Advanced or Metastatic (Medically or Surgically Unresectable) Clear-cell Renal Cell CarcinomaPhase 3NCT01668784
Study of Nivolumab (BMS-936558) vs. Everolimus in Pre-Treated Advanced or Metastatic Clear-cell Renal Cell Carcinoma (CheckMate 025)
A Phase 3 study testing Nivolumab and Everolimus in people with Advanced or Metastatic (Medically or Surgically Unresectable) Clear-cell Renal Cell Carcinoma, run by Bristol-Myers Squibb at 168 sites in 24 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of the study is to compare the clinical benefit, as measured by duration of overall survival, of Nivolumab vs. Everolimus in subjects with advanced or metastatic clear-cell renal cell carcinoma who have received prior anti-angiogenic therapy Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Advanced or Metastatic (Medically or Surgically Unresectable) Clear-cell Renal Cell Carcinoma
- What is being tested?
- Nivolumab and Everolimus
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 821 participants
- Where
- 168 sitesin 24 countries
- Study dates
- 9 Oct 2012to 19 Jul 2021
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Men \& women ≥18 years of age
- Histologic confirmation of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with clear-cell component
- Advanced/metastatic RCC
- Measurable disease per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 criteria
- Received 1 or 2 prior anti-angiogenic therapy regimens in advanced or metastatic setting
- No more than 3 total prior systemic treatment regimens in the advanced or metastatic setting, and evidence of progression on or after last treatment regimen received and within 6 months of enrollment
- Karnofsky Performance Score ≥70%
Who cannot join
- Any Central Nervous System (CNS) metastases or history of CNS metastases
- Prior therapy with an Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor
- Any active known or suspected autoimmune disease
- Uncontrolled adrenal insufficiency
- Active chronic liver disease
- Prior malignancy active within past 3 years, except for locally curable cancers
- Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria apply
Trial locations and contacts
168 sites in 24 countries.
168 sites in 24 countries
United States39 sites
University Of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109-5946
Winship Cancer Institute.
Atlanta, Georgia, 30322
University Of Colorado
Aurora, Colorado, 80045
Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center At Johns Hopkins
Baltimore, Maryland, 21231-1000
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02215
Roswell Park Cancer Institute
Buffalo, New York, 14263
Medical University Of South Carolina
Charleston, South Carolina, 29425
Levine Cancer Institute
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28204
Northwestern University
Chicago, Illinois, 60611
The Ohio State University
Columbus, Ohio, 43210
Ut Southwestern Medical Center
Dallas, Texas, 75390-9133
Karmanos Cancer Institute
Detroit, Michigan, 48201
Duke University Medical Center
Durham, North Carolina, 27710
Local Institution - 0182
Fayetteville, Arkansas, 72703
St Francis Hospital
Greenville, South Carolina, 29601
Local Institution - 0139
Houston, Texas, 77030-4009
Indiana University Simon Cancer Center
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202
University Of Iowa Hospitals And Clinics
Iowa City, Iowa, 52242
UCSD Moores Cancer Center
La Jolla, California, 92093-0698
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
Lebanon, New Hampshire, 03756
Local Institution - 0024
Los Angeles, California, 90033
University Of Southern California
Los Angeles, California, 90033
Cedars Sinai Medical Center
Los Angeles, California, 90048
Loyola University Chicago
Maywood, Illinois, 60153
Tennessee Oncology, PLLC
Nashville, Tennessee, 37203
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Nashville, Tennessee, 37232-6307
Memorial Sloan Kettering Nassau
New York, New York, 10065
Weill Cornell Medical College
New York, New York, 10065
Fox Chase Cancer Center
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19111
Temple University Hospital
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19140
Local Institution - 0076
Richmond, Virginia, 23229
CTRC at UTHSC San Antonio
San Antonio, Texas, 78229
Ucsf Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center
San Francisco, California, 94115
Local Institution - 0009
Seattle, Washington, 98109
University Of Washington
Seattle, Washington, 98109
Stanford Cancer Institute
Stanford, California, 94305
H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute
Tampa, Florida, 33612-9497
Georgetown University Medical Center
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20007
Local Institution - 0027
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20007
Japan21 sites
Local Institution
Akita, Akita, 0108543
Local Institution
Chiba, Chiba, 2608717
Local Institution - 0167
Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, 4313192
Local Institution
Higashiku, Fukuoka, 812-8582
Local Institution
Kobe-city, Hyogo, 650-0017
Local Institution
Kumamoto, 860-8556
Local Institution
Kyoto, Kyoto, 602-8566
Local Institution
Morioka, Iwate, 0208505
Local Institution
Osaka-sayama-shi, Osaka, 5898511
Local Institution
Sapporo, Hokkaido, 0608543
Local Institution
Sapporo, Hokkaido, 0608648
Local Institution - 0169
Suita, Osaka, 5650871
Local Institution
Tokushima, Tokushima, 7708503
Local Institution
Tokyo, 1138603
Local Institution
Tokyo, 1138655
Local Institution
Tokyo, 1358550
Local Institution
Tokyo, 1608582
Local Institution
Tokyo, 1628666
Local Institution
Tokyo, 1738606
Local Institution
Yamagata, Yamagata, 9909585
Local Institution
Yokohama, Kanagawa, 2360004
France17 sites
Local Institution - 0008
Bordeaux, 33075
Local Institution
Bordeaux, 33075
Local Institution - 0007
Lyon, 69373
Local Institution
Lyon, 69373
Local Institution - 0004
Marseille, 13009
Local Institution
Marseille, 13009
Local Institution - 0118
Paris, 75908
Local Institution - 0003
Poitiers, 86000
Local Institution
Poitiers, 86000
Local Institution - 0005
Saint-Herblain, 44805
Local Institution
Saint-Herblain, 44805
Local Institution - 0012
Toulouse, 31059
Local Institution
Toulouse, 31059
Local Institution - 0006
Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, Lorraine, 54519
Local Institution
Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, 54511
Local Institution - 0002
Villejuif, 94805
Local Institution
Villejuif, 94805
Canada9 sites
Tom Baker Cancer Centre
Calgary, Alberta, T2N 4N2
Cross Cancer Institute
Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 1Z2
QEII Health Sciences Centre
Halfax, Nova Scotia, B3H 2Y9
Centre D'Oncologie Dr-Leon-Richard
Moncton, New Brunswick, E1C 8X3
Chum, Hopital Notre-Dame
Montreal, Quebec, H2L 4M1
Local Institution - 0145
Montreal, H3T 1E2
Local Institution - 0143
Oshawa, Ontario, L1G 2B9
Princess Margaret Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2M9
BC Cancer Agency - Vancouver Centre
Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 4E6
Italy9 sites
Local Institution
Arezzo, 52100
Local Institution
Meldola (fc), 47014
Local Institution - 0082
Milan, 20133
Local Institution
Rimini, 47900
Local Institution
Roma, 00144
Local Institution
Roma, 00152
Local Institution - 0102
Rozzano, 20089
Local Institution
Siena, 53100
Local Institution
Terni, 05100
Germany8 sites
Local Institution
Aachen, 52074
Local Institution
Dresden, 01307
Local Institution
Erlangen, 91054
Local Institution
Essen, 45122
Local Institution
Hanover, 30625
Local Institution - 0126
Heidelberg, 69120
Local Institution
Munich, 81675
Local Institution
Tübingen, 72076
Argentina6 sites
COIBA
Berazategui, Buenos Aires, 1880
Local Institution
Buenos Aires, C1280AEB
Local Institution
Buenos Aires, C1426ANZ
Local Institution
Capital Federal, Buenos Aires, 1431
Instituto Oncologico De Cordoba
Córdoba, X5006HBF
Centro Para La Atencion Integral Del Paciente Oncologico
San Miguel de Tucumán, Tucumán Province, 4000
Poland6 sites
Local Institution
Gdansk, 80-219
Local Institution
Lodz, 93-513
Local Institution
Poznan, 60-569
Local Institution
Rybnik, 44-200
Local Institution
Warsaw, 00-909
Local Institution
Wroclaw, 50-556
Spain6 sites
Local Institution
Barcelona, 08035
Local Institution - 0064
L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08907
Local Institution
Madrid, 28007
Local Institution
Madrid, 28040
Local Institution
Madrid, 28041
Local Institution
Pamplona, Navarre, 31008
Australia5 sites
Local Institution
Box Hill, Victoria, 3128
Local Institution
Clayton, Victoria, 3168
Local Institution
Melbourne, Victoria, 3000
Local Institution - 0095
Westmead, New South Wales, 2145
Local Institution
Woodville South, South Australia, 5011
United Kingdom5 sites
Local Institution
Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, CB2 0QQ
Local Institution
London, Greater London, HA6 2RN
Local Institution
London, Greater London, SW3 6JJ
Local Institution - 0048
Swansea, Carmarthenshire, SA2 8QA
Local Institution
Swansea, Carmarthenshire, SA2 8QA
Belgium4 sites
Local Institution
Brussels, 1090
Local Institution
Brussels, 1200
Local Institution
Ghent, 9000
Local Institution
Leuven, 3000
Israel4 sites
Local Institution
Haifa, 31096
Local Institution - 0148
Petah Tikva, 49100
Local Institution
Ramat Gan, 52621
Local Institution
Tel Aviv, 64239
Romania4 sites
Local Institution
Bucharest, 022328
Local Institution
Craiova, 200385
Local Institution
Iași, 700106
Local Institution
Timișoara, 300167
Austria3 sites
Local Institution
Linz, 4020
Local Institution
Vienna, 1090
Local Institution
Vienna, 1130
Brazil3 sites
Local Institution - 0125
Ijuí, Rio Grande do Sul, 98700-000
Local Institution - 0124
São Paulo, 01246-000
Local Institution
São Paulo, 01321-001
Czechia3 sites
Local Institution
Hradec Králové, 500 05
Local Institution
Olomouc, 779 00
Local Institution
Prague, 150 06
Denmark3 sites
Local Institution
Aarhus N, 8200
Local Institution
Herlev, 2730
Local Institution - 0137
Odense, 5000
Ireland3 sites
Local Institution - 0087
Dublin, 7
Local Institution
Dublin, Dublin 7
Local Institution
Tallaght, Dublin, DUBLIN 24
Russia3 sites
Local Institution
Moscow, 115478
Local Institution
Moscow, 121309
Local Institution
Saint Petersburg, 198255
Greece2 sites
Alexandra General Hospital Of Athens
Athens, 12462
Euromedica General Clinic of Thessaloniki
Thessaloniki, 54645
Sweden2 sites
Local Institution
Gothenberg, 413 45
Local Institution
Solna, 171 64
About this study
Official title: A Randomized, Open-Label, Phase 3 Study of Nivolumab (BMS-936558) vs. Everolimus in Subjects With Advanced or Metastatic Clear-Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Who Have Received Prior Anti-Angiogenic Therapy
The purpose of the study is to compare the clinical benefit, as measured by duration of overall survival, of Nivolumab vs. Everolimus in subjects with advanced or metastatic clear-cell renal cell carcinoma who have received prior anti-angiogenic therapy
- Conditions
- Advanced or Metastatic (Medically or Surgically Unresectable) Clear-cell Renal Cell Carcinoma
- Being tested
- Nivolumab, Everolimus
- Medical subject headings
- Neoplasm Metastasis, Carcinoma, Renal Cell
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
NivolumabBiological
Also called BMS-936558
EverolimusDrug
Also called Afinitor
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Arm 1: Nivolumab | Experimental | Nivolumab 3 mg/kg solution intravenously every 2 weeks until documented disease progression, discontinuation due to toxicity, withdrawal of consent or the study ends Receives: Biological: Nivolumab |
| Arm 2: Everolimus | Active comparator | Everolimus 10 mg tablets by mouth daily until documented disease progression, discontinuation due to toxicity, withdrawal of consent or the study ends Receives: Drug: Everolimus |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Overall Survival (OS) at Primary Endpoint
Overall Survival (OS) was defined as the time from randomization to the date of death. Participants that had not died were censored at last known date alive. Median OS time was calculated using Kaplan-Meier Estimates. Interim analysis for the Primary Endpoint occurred after 398 deaths (70% of the total OS events needed for final analysis). At that time the data monitoring committee noted that the pre-specified boundary for OS (nominal significance level p < 0.0148) was crossed while no new safety signals that would affect continuation of the study were found. The study was stopped early by the Sponsor, Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS) and the interim analysis became the final analysis. As a result, participants in the everolimus groups could be assessed for a crossover to nivolumab treatment if they met all inclusion criteria.
Measured: Randomization until 398 deaths, up to May 2015 (approximately 30 months)
Secondary outcomes (9)
Investigator-assessed Objective Response Rate (ORR)
ORR is defined as Percentage of participants with a best response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) divided by number of randomized participants. CR=Disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to < 10 mm.; PR=At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, the baseline sum diameters used as reference. Tumor assessments began at 8 weeks following randomization and continued every 8 weeks for the first year, then every 12 weeks thereafter until disease progression or death. CIs used Clopper and Pearson.
Measured: from randomization up to disease progression or death (approximately up to 105 Months)
Investigator-assessed Duration of Objective Response
Duration of objective response is defined as the time from study start date to response, CR or partial response, PR) to the date of the first documented tumor progression as determined by the investigator (per RECIST 1.1 criteria or clinical) or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. For participants who neither progress nor die, the duration of objective response were censored at the same time they were censored for the primary definition. CR=Disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to < 10 mm.; PR=At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, the baseline sum diameters used as reference. Based on Kaplan-Meier Estimates.
Measured: From randomization to date of disease progression or death or censoring if no progression or death occurred (approximately 105 months)
Investigator-assessed Time to Objective Response
Time to objective response is defined as the time from randomization to first response (complete response, CR or partial response, PR). CR=Disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to < 10 mm.; PR=At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, the baseline sum diameters used as reference.
Measured: Randomization to date of first response (approximately 105 months)
Investigator-assessed Time of Progression-free Survival (PFS)
PFS=time from randomization to date of first documented tumor progression as determined by investigator (per RECIST 1.1 criteria or clinical) or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Participants who die without a reported prior progression and without subsequent anti-cancer therapy were considered to have progressed on the date of their death. Participants who did not progress or die were censored on the date of their last evaluable tumor assessment. Participants who did not have any on-study tumor assessments and did not die were censored on the date they were randomized. Participants who received any subsequent anti-cancer therapy without a prior reported progression were censored at the last evaluable tumor assessment prior to or on initiation date of the subsequent anti-cancer therapy. Progressive disease: >=20% increase in sum of target lesion diameters and sum must show absolute increase of >=5mm; smallest sum on study as reference. Based on Kaplan-Meier Estimates.
Measured: from randomization up to disease progression or death (approximately up to 105 Months)
Overall Survival (OS) by Programmed Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Expression Level
Quantifiable PD-L1 expression=percent of tumor cell membrane staining in a minimum of 100 evaluable tumor cells per Dako PD-L1 IHC assay. If the PD-L1 staining could not be quantified it was classified as: indeterminate=tumor cell membrane staining hampered for reasons attributed to biology of tumor biopsy specimen and not due to improper sample preparation or handling; not evaluable=tumor biopsy specimen was not optimally collected or prepared. Not evaluable determined from H\&E process before the tumor biopsy specimen was sent for evaluation or from H\&E process during PD-L1 evaluation; baseline PD-L1 expression=if more than one tumor biopsy specimen was available, the most recently collected specimen with a quantifiable result. If all specimens for a given participant are either indeterminate or not evaluable, then the PD-L1 expression was considered indeterminate as long as at least one specimen is indeterminate. Otherwise, PD-L1 expression was considered not evaluable.
Measured: Randomization to date of death or date of last contact for patients without documentation of death, up to May 2015 (approximately 30 months)
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events, Death, Discontinuation Due to Adverse Events
Adverse event (AE) defined: any new unfavorable symptom, sign, or disease or worsening of a preexisting condition that may not have a causal relationship with treatment. Serious adverse event (SAE) defined: a medical event that at any dose results in death, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or drug dependency/abuse; is life-threatening, an important medical event, or a congenital anomaly/birth defect; or requires or prolongs hospitalization.
Measured: Day of first dose to 30 days post study completion (approximately 106 months)
Percentage of Participants With Disease-related Symptom Progression (DRSP)
Disease-related symptom progression rate (DRSPR)=a decrease of two points in the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Kidney Symptom Index - Disease Related Symptoms (FKSI-DRS) questionnaire relative to the participant's baseline FKSI-DRS score with no later increase above this threshold observed during the course of the study. The 9 items of the FKSI-DRS were summarized into a symptom scale ranging in score from 0 to 36, with 0 being the worst possible score and 36 being the best possible score. A single measure reporting a decrease of at least 2 units was considered disease-related symptom progression only if it was the last one available for the participant. In order to consider a questionnaire received as valid, over 50% of the items were to be completed. Calculated by the Clopper-Pearson method for each treatment group.
Measured: from randomization up to disease progression or death (approximately up to 105 Months)
Number of Participants Meeting Marked Laboratory Abnormality Criteria in Specific Liver and Thyroid Tests
Aspartate aminotransferase, AST. Alanine aminotransaminase, ALT. Total bilirubin, tBIL. Thyroid stimulating hormone, TSH. Upper limit of normal (ULN). Units per Liter (U/L). Results reported in International System of Units (SI).
Measured: Day 1 to 30 days post study completion (approximately 106 months)
Number of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI Units
Common Terminology Criteria (CTC) version 4.0 in International System of Units (SI); Gr 3=Severe, Gr 4= Potentially Life-threatening or disabling. Hematology parameters=Hemoglobin (Gr 3: < 8.0 g/dL), Platelet Count (Gr 3: 25.0 -< 50.0*10^9 c/L; Gr 4: < 25.0*10^9 c/L), Leukocyte Count (Gr 3: 1.0 -< 2.0*10^3 c/µL; Gr4: < 1.0*10^3 c/µL), Absolute Lymphocyte Count (Gr 3: 0.2 -< 0.5*10^3 c/µL; Gr 4: < 0.2*10^3 c/µL), Absolute Neutrophil Count (Gr 3: 0.5 - < 1.0*10^3 c/µL; Gr 4: < 0.5*10^3 c/µL). Liver Function parameters=Alkaline Phosphatase (Gr 3: > 5.0 - 20.0 U/L * ULN; Gr 4: > 20.0 U/L * ULN), AST (Gr 3: > 5.0 - 20.0 U/L * ULN; Gr 4: > 20.0 U/L * ULN), ALT (Gr 3: > 5.0 - 20.0 U/L * ULN; Gr 4: > 20.0 U/L * ULN), tBIL (Gr 3: > 3.0 - 10.0 mg/dL * ULN; Gr 4: > 10.0 mg/dL * ULN). Renal parameter=Creatinine (Grade: Gr3: > 3.0 - 6.0 mg/dL *ULN; Gr4: > 6.0 mg/dL *ULN). Cells per microliter (c/µL). Cells per Liter (c/L). Grams per deciliter (g/dL). Milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL).
Measured: Day 1 to 30 days post study completion (approximately 106 months)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Aug 2012 (estimated)
- Study start9 Oct 2012
- Primary completion6 May 2015
- Study completion19 Jul 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (8)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Advanced or Metastatic (Medically or Surgically Unresectable) Clear-cell Renal Cell CarcinomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Bristol-Myers SquibbThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 821 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Bristol-Myers Squibb
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Bristol-Myers Squibb, Study director, Bristol-Myers Squibb
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01668784
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CA209-025
- Other IDs
- 2011-005132-26
- Status last verified
- Jul 2022
- First submitted
- 16 Aug 2012
- Last updated
- 9 Aug 2022
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Expanded access
- Available
Publications
Klijn SL, Fenwick E, Kroep S, Johannesen K, Malcolm B, Kurt M, Kiff C, Borrill J. What Did Time Tell Us? A Comparison and Retrospective Validation of Different Survival Extrapolation Methods for Immuno-Oncologic Therapy in Advanced or Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma. Pharmacoeconomics. 2021 Mar;39(3):345-356. doi: 10.1007/s40273-020-00989-1. Epub 2021 Jan 11.
PubMed 33428174Ambavane A, Yang S, Atkins MB, Rao S, Shah A, Regan MM, McDermott DF, Michaelson MD. Clinical and economic outcomes of treatment sequences for intermediate- to poor-risk advanced renal cell carcinoma. Immunotherapy. 2020 Jan;12(1):37-51. doi: 10.2217/imt-2019-0199. Epub 2020 Jan 29.
PubMed 31992108Shah R, Botteman M, Solem CT, Luo L, Doan J, Cella D, Motzer RJ. A Quality-adjusted Time Without Symptoms or Toxicity (Q-TWiST) Analysis of Nivolumab Versus Everolimus in Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma (aRCC). Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2019 Oct;17(5):356-365.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2019.05.010. Epub 2019 May 31.
PubMed 31272883Long GV, Tykodi SS, Schneider JG, Garbe C, Gravis G, Rashford M, Agrawal S, Grigoryeva E, Bello A, Roy A, Rollin L, Zhao X. Assessment of nivolumab exposure and clinical safety of 480 mg every 4 weeks flat-dosing schedule in patients with cancer. Ann Oncol. 2018 Nov 1;29(11):2208-2213. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdy408.
PubMed 30215677Escudier B, Motzer RJ, Sharma P, Wagstaff J, Plimack ER, Hammers HJ, Donskov F, Gurney H, Sosman JA, Zalewski PG, Harmenberg U, McDermott DF, Choueiri TK, Richardet M, Tomita Y, Ravaud A, Doan J, Zhao H, Hardy H, George S. Treatment Beyond Progression in Patients with Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated with Nivolumab in CheckMate 025. Eur Urol. 2017 Sep;72(3):368-376. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.03.037. Epub 2017 Apr 12.
PubMed 28410865Escudier B, Sharma P, McDermott DF, George S, Hammers HJ, Srinivas S, Tykodi SS, Sosman JA, Procopio G, Plimack ER, Castellano D, Gurney H, Donskov F, Peltola K, Wagstaff J, Gauler TC, Ueda T, Zhao H, Waxman IM, Motzer RJ; CheckMate 025 investigators. CheckMate 025 Randomized Phase 3 Study: Outcomes by Key Baseline Factors and Prior Therapy for Nivolumab Versus Everolimus in Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma. Eur Urol. 2017 Dec;72(6):962-971. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.02.010. Epub 2017 Mar 3.
PubMed 28262413Cella D, Grunwald V, Nathan P, Doan J, Dastani H, Taylor F, Bennett B, DeRosa M, Berry S, Broglio K, Berghorn E, Motzer RJ. Quality of life in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma given nivolumab versus everolimus in CheckMate 025: a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016 Jul;17(7):994-1003. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30125-5. Epub 2016 Jun 6.
PubMed 27283863Motzer RJ, Escudier B, McDermott DF, George S, Hammers HJ, Srinivas S, Tykodi SS, Sosman JA, Procopio G, Plimack ER, Castellano D, Choueiri TK, Gurney H, Donskov F, Bono P, Wagstaff J, Gauler TC, Ueda T, Tomita Y, Schutz FA, Kollmannsberger C, Larkin J, Ravaud A, Simon JS, Xu LA, Waxman IM, Sharma P; CheckMate 025 Investigators. Nivolumab versus Everolimus in Advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2015 Nov 5;373(19):1803-13. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1510665. Epub 2015 Sep 25.
PubMed 26406148
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Aug 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized, Open-Label, Phase 3 Study of Nivolumab (BMS-936558) vs. Everolimus in Subjects With Advanced or Metastatic Clear-Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Who Have Received Prior Anti-Angiogenic Therapy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01668784
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CA209-025
- Conditions
- Advanced or Metastatic (Medically or Surgically Unresectable) Clear-cell Renal Cell Carcinoma
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 821 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Bristol-Myers SquibbIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
- Study start
- 9 Oct 2012 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 6 May 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- 19 Jul 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 20 Aug 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 29 Apr 2016
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of the study is to compare the clinical benefit, as measured by duration of overall survival, of Nivolumab vs. Everolimus in subjects with advanced or metastatic clear-cell renal cell carcinoma who have received prior anti-angiogenic therapy
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Arm 1: Nivolumab | Experimental | Biological: NivolumabNivolumab 3 mg/kg solution intravenously every 2 weeks until documented disease progression, discontinuation due to toxicity, withdrawal of consent or the study ends |
| Arm 2: Everolimus | Active comparator | Drug: EverolimusEverolimus 10 mg tablets by mouth daily until documented disease progression, discontinuation due to toxicity, withdrawal of consent or the study ends |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Men \& women ≥18 years of age
- Histologic confirmation of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with clear-cell component
- Advanced/metastatic RCC
- Measurable disease per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 criteria
- Received 1 or 2 prior anti-angiogenic therapy regimens in advanced or metastatic setting
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Any Central Nervous System (CNS) metastases or history of CNS metastases
- Prior therapy with an Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor
- Any active known or suspected autoimmune disease
- Uncontrolled adrenal insufficiency
- Active chronic liver disease
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| NivolumabAlso: BMS-936558 | Biological | Arm 1: Nivolumab |
| EverolimusAlso: Afinitor | Drug | Arm 2: Everolimus |
Primary outcome
Overall Survival (OS) at Primary Endpoint
Time frame: Randomization until 398 deaths, up to May 2015 (approximately 30 months)
Overall Survival (OS) was defined as the time from randomization to the date of death. Participants that had not died were censored at last known date alive. Median OS time was calculated using Kaplan-Meier Estimates. Interim analysis for the Primary Endpoint occurred after 398 deaths (70% of the total OS events needed for final analysis). At that time the data monitoring committee noted that the pre-specified boundary for OS (nominal significance level p < 0.0148) was crossed while no new safety signals that would affect continuation of the study were found. The study was stopped early by the Sponsor, Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS) and the interim analysis became the final analysis. As a result, participants in the everolimus groups could be assessed for a crossover to nivolumab treatment if they met all inclusion criteria.
9 secondary outcomes
Investigator-assessed Objective Response Rate (ORR)
Time frame: from randomization up to disease progression or death (approximately up to 105 Months)
Investigator-assessed Duration of Objective Response
Time frame: From randomization to date of disease progression or death or censoring if no progression or death occurred (approximately 105 months)
Investigator-assessed Time to Objective Response
Time frame: Randomization to date of first response (approximately 105 months)
Investigator-assessed Time of Progression-free Survival (PFS)
Time frame: from randomization up to disease progression or death (approximately up to 105 Months)
Overall Survival (OS) by Programmed Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Expression Level
Time frame: Randomization to date of death or date of last contact for patients without documentation of death, up to May 2015 (approximately 30 months)
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events, Death, Discontinuation Due to Adverse Events
Time frame: Day of first dose to 30 days post study completion (approximately 106 months)
Percentage of Participants With Disease-related Symptom Progression (DRSP)
Time frame: from randomization up to disease progression or death (approximately up to 105 Months)
Number of Participants Meeting Marked Laboratory Abnormality Criteria in Specific Liver and Thyroid Tests
Time frame: Day 1 to 30 days post study completion (approximately 106 months)
Number of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI Units
Time frame: Day 1 to 30 days post study completion (approximately 106 months)
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Aug 2022.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33428174Klijn SL, Fenwick E, Kroep S, Johannesen K, Malcolm B, Kurt M, Kiff C, Borrill J. What Did Time Tell Us? A Comparison and Retrospective Validation of Different Survival Extrapolation Methods for Immuno-Oncologic Therapy in Advanced or Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma. Pharmacoeconomics. 2021 Mar;39(3):345-356. doi: 10.1007/s40273-020-00989-1. Epub 2021 Jan 11.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31992108Ambavane A, Yang S, Atkins MB, Rao S, Shah A, Regan MM, McDermott DF, Michaelson MD. Clinical and economic outcomes of treatment sequences for intermediate- to poor-risk advanced renal cell carcinoma. Immunotherapy. 2020 Jan;12(1):37-51. doi: 10.2217/imt-2019-0199. Epub 2020 Jan 29.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31272883Shah R, Botteman M, Solem CT, Luo L, Doan J, Cella D, Motzer RJ. A Quality-adjusted Time Without Symptoms or Toxicity (Q-TWiST) Analysis of Nivolumab Versus Everolimus in Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma (aRCC). Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2019 Oct;17(5):356-365.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2019.05.010. Epub 2019 May 31.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 30215677Long GV, Tykodi SS, Schneider JG, Garbe C, Gravis G, Rashford M, Agrawal S, Grigoryeva E, Bello A, Roy A, Rollin L, Zhao X. Assessment of nivolumab exposure and clinical safety of 480 mg every 4 weeks flat-dosing schedule in patients with cancer. Ann Oncol. 2018 Nov 1;29(11):2208-2213. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdy408.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 28410865Escudier B, Motzer RJ, Sharma P, Wagstaff J, Plimack ER, Hammers HJ, Donskov F, Gurney H, Sosman JA, Zalewski PG, Harmenberg U, McDermott DF, Choueiri TK, Richardet M, Tomita Y, Ravaud A, Doan J, Zhao H, Hardy H, George S. Treatment Beyond Progression in Patients with Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated with Nivolumab in CheckMate 025. Eur Urol. 2017 Sep;72(3):368-376. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.03.037. Epub 2017 Apr 12.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 28262413Escudier B, Sharma P, McDermott DF, George S, Hammers HJ, Srinivas S, Tykodi SS, Sosman JA, Procopio G, Plimack ER, Castellano D, Gurney H, Donskov F, Peltola K, Wagstaff J, Gauler TC, Ueda T, Zhao H, Waxman IM, Motzer RJ; CheckMate 025 investigators. CheckMate 025 Randomized Phase 3 Study: Outcomes by Key Baseline Factors and Prior Therapy for Nivolumab Versus Everolimus in Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma. Eur Urol. 2017 Dec;72(6):962-971. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.02.010. Epub 2017 Mar 3.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 27283863Cella D, Grunwald V, Nathan P, Doan J, Dastani H, Taylor F, Bennett B, DeRosa M, Berry S, Broglio K, Berghorn E, Motzer RJ. Quality of life in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma given nivolumab versus everolimus in CheckMate 025: a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016 Jul;17(7):994-1003. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30125-5. Epub 2016 Jun 6.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 26406148Motzer RJ, Escudier B, McDermott DF, George S, Hammers HJ, Srinivas S, Tykodi SS, Sosman JA, Procopio G, Plimack ER, Castellano D, Choueiri TK, Gurney H, Donskov F, Bono P, Wagstaff J, Gauler TC, Ueda T, Tomita Y, Schutz FA, Kollmannsberger C, Larkin J, Ravaud A, Simon JS, Xu LA, Waxman IM, Sharma P; CheckMate 025 Investigators. Nivolumab versus Everolimus in Advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2015 Nov 5;373(19):1803-13. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1510665. Epub 2015 Sep 25.
- BMS Clinical Trial InformationLink provided by the sponsor.
- BMS Clinical Trial Patient RecruitingLink provided by the sponsor.
- FDA Safety Alerts and RecallsLink provided by the sponsor.
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Bristol-Myers Squibb study director
Bristol-Myers Squibb
168 sites in 24 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Nivolumab and Everolimus in people with Advanced or Metastatic (Medically or Surgically Unresectable) Clear-cell Renal Cell Carcinoma, run by Bristol-Myers Squibb at 168 sites in 24 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Aug 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 168 sites in United States, Japan, France, Canada, Italy and 19 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 29 Apr 2016). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Overall Survival (OS) at Primary Endpoint (time frame: Randomization until 398 deaths, up to May 2015 (approximately 30 months)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01668784, which also lists 8 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Aug 2022.