AzTrials
AzTrials

Coronary Disease Undergoing CABGPhase 4NCT01682707

Assessment of Hemodynamic Response During Intubation Between Rigid Laryngoscopy and Track Light in Coronary Patients

A Phase 4 study testing laryngoscopy and track light in people with Coronary Disease Undergoing CABG, run by Federal University of Juiz de Fora at 1 site in Brazil.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Opioids provide greater patient comfort during intubation, but are not able to abolish completely the release adrenergic hormones during the laryngoscopy, which may cause undesirable hemodynamic changes. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 40 to 70 years
Conditions the study is for
Coronary Disease Undergoing CABG
What is being tested?
laryngoscopy and track light
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
40 participants
Where
1 siteBrazil
Study dates
Feb 2010to Mar 2010
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 40 to 70 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • coronary disease ASA 2 e 3 using beta-blockers

Who cannot join

  • emergency surgery arrythmia other antiarrythmic drugs

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Brazil1 site
  • National Institute of Cardiology / Ministry of Health

    Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, 22240-005

Other trials in Brazil

About this study

Official title: Randomized Clinical Trials to Compare the Hemodynamic Response During Intubation Between Rigid Laryngoscopy and Track Light in Coronary Patients Undergoing CABG

Opioids provide greater patient comfort during intubation, but are not able to abolish completely the release adrenergic hormones during the laryngoscopy, which may cause undesirable hemodynamic changes.

In this study the investigators selected two techniques commonly used for intubation, laryngoscopy and track light, so the investigators can verify which intubation techniques provides less hemodynamic changes in coronary patients under standard anesthesia induction.

Being tested
laryngoscopy, track light
Keywords
intubation, coronary disease, hemodynamic response, anesthesia with tracheal intubation, assessment of hemodynamic response
Medical subject headings
Coronary Disease

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • laryngoscopyProcedure or surgery

    Also called rigidy laryngoscopy,

    tracheal intubation with two different techniques, track light and laryngoscopy.

  • track lightProcedure or surgery

Study groups in NCT01682707
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
LaryngoscopyActive comparatorLaryngoscopy Track Light teaqueal intubation
Receives: Procedure: laryngoscopy
Track LightActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Procedure: track light

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. hemodynamic response

    tracheal intubation with track light release less adrenergic hormones than laryngoscopy intubation

    Measured: patient prepare (baseline), 1min after induction, 5 min after induction, 1 min after intubation

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted11 Sep 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study startFeb 2010
  3. Primary completionMar 2010
  4. Study completionMar 2010

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
40 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01682707
Sponsor's protocol ID
CAAE-0021.0.185.000-09
Status last verified
Apr 2012
First submitted
1 Apr 2010
Last updated
11 Sep 2012
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Nishiyama T, Misawa K, Yokoyama T, Hanaoka K. Effects of combining midazolam and barbiturate on the response to tracheal intubation: changes in autonomic nervous system. J Clin Anesth. 2002 Aug;14(5):344-8. doi: 10.1016/s0952-8180(02)00370-7.

    PubMed 12208438
  • Nora FS, Klipel R, Ayala G, Oliveira Filho GR. [Remifentanil: does the infusion regimen make a difference in the prevention of hemodynamic responses to tracheal intubation?]. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2007 Jun;57(3):247-60. doi: 10.1590/s0034-70942007000300003. Portuguese.

    PubMed 19466360
  • Almeida MC, Martins RS, Martins AL. [Tracheal intubation conditions at 60 seconds in children, adults and elderly patients.]. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2004 Apr;54(2):204-11. doi: 10.1590/s0034-70942004000200007. Portuguese.

    PubMed 19471727

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing laryngoscopy and track light in people with Coronary Disease Undergoing CABG, run by Federal University of Juiz de Fora at 1 site in Brazil.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Sep 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Brazil. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

hemodynamic response (time frame: patient prepare (baseline), 1min after induction, 5 min after induction, 1 min after intubation). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01682707, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Sep 2012.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in