levels pre-trial, mid-trial and after 3 gram/day gluten challenge
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Aug 2012 (estimated)
- Study startAug 2012
- Primary completionMar 2014
- Study completionMar 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Celiac DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 12 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- The Prince Charles Hospital
- Sponsor type
- Other government
- Collaborators
- National Health and Medical Research Council, Australia
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Dr John Croese, The Prince Charles Hospital
- Investigators
- John Croese, MD, Study director, The Prince Charles Hospital, Centre for Biodiscovery and Molecular Development of TherapeuticsDianne Jones, BAppSc, Principal investigator, Logan HospitalAlexander Loukas, PhD, Principal investigator, Centre for Biodiscovery and Molecular Development of Therapeutics, James Cook University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01661933
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- AU/3/BOBD012
- Acronym
- NaCeD
- Status last verified
- Oct 2014
- First submitted
- 6 Aug 2012
- Last updated
- 20 Oct 2014
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Daveson AJ, Jones DM, Gaze S, McSorley H, Clouston A, Pascoe A, Cooke S, Speare R, Macdonald GA, Anderson R, McCarthy JS, Loukas A, Croese J. Effect of hookworm infection on wheat challenge in celiac disease--a randomised double-blinded placebo controlled trial. PLoS One. 2011 Mar 8;6(3):e17366. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017366.
PubMed 21408161
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Oct 2014. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Combining Necator Americanus With Trace Gluten to Restore Tolerance in Coeliac Disease: a Pilot Clinical and a Detailed in Vitro Immunological Study.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01661933
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- NaCeD / AU/3/BOBD012
- Conditions
- Celiac Disease
- Keywords
- celiac disease, hookworm, probiotic
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 12 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- The Prince Charles HospitalOther government
- Collaborators
- National Health and Medical Research Council, Australia
- Study start
- Aug 2012
- Primary completion
- Mar 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- Mar 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 10 Aug 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 13 Oct 2014
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
We have established that the hookworm Necator americanus (Na) dramatically alters the local and systemic immune landscape of the infected human host. Consistent with the principle of desensitisation, diet managed celiac disease subjects previously infected by us with Na will be invited to receive small incremental doses of gluten as pasta (3-25 mm straw of spaghetti) over 16 weeks. Each participant will then be carefully re-assessed to determine if it is appropriate to undertake a 12-week gluten challenge.
Detailed description
Hypothesis The adaptive Th2/regulatory profile imposed by Na will promote gluten tolerance following a micro-dose desensitising programme.
Primary Aim: To determine the safety and efficacy of Na as a tolerising agent in celiac subjects
Specific Aim 1. Undertake a therapeutic pilot study comparing mucosal histopathology before and after a gluten challenge, to be preceded by a programmed desensitising micro-challenge using Na as a tolerising agent.
Specific Aim 2. Assess systemic and mucosal immune responses to gluten micro-challenge, Na infection, and gluten re-challenge throughout the pilot study, to be referenced against hookworm-naive people with treated and untreated celiac disease.
Specific Aim 3. Utilising blood and tissue from hookworm-naive celiac disease volunteers, undertake in vitro studies focusing on the effects of Na-derived excretory/secretory (ES) products on gluten-stimulated gut mucosal cell apoptosis, cytokine and gene profiles.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Necator americanus, gluten challenge | Experimental | Biological: Necator americanusSingle arm, vertical. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Previously enrolled adults who received an experimental hookworm infection with diet treated celiac disease.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Immune suppressive therapies
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Necator americanusAlso: HookwormPreviously inoculated subjects will be further inoculated as previously undertaken with 20 3rd stage infective Na larvae (10 + 10 over 4 weeks). Four weeks after the 2nd inoculation, each participant will receive a micro-dose of gluten (10 mg daily) as pasta for 8 weeks, to be followed by a low-dose of gluten (50 mg daily) for 8 weeks. After this, a detailed assessment involving upper endoscopy and duodenal biopsy will be performed before deciding on an individual case basis that it is safe for the participant to proceed to challenge. A gluten challenge of 1 G (15-20 G of pasta or a ½ slice of standard white bread) twice weekly for 12 weeks will commence. | Biological | Necator americanus, gluten challenge |
| Necator americanusAlso: HookwormAfter completion of the previously planned challenge, volunteers will be invited to extend the gluten challenge. The extension is for 4 weeks total. The gluten challenge is stepwise: gluten 10 mg daily for one week, 50 mg daily for one week and finally 3 grams daily for 2 weeks. The outcome measure is serum tissue transglutaminase to be compared before and after the intervention. | Biological | Necator americanus, gluten challenge |
Primary outcome
Duodenal Villus Height:Crypt Depth
Time frame: Week -24 to -36
Biopsies were fixed in neutral buffered formalin, processed and carefully orientated and embedded in paraffin wax. Sections (3 µm) were stained with H\&E. Slides from both time-points were de-identified, shuffled and graded by Dr John Croese after which results from poorly orientated slides were verified by Dr Andrew Clouston. The Vh:Cd ratios were measured on 5 randomly selected well-orientated sites. The null hypothesis is that hookworm infection will not protect against mucosal damage following 12-week exposure to gluten in celiac disease.
3 secondary outcomes
Intraepithelial Lymphocyte Count
Time frame: Week-24 and -36
Number of Participants With 2 Points Increase in Marsh Score Post GC-1g
Time frame: Longitudinal change between week-24 and week-36
Serum Anti-tissue Transglutaminase Antibodies Measured as International Units/mL (IU/mL)
Time frame: Anti-tTG IU/mL levels pre-trial, mid-trial and after 3 gram/day gluten challenge
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Oct 2014.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 21408161Daveson AJ, Jones DM, Gaze S, McSorley H, Clouston A, Pascoe A, Cooke S, Speare R, Macdonald GA, Anderson R, McCarthy JS, Loukas A, Croese J. Effect of hookworm infection on wheat challenge in celiac disease--a randomised double-blinded placebo controlled trial. PLoS One. 2011 Mar 8;6(3):e17366. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017366.
Related trials for Celiac Disease
RecruitingObservational study
Impact of Mediterranean Diet and Processed Food Consumption on Gastrointestinal Symptoms in Coeliac Patients on a Gluten-Free Diet
Celiac Disease, Gluten-free Diet
Active, not recruitingEarly Phase 1
VTP-1000 in Adults With Celiac Disease
Celiac Disease
Recruiting
GF-NOURISH (Gluten Free Nutrition Optimization Through Ultra-processed Food Reduction and Improved Strategies for Health)
Celiac Disease in Children, Nutrition Disorder, Child
RecruitingObservational study
Celiac Disease Genomic Environmental Microbiome and Metabolomic Study
Celiac Disease
RecruitingObservational study
Pathogenic Study of Adult Immune Enteropathies
Celiac Disease, Autoimmune Enteropathy
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
John Croese, MD study director
The Prince Charles Hospital, Centre for Biodiscovery and Molecular Development of Therapeutics
Dianne Jones, BAppSc principal investigator
Logan Hospital
Alexander Loukas, PhD principal investigator
Centre for Biodiscovery and Molecular Development of Therapeutics, James Cook University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1/2 study testing Necator americanus in people with Celiac Disease, run by The Prince Charles Hospital at 1 site in Australia.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Oct 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Australia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 13 Oct 2014). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Duodenal Villus Height:Crypt Depth (time frame: Week -24 to -36). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01661933, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Oct 2014.