AzTrials
AzTrials

Geographic AtrophyGAINNCT01694095

Evolution and Risk Factors Associated With Geographic Atrophy Progression

An observational study of Geographic Atrophy, run by Institut de la Macula y la Retina at 1 site in Spain.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Age-related macular degeneration is one of the leading causes of blindness worldwide. The factors that induce the progression of geographic atrophy, the advanced form of dry age-related macular degeneration, remain poorly understood. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 50 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Geographic Atrophy
How many people
96 participants
Where
1 siteSpain
Study dates
Dec 2009to Aug 2013
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 50 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients with geographic atrophy

Who may be able to join

  • Both sexes
  • 50 years of age or older
  • Uni or bilateral areas of geographic atrophy in the macula (as defined as areas devoid of retinal pigment epithelium measuring at least 0.5 disk areas on a 35º fundus photograph centered on field 2) secondary to age-related macular degeneration
  • Willing to provide Informed consent

Who cannot join

  • Other causes of geographic atrophy aside from age-related macular degeneration (ie, drug induced, central serous chorioretinopathy)
  • Prior history of wet age-related macular degeneration
  • Other significant concomitant macular diseases (ie, significant epiretinal membrane, stage II-IV macular hole)
  • Previous treatment with macular laser photocoagulation, photodynamic therapy, antiangiogenic drugs or other treatments for wet age-related macular degeneration
  • Intraocular surgery aside from phacoemulsification
  • Inability to measure the full extent of the area of atrophy on a 35º fundus autofluorescence image centered on field 2
  • Areas of geographic atrophy in direct contact with peripapillary areas of atrophy

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Spain1 site
  • Institut de la màcula i de la retina

    Barcelona, Barcelona, 08017

Other trials in Spain

About this study

Official title: Characterization of Geographic Atrophy Progression in Patients With Age-related Macular Degeneration

Age-related macular degeneration is one of the leading causes of blindness worldwide. The factors that induce the progression of geographic atrophy, the advanced form of dry age-related macular degeneration, remain poorly understood. The aims of this study are to describe the natural history of geographic atrophy and identify potential risk factors associated with a faster spread of atrophy that may be used to develop rational therapies.

Read the detailed description

Age-related macular degeneration is the leading cause of blindness in developed countries. Geographic atrophy is the advanced form of dry age-related macular degeneration, and currently has no effective therapy. Little is known about the risk factors that drive the progression of geographic atrophy, and yet they are crucial to understand the mechanisms of the disease. Therefore, the identification of risk factors associated with a faster spread of atrophy may help contribute to identify the causes of the disease and, ultimately, to develop new therapeutic strategies to manage the disorder.

The current prospective, observational, natural history study has the following objectives:

  • Describe the natural history of geographic atrophy in anatomic and visual terms
  • Identify risk factors associated with a faster enlargement of atrophy

The main hypothesis is that lipofuscin accumulation at the borders of atrophy as seen with fundus autofluorescence imaging is associated with a faster progression of the disease.

Keywords
Geographic atrophy, prognosis, risk factors, natural history
Medical subject headings
Geographic Atrophy

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT01694095
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Patients with geographic atrophyNot described

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Median/mean change in area of geographic atrophy as measured in mm2 with fundus autofluorescence on a 30º image centered on field 2

    For measures related to change in the area of atrophy, a multivariable model will be fit and will include as an independent variable (amongst other presumed risk factors) fundus autofluorescence patterns

    Measured: From baseline to last follow-up

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Median change in area of geographic atrophy as measured in square root of mm2 with fundus autofluorescence on a 30º image centered on field 2

    Exploratory analysis, either in the main publication or in another paper

    Measured: From baseline to last follow-up

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted26 Sep 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study startDec 2009
  3. Primary completionAug 2013
  4. Study completionAug 2013

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
96 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01694095
Sponsor's protocol ID
GAIN-002-10-2010
Acronym
GAIN
Status last verified
Mar 2015
First submitted
22 Sep 2012
Last updated
24 Mar 2015
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Biarnes M, Mones J, Trindade F, Alonso J, Arias L. Intra and interobserver agreement in the classification of fundus autofluorescence patterns in geographic atrophy secondary to age-related macular degeneration. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2012 Apr;250(4):485-90. doi: 10.1007/s00417-011-1846-y. Epub 2011 Oct 28.

    PubMed 22033626
  • Mones J, Biarnes M, Trindade F. Hyporeflective wedge-shaped band in geographic atrophy secondary to age-related macular degeneration: an underreported finding. Ophthalmology. 2012 Jul;119(7):1412-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.01.026. Epub 2012 Mar 21.

    PubMed 22440276
  • Mones J, Biarnes M, Trindade F, Arias L, Alonso J. Optical coherence tomography assessment of apparent foveal swelling in patients with foveal sparing secondary to geographic atrophy. Ophthalmology. 2013 Apr;120(4):829-36. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.09.054. Epub 2013 Jan 3.

    PubMed 23290986
  • Biarnes M, Forero CG, Arias L, Alonso J, Mones J. Reappraisal of geographic atrophy patterns seen on fundus autofluorescence using a latent class analysis approach. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014 Nov 18;55(12):8302-8. doi: 10.1167/iovs.13-13542.

    PubMed 25406275

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Geographic Atrophy, run by Institut de la Macula y la Retina at 1 site in Spain.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Mar 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Median/mean change in area of geographic atrophy as measured in mm2 with fundus autofluorescence on a 30º image centered on field 2 (time frame: From baseline to last follow-up). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01694095, which also lists 4 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Mar 2015.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in