RhinosinusitisNCT01680705
Ideal Frequency of Postoperative High Volume Saline Irrigations Following Endoscopic Sinus Surgery
A study testing High Volume Saline Irrigation in people with Rhinosinusitis, run by Dr. Luke Rudmik at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
The aim of this study is to determine what the ideal frequency of high-volume sinonasal saline irrigation in the early postoperative period following ESS for medically refractory CRS. We will evaluate once, twice, and three times daily frequency sinonasal saline irrigation protocols. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Rhinosinusitis
- What is being tested?
- High Volume Saline Irrigation
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 75 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- Jul 2012to Sep 2014
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Adult patients with a diagnosis of CRS as per guidelines (> 18 years old)
- Documented failed medical treatment of CRS
- Planned ESS for the treatment of CRS
- Able to read and understand English
Who cannot join
- Pregnant
- Cystic Fibrosis
- Diagnosed immotile cilia syndrome
- Diagnosed immunodeficiency syndrome
- Diagnosed fungal sinusitis
- Sinonasal tumours or obstructive lesions
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
The aim of this study is to determine what the ideal frequency of high-volume sinonasal saline irrigation in the early postoperative period following ESS for medically refractory CRS. We will evaluate once, twice, and three times daily frequency sinonasal saline irrigation protocols. Our hypothesis is that three times a day sinonasal saline irrigations for the first week is ideal with no difference between frequencies after 1 week.
Read the detailed description
Chronic Rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a common inflammatory condition of the upper respiratory tract lasting more than 8 to 12 weeks. Major symptoms include facial congestion/fullness, facial pain/pressure, nasal obstruction/blockage, purulent nasal drainage, and reduction or loss of smell. The diagnosis must include two major symptoms and either endoscopic evidence of polyps, edema or mucopurulent discharge from the middle meatus and/or CT changes in the mucosa of sinuses or ostiomeatal complexes.
CRS has an estimated prevalence of 5% in the Canadian population, and up to 16% in some adult populations in the United States. Sinusitis is associated with a major societal health care burden, costing billions of dollars a year in North America. The medical treatment of CRS includes topical saline and corticosteroid sprays, systemic steroids and antimicrobials. Specifically, sinonasal saline irrigation is a safe, nonpharmacologic treatment, and an important and efficacious component in the management of CRS. Sinonasal saline irrigation can vary by concentration (e.g. hypertonic, isotonic, hypotonic), pressure (e.g. passive or active), and volume (e.g. high and low).
A recent evidence-based review by Rudmik et al. recommended sinonasal saline irrigation in the early postoperative period following endoscopic sinus surgery. Although 'daily' sinonasal saline irrigations are recommended, the ideal frequency is unknown since there have been no studies evaluating this topic.
This is a prospective, randomized, single blind study evaluating the subjective and objective outcomes of different sinonasal saline irrigation frequencies in patients who receive ESS for medically refractory CRS. Both disease-specific quality of life (QoL) and endoscopy scores will be measured at 1 week, 3 weeks, and 2 months postoperatively. The expected total number of patients to be enrolled in this study is approximately 75 (25 per arm), with a planned completion time of two years.
- Conditions
- Rhinosinusitis
- Being tested
- High Volume Saline Irrigation
- Keywords
- Chronic Rhinosinusitis, Endoscopic Sinus Surgery, Sinonasal saline irrigation, Frequency, Postoperative, High Volume, Randomized Control Trial, Single Blinded, Prospective Study, Quality of Life, Endoscopic Sinus Score
- Medical subject headings
- Rhinosinusitis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
High Volume Saline IrrigationOther
High volume saline irrigation (240 ml)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Frequency: Once Daily | Active comparator | Patients will use high volume saline irrigation once daily post operatively. Receives: Other: High Volume Saline Irrigation |
| Frequency: Twice Daily | Active comparator | Patients will use high volume saline irrigation twice daily post operatively. Receives: Other: High Volume Saline Irrigation |
| Frequency: Three Times Daily | Active comparator | Patients will use high volume saline irrigation three times daily post operatively. Receives: Other: High Volume Saline Irrigation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in Quality of Life
The SNOT-22 and the nasal and sinus symptoms score will be complete by the patient to assess quality of life. They will be completed preoperatively and 1 week, 3 weeks and 2 months postoperatively.
Measured: Pre and post operative (1, 3 and 8 weeks post operatively)
Secondary outcomes (1)
Change in Endoscopic Score
Two endoscopic scales (the Lund-Kennedy and the POSE) will be used to assess the endoscopic appearance pre and post operatively. They will be completed preoperatively and 1 week, 3 weeks and 2 months postoperatively.
Measured: Pre and Post-Operative (1, 3 and 8 weeks post operatively)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 Sep 2012 (estimated)
- Study startJul 2012
- Primary completionJul 2014
- Study completionSep 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (11)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for RhinosinusitisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Investigator
- Enrolment
- 75 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Dr. Luke Rudmik
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Dr. Luke Rudmik, University of Calgary
- Investigators
- Luke Rudmik, MD, Principal investigator, University of Calgary
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01680705
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- SIESS-2012
- Status last verified
- Dec 2014
- First submitted
- 30 Aug 2012
- Last updated
- 3 Dec 2014
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Desrosiers M, Evans GA, Keith PK, Wright ED, Kaplan A, Bouchard J, Ciavarella A, Doyle PW, Javer AR, Leith ES, Mukherji A, Robert Schellenberg R, Small P, Witterick IJ. Canadian clinical practice guidelines for acute and chronic rhinosinusitis. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011 May;40 Suppl 2:S99-193. English, French.
PubMed 21658337Chen Y, Dales R, Lin M. The epidemiology of chronic rhinosinusitis in Canadians. Laryngoscope. 2003 Jul;113(7):1199-205. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200307000-00016.
PubMed 12838019Anand VK. Epidemiology and economic impact of rhinosinusitis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl. 2004 May;193:3-5. doi: 10.1177/00034894041130s502.
PubMed 15174752Ray NF, Baraniuk JN, Thamer M, Rinehart CS, Gergen PJ, Kaliner M, Josephs S, Pung YH. Healthcare expenditures for sinusitis in 1996: contributions of asthma, rhinitis, and other airway disorders. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1999 Mar;103(3 Pt 1):408-14. doi: 10.1016/s0091-6749(99)70464-1.
PubMed 10069873Van Cauwenberge P, Watelet JB. Epidemiology of chronic rhinosinusitis. Thorax. 2000 Oct;55 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S20-1. doi: 10.1136/thorax.55.suppl_2.s20. No abstract available.
PubMed 10992549Tomooka LT, Murphy C, Davidson TM. Clinical study and literature review of nasal irrigation. Laryngoscope. 2000 Jul;110(7):1189-93. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200007000-00023.
PubMed 10892694Rabago D, Zgierska A, Mundt M, Barrett B, Bobula J, Maberry R. Efficacy of daily hypertonic saline nasal irrigation among patients with sinusitis: a randomized controlled trial. J Fam Pract. 2002 Dec;51(12):1049-55.
PubMed 12540331Meltzer EO, Hamilos DL. Rhinosinusitis diagnosis and management for the clinician: a synopsis of recent consensus guidelines. Mayo Clin Proc. 2011 May;86(5):427-43. doi: 10.4065/mcp.2010.0392. Epub 2011 Apr 13.
PubMed 21490181Morley AD, Sharp HR. A review of sinonasal outcome scoring systems - which is best? Clin Otolaryngol. 2006 Apr;31(2):103-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-4486.2006.01155.x.
PubMed 16620328Wright ED, Agrawal S. Impact of perioperative systemic steroids on surgical outcomes in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with polyposis: evaluation with the novel Perioperative Sinus Endoscopy (POSE) scoring system. Laryngoscope. 2007 Nov;117(11 Pt 2 Suppl 115):1-28. doi: 10.1097/MLG.0b013e31814842f8.
PubMed 18075447Hopkins C, Browne JP, Slack R, Lund V, Brown P. The Lund-Mackay staging system for chronic rhinosinusitis: how is it used and what does it predict? Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007 Oct;137(4):555-61. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2007.02.004.
PubMed 17903570
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 Dec 2014. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Ideal Frequency of Postoperative High Volume Saline Irrigations Following Endoscopic Sinus Surgery
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01680705
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SIESS-2012
- Conditions
- Rhinosinusitis
- Keywords
- Chronic Rhinosinusitis, Endoscopic Sinus Surgery, Sinonasal saline irrigation, Frequency, Postoperative, High Volume, Randomized Control Trial, Single Blinded
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 75 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Dr. Luke RudmikUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jul 2012
- Primary completion
- Jul 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- Sep 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 7 Sep 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of this study is to determine what the ideal frequency of high-volume sinonasal saline irrigation in the early postoperative period following ESS for medically refractory CRS. We will evaluate once, twice, and three times daily frequency sinonasal saline irrigation protocols. Our hypothesis is that three times a day sinonasal saline irrigations for the first week is ideal with no difference between frequencies after 1 week.
Detailed description
Chronic Rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a common inflammatory condition of the upper respiratory tract lasting more than 8 to 12 weeks. Major symptoms include facial congestion/fullness, facial pain/pressure, nasal obstruction/blockage, purulent nasal drainage, and reduction or loss of smell. The diagnosis must include two major symptoms and either endoscopic evidence of polyps, edema or mucopurulent discharge from the middle meatus and/or CT changes in the mucosa of sinuses or ostiomeatal complexes.
CRS has an estimated prevalence of 5% in the Canadian population, and up to 16% in some adult populations in the United States. Sinusitis is associated with a major societal health care burden, costing billions of dollars a year in North America. The medical treatment of CRS includes topical saline and corticosteroid sprays, systemic steroids and antimicrobials. Specifically, sinonasal saline irrigation is a safe, nonpharmacologic treatment, and an important and efficacious component in the management of CRS. Sinonasal saline irrigation can vary by concentration (e.g. hypertonic, isotonic, hypotonic), pressure (e.g. passive or active), and volume (e.g. high and low).
A recent evidence-based review by Rudmik et al. recommended sinonasal saline irrigation in the early postoperative period following endoscopic sinus surgery. Although 'daily' sinonasal saline irrigations are recommended, the ideal frequency is unknown since there have been no studies evaluating this topic.
This is a prospective, randomized, single blind study evaluating the subjective and objective outcomes of different sinonasal saline irrigation frequencies in patients who receive ESS for medically refractory CRS. Both disease-specific quality of life (QoL) and endoscopy scores will be measured at 1 week, 3 weeks, and 2 months postoperatively. The expected total number of patients to be enrolled in this study is approximately 75 (25 per arm), with a planned completion time of two years.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (investigator)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Frequency: Once Daily | Active comparator | Other: High Volume Saline IrrigationPatients will use high volume saline irrigation once daily post operatively. |
| Frequency: Twice Daily | Active comparator | Other: High Volume Saline IrrigationPatients will use high volume saline irrigation twice daily post operatively. |
| Frequency: Three Times Daily | Active comparator | Other: High Volume Saline IrrigationPatients will use high volume saline irrigation three times daily post operatively. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Adult patients with a diagnosis of CRS as per guidelines (> 18 years old)
- Documented failed medical treatment of CRS
- Planned ESS for the treatment of CRS
- Able to read and understand English
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Pregnant
- Cystic Fibrosis
- Diagnosed immotile cilia syndrome
- Diagnosed immunodeficiency syndrome
- Diagnosed fungal sinusitis
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| High Volume Saline IrrigationHigh volume saline irrigation (240 ml) | Other | Frequency: Once Daily, Frequency: Three Times Daily, Frequency: Twice Daily |
Primary outcome
Change in Quality of Life
Time frame: Pre and post operative (1, 3 and 8 weeks post operatively)
The SNOT-22 and the nasal and sinus symptoms score will be complete by the patient to assess quality of life. They will be completed preoperatively and 1 week, 3 weeks and 2 months postoperatively.
1 secondary outcome
Change in Endoscopic Score
Time frame: Pre and Post-Operative (1, 3 and 8 weeks post operatively)
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 Dec 2014.
- Background: PubMed 21658337Desrosiers M, Evans GA, Keith PK, Wright ED, Kaplan A, Bouchard J, Ciavarella A, Doyle PW, Javer AR, Leith ES, Mukherji A, Robert Schellenberg R, Small P, Witterick IJ. Canadian clinical practice guidelines for acute and chronic rhinosinusitis. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011 May;40 Suppl 2:S99-193. English, French.
- Background: PubMed 12838019Chen Y, Dales R, Lin M. The epidemiology of chronic rhinosinusitis in Canadians. Laryngoscope. 2003 Jul;113(7):1199-205. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200307000-00016.
- Background: PubMed 15174752Anand VK. Epidemiology and economic impact of rhinosinusitis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl. 2004 May;193:3-5. doi: 10.1177/00034894041130s502.
- Background: PubMed 10069873Ray NF, Baraniuk JN, Thamer M, Rinehart CS, Gergen PJ, Kaliner M, Josephs S, Pung YH. Healthcare expenditures for sinusitis in 1996: contributions of asthma, rhinitis, and other airway disorders. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1999 Mar;103(3 Pt 1):408-14. doi: 10.1016/s0091-6749(99)70464-1.
- Background: PubMed 10992549Van Cauwenberge P, Watelet JB. Epidemiology of chronic rhinosinusitis. Thorax. 2000 Oct;55 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S20-1. doi: 10.1136/thorax.55.suppl_2.s20. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 10892694Tomooka LT, Murphy C, Davidson TM. Clinical study and literature review of nasal irrigation. Laryngoscope. 2000 Jul;110(7):1189-93. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200007000-00023.
- Background: PubMed 12540331Rabago D, Zgierska A, Mundt M, Barrett B, Bobula J, Maberry R. Efficacy of daily hypertonic saline nasal irrigation among patients with sinusitis: a randomized controlled trial. J Fam Pract. 2002 Dec;51(12):1049-55.
- Background: PubMed 21490181Meltzer EO, Hamilos DL. Rhinosinusitis diagnosis and management for the clinician: a synopsis of recent consensus guidelines. Mayo Clin Proc. 2011 May;86(5):427-43. doi: 10.4065/mcp.2010.0392. Epub 2011 Apr 13.
- Background: PubMed 16620328Morley AD, Sharp HR. A review of sinonasal outcome scoring systems - which is best? Clin Otolaryngol. 2006 Apr;31(2):103-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-4486.2006.01155.x.
- Background: PubMed 18075447Wright ED, Agrawal S. Impact of perioperative systemic steroids on surgical outcomes in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with polyposis: evaluation with the novel Perioperative Sinus Endoscopy (POSE) scoring system. Laryngoscope. 2007 Nov;117(11 Pt 2 Suppl 115):1-28. doi: 10.1097/MLG.0b013e31814842f8.
- Background: PubMed 17903570Hopkins C, Browne JP, Slack R, Lund V, Brown P. The Lund-Mackay staging system for chronic rhinosinusitis: how is it used and what does it predict? Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007 Oct;137(4):555-61. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2007.02.004.
Related trials for Rhinosinusitis
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of GSK5784283 (Felcorekibart) in Participants With Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps (CRSwNP)
Nasal Polyps
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Lebrikizumab (LY3650150) in Participants With Chronic Rhinosinusitis and Nasal Polyps Treated With Intranasal Corticosteroids (CONTRAST-NP)
Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps (CRSwNP)
RecruitingPhase 4
Biologics in Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyposis
Chronic Sinusitis, Nasal Polyps
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Study to Investigate Changes in Symptoms in Adult Participants With Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyposis Initiating Treatment With Tezepelumab
Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Firefighter's Longitudinal Airway and Respiratory Exposome/Multiome Study (FLARES)
Anosmia, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Luke Rudmik, MD principal investigator
University of Calgary
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing High Volume Saline Irrigation in people with Rhinosinusitis, run by Dr. Luke Rudmik at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Dec 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in Quality of Life (time frame: Pre and post operative (1, 3 and 8 weeks post operatively)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01680705, which also lists 11 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Dec 2014.