AzTrials
AzTrials

HIV Risk ReductionVHRWNCT01695694

Violence and HIV Risk Among Women

A study testing supporting positive and healthy relationships and community support group in people with HIV Risk Reduction, run by University of Rochester at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of the study is to test the feasibility, acceptability, and efficacy of an adapted intervention that is theoretically and empirically guided by the Information-Motivation-Behavioral skills model (IMB) and aims at reducing sexual risk behavior among women who have experienced Intimate Partner Violence… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 49 years, women only
Conditions the study is for
HIV Risk Reduction
What is being tested?
supporting positive and healthy relationships and community support group
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
120 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Sep 2012to Oct 2013
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 49 years
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Women will be eligible to participate in the research study if they meet the following criteria:
  • between ages 18 and 49;
  • heterosexually active;
  • have experienced intimate partner violence in the last three months;
  • have engaged in risky sexual behavior in the past three months;
  • not currently pregnant or trying to become pregnant; and
  • physically and psychologically capable of providing informed consent. All subjects will be required to provide written informed consent prior to enrolling in the study.

Who cannot join

  • Persons who meet one or more of the following criteria will be excluded from the study:
  • men;
  • women who have active psychosis or impaired mental status (confirmed with a Mini-Mental Status Exam);
  • are unable to understand spoken English;
  • are less than 18 years old or greater than 49 years old;
  • are currently pregnant or trying to become pregnant
  • women who are exclusively in same-sex relationships.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • University of Rochester

    Rochester, New York, 14642

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: HIV Risk Reduction for Women Reporting Intimate Partner Violence

The purpose of the study is to test the feasibility, acceptability, and efficacy of an adapted intervention that is theoretically and empirically guided by the Information-Motivation-Behavioral skills model (IMB) and aims at reducing sexual risk behavior among women who have experienced Intimate Partner Violence (IPV), as well as such an intervention.

Read the detailed description

The two foremost health problems impacting young adult women are STDs/HIV infection and intimate partner violence (IPV). STDs pose a significant public health issue in the US, particularly among women. The consequences of some STDs are more severe for women, and include infertility, pelvic inflammatory disease, and brain, cardiovascular, and organ damage. Women with STDs are at increased risk for HIV. The proportion of AIDS cases among US adult and adolescent women has more than tripled since 1985. Approximately 12,000 US women are infected with HIV annually, primarily through heterosexual contact. Also, in the US HIV is particularly affecting women of color and those in low-income urban areas.

IPV also affects many women. While the causal links between IPV and HIV risk or infection have not yet been established, emerging empirical evidence has drawn connections between IPV with HIV risk. Several researchers have highlighted the importance of developing sexual risk reduction interventions that address the growing concern of gender-based violence against women. Also, scholars are calling for HIV prevention programs aimed at women to be more comprehensive; for example, by combining them with STD screening or with programs designed to reduce violence against women. Despite this call, there are very few empirically tested interventions for prevention and treatment targeting women who are at risk for STDs/HIV and experience IPV in their intimate relationships. To address high risk sexual behaviors among women who experience gender-based violence in their intimate relationships, I have adapted an existing information-motivation-behavioral skills (IMB) STD/HIV prevention intervention for reducing high sexual risk-taking behaviors. The STD/HIV and IPV comprehensive intervention will address both sexual risk reduction and IPV risk; the intention is to help women to acquire knowledge, skills, and strategies that will reduce their risk for both STDs/HIV and IPV.

Aim 1: To assess the feasibility and acceptability of the adapted IMB STD/HIV prevention intervention by implementing the intervention with a sample of women who are at risk for HIV/STDs and experience IPV. To achieve this aim:

  1. 120 women who are at risk for HIV/STDs and have experienced IPV will be randomized either to receive the experimental prevention intervention or to attend a structurally similar drop-in enhanced support group at a domestic violence agency.
  2. Enrollment, attendance, and attrition data will be used to determine the feasibility of the intervention.
  3. The acceptability of the intervention will be appraised by analyzing pre- and post-intervention acceptability ratings completed by subjects and interventionists.

Aim 2: To gather preliminary evidence of the efficacy of the theoretically guided intervention using a controlled design. To achieve this aim:

  1. Women in the experimental and control groups will be assessed at baseline, post-intervention, and at a 3-month follow-up.
  2. Outcome analyses to calculate effect sizes for use in future power analyses for a larger RCT of the proposed intervention will include measures on primary variables of hypothesized risk antecedents, standard measures of protected and unprotected sex, and secondary variables such as mental health, self esteem, and IPV experiences.
Being tested
supporting positive and healthy relationships, community support group

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • supporting positive and healthy relationshipsBehavioural

  • community support groupBehavioural

Study groups in NCT01695694
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
community support groupActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Behavioral: community support group
supporting positive and healthy relationshipsExperimentalNot described
Receives: Behavioral: supporting positive and healthy relationships

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change from Baseline in sexual risk behavior at 3 months

    Sexual risk behavior is assessed by self-reported number sexual partners in the last three months and number of episodes of unprotected sex with each partner

    Measured: at the completion of 3 months after the intervention

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Change from Baseline in experience of violence at 3 months

    Participant's experiences of violence as well as the frequency and intensity of thse experiences will be assessed using established measures of intimate partner violence

    Measured: At the end 3-months after the end of the intervention

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted28 Sep 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study startSep 2012
  3. Primary completionOct 2013
  4. Study completionOct 2013

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
120 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01695694
Sponsor's protocol ID
RSRB00040309
Other IDs
7K01MH080660
Acronym
VHRW
Status last verified
Feb 2014
First submitted
20 Jul 2012
Last updated
19 Feb 2014
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing supporting positive and healthy relationships and community support group in people with HIV Risk Reduction, run by University of Rochester at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Feb 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change from Baseline in sexual risk behavior at 3 months (time frame: at the completion of 3 months after the intervention). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Feb 2014.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in