Spinal Cord InjuryPhase 2/3NCT01676441
Safety and Efficacy of Autologous Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Chronic Spinal Cord Injury
A Phase 2/3 study testing cellgram-spine in people with Spinal Cord Injury, run by Pharmicell Co., Ltd. at 1 site in South Korea.
Trial summary
This phase II/III clinical trial is designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of autologous Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSC) transplanted directly into the injured spinal cord. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 16 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Spinal Cord Injury
- What is being tested?
- cellgram-spine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 20 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSouth Korea
- Study dates
- Aug 2008to 4 Mar 2021
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 16 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Aged between 16-65 years
- Traumatic spinal cord injury at the level of cervical
- American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale B
- 12 months or more post spinal cord injury subject with stable neurological finding after more than 1 month rehabilitation therapy
- No signs of contracture
- Good physical condition to go through operation
- Must be willing and able to participate in study procedures with no mental and verbal problem
- Able to consent by patients or legal representatives
Who cannot join
- Serum SGOT/SGPT > 3 X upper limit of normal or Creatinine > 1.5 X upper limit of normal
- Major surgical procedure in the past 3 months
- Penetrating injury
- Mechanical ventilation
- Serious pre-existing medical conditions
- Recently diagnosed infection (Urinary tract infection, Pneumonia etc)
Show all 14Show fewer
- Positive skin test for penicillin
- Positive result for viral markers (human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV) and Venereal Disease Research Laboratory (VDRL) test)
- Pregnant women, women of childbearing potential who do not want adequate contraception, breastfeeding females
- Unwilling to participate in study
- Patients with psychiatric disorder severe as to make compliance with the treatment unlike, and signing informed consent impossible
- Drug abuse in the past 1 year
- Participating in other clinical trials in the past 1 month
- Inappropriate patients to participate in the study according to the chief investigator
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: A Phase II/III Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Bone Marrow-derived Mesenchymal Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients With Chronic Spinal Cord Injury.
This phase II/III clinical trial is designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of autologous Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSC) transplanted directly into the injured spinal cord.
Read the detailed description
The Principal investigator has performed a clinical trial using autologous MSCs in patients with cervical spinal cord injury. The results revealed the safety of autologous MSC. This Phase II, III single-center trial is to assess the safety and efficacy of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cell transplantation direct to injured spinal cord site via laminectomy. After recovery from the operation, the subjects receive 4 weeks of physical and occupational therapy.
- Conditions
- Spinal Cord Injury
- Being tested
- cellgram-spine
- Keywords
- spinal cord injury, mesenchymal stem cell
- Medical subject headings
- Spinal Cord Injuries
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
cellgram-spineDrug
Also called Mesenchymal stem cells
Mesenchymal stem cells transplantation
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| cellgram-spine | Experimental | posterior cervical laminectomy and Mesenchymal stem cells tranplantation. After laminectomy, 1.6X10^7 and 3.2 X10^7 Autologous Mesenchymal stem cells is injected into the intramedullary and intrathecal space respectively Receives: Drug: cellgram-spine |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Compared change of Motor Score of the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) scale
Compared Baseline and after 6, 12 months of cell treatment, ASIA motor test analyzes the proportion of patients with a motor grade of more than 2 devision, with a motor grade improving from 2 to 3 and a rise of 5 or more in total score.
<American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) scale> 0 Total paralysis
- Palpable or visible contraction
- Active movement, full Range Of Motion(ROM) with gravity eliminated
- Active movement, full ROM against gravity
- Active movement, full ROM against gravity and moderate resistance in a muscle specific position
- (normal) Active movement, full ROM against gravity and full resistance in a functional muscle position expected from an otherwise unimpaired person 5* (normal) Active movement, full ROM against gravity and sufficient resistance to be considered normal if identified inhibiting factors (i.e. pain, disuse) were not present NT Not testable
Measured: Baseline, post operation(24 hours), 1 month, 3 month, 6 month, 12 month
Secondary outcomes (3)
Sensory score of the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) scale
Analyze the difference between the pre and post of the ASIA sensory score by using the Study's pre-test (Wilcoxon's signed test).
<American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) scale> The exam is based on neurological responses, touch and pinprick sensations tested in each dermatome, and strength of the muscles that control key motions on both sides of the body. Sensation is graded on a scale of 0-2: 0 is no sensation, 1 is altered or decreased sensation, and 2 is full sensation. Each side of the body is graded independently. When an area is not available (e.g. because of an amputation or cast), it is recorded as "NT", "not testable".
Measured: Baseline, post operation(24 hours), 1 month, 3 month, 6 month, 12 month
Electrophysiological change (Motor Evoked Potentials-MEP, Somatosensory Evoked Potentials-SSEP)
Post 6 months of treatment, the validity is analyzed through patients who have expressed their responses to the electrophysiological test (Motor Evoked Potentials-MEP, Somatosensory Evoked Potentials-SSEP).
Measured: 6 months
MRI and Diffusion Tensor Imaging of spinal cord
Post 6 months of cell treatment, the ratio of patients with changes in magnetic resonance imaging is analyzed.
Measured: 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted31 Aug 2012 (estimated)
- Study startAug 2008
- Primary completion4 Mar 2021
- Study completion4 Mar 2021
Why it stopped: sponsor decision (confidential)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Spinal Cord InjuryStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- posterior cervical laminectomy and Mesenchymal stem cells(cellgram-spine) tranplantation. After laminectomy, 1.6X107 and 3.2 X107 Autologous Mesenchymal stem cells is injected into the intramedullary and intrathecal space respectively
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Pharmicell Co., Ltd.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Sangryong Jeon, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Asan Medical Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01676441
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Cerecellgram-spine
- Status last verified
- Mar 2021
- First submitted
- 23 Aug 2012
- Last updated
- 23 Mar 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Park JH, Kim DY, Sung IY, Choi GH, Jeon MH, Kim KK, Jeon SR. Long-term results of spinal cord injury therapy using mesenchymal stem cells derived from bone marrow in humans. Neurosurgery. 2012 May;70(5):1238-47; discussion 1247. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e31824387f9.
PubMed 22127044
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Mar 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase II/III Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Bone Marrow-derived Mesenchymal Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients With Chronic Spinal Cord Injury.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01676441
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Cerecellgram-spine
- Conditions
- Spinal Cord Injury
- Keywords
- spinal cord injury, mesenchymal stem cell
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: sponsor decision (confidential)
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Pharmicell Co., Ltd.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Aug 2008
- Primary completion
- 4 Mar 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 4 Mar 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 31 Aug 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This phase II/III clinical trial is designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of autologous Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSC) transplanted directly into the injured spinal cord.
Detailed description
The Principal investigator has performed a clinical trial using autologous MSCs in patients with cervical spinal cord injury. The results revealed the safety of autologous MSC. This Phase II, III single-center trial is to assess the safety and efficacy of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cell transplantation direct to injured spinal cord site via laminectomy. After recovery from the operation, the subjects receive 4 weeks of physical and occupational therapy.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
- Model description
- posterior cervical laminectomy and Mesenchymal stem cells(cellgram-spine) tranplantation. After laminectomy, 1.6X107 and 3.2 X107 Autologous Mesenchymal stem cells is injected into the intramedullary and intrathecal space respectively
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| cellgram-spine | Experimental | Drug: cellgram-spineposterior cervical laminectomy and Mesenchymal stem cells tranplantation. After laminectomy, 1.6X10^7 and 3.2 X10^7 Autologous Mesenchymal stem cells is injected into the intramedullary and intrathecal space respectively |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 16 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Aged between 16-65 years
- Traumatic spinal cord injury at the level of cervical
- American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale B
- 12 months or more post spinal cord injury subject with stable neurological finding after more than 1 month rehabilitation therapy
- No signs of contracture
Key exclusion criteria (14 listed)
- Serum SGOT/SGPT > 3 X upper limit of normal or Creatinine > 1.5 X upper limit of normal
- Major surgical procedure in the past 3 months
- Penetrating injury
- Mechanical ventilation
- Serious pre-existing medical conditions
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| cellgram-spineAlso: Mesenchymal stem cellsMesenchymal stem cells transplantation | Drug | cellgram-spine |
Primary outcome
Compared change of Motor Score of the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) scale
Time frame: Baseline, post operation(24 hours), 1 month, 3 month, 6 month, 12 month
Compared Baseline and after 6, 12 months of cell treatment, ASIA motor test analyzes the proportion of patients with a motor grade of more than 2 devision, with a motor grade improving from 2 to 3 and a rise of 5 or more in total score. <American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) scale> 0 Total paralysis 1. Palpable or visible contraction 2. Active movement, full Range Of Motion(ROM) with gravity eliminated 3. Active movement, full ROM against gravity 4. Active movement, full ROM against gravity and moderate resistance in a muscle specific position 5. (normal) Active movement, full ROM against gravity and full resistance in a functional muscle position expected from an otherwise unimpaired person 5* (normal) Active movement, full ROM against gravity and sufficient resistance to be considered normal if identified inhibiting factors (i.e. pain, disuse) were not present NT Not testable
3 secondary outcomes
Sensory score of the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) scale
Time frame: Baseline, post operation(24 hours), 1 month, 3 month, 6 month, 12 month
Electrophysiological change (Motor Evoked Potentials-MEP, Somatosensory Evoked Potentials-SSEP)
Time frame: 6 months
MRI and Diffusion Tensor Imaging of spinal cord
Time frame: 6 months
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: sponsor decision (confidential)). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Mar 2021.
- Background: PubMed 22127044Park JH, Kim DY, Sung IY, Choi GH, Jeon MH, Kim KK, Jeon SR. Long-term results of spinal cord injury therapy using mesenchymal stem cells derived from bone marrow in humans. Neurosurgery. 2012 May;70(5):1238-47; discussion 1247. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e31824387f9.
Related trials for Spinal Cord Injury
Recruiting
MyHand-SCI: An Active Hand Orthosis for Spinal Cord Injury
Spinal Cord Injuries, Tetraplegia
Recruiting
Clinical Outcome Assessment for AT & BCI
Spinal Cord Injury, ALS (Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis)
Recruiting
Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation Combined With 4-Aminopyridine and Intensive Rehabilitation in SCI
Spinal Cord Injuries
Not yet recruiting
Evaluating the Effect of the Zeen Mobility Device on Clinical Practicality, Safety, and Impact (Via Assessments of Walking, Standing Tolerance, Balance, Endurance, Effort, and Participation in Daily Tasks) in an Outpatient Rehabilitation Setting for Individuals With Mobility Impairments.
Stroke, Parkinson's Disease (PD)
RecruitingPhase 3
A Trial Investigating the Efficacy and Safety of NVG-291 in Subjects With Chronic Spinal Cord Injury
Chronic Spinal Cord Injury
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Sangryong Jeon, MD, PhD principal investigator
Asan Medical Center
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2/3 study testing cellgram-spine in people with Spinal Cord Injury, run by Pharmicell Co., Ltd. at 1 site in South Korea.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 14 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Mar 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: sponsor decision (confidential)). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Compared change of Motor Score of the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) scale (time frame: Baseline, post operation(24 hours), 1 month, 3 month, 6 month, 12 month). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01676441, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Mar 2021.