Septic ShockPhase 3IDEAL-ICUNCT01682590
I.D.E.A.L.-I.C.U. (Initiation of Dialysis EArly Versus deLayed in Intensive Care Unit)
A Phase 3 study testing Renal Remplacement Therapy in people with Septic Shock and Acute Renal Failure (as Defined by the "Failure" Stage of the RIFLE Classification), run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Dijon at 27 sites in France.
Trial summary
The purpose of this multicentric, randomized controlled trial is to assess whether the timing of renal replacement therapy initiation (early vs delayed) has an impact on mortality at 90 days in patients with severe acute kidney injury at the failure stage (according to RIFLE criteria) during the initial phase of… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Septic Shock, Acute Renal Failure (as Defined by the "Failure" Stage of the RIFLE Classification)
- What is being tested?
- Renal Remplacement Therapy
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 500 participants
- Where
- 27 sitesFrance
- Study dates
- Jul 2012to Oct 2016
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Adults (males or females, age >18 years) with septic shock who develop acute renal failure (as defined by the "Failure" stage of the RIFLE classification) will be eligible for inclusion.
- Septic shock is defined as severe sepsis with at least 2 to 4 "SIRS" criteria and persistent hypotension despite adequate vascular filling and need vaso-active drugs.
- SIRS is defined as the simultaneous presence of at least 2 of the following criteria :
- Body temperature ≥ 38°C ou ≤ 36°C
- Heart rate ≥ 90 bpm
- Respiratory rate ≥ 20/mn or PaCO2 ≤ 32 mmHg
Show all 12Show fewer
- Leucocytes ≥ 12,000/mm3 or ≤ 4,000/mm3 or >10% immature forms.
- Acute renal insufficiency is defined as the "failure" stage of the RIFLE classification, i.e. the presence of at least one of the following criteria:
- Increased creatinine x 3 times the baseline value
- Oliguria < 0.3 ml/kg/h for 12 hours
- Anuria (diuresis < 100ml) for at least 12 hours
- All patients are required to provide informed consent after having been appropriately informed about the study. In case of temporary incapacity of the patient to sign, the consent form can be signed by a surrogate.
Who cannot join
- Patients presenting any of the following criteria will not be eligible for inclusion in the study:
- Patients with chronic renal at dialysis.
- Patients presenting acute renal failure of type obstructive and patients already presenting emergency criteria for immediate hemodialysis at the time of randomization (i.e. hyperkalemia >6.5 mmol/L or pH<7.15 or pulmonary oedema by fluid overload)
- Patients already had hemodialysis before their arrival in the intensive care unit
- Pregnant women.
- Moribund patients whose life expectancy is less than 24 hours
Show all 10Show fewer
- Patients unlikely to survive to 28 days because of uncontrollable comorbidities (e.g. cardiac, pulmonary or hepatic disease at the terminal stage, hepatorenal syndrome, uncontrolled cancer, severe post-anorexic encephalopathy…)
- Patients with advance directives indicating their wish not to be resuscitated.
- Patients under legal guardianship.
- Patients participing in another interventional study that may influence the prognosis of patients.
Trial locations and contacts
27 sites in 1 country.
27 sites in 1 country
France27 sites
CH Avignon
Avignon, 84000
CH Belfort
Belfort, 90000
CHU Besançon
Besançon, 25000
CH de BOURG-EN-BRESSE
Bourg-en-Bresse, 01012
CHU Caen
Caen, 14003
CHU Clermont-Ferrand
Clermont-Ferrand, 63100
CH Dieppe
Dieppe, 76200
CHU Dijon
Dijon, 21000
CH Sud Essonne - Site Etampes
Étampes, 91 150
Hôpital Raymond-Poincaré GARCHES (AP-HP)
Garches, 92380
CHU Grenoble
Grenoble, 38043
CH de LA ROCHE sur YON
La Roche-sur-Yon, 85000
Groupe Hospitalier de l'institut Catholique de LILLE
Lille, 59160
CHU de Lyon
Lyon, 69000
CHU Montpellier
Montpellier, 34000
CHU Lapeyronie
Montpellier, 34295
CHG Mulhouse
Mulhouse, 68100
CHU Nancy Brabois
Nancy, 54000
CHU Nîmes
Nîmes, 30000
CHR d'Orléans
Orléans, 45100
Hôpital Cochin
Paris, 75014
HOPITAL BICHAT Claude-Bernard
Paris, 75018
CH Périgueux
Périgueux, 24019
CHU Lyon Sud
Pierre-Bénite, 69495
CHU de Strasbourg - Nouvel hôpital civil
Strasbourg, 67000
CHR Metz
Thionville, 57100
CHRU Tours
Tours
About this study
Official title: Impact on Mortality of the Timing of Renal Replacement Therapy in Patients With Severe Acute Kidney Injury in Septic Shock: the IDEAL-ICU Study (Initiation of Dialysis Early Versus Delayed in the Intensive Care Unit): Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial
The purpose of this multicentric, randomized controlled trial is to assess whether the timing of renal replacement therapy initiation (early vs delayed) has an impact on mortality at 90 days in patients with severe acute kidney injury at the failure stage (according to RIFLE criteria) during the initial phase of septic shock.
Read the detailed description
Acute renal failure is one of the most feared complications of septic shock and occurs in 51% of patients with these conditions. Mortality at 3 months ranges from 36% to 60%. To date, these exists no consensus regarding the optimal time to initiate renal remplacement therapy (RRT). Retrospective and observational studies have suggested that early initiation of RRT could help to improve prognosis in these patients. Therefore, we aim to investigate wether early initiation of RRT (within 12 hours after a diagnosis of acute renal insufficiency at the "failure" stage according to the RIFLE Criteria), will reduce 90-day mortality as compared to deferred initiation of RRT (48 to 60 hours after diagnosis), in intensive care unit (ICU) patients with septic shock who develop acute renal failure.
Secondary objectives include: to compare the impact of the two RRT strategies on 28, 180 et 360 day mortality, duration of mechanical ventilation, duration of RRT, duration of ICU stay and duration of overall hospital stay. In addition, quality of life at 90 and 360 days will be evaluated using the EQ5D questionnaire. Tolerance of both strategies will be compared in terms of metabolic disorders, arrhythmias, pulmonary oedema by overload, hypotension, hemorrhagic complications, and dependence on RRT at hospital discharge.
- Conditions
- Septic Shock, Acute Renal Failure (as Defined by the "Failure" Stage of the RIFLE Classification)
- Being tested
- Renal Remplacement Therapy
- Keywords
- septic shock; acute renal failure; renal remplacement therapy; mortality; intensive care; critical care; acute kidney injury
- Medical subject headings
- Shock, Septic, Acute Kidney Injury
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Renal Remplacement TherapyProcedure or surgery
Investigators of each center will have the choice of the RRT technique based on their usual practice: intermittent hemodialysis, intermittent hemodiafiltration, continuous hemodialysis, continuous hemofiltration, continuous hemodiafiltration (typically the continuous techniques in the acute phase, followed by intermittent techniques after stabilization).
In case of life threatening conditions within the 48 hours after randomisation (hyperkalemia, metabolic acidosis or pulmonary edema) the RRT will be initiated as soon as possible.
In case of improvement of renal function within the 48 hours after randomisation (defined as the return of spontaneous urine output > 1000ml/24 hr or >2000ml/24hr with diuretics), RRT is not mandatory.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Early initiation of RRT | Experimental | Start of RRT within a maximum of 12 hours after randomisation. Receives: Procedure: Renal Remplacement Therapy |
| Deferred RRT | Active comparator | Start of RRT between 48 and 60 hours after randomisation. Receives: Procedure: Renal Remplacement Therapy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Progression free survival
To investigate whether early initiation of RRT (within 12 hours after a diagnosis of acute renal insufficiency at the "failure" stage according to the RIFLE Criteria), will reduce 90-day mortality as compared to deferred initiation of RRT (48 to 60 hours after diagnosis), in intensive care unit (ICU) patients with septic shock who develop acute renal failure.
Measured: 90 days
Secondary outcomes (1)
Comparison of the tolerance and evaluation quality of life
Secondary objectives include: to compare the impact of the two RRT strategies on 28, 180 and 360 day mortality, duration of mechanical ventilation, duration of RRT, duration of ICU stay and duration of overall hospital stay. In addition, quality of life at 90 and 360 days will be evaluated using the EQ5D questionnaire. Tolerance of both strategies will be compared in terms of metabolic disorders, arrhythmias, pulmonary oedema by overload, hypotension, hemorrhagic complications, and dependence on RRT at hospital discharge.
Measured: 90 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Sep 2012 (estimated)
- Study startJul 2012
- Primary completionOct 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Septic ShockStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- To investigate whether early initiation of RRT (within 12 hours after a diagnosis of acute renal insufficiency at the"failure" stage according to the RIFLE Criteria), will reduce 90-day mortality as compared to deferred initiation of RRT(48 to 60 hours after diagnosis), in intensive care unit (ICU) patients with septic shock who develop acute renal failure
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 500 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Dijon
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Jean-Pierre QUENOT, Study director, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire DijonSaber Davide BARBAR, Principal investigator, CHU de Nimes
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01682590
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Quenot IDEAL-ICU
- Acronym
- IDEAL-ICU
- Status last verified
- Feb 2026
- First submitted
- 10 Sep 2012
- Last updated
- 9 Feb 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Barbar SD, Binquet C, Monchi M, Bruyere R, Quenot JP. Impact on mortality of the timing of renal replacement therapy in patients with severe acute kidney injury in septic shock: the IDEAL-ICU study (initiation of dialysis early versus delayed in the intensive care unit): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2014 Jul 7;15:270. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-270.
PubMed 24998258Barbar SD, Clere-Jehl R, Bourredjem A, Hernu R, Montini F, Bruyere R, Lebert C, Bohe J, Badie J, Eraldi JP, Rigaud JP, Levy B, Siami S, Louis G, Bouadma L, Constantin JM, Mercier E, Klouche K, du Cheyron D, Piton G, Annane D, Jaber S, van der Linden T, Blasco G, Mira JP, Schwebel C, Chimot L, Guiot P, Nay MA, Meziani F, Helms J, Roger C, Louart B, Trusson R, Dargent A, Binquet C, Quenot JP; IDEAL-ICU Trial Investigators and the CRICS TRIGGERSEP Network. Timing of Renal-Replacement Therapy in Patients with Acute Kidney Injury and Sepsis. N Engl J Med. 2018 Oct 11;379(15):1431-1442. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1803213.
PubMed 30304656Barbar SD, Dargent A, Quenot JP. Timing of Renal-Replacement Therapy in Acute Kidney Injury and Sepsis. N Engl J Med. 2019 Jan 24;380(4):399. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1815142. No abstract available.
PubMed 30673539Fayad AI, Buamscha DG, Ciapponi A. Timing of kidney replacement therapy initiation for acute kidney injury. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 23;11(11):CD010612. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010612.pub3.
PubMed 36416787
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Feb 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Impact on Mortality of the Timing of Renal Replacement Therapy in Patients With Severe Acute Kidney Injury in Septic Shock: the IDEAL-ICU Study (Initiation of Dialysis Early Versus Delayed in the Intensive Care Unit): Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01682590
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IDEAL-ICU / Quenot IDEAL-ICU
- Conditions
- Septic Shock, Acute Renal Failure (as Defined by the "Failure" Stage of the RIFLE Classification)
- Keywords
- septic shock; acute renal failure; renal remplacement therapy; mortality; intensive care; critical care; acute kidney injury
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Terminated
- Enrolment
- 500 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire DijonUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jul 2012
- Primary completion
- Oct 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 11 Sep 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this multicentric, randomized controlled trial is to assess whether the timing of renal replacement therapy initiation (early vs delayed) has an impact on mortality at 90 days in patients with severe acute kidney injury at the failure stage (according to RIFLE criteria) during the initial phase of septic shock.
Detailed description
Acute renal failure is one of the most feared complications of septic shock and occurs in 51% of patients with these conditions. Mortality at 3 months ranges from 36% to 60%. To date, these exists no consensus regarding the optimal time to initiate renal remplacement therapy (RRT). Retrospective and observational studies have suggested that early initiation of RRT could help to improve prognosis in these patients. Therefore, we aim to investigate wether early initiation of RRT (within 12 hours after a diagnosis of acute renal insufficiency at the "failure" stage according to the RIFLE Criteria), will reduce 90-day mortality as compared to deferred initiation of RRT (48 to 60 hours after diagnosis), in intensive care unit (ICU) patients with septic shock who develop acute renal failure.
Secondary objectives include: to compare the impact of the two RRT strategies on 28, 180 et 360 day mortality, duration of mechanical ventilation, duration of RRT, duration of ICU stay and duration of overall hospital stay. In addition, quality of life at 90 and 360 days will be evaluated using the EQ5D questionnaire. Tolerance of both strategies will be compared in terms of metabolic disorders, arrhythmias, pulmonary oedema by overload, hypotension, hemorrhagic complications, and dependence on RRT at hospital discharge.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- To investigate whether early initiation of RRT (within 12 hours after a diagnosis of acute renal insufficiency at the"failure" stage according to the RIFLE Criteria), will reduce 90-day mortality as compared to deferred initiation of RRT(48 to 60 hours after diagnosis), in intensive care unit (ICU) patients with septic shock who develop acute renal failure
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Early initiation of RRT | Experimental | Procedure: Renal Remplacement TherapyStart of RRT within a maximum of 12 hours after randomisation. |
| Deferred RRT | Active comparator | Procedure: Renal Remplacement TherapyStart of RRT between 48 and 60 hours after randomisation. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (12 listed)
- Adults (males or females, age >18 years) with septic shock who develop acute renal failure (as defined by the "Failure" stage of the RIFLE classification) will be eligible for inclusion.
- Septic shock is defined as severe sepsis with at least 2 to 4 "SIRS" criteria and persistent hypotension despite adequate vascular filling and need vaso-active drugs.
- Body temperature ≥ 38°C ou ≤ 36°C
- Heart rate ≥ 90 bpm
- Respiratory rate ≥ 20/mn or PaCO2 ≤ 32 mmHg
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Patients presenting any of the following criteria will not be eligible for inclusion in the study:
- Patients with chronic renal at dialysis.
- Patients presenting acute renal failure of type obstructive and patients already presenting emergency criteria for immediate hemodialysis at the time of randomization (i.e. hyperkalemia >6.5 mmol/L or pH<7.15 or pulmonary oedema by fluid overload)
- Patients already had hemodialysis before their arrival in the intensive care unit
- Pregnant women.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Renal Remplacement TherapyInvestigators of each center will have the choice of the RRT technique based on their usual practice: intermittent hemodialysis, intermittent hemodiafiltration, continuous hemodialysis, continuous hemofiltration, continuous hemodiafiltration (typically the continuous techniques in the acute phase, followed by intermittent techniques after stabilization). In case of life threatening conditions within the 48 hours after randomisation (hyperkalemia, metabolic acidosis or pulmonary edema) the RRT will be initiated as soon as possible. In case of improvement of renal function within the 48 hours after randomisation (defined as the return of spontaneous urine output > 1000ml/24 hr or >2000ml/24hr with diuretics), RRT is not mandatory. | Procedure or surgery | Deferred RRT, Early initiation of RRT |
Primary outcome
Progression free survival
Time frame: 90 days
To investigate whether early initiation of RRT (within 12 hours after a diagnosis of acute renal insufficiency at the "failure" stage according to the RIFLE Criteria), will reduce 90-day mortality as compared to deferred initiation of RRT (48 to 60 hours after diagnosis), in intensive care unit (ICU) patients with septic shock who develop acute renal failure.
1 secondary outcome
Comparison of the tolerance and evaluation quality of life
Time frame: 90 days
Results and safety
The study was stopped early. Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Feb 2026.
- Background: PubMed 24998258Barbar SD, Binquet C, Monchi M, Bruyere R, Quenot JP. Impact on mortality of the timing of renal replacement therapy in patients with severe acute kidney injury in septic shock: the IDEAL-ICU study (initiation of dialysis early versus delayed in the intensive care unit): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2014 Jul 7;15:270. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-270.
- Results publication: PubMed 30304656Barbar SD, Clere-Jehl R, Bourredjem A, Hernu R, Montini F, Bruyere R, Lebert C, Bohe J, Badie J, Eraldi JP, Rigaud JP, Levy B, Siami S, Louis G, Bouadma L, Constantin JM, Mercier E, Klouche K, du Cheyron D, Piton G, Annane D, Jaber S, van der Linden T, Blasco G, Mira JP, Schwebel C, Chimot L, Guiot P, Nay MA, Meziani F, Helms J, Roger C, Louart B, Trusson R, Dargent A, Binquet C, Quenot JP; IDEAL-ICU Trial Investigators and the CRICS TRIGGERSEP Network. Timing of Renal-Replacement Therapy in Patients with Acute Kidney Injury and Sepsis. N Engl J Med. 2018 Oct 11;379(15):1431-1442. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1803213.
- Results publication: PubMed 30673539Barbar SD, Dargent A, Quenot JP. Timing of Renal-Replacement Therapy in Acute Kidney Injury and Sepsis. N Engl J Med. 2019 Jan 24;380(4):399. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1815142. No abstract available.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36416787Fayad AI, Buamscha DG, Ciapponi A. Timing of kidney replacement therapy initiation for acute kidney injury. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 23;11(11):CD010612. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010612.pub3.
Related trials for Septic Shock
RecruitingPhase 3
A Trial of Adjunctive Fludrocortisone (50mcg, 100mcg or Placebo) in Critically Ill Patients With Septic Shock Receiving Hydrocortisone, Evaluating Survival and Functional Recovery and the Influence of Transcriptomic Response
Septic Shock
RecruitingObservational study
Comparison of Cardiac Index Measurement Using Right Ventricular Pressure Curve Analysis and Thermodilution Via a Swan-Ganz IQ™ Catheter.
Septic Shock
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Clinical Value of EMR3 in Sepsis Diagnosis, Monitoring, and Prognosis: A Multicenter Prospective Observational Study
Sepsis
RecruitingPhase 3
Systematic Adjunction of Vasopressine in Septic Shock
Septic Shock
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Neutrophil Activation and NETosis in Sepsis
Sepsis, Septic Shock
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jean-Pierre QUENOT study director
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Dijon
Saber Davide BARBAR principal investigator
CHU de Nimes
27 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Renal Remplacement Therapy in people with Septic Shock and Acute Renal Failure (as Defined by the "Failure" Stage of the RIFLE Classification), run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Dijon at 27 sites in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 12 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Feb 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 27 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early. Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Progression free survival (time frame: 90 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01682590, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Feb 2026.