AzTrials
AzTrials

Puerperal SepsisNCT01665456

Assessing Childbirth-related Complications at the Community Level in Kenya

An observational study of Puerperal Sepsis and Postpartum Hemorrhage, run by Wilson Liambila at 1 site in Kenya.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Kenya is one of the countries in sub-Saharan Africa that still experience high maternal mortality. For instance, in 2008/09 maternal mortality ratio was estimated to be 488/100,000 live births. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 15 to 49 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
How many people
585 participants
Where
1 siteKenya
Study dates
Aug 2012to Mar 2014
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 15 to 49 years
  • Women only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child, Adult

Study population: The study population consisted of women aged 15-49 years with a delivery within 12 months preceding data collection date. A woman who reported having experienced a birth-related complication was recruited as a case. A woman aged 15-49 years with a delivery within 12 months preceding data collection who report having experienced no complication during child-birth was recruited as a control.

Case Inclusion criteria:

  • Delivery in the past 12 months
  • Suffered from obstetric complications during child birth and within 42days
  • Provided oral or written informed consent to participate in the study
  • Age ranges 15-49 years

Control inclusion criteria

  • Delivered in the past 12 months
  • Did not suffer from obstetric complications during child birth and within 42 days after delivery
  • Provided oral or written informed consent to participate in the study
  • Age ranges 15-49 years

Case and Control exclusion criteria:

  • Did not deliver in the past 12 months;
  • Refused to participate in the study;
  • Excluded as controls if experienced complications similar to cases
  • Excluded as cases if they didnot experience complications
  • If unable to give informed consent or follow an interview

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Kenya1 site
  • Lugari and Bungoma districts

    Kakamega, Western Province

Other trials in Kenya

About this study

Official title: Assessing Childbirth-related Complications at the Community Level in Kenya: A Case Control Study Among Postpartum Women

Kenya is one of the countries in sub-Saharan Africa that still experience high maternal mortality. For instance, in 2008/09 maternal mortality ratio was estimated to be 488/100,000 live births. Direct obstetric complications such as puerperal sepsis, postpartum hemorrhage, pre-eclampsia and eclampsia, obstructed labor and indirect causes including HIV, malaria and anemia in pregnancy are responsible for the majority of these cases. Just under 44% of births in Kenya are delivered under the supervision of a skilled birth attendant.

The overall objective of this study is to determine the effect of provider type in the occurrence and management of serious childbirth related complications among postpartum women at the community level in Bungoma and Lugari Districts of Western Province, Kenya.

Read more

The proposed study will employ a case control study design in which women with obstetric complication(s)will be cases and women without obstetric complications will be controls. Controls will be sampled concurrently with the cases. Each time a new case is diagnosed, a control is selected from the population at risk in the neighborhood at that point in time.

The study population will consist of women aged 15-49 years with a delivery in the past 12 months. A woman who reports having experienced a birth-related complication will be recruited as a case while woman who reports having experienced no complication during child-birth will be recruited as a control.

Read the detailed description

Evidence from published literature is scanty on the effect of various categories of health providers in averting serious child birth related complications at the community level. For instance, no one knows what happens to pregnancy outcomes for both the mother and the baby in a context where a significant proportion of women are delivered by neighbors, relatives or on their own. Literature is also scanty regarding the outcomes of child birth related complications in situations where Traditional Birth Attendants conduct a significant proportion of deliveries.

A thorough understanding of factors that fuel disrespect and abuse as well as their effect on utilization of delivery services will help providers and programme managers to explore ways of addressing this issue. This study hypothesizes that since majority of deliveries take place at the household level, most complications and even deaths are likely to occur at this level.

The overall objective of this study is to determine the effect of provider type in the occurrence and management of serious childbirth related complications among postpartum women at the community level in Bungoma and Lugari Districts of Western Province, Kenya. Specific objectives of the study are:

To determine the quality of obstetric care given by community midwives and TBAs to clients seeking antenatal care, during delivery and post-partum care at the community level by assessing providers' preparedness and the range of services offered.

To assess the nature of obstetric complications among those women who were delivered by skilled health providers, versus those who were delivered by TBAs, neighbors, friends or on their own To determine the role of socio-economic, demographic and health service related factors in the occurrence of child birth related complications at the community level To obtain views from key stakeholders on the extent and occurrence of child birth related complications at the community level

Keywords
complications
Medical subject headings
Puerperal Infection, Postpartum Hemorrhage, Pre-Eclampsia, Eclampsia, Placenta, Retained

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT01665456
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Cases (women with complications)Cases are women aged 15-49 years who delivered within 12 months prior to data collection and had experienced obstetric complication(s) that either necessitated treatment or hospitalization in order to prevent the likelihood of death of the mother.
Control (women who did not experience any complications)Controls are women aged 15-49 years who delivered within 12 months prior to data collection. They did not have or develop any of the complications which cases experienced or suffered from.Although controls did not have complications, they were individually matched on the basis of age and location. The idea was to compare how many cases were exposed versus how many controls were exposed.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The odds ratio was the primary outcome measure of association between the the occurrence of complications and exposure to health providers in the past 12 months.

    The study sought to determine the association of provider type with the occurrence and management of serious childbirth related complications among postpartum women at the community level in Kenya in the past 12 months.The odds of exposure among cases were compared to the odds of exposure among controls to estimate the magnitude of association between exposure to health providers and other caregivers and the occurrence of complications.

    Measured: One Year

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Proportion of women receiving skilled attendance at birth in the community in the past 12 months.

    This secondary outcome measure was assessed by collecting information on the nature of obstetric complications among those women who were delivered by skilled health providers, versus those who were delivered by Traditional Birth attendants, neighbours, friends or delivered on their own.

    Measured: One Year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted15 Aug 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study startAug 2012
  3. Primary completionNov 2013
  4. Study completionMar 2014

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
585 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01665456
Sponsor's protocol ID
P141/03/2012
Status last verified
Apr 2014
First submitted
9 Aug 2012
Last updated
28 Apr 2014
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Brennan M. Training traditional birth attendants reduces maternal mortality and morbidity. Trop J Obstet Gynaecol. 1988;1(1):44-7.

    PubMed 12179276
  • Koblinsky MA, Tinker A, Daly P. Programming for safe motherhood: a guide to action. Health Policy Plan. 1994 Sep;9(3):252-66. doi: 10.1093/heapol/9.3.252.

    PubMed 10137741
  • Bisika T. The effectiveness of the TBA programme in reducing maternal mortality and morbidity in Malawi. East Afr J Public Health. 2008 Aug;5(2):103-10.

    PubMed 19024419
  • Magoma M, Requejo J, Campbell OM, Cousens S, Filippi V. High ANC coverage and low skilled attendance in a rural Tanzanian district: a case for implementing a birth plan intervention. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2010 Mar 19;10:13. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-10-13.

    PubMed 20302625
  • Knol MJ, Vandenbroucke JP, Scott P, Egger M. What do case-control studies estimate? Survey of methods and assumptions in published case-control research. Am J Epidemiol. 2008 Nov 1;168(9):1073-81. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwn217. Epub 2008 Sep 15.

    PubMed 18794220
  • Mushi D, Mpembeni R, Jahn A. Effectiveness of community based Safe Motherhood promoters in improving the utilization of obstetric care. The case of Mtwara Rural District in Tanzania. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2010 Apr 1;10:14. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-10-14.

    PubMed 20359341
  • Thatte N, Mullany LC, Khatry SK, Katz J, Tielsch JM, Darmstadt GL. Traditional birth attendants in rural Nepal: knowledge, attitudes and practices about maternal and newborn health. Glob Public Health. 2009;4(6):600-17. doi: 10.1080/17441690802472406.

    PubMed 19431006
  • Kwast BE. Reduction of maternal and perinatal mortality in rural and peri-urban settings: what works? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1996 Oct;69(1):47-53. doi: 10.1016/0301-2115(95)02535-9.

    PubMed 8909956
  • Maine D, Akalin MZ, Chakraborty J, de Francisco A, Strong M. Why did maternal mortality decline in Matlab? Stud Fam Plann. 1996 Jul-Aug;27(4):179-87.

    PubMed 8875731
  • Rodrigues L, Kirkwood BR. Case-control designs in the study of common diseases: updates on the demise of the rare disease assumption and the choice of sampling scheme for controls. Int J Epidemiol. 1990 Mar;19(1):205-13. doi: 10.1093/ije/19.1.205.

    PubMed 2190942

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Puerperal Sepsis and Postpartum Hemorrhage, run by Wilson Liambila at 1 site in Kenya.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Apr 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Kenya. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The odds ratio was the primary outcome measure of association between the the occurrence of complications and exposure to health providers in the past 12 months. (time frame: One Year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01665456, which also lists 10 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Apr 2014; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 7 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in