AzTrials
AzTrials

Drug Abuse/DependenceNCT01678833

Understanding Drug Abuse Treatment Outcomes

An observational study of Drug Abuse/Dependence, run by National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) at 2 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Background: Although some treatments for substance abuse are considered effective for some people who are drug dependent, many others do not benefit as much over time. Researchers are working to find out what characteristics predict treatment response. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 60 years, men onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Drug Abuse/Dependence
How many people
7 participants
Where
2 sitesUnited States
Study dates
19 Jul 2012to 7 Mar 2016
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 60 years
  • Men only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Participants will be eligible for inclusion in the study if they meet the following criteria:
  • Right-handed individuals between the ages of 18 and 60;
  • Good physical condition;
  • Participating and receiving buprenorphine treatment in protocol 09-DA-N020, a study being conducted in the NIDA Intramural Archway Clinic (Dr. Kenzie Preston, PI) in Baltimore, MD OR at outpatient treatment facilities at UMMC (ADAP or OATS);
  • Heroin or other opioid dependent;
  • Suitable for MRI scanning;

Who cannot join

  • Participants will be excluded from this study if they:
  • History of neurological illnesses including but not limited to CVA, CNS tumor, head trauma, MS or other demyelinating diseases, epilepsy, movement disorders, or migraine in treatment.
  • Are HIV infected.
  • Have deep vein thrombosis (DVT): Assessment tool: self report during H\&P of thrombosis, family history of thrombosis, or a medical condition that may lead to a hypercoagulable state Rationale: Lying still for an hour (plus the mock scanning session) may be a risk for the development of DVT in persons with certain medical conditions. As such, persons with will be excluded.
  • Have current suicidal ideation.
  • Are unable to undergo MRI scanning due to metallic devices in the body including dental braces, claustrophobia or body morphometry.
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Are currently using respiratory, cardiovascular or anticonvulsant medications that may interfere with the BOLD MRI signal.
  • Cognitively impaired;
  • Continued noncompliance (after the 3rd time) with respect to testing positive for illicit drugs or reporting caffeine use in the past 12 hours or alcohol use in the past 24 hours when they visit for their scanning sessions will lead to discontinuing their participation in the #480 protocol.

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

United States2 sites
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse

    Baltimore, Maryland, 21224

  • University of Maryland

    Baltimore, Maryland

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Neural Mechanistic Explanations for Differential Drug Abuse Treatment Outcomes

Background:

Although some treatments for substance abuse are considered effective for some people who are drug dependent, many others do not benefit as much over time. Researchers are working to find out what characteristics predict treatment response. They also want to determine how to design treatments that are more effective for a greater number of substance abusers. This pilot study involves providing drug addicts with cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), a treatment considered to be one of the most effective in reducing substance-abuse, to identify ways in which the brain works that may predict and explain treatment effects. A comparison group will be included that receives only standard psychotherapy or talk therapy. This approach will enable researchers to determine what factors might be interfering with favorable treatment outcomes and how to refine or develop new treatments that work well for more people.

Read more

Objectives:

  • To identify individual characteristics which predict and explain the effects of CBT in people with opiate dependence.

Eligibility:

  • Males between 18 and 60 years of age who are dependent on opioids (such as heroin).
  • Participants must be willing to take buprenorphine and receive substance abuse counseling.

Design:

  • Participants will be screened with a physical exam and medical history.
  • Researchers will ask questions about participants ability to cope in certain situations, along with questions about drug use and lifestyle issues. These questions will be asked twice, before and after completing treatment.
  • Participants will be placed into one of two groups. One group will have CBT twice a week for 8 weeks. The other group will have standard counseling twice per week. Both groups will take buprenorphine as part of the drug abuse treatment.
  • Participants will have other tests during this study. They will have imaging studies to look at brain function. These studies will test thinking and decision making.
Read the detailed description

OBJECTIVE:

The primary objective of this pilot study is to collect data for a NIH RO1 grant submission that aims to elucidate cognitive, emotional regulatory and neurobiological mechanisms that both moderate and mediate effects of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) in individuals with opiate dependence. CBT has proven moderately effective in treating substance abuse; however, significant variability in treatment outcomes remains. CBT curricula teach adaptive decision making and cognitive reappraisal skills to down-regulate emotional responses to drug-related cues, thereby promoting avoidance of drug use situations. A certain level of cognitive and emotion regulatory functioning is, however, required for assimilating and executing these skills which is often deficient in substance abusers. Consequently, many addicts cannot effectively process and act on CBT curriculum, leading to poor treatment outcomes. Tailoring interventions requires systematic investigation of neurobiological indicators that interfere with or promote favorable treatment responsivity.

The small pilot study outlined below will provide the feasibility and supportive data for a larger effort.

Aim 1: Moderation. Identify baseline ECF and emotion regulatory functions and their neural substrates that predict treatment variability in the form of: (a) program responsivity (e.g., treatment engagement, motivation, social competences) and (b) posttreatment outcomes (e.g., substance use frequency, days of continuous abstinence). Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) will be used during performance of tasks that measure ECF (decision-making; inhibitory control) and cognitive reappraisal of emotional cues to investigate the neuromodulatory role of PFC regions (e.g., OFC, ACC) on emotion (e.g., amygdala) and reward (e.g., ventral striatum) structures and autonomic activity.

Aim 2: Mediation. Determine whether change in these neurocognitive functions in response to CBT mediate intervention effects. Evidence suggests that CBT alters PFC and limbic function; such changes are associated with clinical outcomes in depression and anxiety. Similarly, in drug abusers, we predict treatment response will be associated with changes in neural activation patterns, ECF, and emotional regulation, and that little to no change will occur in those with relatively poorer outcomes.

Study Population: Participants will be 18 primary opioid dependent individuals between the ages of 18 and 60. These individuals will either be enrolled in NIDA Protocol 09-DA-N020, (Dr. Kenzie Preston, PI) or patients at the University of Maryland Medical Center outpatient substance abuse clinics (i.e., Alcohol and Drug Abuse Program (ADAP) or Outpatient Addiction Treatment Service (OATS) and are receiving buprenorphine.

DESIGN:

Study participants visit their treatment facility daily for buprenorphine and receive standard counseling as part of Protocol 09-DA-N020 or their treatment protocol at ADAP or

OATS. They will be screened by MMG for eligibility into the present study then randomly assigned to a TAU control group or a CBT group. This study consists of 3 assessment time points (baseline, midway, post-treatment) and 16 bi-weekly counseling visits (CBT or standard TAU counseling). Baseline assessments will consist of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during performance of decision making, inhibitory control and emotional regulatory tasks. Questionnaires will be used to evaluate historical and current drug use, background and psychological traits, and other relevant factors. Those in the TAU group visit their treatment facility routinely for buprenorphine and standard counseling but will not receive CBT. The CBT group participants will undergo 8 weeks of CBT in the

Archway Clinic twice a week provided by a CBT clinician from Mountain Manor Treatment

Center who will be supervised by Dr. Marc Fishman, treatment director at MMTC; this CBT counseling will be in place of the TAU counseling they would be receiving as part of the parent protocol. Midway through CBT/TAU counseling, participants in this pilot study will be evaluated outside the scanner with the same cognitive tasks used in the scanner and questionnaires from baseline. After treatment completion, they will receive a post-treatment fMRI scan where they will perform the same tasks and questionnaires. Also, we will preliminarily assess mediation by examining variability in level of responsivity within the treatment group to determine whether this outcome is related to functional baseline characteristics and change over time. Expectations are that baseline features will predict intervention response and that these same characteristics will change over time in response to intervention in those with favorable outcomes.

OUTCOME MEASURES:

The focus of our outcome evaluation will be use of opioid (e.g., frequency, days of continuous abstinence, etc.), coping strategies, and change in lifestyle measures (e.g., employment, relationships, behavioral problems, treatment engagement).

Keywords
Drug Abuse/Dependence
Medical subject headings
Substance-Related Disorders

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The focus of our outcome evaluation will be use of opioid (e.g., frequency, days of continuous abstinence, etc.), coping strategies, and change in lifestyle measures (e.g., employment, relationships, behavioral problems, treatment engagement).

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted5 Sep 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study start19 Jul 2012
  3. Study completion7 Mar 2016

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Time perspective
Other
Enrolment
7 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01678833
Sponsor's protocol ID
999912480
Other IDs
12-DA-N480
Status last verified
7 Mar 2016
First submitted
31 Aug 2012
Last updated
5 Apr 2018
Results posted
No

Publications

  • Apodaca TR, Miller WR. A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of bibliotherapy for alcohol problems. J Clin Psychol. 2003 Mar;59(3):289-304. doi: 10.1002/jclp.10130.

    PubMed 12579546
  • Aharonovich E, Hasin DS, Brooks AC, Liu X, Bisaga A, Nunes EV. Cognitive deficits predict low treatment retention in cocaine dependent patients. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2006 Feb 28;81(3):313-22. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2005.08.003. Epub 2005 Sep 19.

    PubMed 16171953
  • Aharonovich E, Brooks AC, Nunes EV, Hasin DS. Cognitive deficits in marijuana users: Effects on motivational enhancement therapy plus cognitive behavioral therapy treatment outcome. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2008 Jun 1;95(3):279-83. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2008.01.009. Epub 2008 Mar 7.

    PubMed 18329188

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Drug Abuse/Dependence, run by National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) at 2 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Apr 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The focus of our outcome evaluation will be use of opioid (e.g., frequency, days of continuous abstinence, etc.), coping strategies, and change in lifestyle measures (e.g., employment, relationships, behavioral problems, treatment engagement).. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01678833, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Apr 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in