AzTrials
AzTrials

InfertilityUS EPICNCT01671657

US Eeva™ Pregnancy Investigational Clinical Study (US EPIC)

An observational study of Infertility, run by Progyny, Inc. at 1 site in United States.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this clinical investigation is to gather data to evaluate the impact of using Eeva with traditional morphology grading on implantation rates. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age, women only
Conditions the study is for
Infertility
How many people
100 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Jan 2013to Jun 2016
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients undergoing in vitro fertilization treatment who provide informed consent and plan to undergo Day 3 embryo transfer.

Who may be able to join

  • Women undergoing fresh in vitro fertilization treatment using their own eggs or donor eggs.
  • IVF cycle attempts ≤ 2.
  • Egg age ≤ 40 years.
  • Planned Day 3 embryo transfer.
  • At least 4 normally fertilized eggs (2PN).
  • All 2PN embryos must be imaged by Eeva.
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Ejaculated sperm or sperm from the epididymis (fresh or frozen).
  • Willing to comply with study protocol and procedures.
  • Willing to provide written informed consent.

Who cannot join

  • Planned preimplantation genetic diagnosis or preimplantation genetic screening.
  • Planned "freeze all" cycle (oocytes or embryos).
  • Sperm retrieved from testicular tissue.
  • Abnormal uterine cavity as evaluated by standard methods.
  • Gestational carrier.
  • Endometriosis
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Hydrosalpinx.
  • History of cancer.
  • Concurrent participation in another clinical study.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Fertility Physicians of Northern California

    San Jose, California, 95124

Other trials in United States

About this study

The purpose of this clinical investigation is to gather data to evaluate the impact of using Eeva with traditional morphology grading on implantation rates.

Read the detailed description

The purpose of this clinical investigation is to gather data to evaluate the impact of implantation rates for Day 3 embryo transfers using Eeva and morphology grading (test group) versus Day 3 embryo transfers using morphology grading only (from a concurrent control group).

Conditions
Infertility
Keywords
In vitro fertilization, Assisted reproductive therapy, Time-lapse image recording, Image analysis software
Medical subject headings
Infertility

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT01671657
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Eeva Test GroupDay 3 embryo transfers that used Eeva with morphology grading (Test Group).
Matched case control groupDay 3 embryo transfers using morphology grading only (from concurrent Control Group).

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Rate of implantation

    To compare implantation rates for the Day 3 embryo transfers that used Eeva with morphology grading (test group) versus Day 3 embryo transfers using morphology grading only (control group).

    Measured: 5-6 gestational age

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. To evaluate clinical pregnancy rates from the Eeva Test group to the Control group

    Measured: 5-6 weeks gestational age

  2. Ongoing pregnancy rate

    Measured: Gestational age week 8-12

  3. Multiple pregnancy rate

    Measured: Gestational age weeks 5-6 and 8-12

  4. Spontaneous miscarriage rate

    Measured: Gestational age week 8-12

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted23 Aug 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2013
  3. Primary completionJun 2016 (estimated)
  4. Study completionJun 2016 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case-control
Enrolment
100 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01671657
Sponsor's protocol ID
2012-AUX-008
Acronym
US EPIC
Status last verified
Oct 2015
First submitted
21 Aug 2012
Last updated
20 Oct 2015
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Adamson GD, Abusief ME, Palao L, Witmer J, Palao LM, Gvakharia M. Improved implantation rates of day 3 embryo transfers with the use of an automated time-lapse-enabled test to aid in embryo selection. Fertil Steril. 2016 Feb;105(2):369-75.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.10.030. Epub 2015 Nov 18.

    PubMed 26604069

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Infertility, run by Progyny, Inc. at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Oct 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Rate of implantation (time frame: 5-6 gestational age). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01671657, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Oct 2015.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in