Liver Transplant RejectionNCT01678937
Immune Tolerance and Alloreactivity in Liver Transplant Recipients on Different Monotherapy Immunosuppressive Agents
An observational study of Liver Transplant Rejection and Immunosuppression, run by Northwestern University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This study is being done with the purpose of trying to understand if and why transplant recipients may develop tolerance to their transplanted organ. Tolerance means being able to lower or take away immunosuppression (anti-rejection medications) without causing organ rejection. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Liver Transplant Rejection, Immunosuppression
- What is being tested?
- Blood Draw - Rapamycin, Blood Draw - CyA and Blood Draw - Tacrolimus
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- 31 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Sep 2007to Sep 2008
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Liver transplant patients converting on stable IS monotherapy or undergoing conversion to rapamycin or MMF monotherapy.
Who may be able to join
- Age ≥18 years
- Orthotopic or Living-Related liver transplant (LT) recipient
- Monotherapy patients: > 6 months with stable graft function on current monotherapy (CNI, MMF, or rapamycin)
- Converting patients: CNI therapy converting to rapamycin or MMF monotherapy and > 6 months of stable graft function.
- >1 years post-LT without an acute rejection episode or chronic rejection
- Normal liver function tests (no recurrent HCV, chronic rejection, autoimmune hepatitis, etc.)
- No history of induction or lymphocyte depletion therapy
Who cannot join
- Multi-visceral organ recipients
- Graft dysfunction of any etiology
- Inadequate follow-up or available outcomes
- Unable to understand, sign or ask questions regarding the informed consent process and protocol
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Northwestern Memorial Hospital
Chicago, Illinois, 60611
About this study
This study is being done with the purpose of trying to understand if and why transplant recipients may develop tolerance to their transplanted organ. Tolerance means being able to lower or take away immunosuppression (anti-rejection medications) without causing organ rejection.
Read the detailed description
Life-long immunosuppressive therapy is typically required in the majority of liver allograft recipients. In the early years of liver transplantation (LT), the majority of deaths occurred secondary to graft loss from acute or chronic rejection despite immunosuppression (IS). With the advent of more powerful and specific IS agents, e.g. calcineurin-inhibitors (CNIs) cyclosporine (CyA) and tacrolimus (TAC), graft rejection rates significantly declined and short and long term graft/patient survival dramatically improved. However, along with the advance in survival rates came the adverse effects of long term immunosuppression (IS), e.g. morbidity and mortality from cardiovascular events, renal insufficiency, infectious complications, recurrent viral hepatitis and malignancy. These events are exacerbated by pre-existing conditions and an aging transplant population. Immunosuppression tapering or withdrawal could lower the incidence of these complications and improve long term graft and patient survival.
Therefore, the study proposed is a laboratory investigation (using blood samples collected from the subjects) comparing immune tolerance and alloreactivity profiles in LT recipients on monotherapy IS or converted to rapamycin monotherapy, to determine tolerogenic properties of the different IS agents. Knowledge of these properties would support the need for specific IS therapy to promote immune tolerance and consider IS withdrawal.
Monotherapy patients will be identified by the organ transplant database and medical charts at Northwestern. Patients will be invited to participate in the study and asked to undergo venipunctures for our analysis. Patient demographics, laboratories and other clinical data will be recorded. Patients on CNI monotherapy are continuously being identified for conversion to rapamycin monotherapy during clinic visits or chart reviews at Northwestern. Patients are selected for conversion due to significant CNI side effects, e.g. chronic kidney disease (creatinine clearance < 50 in the absence of significant proteinuria > 1g, poorly controlled diabetes mellitus/hypertension/hyperlipidemia, peripheral neuropathy). In general, patients are converted from CNIs to rapamycin over 2-3 weeks once therapeutic rapamycin levels are achieved.
Study procedures will be carried out by the investigators and associated personnel. Patients will be assigned a number in numerical order, to remove patient identifiers from the data analysis. A separate screening/enrollment log will be kept separate from the data. Baseline characteristics of the patients will be recorded: age, sex, liver disease, past medical history, history of acute rejection or other graft dysfunction, other post-LT complications, previous and current IS regimens. Monotherapy patients (10 from CyA, Tacrolimus, and MMF; 5 rapamycin) will be identified as above and asked to participate. Blood will be drawn at one time point for the following analysis:
- Dendritic cell assays: myeloid vs. lymphoid (CD11c; CD123); maturation and ability to process antigens (CD83; CD205); markers that have been shown to induce regulatory T cells (ILT3; ILT4).
- Regulatory/Suppressor Cells (CD4+CD25+FOXP3+CD127low; and CD8+ CD28- FOXP3+CD127low cells).
- HLA microchimerism \& HLA G
Ten patients who have been pre-selected for rapamycin conversion will have the above assays performed two weeks prior to conversion and 3-6 months following conversion. They will also have liver function and drug level tests.
- Conditions
- Liver Transplant Rejection, Immunosuppression
- Being tested
- Blood Draw - Rapamycin, Blood Draw from Control Subjects, Blood Draw - CyA, Blood Draw - Tacrolimus, Blood Draw - MMF
- Keywords
- Immunosuppression
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Blood Draw - RapamycinProcedure or surgery
Also called Sirolimus
Ten calcineurin-inhibitors (CNI) monotherapy or dual therapy (CNI+MMF) patients will have blood taken (40 ml=8 tsp.) 2 wks. prior to conversion, 3-6 months post successful conversion. 1) Regulatory/Suppressor Cells (CD4+CD25+FOXP3+CD127low; and CD8+ CD28-FOXP3+CD127low cells). 2) Dendritic cell assays: myeloid vs. lymphoid (CD11c; CD123); maturation and ability to process antigens (CD83; CD205); markers shown to induce regulatory T cells (ILT3; ILT4), 3) Soluble HLA G, and 4) Liver function/drug levels. If problems develop during conversion (e.g. acute rejection, significant drug side effects) requiring discontinuation of rapamycin, MMF and/or reversion to CNI therapy, assays will not be performed. Monthly liver function/drug levels performed after successful conversion (standard of care).
Blood Draw from Control SubjectsProcedure or surgery
Ten healthy individuals will have blood drawn (40 ml = 8 teaspoons (tsps.)).Blood will be drawn at one time point for the following:
- Dendritic cell assays: myeloid vs. lymphoid (CD11c; CD123); maturation and ability to process antigens (CD83; CD205); markers that have been shown to induce regulatory T cells (ILT3; ILT4).
- Regulatory/Suppressor Cells (CD4+CD25+FOXP3+CD127low; and CD8+ CD28- FOXP3+CD127low cells).
- HLA microchimerism \& HLA G
Blood Draw - CyAProcedure or surgery
Also called cyclosporine
Blood drawn from 10 patients on cyclosporine (CyA) (40 ml = 8 tsp.)). Blood will be drawn at one time point for the following:
- Dendritic cell assays: myeloid vs. lymphoid (CD11c; CD123); maturation and ability to process antigens (CD83; CD205); markers that have been shown to induce regulatory T cells (ILT3; ILT4).
- Regulatory/Suppressor Cells (CD4+CD25+FOXP3+CD127low; and CD8+ CD28- FOXP3+CD127low cells).
- HLA microchimerism \& HLA G
Blood Draw - TacrolimusProcedure or surgery
Also called Tacrolimus
Blood drawn from 5 patients on Tacrolimus (40 ml = 8 tsp.) at one time point for the following:
- Dendritic cell assays: myeloid vs. lymphoid (CD11c; CD123); maturation and ability to process antigens (CD83; CD205); markers that have been shown to induce regulatory T cells (ILT3; ILT4).
- Regulatory/Suppressor Cells (CD4+CD25+FOXP3+CD127low; and CD8+ CD28- FOXP3+CD127low cells).
- HLA microchimerism \& HLA G
Blood Draw - MMFProcedure or surgery
Also called mycophenolate mofetil
Blood will be drawn from 10 patients on mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (40 ml or the equivalent of 8 teaspoons). Blood will be drawn at one time point for the following analysis:
- Dendritic cell assays: myeloid vs. lymphoid (CD11c; CD123); maturation and ability to process antigens (CD83; CD205); markers that have been shown to induce regulatory T cells (ILT3; ILT4).
- Regulatory/Suppressor Cells (CD4+CD25+FOXP3+CD127low; and CD8+ CD28- FOXP3+CD127low cells).
- HLA microchimerism \& HLA G
Blood Draw - RapamycinProcedure or surgery
Also called Rapamycin
Blood drawn from 10 patients on rapamycin (40 ml = 8 tsp.)) at one time point for the following:
- Dendritic cell assays: myeloid vs. lymphoid (CD11c; CD123); maturation and ability to process antigens (CD83; CD205); markers that have been shown to induce regulatory T cells (ILT3; ILT4).
- Regulatory/Suppressor Cells (CD4+CD25+FOXP3+CD127low; and CD8+ CD28- FOXP3+CD127low cells).
- HLA microchimerism \& HLA G
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Control Group | Ten Healthy individuals will have blood drawn (4 green top tubes(40 ml = 8 tsp.)) at one time point at Northwestern for control purposes. Blood will be drawn to conduct the following tests:
1. Dendritic cell assays: myeloid vs. lymphoid (CD11c; CD123); maturation and ability to process antigens (CD83; CD205); markers that have been shown to induce regulatory T cells (ILT3; ILT4).
2. Regulatory/Suppressor Cells (CD4+CD25+FOXP3+CD127low; and CD8+ CD28- FOXP3+CD127low cells), and
3. HLA microchimerism \& HLA G. Receives: Procedure: Blood Draw from Control Subjects | |
| Monotherapy Group | Monotherapy patients [cyclosporine (CyA) (10 patients), Tacrolimus (5 patients), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (10 patients), rapamycin (10 patients)]: Blood will be drawn at one time point (4 green top tubes (40 ml = 8 tsp.)) to conduct the following tests:
1. Dendritic cell assays: myeloid vs. lymphoid (CD11c; CD123); maturation and ability to process antigens (CD83; CD205); markers that have been shown to induce regulatory T cells (ILT3; ILT4).
2. Regulatory/Suppressor Cells (CD4+CD25+FOXP3+CD127low; and CD8+ CD28- FOXP3+CD127low cells), and
3. HLA microchimerism \& HLA G. Receives: Procedure: Blood Draw - CyA; Procedure: Blood Draw - Tacrolimus; Procedure: Blood Draw - MMF; Procedure: Blood Draw - Rapamycin | |
| Conversion Group | Ten CNI monotherapy/dual therapy (CNI + MMF) patients pre-selected for conversion to rapamycin or wean to MMF monotherapy. Assays performed 2 weeks prior to conversion, 3-6 months following successful conversion. Liver function/drug levels monitored weekly during conversion until stable levels achieved. Patients converting from CNI monotherapy to rapamycin monotherapy (2-4 wks.): CNI discontinued when 2 therapeutic rapamycin levels (5-10) reached, graft function stable (clinical care protocol). MMF conversion: MMF dose slowly increased to 3 g/day (max.) while CNI therapy reduced by 1-2 mg/day (FK506) or 25-50 mg/day (CyA) monthly until CNI discontinued (1-6 months) (clinical care protocol). Monthly liver function/drug levels performed after successful conversion (standard of care). Receives: Procedure: Blood Draw - Rapamycin |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Track interval outcome measures for development of higher percentages of FOXP3+ T1 regulatory cells in stable liver transplant recipients on rapamycin or MMF monotherapy compared to CNI monotherapy.
- Dendritic cell assays: myeloid vs. lymphoid (CD11c; CD123); maturation and ability to process antigens (CD83; CD205); markers that have been shown to induce regulatory T cells (ILT3; ILT4).
- Regulatory/Suppressor Cells (CD4+CD25+FOXP3+CD127low; and CD8+ CD28- FOXP3+CD127low cells).
- Liver function and drug levels.
Measured: Two weeks prior to conversion, Months 3 & 6 following conversion
Track interval outcome measures for development of higher percentages of FOXP3+ T regulatory cells in liver transplant recipients after conversion from CNI to rapamycin comparing to MMF monotherapy.
- Dendritic cell assays: myeloid vs. lymphoid (CD11c; CD123); maturation and ability to process antigens (CD83; CD205); markers that have been shown to induce regulatory T cells (ILT3; ILT4).
- Regulatory/Suppressor Cells (CD4+CD25+FOXP3+CD127low; and CD8+ CD28- FOXP3+CD127low cells).
Measured: Two weeks prior to conversion, Months 3 & 6 following conversion
Secondary outcomes (4)
Track interval outcome measures for development of higher percentages of immunophenotypic markers associated with regulatory T cell production in stable liver transplant recipients on rapamycin or MMF monotherapy compared to CNI monotherapy.
- Dendritic cell assays: myeloid vs. lymphoid (CD11c; CD123); maturation and ability to process antigens (CD83; CD205); markers that have been shown to induce regulatory T cells (ILT3; ILT4).
- Regulatory/Suppressor Cells (CD4+CD25+FOXP3+CD127low; and CD8+ CD28- FOXP3+CD127low cells).
- HLA microchimerism \& HLA G (dendritic cell ratios, soluble HLA G)
- Liver function and drug levels.
Measured: Two weeks prior to conversion, Months 3 & 6 following conversion
Track interval outcome measures for development of higher percentages of immunophenotypic markers associated with regulatory T cell production in liver transplant recipients after conversion from CNI to rapamycin or MMF monotherapy.
- Dendritic cell assays: myeloid vs. lymphoid (CD11c; CD123); maturation and ability to process antigens (CD83; CD205); markers that have been shown to induce regulatory T cells (ILT3; ILT4).
- Regulatory/Suppressor Cells (CD4+CD25+FOXP3+CD127low; and CD8+ CD28- FOXP3+CD127low cells).
- HLA microchimerism \& HLA G (dendritic cell ratios, soluble HLA G)(hypertension, hyperlipidemia, renal insufficiency, diabetes, neuropathy)
Measured: Two weeks prior to conversion, Months 3 & 6 following conversion
Document improvement in adverse CNI side effects after conversion to rapamycin or MMF monotherapy, comparing designated time points.
CNI side effects - hypertension, hyperlipidemia, renal insufficiency, diabetes, neuropathy. Review liver function and drug levels at designated time points.
Measured: Two weeks prior to conversion, Months 3 & 6 following conversion
Document the development of any adverse rapamycin or MMF side effects after conversion, comparing designated time points.
Document Rapamycin side effects - oral ulcers, edema, pancytopenia, gastrointestinal dysfunction; or MMF side effects - pancytopenia, gastrointestinal dysfunction. Review liver function and drug levels at designated time points.
Measured: Two weeks prior to conversion, Months 3 & 6 following conversion
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Sep 2012 (estimated)
- Study startSep 2007
- Primary completionMay 2008
- Study completionSep 2008
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (21)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Liver Transplant RejectionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Northwestern UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 31 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Northwestern University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Northwestern Memorial Hospital
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Josh Levitsky, Northwestern University
- Investigators
- Josh Levitsky, MD, Principal investigator, Northwestern University, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Northwestern Medical Faculty Foundation
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01678937
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 1783-011
- Status last verified
- Apr 2015
- First submitted
- 8 Jul 2011
- Last updated
- 15 Apr 2015
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Sayegh MH, Carpenter CB. Transplantation 50 years later--progress, challenges, and promises. N Engl J Med. 2004 Dec 23;351(26):2761-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJMon043418. No abstract available.
PubMed 15616214Takatsuki M, Uemoto S, Inomata Y, Egawa H, Kiuchi T, Fujita S, Hayashi M, Kanematsu T, Tanaka K. Weaning of immunosuppression in living donor liver transplant recipients. Transplantation. 2001 Aug 15;72(3):449-54. doi: 10.1097/00007890-200108150-00016.
PubMed 11502975Tisone G, Orlando G, Cardillo A, Palmieri G, Manzia TM, Baiocchi L, Lionetti R, Anselmo A, Toti L, Angelico M. Complete weaning off immunosuppression in HCV liver transplant recipients is feasible and favourably impacts on the progression of disease recurrence. J Hepatol. 2006 Apr;44(4):702-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2005.11.047. Epub 2006 Jan 4.
PubMed 16473433Girlanda R, Rela M, Williams R, O'Grady JG, Heaton ND. Long-term outcome of immunosuppression withdrawal after liver transplantation. Transplant Proc. 2005 May;37(4):1708-9. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2005.03.070.
PubMed 15919439Hurwitz M, Desai DM, Cox KL, Berquist WE, Esquivel CO, Millan MT. Complete immunosuppressive withdrawal as a uniform approach to post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease in pediatric liver transplantation. Pediatr Transplant. 2004 Jun;8(3):267-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3046.2004.00129.x.
PubMed 15176965Oike F, Yokoi A, Nishimura E, Ogura Y, Fujimoto Y, Kasahara M, Kaihara S, Kiuchi T, Egawa H, Uemoto S, Tanaka K. Complete withdrawal of immunosuppression in living donor liver transplantation. Transplant Proc. 2002 Aug;34(5):1521. doi: 10.1016/s0041-1345(02)02980-9. No abstract available.
PubMed 12176465Lerut J, Sanchez-Fueyo A. An appraisal of tolerance in liver transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2006 Aug;6(8):1774-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2006.01396.x.
PubMed 16889539Mazariegos GV, Reyes J, Marino I, Flynn B, Fung JJ, Starzl TE. Risks and benefits of weaning immunosuppression in liver transplant recipients: long-term follow-up. Transplant Proc. 1997 Feb-Mar;29(1-2):1174-7. doi: 10.1016/s0041-1345(96)00535-0. No abstract available.
PubMed 9123261Mazariegos GV, Reyes J, Marino IR, Demetris AJ, Flynn B, Irish W, McMichael J, Fung JJ, Starzl TE. Weaning of immunosuppression in liver transplant recipients. Transplantation. 1997 Jan 27;63(2):243-9. doi: 10.1097/00007890-199701270-00012.
PubMed 9020325Donckier V, Troisi R, Le Moine A, Toungouz M, Ricciardi S, Colle I, Van Vlierberghe H, Craciun L, Libin M, Praet M, Noens L, Stordeur P, Andrien M, Lambermont M, Gelin M, Bourgeois N, Adler M, de Hemptinne B, Goldman M. Early immunosuppression withdrawal after living donor liver transplantation and donor stem cell infusion. Liver Transpl. 2006 Oct;12(10):1523-8. doi: 10.1002/lt.20872.
PubMed 17004249Mazariegos GV, Zahorchak AF, Reyes J, Ostrowski L, Flynn B, Zeevi A, Thomson AW. Dendritic cell subset ratio in peripheral blood correlates with successful withdrawal of immunosuppression in liver transplant patients. Am J Transplant. 2003 Jun;3(6):689-96. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-6143.2003.00109.x.
PubMed 12780560Wong T, Nouri-Aria KT, Devlin J, Portmann B, Williams R. Tolerance and latent cellular rejection in long-term liver transplant recipients. Hepatology. 1998 Aug;28(2):443-9. doi: 10.1002/hep.510280223.
PubMed 9696010Devlin J, Doherty D, Thomson L, Wong T, Donaldson P, Portmann B, Williams R. Defining the outcome of immunosuppression withdrawal after liver transplantation. Hepatology. 1998 Apr;27(4):926-33. doi: 10.1002/hep.510270406.
PubMed 9537430Woltman AM, de Fijter JW, Kamerling SW, Paul LC, Daha MR, van Kooten C. The effect of calcineurin inhibitors and corticosteroids on the differentiation of human dendritic cells. Eur J Immunol. 2000 Jul;30(7):1807-12. doi: 10.1002/1521-4141(200007)30:73.0.CO;2-N.
PubMed 10940869Koenen HJ, Fasse E, Joosten I. Cyclosporine preserves the anergic state of human T cells induced by costimulation blockade in vitro. Transplantation. 2005 Aug 27;80(4):522-9. doi: 10.1097/01.tp.0000172217.97072.54.
PubMed 16123728
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Apr 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Immune Tolerance and Alloreactivity in Liver Transplant Recipients on Different Monotherapy Immunosuppressive Agents
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01678937
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 1783-011
- Conditions
- Liver Transplant Rejection, Immunosuppression
- Keywords
- Immunosuppression
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 31 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Northwestern UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Northwestern Memorial Hospital
- Study start
- Sep 2007
- Primary completion
- May 2008 (actual)
- Study completion
- Sep 2008 (actual)
- First posted
- 5 Sep 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study is being done with the purpose of trying to understand if and why transplant recipients may develop tolerance to their transplanted organ. Tolerance means being able to lower or take away immunosuppression (anti-rejection medications) without causing organ rejection.
Detailed description
Life-long immunosuppressive therapy is typically required in the majority of liver allograft recipients. In the early years of liver transplantation (LT), the majority of deaths occurred secondary to graft loss from acute or chronic rejection despite immunosuppression (IS). With the advent of more powerful and specific IS agents, e.g. calcineurin-inhibitors (CNIs) cyclosporine (CyA) and tacrolimus (TAC), graft rejection rates significantly declined and short and long term graft/patient survival dramatically improved. However, along with the advance in survival rates came the adverse effects of long term immunosuppression (IS), e.g. morbidity and mortality from cardiovascular events, renal insufficiency, infectious complications, recurrent viral hepatitis and malignancy. These events are exacerbated by pre-existing conditions and an aging transplant population. Immunosuppression tapering or withdrawal could lower the incidence of these complications and improve long term graft and patient survival.
Therefore, the study proposed is a laboratory investigation (using blood samples collected from the subjects) comparing immune tolerance and alloreactivity profiles in LT recipients on monotherapy IS or converted to rapamycin monotherapy, to determine tolerogenic properties of the different IS agents. Knowledge of these properties would support the need for specific IS therapy to promote immune tolerance and consider IS withdrawal.
Monotherapy patients will be identified by the organ transplant database and medical charts at Northwestern. Patients will be invited to participate in the study and asked to undergo venipunctures for our analysis. Patient demographics, laboratories and other clinical data will be recorded. Patients on CNI monotherapy are continuously being identified for conversion to rapamycin monotherapy during clinic visits or chart reviews at Northwestern. Patients are selected for conversion due to significant CNI side effects, e.g. chronic kidney disease (creatinine clearance < 50 in the absence of significant proteinuria > 1g, poorly controlled diabetes mellitus/hypertension/hyperlipidemia, peripheral neuropathy). In general, patients are converted from CNIs to rapamycin over 2-3 weeks once therapeutic rapamycin levels are achieved.
Study procedures will be carried out by the investigators and associated personnel. Patients will be assigned a number in numerical order, to remove patient identifiers from the data analysis. A separate screening/enrollment log will be kept separate from the data. Baseline characteristics of the patients will be recorded: age, sex, liver disease, past medical history, history of acute rejection or other graft dysfunction, other post-LT complications, previous and current IS regimens. Monotherapy patients (10 from CyA, Tacrolimus, and MMF; 5 rapamycin) will be identified as above and asked to participate. Blood will be drawn at one time point for the following analysis:
- Dendritic cell assays: myeloid vs. lymphoid (CD11c; CD123); maturation and ability to process antigens (CD83; CD205); markers that have been shown to induce regulatory T cells (ILT3; ILT4).
- Regulatory/Suppressor Cells (CD4+CD25+FOXP3+CD127low; and CD8+ CD28- FOXP3+CD127low cells).
- HLA microchimerism \& HLA G
Ten patients who have been pre-selected for rapamycin conversion will have the above assays performed two weeks prior to conversion and 3-6 months following conversion. They will also have liver function and drug level tests.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Control Group | – | Procedure: Blood Draw from Control SubjectsTen Healthy individuals will have blood drawn (4 green top tubes(40 ml = 8 tsp.)) at one time point at Northwestern for control purposes. Blood will be drawn to conduct the following tests: 1. Dendritic cell assays: myeloid vs. lymphoid (CD11c; CD123); maturation and ability to process antigens (CD83; CD205); markers that have been shown to induce regulatory T cells (ILT3; ILT4). 2. Regulatory/Suppressor Cells (CD4+CD25+FOXP3+CD127low; and CD8+ CD28- FOXP3+CD127low cells), and 3. HLA microchimerism \& HLA G. |
| Monotherapy Group | – | Procedure: Blood Draw - CyA, Procedure: Blood Draw - Tacrolimus, Procedure: Blood Draw - MMF, Procedure: Blood Draw - RapamycinMonotherapy patients [cyclosporine (CyA) (10 patients), Tacrolimus (5 patients), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (10 patients), rapamycin (10 patients)]: Blood will be drawn at one time point (4 green top tubes (40 ml = 8 tsp.)) to conduct the following tests: 1. Dendritic cell assays: myeloid vs. lymphoid (CD11c; CD123); maturation and ability to process antigens (CD83; CD205); markers that have been shown to induce regulatory T cells (ILT3; ILT4). 2. Regulatory/Suppressor Cells (CD4+CD25+FOXP3+CD127low; and CD8+ CD28- FOXP3+CD127low cells), and 3. HLA microchimerism \& HLA G. |
| Conversion Group | – | Procedure: Blood Draw - RapamycinTen CNI monotherapy/dual therapy (CNI + MMF) patients pre-selected for conversion to rapamycin or wean to MMF monotherapy. Assays performed 2 weeks prior to conversion, 3-6 months following successful conversion. Liver function/drug levels monitored weekly during conversion until stable levels achieved. Patients converting from CNI monotherapy to rapamycin monotherapy (2-4 wks.): CNI discontinued when 2 therapeutic rapamycin levels (5-10) reached, graft function stable (clinical care protocol). MMF conversion: MMF dose slowly increased to 3 g/day (max.) while CNI therapy reduced by 1-2 mg/day (FK506) or 25-50 mg/day (CyA) monthly until CNI discontinued (1-6 months) (clinical care protocol). Monthly liver function/drug levels performed after successful conversion (standard of care). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Liver transplant patients converting on stable IS monotherapy or undergoing conversion to rapamycin or MMF monotherapy.
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Age ≥18 years
- Orthotopic or Living-Related liver transplant (LT) recipient
- Monotherapy patients: > 6 months with stable graft function on current monotherapy (CNI, MMF, or rapamycin)
- Converting patients: CNI therapy converting to rapamycin or MMF monotherapy and > 6 months of stable graft function.
- >1 years post-LT without an acute rejection episode or chronic rejection
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Multi-visceral organ recipients
- Graft dysfunction of any etiology
- Inadequate follow-up or available outcomes
- Unable to understand, sign or ask questions regarding the informed consent process and protocol
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Blood Draw - RapamycinAlso: SirolimusTen calcineurin-inhibitors (CNI) monotherapy or dual therapy (CNI+MMF) patients will have blood taken (40 ml=8 tsp.) 2 wks. prior to conversion, 3-6 months post successful conversion. 1) Regulatory/Suppressor Cells (CD4+CD25+FOXP3+CD127low; and CD8+ CD28-FOXP3+CD127low cells). 2) Dendritic cell assays: myeloid vs. lymphoid (CD11c; CD123); maturation and ability to process antigens (CD83; CD205); markers shown to induce regulatory T cells (ILT3; ILT4), 3) Soluble HLA G, and 4) Liver function/drug levels. If problems develop during conversion (e.g. acute rejection, significant drug side effects) requiring discontinuation of rapamycin, MMF and/or reversion to CNI therapy, assays will not be performed. Monthly liver function/drug levels performed after successful conversion (standard of care). | Procedure or surgery | Conversion Group |
| Blood Draw from Control SubjectsTen healthy individuals will have blood drawn (40 ml = 8 teaspoons (tsps.)).Blood will be drawn at one time point for the following: * Dendritic cell assays: myeloid vs. lymphoid (CD11c; CD123); maturation and ability to process antigens (CD83; CD205); markers that have been shown to induce regulatory T cells (ILT3; ILT4). * Regulatory/Suppressor Cells (CD4+CD25+FOXP3+CD127low; and CD8+ CD28- FOXP3+CD127low cells). * HLA microchimerism \& HLA G | Procedure or surgery | Control Group |
| Blood Draw - CyAAlso: cyclosporineBlood drawn from 10 patients on cyclosporine (CyA) (40 ml = 8 tsp.)). Blood will be drawn at one time point for the following: * Dendritic cell assays: myeloid vs. lymphoid (CD11c; CD123); maturation and ability to process antigens (CD83; CD205); markers that have been shown to induce regulatory T cells (ILT3; ILT4). * Regulatory/Suppressor Cells (CD4+CD25+FOXP3+CD127low; and CD8+ CD28- FOXP3+CD127low cells). * HLA microchimerism \& HLA G | Procedure or surgery | Monotherapy Group |
| Blood Draw - TacrolimusAlso: TacrolimusBlood drawn from 5 patients on Tacrolimus (40 ml = 8 tsp.) at one time point for the following: * Dendritic cell assays: myeloid vs. lymphoid (CD11c; CD123); maturation and ability to process antigens (CD83; CD205); markers that have been shown to induce regulatory T cells (ILT3; ILT4). * Regulatory/Suppressor Cells (CD4+CD25+FOXP3+CD127low; and CD8+ CD28- FOXP3+CD127low cells). * HLA microchimerism \& HLA G | Procedure or surgery | Monotherapy Group |
| Blood Draw - MMFAlso: mycophenolate mofetilBlood will be drawn from 10 patients on mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (40 ml or the equivalent of 8 teaspoons). Blood will be drawn at one time point for the following analysis: * Dendritic cell assays: myeloid vs. lymphoid (CD11c; CD123); maturation and ability to process antigens (CD83; CD205); markers that have been shown to induce regulatory T cells (ILT3; ILT4). * Regulatory/Suppressor Cells (CD4+CD25+FOXP3+CD127low; and CD8+ CD28- FOXP3+CD127low cells). * HLA microchimerism \& HLA G | Procedure or surgery | Monotherapy Group |
| Blood Draw - RapamycinAlso: RapamycinBlood drawn from 10 patients on rapamycin (40 ml = 8 tsp.)) at one time point for the following: * Dendritic cell assays: myeloid vs. lymphoid (CD11c; CD123); maturation and ability to process antigens (CD83; CD205); markers that have been shown to induce regulatory T cells (ILT3; ILT4). * Regulatory/Suppressor Cells (CD4+CD25+FOXP3+CD127low; and CD8+ CD28- FOXP3+CD127low cells). * HLA microchimerism \& HLA G | Procedure or surgery | Monotherapy Group |
Primary outcome
Track interval outcome measures for development of higher percentages of FOXP3+ T1 regulatory cells in stable liver transplant recipients on rapamycin or MMF monotherapy compared to CNI monotherapy.
Time frame: Two weeks prior to conversion, Months 3 & 6 following conversion
* Dendritic cell assays: myeloid vs. lymphoid (CD11c; CD123); maturation and ability to process antigens (CD83; CD205); markers that have been shown to induce regulatory T cells (ILT3; ILT4). * Regulatory/Suppressor Cells (CD4+CD25+FOXP3+CD127low; and CD8+ CD28- FOXP3+CD127low cells). * Liver function and drug levels.
Track interval outcome measures for development of higher percentages of FOXP3+ T regulatory cells in liver transplant recipients after conversion from CNI to rapamycin comparing to MMF monotherapy.
Time frame: Two weeks prior to conversion, Months 3 & 6 following conversion
* Dendritic cell assays: myeloid vs. lymphoid (CD11c; CD123); maturation and ability to process antigens (CD83; CD205); markers that have been shown to induce regulatory T cells (ILT3; ILT4). * Regulatory/Suppressor Cells (CD4+CD25+FOXP3+CD127low; and CD8+ CD28- FOXP3+CD127low cells).
4 secondary outcomes
Track interval outcome measures for development of higher percentages of immunophenotypic markers associated with regulatory T cell production in stable liver transplant recipients on rapamycin or MMF monotherapy compared to CNI monotherapy.
Time frame: Two weeks prior to conversion, Months 3 & 6 following conversion
Track interval outcome measures for development of higher percentages of immunophenotypic markers associated with regulatory T cell production in liver transplant recipients after conversion from CNI to rapamycin or MMF monotherapy.
Time frame: Two weeks prior to conversion, Months 3 & 6 following conversion
Document improvement in adverse CNI side effects after conversion to rapamycin or MMF monotherapy, comparing designated time points.
Time frame: Two weeks prior to conversion, Months 3 & 6 following conversion
Document the development of any adverse rapamycin or MMF side effects after conversion, comparing designated time points.
Time frame: Two weeks prior to conversion, Months 3 & 6 following conversion
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Apr 2015.
- Background: PubMed 15616214Sayegh MH, Carpenter CB. Transplantation 50 years later--progress, challenges, and promises. N Engl J Med. 2004 Dec 23;351(26):2761-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJMon043418. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 11502975Takatsuki M, Uemoto S, Inomata Y, Egawa H, Kiuchi T, Fujita S, Hayashi M, Kanematsu T, Tanaka K. Weaning of immunosuppression in living donor liver transplant recipients. Transplantation. 2001 Aug 15;72(3):449-54. doi: 10.1097/00007890-200108150-00016.
- Background: PubMed 16473433Tisone G, Orlando G, Cardillo A, Palmieri G, Manzia TM, Baiocchi L, Lionetti R, Anselmo A, Toti L, Angelico M. Complete weaning off immunosuppression in HCV liver transplant recipients is feasible and favourably impacts on the progression of disease recurrence. J Hepatol. 2006 Apr;44(4):702-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2005.11.047. Epub 2006 Jan 4.
- Background: PubMed 15919439Girlanda R, Rela M, Williams R, O'Grady JG, Heaton ND. Long-term outcome of immunosuppression withdrawal after liver transplantation. Transplant Proc. 2005 May;37(4):1708-9. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2005.03.070.
- Background: PubMed 15176965Hurwitz M, Desai DM, Cox KL, Berquist WE, Esquivel CO, Millan MT. Complete immunosuppressive withdrawal as a uniform approach to post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease in pediatric liver transplantation. Pediatr Transplant. 2004 Jun;8(3):267-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3046.2004.00129.x.
- Background: PubMed 12176465Oike F, Yokoi A, Nishimura E, Ogura Y, Fujimoto Y, Kasahara M, Kaihara S, Kiuchi T, Egawa H, Uemoto S, Tanaka K. Complete withdrawal of immunosuppression in living donor liver transplantation. Transplant Proc. 2002 Aug;34(5):1521. doi: 10.1016/s0041-1345(02)02980-9. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 16889539Lerut J, Sanchez-Fueyo A. An appraisal of tolerance in liver transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2006 Aug;6(8):1774-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2006.01396.x.
- Background: PubMed 9123261Mazariegos GV, Reyes J, Marino I, Flynn B, Fung JJ, Starzl TE. Risks and benefits of weaning immunosuppression in liver transplant recipients: long-term follow-up. Transplant Proc. 1997 Feb-Mar;29(1-2):1174-7. doi: 10.1016/s0041-1345(96)00535-0. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 9020325Mazariegos GV, Reyes J, Marino IR, Demetris AJ, Flynn B, Irish W, McMichael J, Fung JJ, Starzl TE. Weaning of immunosuppression in liver transplant recipients. Transplantation. 1997 Jan 27;63(2):243-9. doi: 10.1097/00007890-199701270-00012.
- Background: PubMed 17004249Donckier V, Troisi R, Le Moine A, Toungouz M, Ricciardi S, Colle I, Van Vlierberghe H, Craciun L, Libin M, Praet M, Noens L, Stordeur P, Andrien M, Lambermont M, Gelin M, Bourgeois N, Adler M, de Hemptinne B, Goldman M. Early immunosuppression withdrawal after living donor liver transplantation and donor stem cell infusion. Liver Transpl. 2006 Oct;12(10):1523-8. doi: 10.1002/lt.20872.
- Background: PubMed 12780560Mazariegos GV, Zahorchak AF, Reyes J, Ostrowski L, Flynn B, Zeevi A, Thomson AW. Dendritic cell subset ratio in peripheral blood correlates with successful withdrawal of immunosuppression in liver transplant patients. Am J Transplant. 2003 Jun;3(6):689-96. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-6143.2003.00109.x.
- Background: PubMed 9696010Wong T, Nouri-Aria KT, Devlin J, Portmann B, Williams R. Tolerance and latent cellular rejection in long-term liver transplant recipients. Hepatology. 1998 Aug;28(2):443-9. doi: 10.1002/hep.510280223.
- PMID: 19141306Link provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Liver Transplant Rejection
RecruitingObservational study
Magnetic Resonance Elastography as a Method to Estimate Stiffness of Soft Tissues
Heart Failure, Liver Fibrosis
RecruitingObservational study
Immune Biomarkers for Predicting Complications After Liver Transplantation
Liver Transplantation (LT), Immuno-suppression
RecruitingPhase 3
Everolimus bAsed caLcineurin inhibiTor frEe immunosuppRession oNe Year AfTer lIver transplantatiON (ALTERNATION)
Liver Allograft, Liver Diseases
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Global Utilization And Registry Database for Improved preservAtion of doNor Livers
Liver Diseases, Liver Dysfunction
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Safety and Clinical Activity of QEL-001 in A2-mismatch Liver Transplant Patients
Rejection; Transplant, Liver, Liver Failure
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Josh Levitsky, MD principal investigator
Northwestern University, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Northwestern Medical Faculty Foundation
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Liver Transplant Rejection and Immunosuppression, run by Northwestern University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Apr 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Track interval outcome measures for development of higher percentages of FOXP3+ T1 regulatory cells in stable liver transplant recipients on rapamycin or MMF monotherapy compared to CNI monotherapy. (time frame: Two weeks prior to conversion, Months 3 & 6 following conversion). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01678937, which also lists 21 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Apr 2015.