Diabetic Foot UlcerNCT01676272
Multi Center Site , Controlled Trial Comparing a Bioengineered Skin Substitute to a Human Skin Allograft
An observational study of Diabetic Foot Ulcer, run by Solsys Medical LLC at 2 sites in United States.
Trial summary
Despite the widespread use of advanced biologics for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers, data comparing one type of modality to another are scarce. This investigation is a prospective randomized study comparing a bioengineered skin substitute to a human skin allograft. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 90 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Diabetic Foot Ulcer
- How many people
- 23 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Jul 2012to Nov 2015
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 90 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Study population includes Diabetic patients with type 1 or type 2 Diabetes with foot ulcers
Inclusion Criteria:: Subjects are required to meet all of the following criteria for enrollment into the study and subsequent randomization.
- A signed and dated informed consent form has been obtained from the subject.
- Subject is able and willing to comply with study procedures
- Subject is male or female and is 18 years of age or older.
- Subject, if female of childbearing potential, has a negative serum pregnancy test at screening
- Subject has type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus
- Subject has glycosylated hemoglobin, HbA1c, less than or equal to 12%
- Presence of at least one DFU that meets all of the following criteria:
- Ulcer has been diagnosed as a full-thickness DFU and including those of the heel.
- There is a minimum 2 cm margin between the qualifying study ulcer and any other ulcers on the specified foot, post-debridement)
- Ulcer size (area) greater than 1 cm2 (post-debridement at time of randomization) not deeper than 5mm. deep. Ulcer size no larger than 10 cm2
- Wagner grade 1 at initialization of the clinical trial
- Duration of the study ulcer is at least 30 days at the time of the screening visit Note: If the subject has more than one qualifying DFU, the ulcer designated as the study ulcer will be at the discretion of the Investigator.
- Subject has adequate vascular perfusion of the affected limb, as defined by at least one of the following:
- Ankle-Brachial Index (ABI) at least 0.65 (moderate arterial disease) and less than1.2
- Toe pressure (plethysmography) > 50 mm Hg
- TcPO2 > 40 mm Hg
- Doppler ultrasound (biphasic or triphasic waveforms) consistent with adequate bloodflow to the affected extremity, as determined by the Investigator
- Standard of Care practices of the Investigator and the site:
Subject or responsible caregiver is willing and able to maintain the required off-loading (as applicable for the location of the ulcer) and applicable dressing changes.
-
Exclusion Criteria:Subjects meeting any of the following criteria will be excluded from enrollment and subsequent randomization.
- Subject has suspected or confirmed signs/symptoms of gangrene or wound infection on any part of the affected limb. (Subjects with wound infection at the screening visit may be treated and re-screened for participation in the study after eradication of the infection).
- Subject has a history of hypersensitivity to bovine collagen and/or chondroitin, as listed in the Dermagraft Directions for Use.
- Subject has a history of hypersensitivity to any of the antibiotics or preservation agents listed in the TheraSkin Instructions for Use.
- Subject cannot be pregnant at the time of treatment.
- Subject was previously treated under this clinical study protocol.
- Subject has participated in another clinical trial involving a device or a systemically administered investigational study drug/treatment within 30 days of randomization visit.
- Subject is currently receiving (i.e., within 30 days of randomization visit) or scheduled to receive a medication or treatment which, in the opinion of the Investigator, is known to interfere with or affect the rate and quality of wound healing (e.g., systemic steroids, immunosuppressive therapy, autoimmune disease therapy, cytostatic therapy within the 12 months prior to randomization, dialysis, radiation therapy to the foot, vascular surgery, angioplasty or thrombolysis).
- Subject has any of the following unstable conditions or circumstances that could interfere with treatment regimen compliance:
- Ability to perform required dressing changes
- Ability to comply with treatment visit schedule
- Mental incapacity
- Current substance abuse
- Subject has excessive lymphedema, which, in the opinion of the Investigator, could interfere with wound healing.
- Subject has unstable Charcot foot or Charcot with boney prominence that, in the opinion of the Investigator, could inhibit wound healing.
- Subject has ulcers secondary to a disease other than diabetes, e.g., vasculitis, neoplasm's, or hematological disorders.
- Subject has osteomyelitis with necrotic soft bone. (If the Investigator suspects the presence of osteomyelitis, the diagnosis must be confirmed by plain film X-ray.)
- Subject with Chopart amputation.
- Subject has a history of bone cancer or metastatic disease on the affected limb, radiation therapy to the foot or has had chemotherapy within the 12 months prior to randomization.
- Subject has been treated with wound dressings that include growth factors, engineered tissues, or skin substitutes (e.g., Regranex®, Dermagraft®, Apligraf®,Theraskin® GraftJacket®, OASIS®, Primatrix®, Matristem®,etc.) within 30 days of randomization.
- Subject has been treated with hyperbaric oxygen within 5 days of screening.
- Subject has a history of or any of the following current illnesses or conditions (other than diabetes) that would compromise the safety of the subject, or the normal wound healing process:
- End-stage renal disease
- Immunosuppression
- Severe malnutrition
- Liver disease
- Aplastic anemia
- Scleroderma
- Acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) or HIV positive
- Connective tissue disorder
- Exacerbation of sickle cell anemia
- Subject is an employee or relative of any member of the Investigational site or the Sponsor. -
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
United States2 sites
Mary Immaculat Hospital Wound Care Center
Newport News, Virginia, 23602
Washington Hospital Wound Center
Washington, Pennsylvania, 15301
About this study
Official title: Proposal for a Multi- Center Site Randomized, Prospective Controlled Head-to-head Clinical Trial Comparing a Bioengineered Skin Substitute to a Human Skin Allograf
Despite the widespread use of advanced biologics for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers, data comparing one type of modality to another are scarce. This investigation is a prospective randomized study comparing a bioengineered skin substitute to a human skin allograft.
Read the detailed description
The primary goal in treating a DFU is to obtain wound closure. Healing can be a lengthy and painful process for ulcers of diabetic etiology. Healing is often further complicated in subjects with diabetes by vascular compromise and peripheral ischemia, renal insufficiency and diminution of inflammatory responses
The two products to be compared in this study are both commonly used for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers. DermaGraft is considered a medical device by the FDA, and was cleared for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers in 1997. It is a staple for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers, and is widely used throughout the United States. It is composed of an absorbable substrate that has been seeded with living human fibroblasts. Once formed, the graft is cryopreserved until it reaches the clinic, where it is defrosted and applied to the wound surface.
TheraSkin is composed of a split thickness skin graft harvested within 24 hours post-mortem, from an organ donor who has cleared the standard safety screenings. It is classified by the FDA as a donated tissue. Once harvested, the graft is sanitized according to FDA specifications, and cryopreserved, until it is delivered to the clinic for application to the foot ulcer. It is also a widely used treatment for diabetic foot ulcers.
- Conditions
- Diabetic Foot Ulcer
- Medical subject headings
- Diabetic Foot
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Proposal for a multi center site randomized, prospective controlled head-to-head clinical trial comparing a bioengineered skin substitute to a human skin allograft.
Despite the widespread use of advanced biologics for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers, data comparing one type of modality to another are scarce. This investigation is a prospective randomized study comparing a bioengineered skin substitute to a human skin allograft.
Measured: 2 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 Aug 2012 (estimated)
- Study startJul 2012
- Primary completionNov 2015
- Study completionNov 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Diabetic Foot UlcerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 23 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Solsys Medical LLC
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Nelson Keller, DPM, Principal investigator, Mary Immaculate Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01676272
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- soluble 102
- Status last verified
- Nov 2015
- First submitted
- 28 Aug 2012
- Last updated
- 26 Jun 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 26 Jun 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Proposal for a Multi- Center Site Randomized, Prospective Controlled Head-to-head Clinical Trial Comparing a Bioengineered Skin Substitute to a Human Skin Allograf
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01676272
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- soluble 102
- Conditions
- Diabetic Foot Ulcer
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 23 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Solsys Medical LLCIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Jul 2012
- Primary completion
- Nov 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- Nov 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 30 Aug 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Despite the widespread use of advanced biologics for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers, data comparing one type of modality to another are scarce. This investigation is a prospective randomized study comparing a bioengineered skin substitute to a human skin allograft.
Detailed description
The primary goal in treating a DFU is to obtain wound closure. Healing can be a lengthy and painful process for ulcers of diabetic etiology. Healing is often further complicated in subjects with diabetes by vascular compromise and peripheral ischemia, renal insufficiency and diminution of inflammatory responses
The two products to be compared in this study are both commonly used for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers. DermaGraft is considered a medical device by the FDA, and was cleared for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers in 1997. It is a staple for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers, and is widely used throughout the United States. It is composed of an absorbable substrate that has been seeded with living human fibroblasts. Once formed, the graft is cryopreserved until it reaches the clinic, where it is defrosted and applied to the wound surface.
TheraSkin is composed of a split thickness skin graft harvested within 24 hours post-mortem, from an organ donor who has cleared the standard safety screenings. It is classified by the FDA as a donated tissue. Once harvested, the graft is sanitized according to FDA specifications, and cryopreserved, until it is delivered to the clinic for application to the foot ulcer. It is also a widely used treatment for diabetic foot ulcers.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 90 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Study population includes Diabetic patients with type 1 or type 2 Diabetes with foot ulcers
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Proposal for a multi center site randomized, prospective controlled head-to-head clinical trial comparing a bioengineered skin substitute to a human skin allograft.
Time frame: 2 years
Despite the widespread use of advanced biologics for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers, data comparing one type of modality to another are scarce. This investigation is a prospective randomized study comparing a bioengineered skin substitute to a human skin allograft.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 26 Jun 2019.
Related trials for Diabetic Foot Ulcer
Not yet recruiting
Comparison of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Versus Moist Wound Dressing in Diabetic Foot Ulcer Patients
Diabetic Foot Ulcer
RecruitingPhase 2
Evaluation of the Safety and Efficacy of Live ASCs in the Treatment of Diabetic Foot Syndrome.
Diabetic Foot Ulcer
RecruitingObservational study
Efficacy and Safety of a Nitric Oxide Generating Dressing for Diabetic Foot Ulcers (ONWARD)
Diabetic Foot Ulcers (DFUs)
RecruitingObservational study
Factors Associated With an Evolution in the Quality of Life of Diabetic Patients With Chronic, Wound-free Charcot Foot
Charcot Joint of Foot, Osteoarthropathy
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Placental Cells for Diabetic Foot Ulcers
Diabetic Foot Ulcer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Nelson Keller, DPM principal investigator
Mary Immaculate Hospital
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Diabetic Foot Ulcer, run by Solsys Medical LLC at 2 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Jun 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Proposal for a multi center site randomized, prospective controlled head-to-head clinical trial comparing a bioengineered skin substitute to a human skin allograft. (time frame: 2 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Jun 2019.