AzTrials
AzTrials

Ischemic StrokeDASHNCT01683591

Dysphagia Assessment in Acute Ischemic Stroke Using High-resolution Manometry

An observational study of Ischemic Stroke, run by The Catholic University of Korea at 1 site in South Korea.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Dysphagia occurs relatively commonly in patients with acute stroke, and can lead to aspiration pneumonia and malnutrition. By using the stroke registry of our hospital, we will evaluate the feasibility and usefulness of Dysphagia screening in Acute Stroke using High-resolution impedance manometry (DASH). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age
Conditions the study is for
Ischemic Stroke
What is being tested?
High-resolution impedance manometry test
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
How many people
293 participants
Where
1 siteSouth Korea
Study dates
Apr 2009to Nov 2009
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: Acute ischemic stroke patients at neurology department from April 2009 to November 2009 were evaluated.

Who may be able to join

None listed.

Who cannot join

  • hyperacute stroke receiving thrombolytic therapy
  • symptom onset > 48 hours
  • patients who died in the incipient stage of acute stroke
  • neurological deterioration (increase in NIHSS ≥ 4)
  • transient ischemic attack
  • history of prior stroke and dysphagia
Show all 10Show fewer
  • other neurological diseases causing oropharyngeal dysphagia, such as Parkinsonism, dementia, and neuromuscular disorders
  • history of cranial neurosurgery
  • prior or current structural lesions causing oropharyngeal dysphagia,
  • pulmonary diseases such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or current pneumonia.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

South Korea1 site
  • Seoul St. Mary's Hospital

    Seoul, 137-701

Other trials in South Korea

About this study

Official title: Dysphagia Screening in Acute Stroke Using High-resolution Impedance Manometry (DASH); Its Implication to Diet Decision and Clinical Outcome

Dysphagia occurs relatively commonly in patients with acute stroke, and can lead to aspiration pneumonia and malnutrition. By using the stroke registry of our hospital, we will evaluate the feasibility and usefulness of Dysphagia screening in Acute Stroke using High-resolution impedance manometry (DASH). The hypothesis tested in this study is that high-resolution impedance manometry (HRiM) can provide the clinical efficacy to evaluate dysphagia and the diet plan in acute stroke patients.

Read the detailed description

The hypothesis tested in this study was that high-resolution manometry can provide the clinical efficacy to evaluate dysphagia and the diet plan in acute stroke patients. By using of stroke registry of our hospital, we assessed feasibility and usefulness of Dysphagia screening in Acute Stroke using High-resolution impedance manometry in patients with acute stroke.

The registry had the contents of two evaluation steps; the first step was the process to identify the patients with risk of possible aspiration and the second step was for detection of silent aspirators.

Firstly, the patient was interviewed regarding difficulties with food intake, chewing and swallowing, and the neurological signs were confirmed by two independent neurologists. After then, the patients were stratified into three aspiration risk group and controlled by proper diet program. Finally the emergence of aspiration pneumonia was observed.

Conditions
Ischemic Stroke
Being tested
High-resolution impedance manometry test
Keywords
Acute stroke, Dysphagia, High-resolution manometry
Medical subject headings
Ischemic Stroke, Stroke, Deglutition Disorders

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • High-resolution impedance manometry testProcedure or surgery

    Also called ManoScan360 and ManoScanZ (Sierra Scientific Instruments, Los Angeles, CA).

    The test was performed as general guideline for high-resolution impedance manometry test. The parameter was obtained and analyzed using the Chicago classification for the liquid swallows with Takasaki's modification for pharyngeal function monitoring. Swallowing pattern and aspiration risk were defined using real-time assessment of high-resolution impedance manometry test.

Study groups in NCT01683591
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
High-risk aspiration groupAmong the consecutive stroke patients, categorized to high-risk group in the patient (1) was not on alert mentality (from drowsy to comatose mentality), (2) was not able to sit upright or control his/her head, and (3) failed to pass indirect water swallow test.
Low-risk aspiration groupPatents without oropharyngeal neurologic signs
Intermediate-risk aspiration groupIf any one of following was positive, categorized to intermediate-risk group; (1) dysarthria, (2) motor aphasia, (3) inability to close and open lips or (4) facial weakness, (5) tongue deviation or (6) uvula deviation, (7) loss of gag reflex, and (8) inability to cough voluntarily.
Receives: Procedure: High-resolution impedance manometry test

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Improvement of diet program

    All patients with dysphagia received swallowing rehabilitation training and were guided as per National Dysphagia Diet level or nasogastric tube feeding. These patients were monitored in terms of the improvement of dietary program (e.g., From nasogastric tube feeding to step 4 dysphagia diet).

    Measured: Cases were followed for the duration of hospital stay, an average of 2 weeks.

  2. Occurrence of aspiration pneumonia

    All patients were monitored in terms of development of aspiration pneumonia. Aspiration pneumonia was defined as typical clinical signs (fever, sputum etc.) and chest radiographic findings (X-ray and computed tomography etc.).

    Measured: Cases were followed for the duration of hospital stay, an average of 2 weeks.

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Overall satisfaction measurement regarding program

    The patients also answered as visual analogue scales that measured their level of overall satisfaction regarding improvement of their symptoms with the protocol.

    Measured: 1 month after study enrollment

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted12 Sep 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study startApr 2009
  3. Study completionNov 2009

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case only
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
293 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01683591
Sponsor's protocol ID
060613
Acronym
DASH
Status last verified
Sep 2012
First submitted
4 Sep 2012
Last updated
12 Sep 2012
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Ischemic Stroke, run by The Catholic University of Korea at 1 site in South Korea.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 0 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Sep 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Improvement of diet program (time frame: Cases were followed for the duration of hospital stay, an average of 2 weeks.). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Sep 2012.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in