ScoliosisPhase 1NCT01677650
Pharmacogenomics of Methadone in Spine Fusion Surgery
A Phase 1 study testing Methadone in people with Scoliosis and Kyphosis, run by Northwestern University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The overall objective is to develop a patient oriented research program to efficiently evaluate the effects of pharmacogenetic variants on the dose-response relationships and safety of opioids and non-opioid analgesics. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- What is being tested?
- Methadone
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 0 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Mar 2014to Jan 2015
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- ASA physical status I, II, and III
- male and non-pregnant female
- English-speaking
- undergoing elective < 3 vertebral level lumbar spine fusion (with and without interbody fusion)
Who cannot join
- Use of more than the equivalent of 20 mg of IV morphine/24 hr in the past 2 weeks
- history of substance abuse at any time in the past
- known QT prolongation
- Non-elective operations (i.e., cancer or trauma)
- severe hepatic impairment (serum albumin <3.0 g/dL, history of liver disease)
- pregnancy
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Northwestern Memorial Hospital
Chicago, Illinois, 60611
About this study
Official title: The Influence of Pharmacogenetics on Methadone Dose, Safety, and Outcomes After Spine Fusion
The overall objective is to develop a patient oriented research program to efficiently evaluate the effects of pharmacogenetic variants on the dose-response relationships and safety of opioids and non-opioid analgesics. If an opioid regimen can be created that produces excellent opioid analgesia with minimal toxicity related to supratherapeutic opioid concentrations (i.e., ventilatory depression), other non-opioid analgesics (i.e., gabapentin/pregabalin, ketamine, lidocaine, cyclooxygenase inhibitors, etc.) that may decrease preoperative opioid requirements can be more efficiently and safely evaluated. These interventions may limit the opioid related toxicities related to effect site concentrations that are below those required when opioids are the predominant analgesic, such as opioid related ileus. Methadone's slow elimination clearance and limited pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions make it an attractive perioperative opioid. The first step towards personalized opioid analgesia is to determine the effect of common pharmacogenetic variants that affect either methadone metabolism (CYP2B6) or opioid elimination.
Read the detailed description
This study is being done to find the optimal dose of methadone (a long acting pain medication) that decreases the amount of pain that people have after spine surgery. Five different doses of methadone will be compared to each other, while keeping the remainder of the anesthetic routine for surgery. The investigators will determine the analgesic dose-response of methadone. The investigators will also determine the effect of methadone on the incidence of opioid related side effects, the quality of outcome of recovery, and the change in the 3-month opioid use.
- Being tested
- Methadone
- Keywords
- Spinal Fusion, Opioid Analgesia
- Medical subject headings
- Scoliosis, Kyphosis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
MethadoneDrug
Also called Dolophine
Methadone IV Pre-Induction of Anesthesia 0.15 to 0.5 mg/kg
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Methadone 0.5 mg/kg | Active comparator | Methadone 0.5 mg/kg Receives: Drug: Methadone |
| Methadone 0.4 mg/kg | Experimental | Methadone 0.4 mg/kg Receives: Drug: Methadone |
| Methadone 0.3 mg/kg | Active comparator | Methadone 0.3 mg/kg Receives: Drug: Methadone |
| Methadone 0.2 mg/kg | Active comparator | Methadone 0.2 mg/kg Receives: Drug: Methadone |
| Methadone 0.15 mg/kg | Active comparator | Methadone 0.15 mg/kg Receives: Drug: Methadone |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Time until initial request for postoperative analgesic.
Measured: 60 minutes after extubation, 24, 48, and 72 hours after methadone administration
Secondary outcomes (13)
The determination of minimum effective analgesic concentration of methadone.
Measured: 60 minutes after extubation, 24, 48, and 72 hours after methadone administration
Postoperative pain at rest and with movement (numerical rating scale, NRS)
Measured: 60 minutes after extubation, 24, 48, and 72 hours after methadone administration
The number of occurrences of ventilatory depression during each evaluation interval
Measured: 60 minutes after extubation, 24, 48, and 72 hours after methadone administration
Nausea and vomiting: number of rescue antiemetic doses and episodes of emesis
Measured: 60 minutes after extubation, 24, 48, and 72 hours after methadone administration
Level of sedation (modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness and Sedation Scale, modified OAA/S scale)
Measured: 60 minutes after extubation, 24, 48, and 72 hours after methadone administration
Occurence of pruritis
Measured: 60 minutes after extubation, 24, 48, and 72 hours after methadone administration
Algometry to assess pain tolerance
Measured: Pre-operatively, 60 minutes after extubation, 24, 48, and 72 hours after methadone administration
Degree of bother associated with opioid-related adverse effects: Opioid-related Symptom Distress Scale (OR-SDS)
Measured: 24, 48, and 72 hours after methadone administration
Quality of Recovery: Quality of Recovery-40 score
Measured: 24, 48, and 72 hours after methadone administration
Patient analgesic satisfaction
Measured: 24, 48, and 72 hours after methadone administration
Assessment of back condition pre and post-operatively
Measured: Pre-operatively, 6 weeks and 3 months post-operatively
Effects of common opioid related metabolic pathway polymorphisms on methadone's dose response relationships for analgesia and side effects
CYP2B6 Polymorphism effect on
- Time to first request for analgesia
- Secondary outcomes
Measured: Preoperatively
Pupillometry for assessment of sedation
Measured: Pre-operatively, 60 minutes after extubation, 24, 48, and 72 hours after methadone administration
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 Sep 2012 (estimated)
- Study startMar 2014
- Primary completionJan 2015 (estimated)
- Study completionJan 2015 (estimated)
Why it stopped: Investigator moved to new institution
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (23)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for ScoliosisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Northwestern UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Northwestern University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Dhanesh Gupta, Northwestern University
- Investigators
- Dhanesh K. Gupta, M.D., Principal investigator, Northwestern University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01677650
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- STU00064915
- Status last verified
- Apr 2015
- First submitted
- 30 Aug 2012
- Last updated
- 22 Apr 2015
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Rajaee SS, Bae HW, Kanim LE, Delamarter RB. Spinal fusion in the United States: analysis of trends from 1998 to 2008. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Jan 1;37(1):67-76. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31820cccfb.
PubMed 21311399Jadad AR, Browman GP. The WHO analgesic ladder for cancer pain management. Stepping up the quality of its evaluation. JAMA. 1995 Dec 20;274(23):1870-3.
PubMed 7500538Gottschalk A, Durieux ME, Nemergut EC. Intraoperative methadone improves postoperative pain control in patients undergoing complex spine surgery. Anesth Analg. 2011 Jan;112(1):218-23. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181d8a095. Epub 2010 Apr 24.
PubMed 20418538Upton RN, Semple TJ, Macintyre PE. Pharmacokinetic optimisation of opioid treatment in acute pain therapy. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1997 Sep;33(3):225-44. doi: 10.2165/00003088-199733030-00005.
PubMed 9314613Taylor S, Kirton OC, Staff I, Kozol RA. Postoperative day one: a high risk period for respiratory events. Am J Surg. 2005 Nov;190(5):752-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.07.015.
PubMed 16226953Taylor S, Voytovich AE, Kozol RA. Has the pendulum swung too far in postoperative pain control? Am J Surg. 2003 Nov;186(5):472-5. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2003.07.021.
PubMed 14599609Liu N, Kuhlman G, Dalibon N, Moutafis M, Levron JC, Fischler M. A randomized, double-blinded comparison of intrathecal morphine, sufentanil and their combination versus IV morphine patient-controlled analgesia for postthoracotomy pain. Anesth Analg. 2001 Jan;92(1):31-6. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200101000-00007.
PubMed 11133596Joris J, Kaba A, Lamy M. Transition between anesthesia and post-operative analgesia: relevance of intra-operative administration of analgesics. Acta Anaesthesiol Belg. 2001;52(3):271-9.
PubMed 11732383Carroll IR, Angst MS, Clark JD. Management of perioperative pain in patients chronically consuming opioids. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2004 Nov-Dec;29(6):576-91. doi: 10.1016/j.rapm.2004.06.009.
PubMed 15635517Yaksh TL, Hua XY, Kalcheva I, Nozaki-Taguchi N, Marsala M. The spinal biology in humans and animals of pain states generated by persistent small afferent input. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Jul 6;96(14):7680-6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.14.7680.
PubMed 10393880Parker RK, Holtmann B, White PF. Effects of a nighttime opioid infusion with PCA therapy on patient comfort and analgesic requirements after abdominal hysterectomy. Anesthesiology. 1992 Mar;76(3):362-7. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199203000-00007.
PubMed 1539846Gourlay GK, Wilson PR, Glynn CJ. Pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of methadone during the perioperative period. Anesthesiology. 1982 Dec;57(6):458-67. doi: 10.1097/00000542-198212000-00005. No abstract available.
PubMed 6128949Chui PT, Gin T. A double-blind randomised trial comparing postoperative analgesia after perioperative loading doses of methadone or morphine. Anaesth Intensive Care. 1992 Feb;20(1):46-51. doi: 10.1177/0310057X9202000109.
PubMed 1609941van Dorp EL, Kest B, Kowalczyk WJ, Morariu AM, Waxman AR, Arout CA, Dahan A, Sarton EY. Morphine-6beta-glucuronide rapidly increases pain sensitivity independently of opioid receptor activity in mice and humans. Anesthesiology. 2009 Jun;110(6):1356-63. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181a105de.
PubMed 19461298Egan TD, Huizinga B, Gupta SK, Jaarsma RL, Sperry RJ, Yee JB, Muir KT. Remifentanil pharmacokinetics in obese versus lean patients. Anesthesiology. 1998 Sep;89(3):562-73. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199809000-00004.
PubMed 9743391
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 Apr 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Influence of Pharmacogenetics on Methadone Dose, Safety, and Outcomes After Spine Fusion
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01677650
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- STU00064915
- Keywords
- Spinal Fusion, Opioid Analgesia
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- WithdrawnReason stopped: Investigator moved to new institution
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Northwestern UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Mar 2014
- Primary completion
- Jan 2015 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Jan 2015 (estimated)
- First posted
- 3 Sep 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The overall objective is to develop a patient oriented research program to efficiently evaluate the effects of pharmacogenetic variants on the dose-response relationships and safety of opioids and non-opioid analgesics. If an opioid regimen can be created that produces excellent opioid analgesia with minimal toxicity related to supratherapeutic opioid concentrations (i.e., ventilatory depression), other non-opioid analgesics (i.e., gabapentin/pregabalin, ketamine, lidocaine, cyclooxygenase inhibitors, etc.) that may decrease preoperative opioid requirements can be more efficiently and safely evaluated. These interventions may limit the opioid related toxicities related to effect site concentrations that are below those required when opioids are the predominant analgesic, such as opioid related ileus. Methadone's slow elimination clearance and limited pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions make it an attractive perioperative opioid. The first step towards personalized opioid analgesia is to determine the effect of common pharmacogenetic variants that affect either methadone metabolism (CYP2B6) or opioid elimination.
Detailed description
This study is being done to find the optimal dose of methadone (a long acting pain medication) that decreases the amount of pain that people have after spine surgery. Five different doses of methadone will be compared to each other, while keeping the remainder of the anesthetic routine for surgery. The investigators will determine the analgesic dose-response of methadone. The investigators will also determine the effect of methadone on the incidence of opioid related side effects, the quality of outcome of recovery, and the change in the 3-month opioid use.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 5
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Methadone 0.5 mg/kg | Active comparator | Drug: MethadoneMethadone 0.5 mg/kg |
| Methadone 0.4 mg/kg | Experimental | Drug: MethadoneMethadone 0.4 mg/kg |
| Methadone 0.3 mg/kg | Active comparator | Drug: MethadoneMethadone 0.3 mg/kg |
| Methadone 0.2 mg/kg | Active comparator | Drug: MethadoneMethadone 0.2 mg/kg |
| Methadone 0.15 mg/kg | Active comparator | Drug: MethadoneMethadone 0.15 mg/kg |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- ASA physical status I, II, and III
- male and non-pregnant female
- English-speaking
- undergoing elective < 3 vertebral level lumbar spine fusion (with and without interbody fusion)
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Use of more than the equivalent of 20 mg of IV morphine/24 hr in the past 2 weeks
- history of substance abuse at any time in the past
- known QT prolongation
- Non-elective operations (i.e., cancer or trauma)
- severe hepatic impairment (serum albumin <3.0 g/dL, history of liver disease)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| MethadoneAlso: DolophineMethadone IV Pre-Induction of Anesthesia 0.15 to 0.5 mg/kg | Drug | Methadone 0.15 mg/kg, Methadone 0.2 mg/kg, Methadone 0.3 mg/kg, Methadone 0.4 mg/kg, Methadone 0.5 mg/kg |
Primary outcome
Time until initial request for postoperative analgesic.
Time frame: 60 minutes after extubation, 24, 48, and 72 hours after methadone administration
13 secondary outcomes
The determination of minimum effective analgesic concentration of methadone.
Time frame: 60 minutes after extubation, 24, 48, and 72 hours after methadone administration
Postoperative pain at rest and with movement (numerical rating scale, NRS)
Time frame: 60 minutes after extubation, 24, 48, and 72 hours after methadone administration
The number of occurrences of ventilatory depression during each evaluation interval
Time frame: 60 minutes after extubation, 24, 48, and 72 hours after methadone administration
Nausea and vomiting: number of rescue antiemetic doses and episodes of emesis
Time frame: 60 minutes after extubation, 24, 48, and 72 hours after methadone administration
Level of sedation (modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness and Sedation Scale, modified OAA/S scale)
Time frame: 60 minutes after extubation, 24, 48, and 72 hours after methadone administration
Occurence of pruritis
Time frame: 60 minutes after extubation, 24, 48, and 72 hours after methadone administration
Algometry to assess pain tolerance
Time frame: Pre-operatively, 60 minutes after extubation, 24, 48, and 72 hours after methadone administration
Degree of bother associated with opioid-related adverse effects: Opioid-related Symptom Distress Scale (OR-SDS)
Time frame: 24, 48, and 72 hours after methadone administration
Quality of Recovery: Quality of Recovery-40 score
Time frame: 24, 48, and 72 hours after methadone administration
Patient analgesic satisfaction
Time frame: 24, 48, and 72 hours after methadone administration
Assessment of back condition pre and post-operatively
Time frame: Pre-operatively, 6 weeks and 3 months post-operatively
Effects of common opioid related metabolic pathway polymorphisms on methadone's dose response relationships for analgesia and side effects
Time frame: Preoperatively
Pupillometry for assessment of sedation
Time frame: Pre-operatively, 60 minutes after extubation, 24, 48, and 72 hours after methadone administration
Results and safety
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 Apr 2015.
- Background: PubMed 21311399Rajaee SS, Bae HW, Kanim LE, Delamarter RB. Spinal fusion in the United States: analysis of trends from 1998 to 2008. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Jan 1;37(1):67-76. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31820cccfb.
- Background: PubMed 7500538Jadad AR, Browman GP. The WHO analgesic ladder for cancer pain management. Stepping up the quality of its evaluation. JAMA. 1995 Dec 20;274(23):1870-3.
- Background: PubMed 20418538Gottschalk A, Durieux ME, Nemergut EC. Intraoperative methadone improves postoperative pain control in patients undergoing complex spine surgery. Anesth Analg. 2011 Jan;112(1):218-23. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181d8a095. Epub 2010 Apr 24.
- Background: PubMed 9314613Upton RN, Semple TJ, Macintyre PE. Pharmacokinetic optimisation of opioid treatment in acute pain therapy. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1997 Sep;33(3):225-44. doi: 10.2165/00003088-199733030-00005.
- Background: PubMed 16226953Taylor S, Kirton OC, Staff I, Kozol RA. Postoperative day one: a high risk period for respiratory events. Am J Surg. 2005 Nov;190(5):752-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.07.015.
- Background: PubMed 14599609Taylor S, Voytovich AE, Kozol RA. Has the pendulum swung too far in postoperative pain control? Am J Surg. 2003 Nov;186(5):472-5. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2003.07.021.
- Background: PubMed 11133596Liu N, Kuhlman G, Dalibon N, Moutafis M, Levron JC, Fischler M. A randomized, double-blinded comparison of intrathecal morphine, sufentanil and their combination versus IV morphine patient-controlled analgesia for postthoracotomy pain. Anesth Analg. 2001 Jan;92(1):31-6. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200101000-00007.
- Background: PubMed 11732383Joris J, Kaba A, Lamy M. Transition between anesthesia and post-operative analgesia: relevance of intra-operative administration of analgesics. Acta Anaesthesiol Belg. 2001;52(3):271-9.
- Background: PubMed 15635517Carroll IR, Angst MS, Clark JD. Management of perioperative pain in patients chronically consuming opioids. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2004 Nov-Dec;29(6):576-91. doi: 10.1016/j.rapm.2004.06.009.
- Background: PubMed 10393880Yaksh TL, Hua XY, Kalcheva I, Nozaki-Taguchi N, Marsala M. The spinal biology in humans and animals of pain states generated by persistent small afferent input. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Jul 6;96(14):7680-6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.14.7680.
- Background: PubMed 1539846Parker RK, Holtmann B, White PF. Effects of a nighttime opioid infusion with PCA therapy on patient comfort and analgesic requirements after abdominal hysterectomy. Anesthesiology. 1992 Mar;76(3):362-7. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199203000-00007.
- Background: PubMed 6128949Gourlay GK, Wilson PR, Glynn CJ. Pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of methadone during the perioperative period. Anesthesiology. 1982 Dec;57(6):458-67. doi: 10.1097/00000542-198212000-00005. No abstract available.
Related trials for Scoliosis
Active, not recruiting
Diaphragm Mobilization in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis
Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis
Recruiting
Tranexamic Acid in Pediatric Idiopathic Scoliosis Surgery
Scoliosis Idiopathic, Scoliosis; Adolescence
RecruitingObservational study
Turkish Adaptation and Validation of the Scoliosis Misconception Scale in Adolescents With Idiopathic Scoliosis
Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS)
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Clinical and Biological Parameters in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis
Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS)
Recruiting
Studying Melatonin and Recovery in Teens
Juvenile; Scoliosis, Scoliosis Idiopathic
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Dhanesh K. Gupta, M.D. principal investigator
Northwestern University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1 study testing Methadone in people with Scoliosis and Kyphosis, run by Northwestern University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Apr 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Time until initial request for postoperative analgesic. (time frame: 60 minutes after extubation, 24, 48, and 72 hours after methadone administration). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01677650, which also lists 23 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Apr 2015.