AsthmaPhase 4NCT01662778
The Clinical Effect of Monodisperse Fluticasone Propionate in Asthma
A Phase 4 study testing 1.5 microns at 50mg, 6 microns at 50mg and MDI FP in people with Asthma, run by Imperial College London at 2 sites in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
The objective here is to determine that the efficiency of inhaled drug delivery can be improved by using a fine mist cloud of drug particles (as opposed to a coarse mist cloud of drug particles). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Asthma
- What is being tested?
- 1.5 microns at 50mg, 6 microns at 50mg and MDI FP
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 21 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- Dec 2011to Dec 2012
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Male or females aged greater than 18 years with a documented history of reversible airways disease responding to beta2-adrenergic therapy.
- Asthmatic patients who are free from significant cardiac, gastrointestinal, hepatic, renal, haematological, neurological and psychiatric disease.
- Patients who are stabilized on 500 micrograms or less of inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate or alternative inhaled corticosteroid (budesonide or ciclesonide).
- Patients who are able and willing to give written informed consent to take part in the study
- Not taking any regular medication that is contraindicated in those about to receive fluitcasone propionate (as indicated in the British National Formularly); other than the oral contraceptive pill.
Who cannot join
- Those requiring maintenance oral or parenteral corticosteroid therapy for their airways disease or patients who have ceased maintenance oral or parenteral corticosteroid therapy within the four weeks prior to visit 1
- Those requiring greater than 500 micrograms of inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate or alternative inhaled corticosteroid (budesonide or ciclesonide).
- Subjects that have received inhaled or intravenous fluticasone propionate in the last 2 months.
- Those whose reversible airways obstruction has been unstable in the last four weeks (indicated by any change in their maintenance therapy).
- Those participants who have had a lower respiratory tract infection in the previous four weeks
- Those who have donated 450ml blood or more within the previous 1 month.
Show all 11Show fewer
- Those who have a history of drug allergy which, in the opinion of the Unit Physician, contraindicates his/her participation in the study.
- Any female volunteer or females who are pregnant or lactating or are likely to become pregnant during the trial. Women of child-bearing potential may be included in the study if, in the opinion of the investigator, they are taking adequate contraceptive precautions.
- Participants with a known or suspected allergy to corticosteroids or any component of the formulations and/or Suspected hypersensitivity to inhaled corticosteroid (this will be asked directly at the screening visit).
- Any patient with a contraindication to taking an inhaled steroid and specifically FP, listed in the British National Formulary will not be entered into this study
- Those who have experienced an acute asthma exacerbation requiring emergency room treatment and/or hospitalisation within one month of visit 1.
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
United Kingdom2 sites
Asthma Lab, Royal Brompton Hospital
London, SW36LY
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Royal Brompton Hospital
London, SW36NP
About this study
Official title: The Clinical Effect in Asthma of Inhaled Fluticasone Propionate Delivered as Monodisperse Aerosols
The objective here is to determine that the efficiency of inhaled drug delivery can be improved by using a fine mist cloud of drug particles (as opposed to a coarse mist cloud of drug particles). This information will be valuable in designing new inhalers in order to improve their beneficial effects and reduce their side effects, by using the least possible drug dose to achieve a good patient response.
.
Read the detailed description
Inhaled drug therapy is an established and effective means to treat lung diseases such as asthma. Medical inhalers ('puffers') form the cornerstone of the management of patients with respiratory/lung problems. Inhaled treatment usually comprises placing an inhaler (puffer) in the mouth and inhaling a measured dose of drug from the puffer. The drug dose needs to bypass the throat and reach the lungs, in order to be effective.
However, there is still much that is not known about what actually happens to the inhaled drug in the lungs. Much of the inhaled drug dose from a puffer fails to reach the lungs with most of it hitting the back of the throat. Only a small amount (approximately as little as 20%) of the drug reaches the important parts of the lungs to have a beneficial effect. Particle size has a significant influence on our ability to get the inhaled drug to the important parts of the lungs. In order to get the inhaled drug to these important parts of the lungs it is necessary to understand how much of a clinical improvement is obtained when identical doses of FP are inhaled with different particle sizes.
Inhalers (are a bit like hairspray cans or air fresher cans) and produce aerosol clouds of particles. Medical inhalers come in different shapes and sizes and have a variety of drugs used to treat patients. Inhalers used in routine clinical practice produce a 'coarse' mist of drug particles, which have the potential for side effects, as different sized particle will deposit in different parts of the respiratory tract and include; the mouth, the throat, the windpipe, and the bloodstream (all places we do not want the inhaled drug to 'deposit') and the lungs (where we do want the drug to go). This is particularly an important consideration with inhaled steroids that are commonly used in the management of patients with asthma and bronchitis and emphysema. For example, a common side effect is that the deposition of steroid drug in the throat can lead to a hoarse or altered voice, and sometimes thrush of the throat.
In contrast, monodisperse aerosols are special 'fine-mist' aerosols, where all the drug particles are of one particle size. We can use these aerosols to investigate the science of the way the lungs handle and respond to inhaled drugs of different particle size.
We shall use small and large drug particles. In order to deliver the inhaled drug as a monodisperse aerosol, we shall use a spinning top aerosol generator (STAG) (a large research nebuliser machine) which is able to selectively generate aerosol clouds that have a fine mist. This is an efficient machine compared to current nebulisers used in routine clinical practice, where it can often be difficult to control the inhaled drug dose to the patient; sometimes the patient gets too little a dose because the nebuliser is an inefficient inhaler device. But, also, by improving the efficiency of inhaled drug delivery - will allow lower drug doses to be used - which will decrease the potential for patient side effects.
We have previously undertaken and published in the medical literature a series of clinical studies in patients with asthma using the STAG 'fine-mist' aerosol system and the 'reliever' drug salbutamol (ventolin). Also, we are currently undertaking the investigation of the pharmacokinetic effects of inhaling the 'preventer ' steroid class of drug FP at different particle sizes.
The main question is now can we improve the beneficial effect the inhaled drug has on the lungs by altering the particle size. This study will form the next step in the investigation of this commonly used inhaled steroid Fluticasone Propionate, used in asthma, bronchitis and emphysema patients.
We hope this investigation will help to provide further answers to the rationale that by improving the efficiency of drug delivery (by changing drug particle size) one may improve inhaled drug delivery and improve clinical benefit.
- Conditions
- Asthma
- Being tested
- 1.5 microns at 50mg, 6 microns at 50mg, Placebo Comparator, MDI FP
- Keywords
- Monodisperse aerosols, Asthmatics, Pharmacokinetics, AMP Challenge, Multiple Breath Nitrogen Washout
- Medical subject headings
- Asthma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
1.5 microns at 50mgDrug
Also called STAG 1.5um
STAG generated monodisperse 1.5micron particles
6 microns at 50mgDrug
Also called STAG 6um
STAG generated monodisperse 6 micron particles
Placebo ComparatorDrug
Also called STAG placebo
No drug just solvent
MDI FPDrug
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Monodisperse FP 1.5um | Active comparator | 50 mg of monodisperse Fluticasone Propionate delivered as 1.5 microns aerosol followed by AMP PC20 challenge test Receives: Drug: 1.5 microns at 50mg |
| Monodisperse FP 6.0um | Active comparator | 50 mg of monodisperse Fluticasone Propionate delivered as 6.0 microns aerosol followed by AMP PC20 challenge test Receives: Drug: 6 microns at 50mg |
| Placebo STAG | Placebo comparator | No active drug, just solvent delivered from STAG followed by AMP PC20 challenge test Receives: Drug: Placebo Comparator |
| MDI FP | Active comparator | Fluticasone Propionate , Metered dose inhaler, 250 mg dose followed by AMP PC20 challenge test Receives: Drug: MDI FP |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
AMP Challenge Test PC20
The concentration of Adenosine Monophosphate (AMP), measured in mg/ml, required to see a 20% fall in the patient's forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) is measured after taking FP aerosol. AMP is a bronchoconstrictor agent (ie it narrows the airways. We would expect that more would be necessary to produce the same 20% fall in FEV1 after receiving the FP than before due to the reduction in airways inflammation. This change is the primary outcome measure.
Measured: 2 hours
Secondary outcomes (3)
The Concentration of Fluticasone Propionate
The concentration of Fluticasone Propionate in blood following inhalation of the dose will be measured. Cmax will be measured.
Measured: 4 hours
Spirometry
FEV1 and FVC will be measured before and after drug administration
Measured: 0 and 4 hours
Multi-breath Nitrogen Washout Test
At each study visit subjects will breathe in oxygen from a machine, which at the same time will measure the composition of the gases in each exhaled breath. The main gas we are interested in is nitrogen as this makes up the bulk of the air that we breathe. This test is known as the 'multi-breath nitrogen washout'. The test takes 20 minutes and we shall do this at the beginning and at the end of each study visit.
Measured: 0 and 4 hours
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Aug 2012 (estimated)
- Study startDec 2011
- Primary completionDec 2012
- Study completionDec 2012
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for AsthmaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Imperial College LondonThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 21 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Imperial College London
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- GlaxoSmithKline
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Omar Usmani, MBBS, Principal investigator, Imperial College London
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01662778
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CRO1694
- Status last verified
- Oct 2019
- First submitted
- 7 Aug 2012
- Last updated
- 18 Nov 2019
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Biddiscombe MF, Barnes PJ, Usmani OS. Generating monodisperse pharmacological aerosols using the spinning-top aerosol generator. J Aerosol Med. 2006 Fall;19(3):245-53. doi: 10.1089/jam.2006.19.245.
PubMed 17034300Usmani OS, Biddiscombe MF, Barnes PJ. Regional lung deposition and bronchodilator response as a function of beta2-agonist particle size. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2005 Dec 15;172(12):1497-504. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200410-1414OC. Epub 2005 Sep 28.
PubMed 16192448Usmani OS, Biddiscombe MF, Nightingale JA, Underwood SR, Barnes PJ. Effects of bronchodilator particle size in asthmatic patients using monodisperse aerosols. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2003 Nov;95(5):2106-12. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00525.2003. Epub 2003 Aug 1.
PubMed 12897033Biddiscombe MF, Usmani OS, Barnes PJ. A system for the production and delivery of monodisperse salbutamol aerosols to the lungs. Int J Pharm. 2003 Mar 26;254(2):243-53. doi: 10.1016/s0378-5173(03)00032-2.
PubMed 12623200
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Nov 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Clinical Effect in Asthma of Inhaled Fluticasone Propionate Delivered as Monodisperse Aerosols
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01662778
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CRO1694
- Conditions
- Asthma
- Keywords
- Monodisperse aerosols, Asthmatics, Pharmacokinetics, AMP Challenge, Multiple Breath Nitrogen Washout
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 21 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Imperial College LondonUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- GlaxoSmithKline
- Study start
- Dec 2011
- Primary completion
- Dec 2012 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2012 (actual)
- First posted
- 10 Aug 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 18 Nov 2019
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The objective here is to determine that the efficiency of inhaled drug delivery can be improved by using a fine mist cloud of drug particles (as opposed to a coarse mist cloud of drug particles). This information will be valuable in designing new inhalers in order to improve their beneficial effects and reduce their side effects, by using the least possible drug dose to achieve a good patient response.
.
Detailed description
Inhaled drug therapy is an established and effective means to treat lung diseases such as asthma. Medical inhalers ('puffers') form the cornerstone of the management of patients with respiratory/lung problems. Inhaled treatment usually comprises placing an inhaler (puffer) in the mouth and inhaling a measured dose of drug from the puffer. The drug dose needs to bypass the throat and reach the lungs, in order to be effective.
However, there is still much that is not known about what actually happens to the inhaled drug in the lungs. Much of the inhaled drug dose from a puffer fails to reach the lungs with most of it hitting the back of the throat. Only a small amount (approximately as little as 20%) of the drug reaches the important parts of the lungs to have a beneficial effect. Particle size has a significant influence on our ability to get the inhaled drug to the important parts of the lungs. In order to get the inhaled drug to these important parts of the lungs it is necessary to understand how much of a clinical improvement is obtained when identical doses of FP are inhaled with different particle sizes.
Inhalers (are a bit like hairspray cans or air fresher cans) and produce aerosol clouds of particles. Medical inhalers come in different shapes and sizes and have a variety of drugs used to treat patients. Inhalers used in routine clinical practice produce a 'coarse' mist of drug particles, which have the potential for side effects, as different sized particle will deposit in different parts of the respiratory tract and include; the mouth, the throat, the windpipe, and the bloodstream (all places we do not want the inhaled drug to 'deposit') and the lungs (where we do want the drug to go). This is particularly an important consideration with inhaled steroids that are commonly used in the management of patients with asthma and bronchitis and emphysema. For example, a common side effect is that the deposition of steroid drug in the throat can lead to a hoarse or altered voice, and sometimes thrush of the throat.
In contrast, monodisperse aerosols are special 'fine-mist' aerosols, where all the drug particles are of one particle size. We can use these aerosols to investigate the science of the way the lungs handle and respond to inhaled drugs of different particle size.
We shall use small and large drug particles. In order to deliver the inhaled drug as a monodisperse aerosol, we shall use a spinning top aerosol generator (STAG) (a large research nebuliser machine) which is able to selectively generate aerosol clouds that have a fine mist. This is an efficient machine compared to current nebulisers used in routine clinical practice, where it can often be difficult to control the inhaled drug dose to the patient; sometimes the patient gets too little a dose because the nebuliser is an inefficient inhaler device. But, also, by improving the efficiency of inhaled drug delivery - will allow lower drug doses to be used - which will decrease the potential for patient side effects.
We have previously undertaken and published in the medical literature a series of clinical studies in patients with asthma using the STAG 'fine-mist' aerosol system and the 'reliever' drug salbutamol (ventolin). Also, we are currently undertaking the investigation of the pharmacokinetic effects of inhaling the 'preventer ' steroid class of drug FP at different particle sizes.
The main question is now can we improve the beneficial effect the inhaled drug has on the lungs by altering the particle size. This study will form the next step in the investigation of this commonly used inhaled steroid Fluticasone Propionate, used in asthma, bronchitis and emphysema patients.
We hope this investigation will help to provide further answers to the rationale that by improving the efficiency of drug delivery (by changing drug particle size) one may improve inhaled drug delivery and improve clinical benefit.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Monodisperse FP 1.5um | Active comparator | Drug: 1.5 microns at 50mg50 mg of monodisperse Fluticasone Propionate delivered as 1.5 microns aerosol followed by AMP PC20 challenge test |
| Monodisperse FP 6.0um | Active comparator | Drug: 6 microns at 50mg50 mg of monodisperse Fluticasone Propionate delivered as 6.0 microns aerosol followed by AMP PC20 challenge test |
| Placebo STAG | Placebo comparator | Drug: Placebo ComparatorNo active drug, just solvent delivered from STAG followed by AMP PC20 challenge test |
| MDI FP | Active comparator | Drug: MDI FPFluticasone Propionate , Metered dose inhaler, 250 mg dose followed by AMP PC20 challenge test |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Male or females aged greater than 18 years with a documented history of reversible airways disease responding to beta2-adrenergic therapy.
- Asthmatic patients who are free from significant cardiac, gastrointestinal, hepatic, renal, haematological, neurological and psychiatric disease.
- Patients who are stabilized on 500 micrograms or less of inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate or alternative inhaled corticosteroid (budesonide or ciclesonide).
- Patients who are able and willing to give written informed consent to take part in the study
- Not taking any regular medication that is contraindicated in those about to receive fluitcasone propionate (as indicated in the British National Formularly); other than the oral contraceptive pill.
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Those requiring maintenance oral or parenteral corticosteroid therapy for their airways disease or patients who have ceased maintenance oral or parenteral corticosteroid therapy within the four weeks prior to visit 1
- Those requiring greater than 500 micrograms of inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate or alternative inhaled corticosteroid (budesonide or ciclesonide).
- Subjects that have received inhaled or intravenous fluticasone propionate in the last 2 months.
- Those whose reversible airways obstruction has been unstable in the last four weeks (indicated by any change in their maintenance therapy).
- Those participants who have had a lower respiratory tract infection in the previous four weeks
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| 1.5 microns at 50mgAlso: STAG 1.5umSTAG generated monodisperse 1.5micron particles | Drug | Monodisperse FP 1.5um |
| 6 microns at 50mgAlso: STAG 6umSTAG generated monodisperse 6 micron particles | Drug | Monodisperse FP 6.0um |
| Placebo ComparatorAlso: STAG placeboNo drug just solvent | Drug | Placebo STAG |
| MDI FP | Drug | MDI FP |
Primary outcome
AMP Challenge Test PC20
Time frame: 2 hours
The concentration of Adenosine Monophosphate (AMP), measured in mg/ml, required to see a 20% fall in the patient's forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) is measured after taking FP aerosol. AMP is a bronchoconstrictor agent (ie it narrows the airways. We would expect that more would be necessary to produce the same 20% fall in FEV1 after receiving the FP than before due to the reduction in airways inflammation. This change is the primary outcome measure.
3 secondary outcomes
The Concentration of Fluticasone Propionate
Time frame: 4 hours
Spirometry
Time frame: 0 and 4 hours
Multi-breath Nitrogen Washout Test
Time frame: 0 and 4 hours
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Nov 2019.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 17034300Biddiscombe MF, Barnes PJ, Usmani OS. Generating monodisperse pharmacological aerosols using the spinning-top aerosol generator. J Aerosol Med. 2006 Fall;19(3):245-53. doi: 10.1089/jam.2006.19.245.
- Background: PubMed 16192448Usmani OS, Biddiscombe MF, Barnes PJ. Regional lung deposition and bronchodilator response as a function of beta2-agonist particle size. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2005 Dec 15;172(12):1497-504. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200410-1414OC. Epub 2005 Sep 28.
- Background: PubMed 12897033Usmani OS, Biddiscombe MF, Nightingale JA, Underwood SR, Barnes PJ. Effects of bronchodilator particle size in asthmatic patients using monodisperse aerosols. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2003 Nov;95(5):2106-12. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00525.2003. Epub 2003 Aug 1.
- Background: PubMed 12623200Biddiscombe MF, Usmani OS, Barnes PJ. A system for the production and delivery of monodisperse salbutamol aerosols to the lungs. Int J Pharm. 2003 Mar 26;254(2):243-53. doi: 10.1016/s0378-5173(03)00032-2.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Asthma
RecruitingPhase 1
Pilot Study to Identify the Mediators and Inflammatory Cell Surface Receptors Involved in Allergic Airway Inflammation
Asthma
Recruiting
THERMotherapy Against Persistent Bacterial LUNG Infections
Lung Diseases, Obstructive, Bronchiectasis
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study to Compare the Relative Potency of Salbutamol Administered Via Metered Dose Inhalers (MDI) Containing Propellants HFA-152a to HFA-134a in Mild Asthmatics Aged 18 to 65 Inclusive
Asthma, Mild Asthma
Active, not recruitingPhase 2/3
Local Antibiotic Delivery for Community Acquired Pneumonia
Community Acquired Pneumonia (CAP)
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study to Learn About the Study Medicine Called PF-07275315 in People With Moderate-To-Severe Asthma
Asthma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Omar Usmani, MBBS principal investigator
Imperial College London
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing 1.5 microns at 50mg, 6 microns at 50mg and MDI FP in people with Asthma, run by Imperial College London at 2 sites in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Nov 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 18 Nov 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
AMP Challenge Test PC20 (time frame: 2 hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01662778, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Nov 2019; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 8 Nov 2026.