AzTrials
AzTrials

Vitamin D DeficiencyNCT01696409

The Effect Of Vitamin D On Measures Of Bone Health And Gene Expression

An observational study of Vitamin D Deficiency, run by Boston University at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Vitamin D deficiency is now recognized as one of the most common vitamin deficiencies in adults in the United States. Vitamin D deficiency has been connected to many chronic health diseases. The goal of this innovative research is to identify how vitamin D is able to have such wide ranging health benefits. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 70 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Vitamin D Deficiency
What is being tested?
400 IU vitamin D3 and 2000 IU vitamin D3
How many people
11 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Jul 2009to Jun 2012
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 70 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Healthy Students from Boston University Medical School

Who may be able to join

  • Male and female adults of all races ages 18 years and older

Who cannot join

  • 1. Pregnant and lactating women.
  • 2. Current or recent history of hepatic or renal disease
  • 3. History of taking a daily supplement that contains more than 400 IU vitamin D2 or vitamin D3 within the past month or taking a pharmacologic amount of vitamin D2 or one of the active vitamin D analogs including Zemplar (Paricalcitol), Dovonex (calcipotriol), Hectorol (vitamin D pro hormone)
  • 4. Subjects who are taking antiseizure medications or glucocorticoids.
  • 5. Exposure to a tanning bed or tanning on a beach for more than eight hours within the past month.
  • 6. Known history of elevated calcium. (> 10.5 mg% (mg/dl))
  • 7. History of intestinal malabsorption (i.e. Cystic Fibrosis, Fat Malabsorption Syndrome, Crohn's Disease)
  • 8. Unwilling to consent to this trial

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Boston Medical Center

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02118

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: The Effect of Vitamin D on Measures of Bone Health and Gene Expression

Vitamin D deficiency is now recognized as one of the most common vitamin deficiencies in adults in the United States. Vitamin D deficiency has been connected to many chronic health diseases. The goal of this innovative research is to identify how vitamin D is able to have such wide ranging health benefits. This study will determine which genes are turned on and turned off in adults who receive 2000 IU vitamin D3 per day compared to 400 IU vitamin D3 per day. Results should provide important new insights about the health benefits of vitamin D for adults.

Read the detailed description

Vitamin D, commonly known as the sunshine vitamin, is produced in the skin from sun exposure as well as from dietary sources. However, very few foods naturally contain vitamin D and the amount of vitamin D in fortified foods typically, 100 IU per serving, has been totally inadequate in satisfying adults vitamin D requirement, which is now been estimated to be at least 2,000 IU of vitamin D a day. As a result, vitamin D deficiency is rapidly being recognized world-wide as the most common vitamin deficiency. Upwards of 50-100% of children and adults have been reported as being vitamin D deficient depending on ethnicity, latitude and skin pigmentation. The investigators reported in women at the time of delivery that 76% of mothers and 81% of newborns were vitamin D deficient despite the fact that the mother was taking a prenatal vitamin containing 400 IU vitamin D and drinking two glasses of milk a day. The investigators also reported 30-80% vitamin D deficiency rates in white and black children, healthy young, middle aged and older adults. There have been numerous epidemiologic and clinical observations relating vitamin D deficiency to many chronic diseases and there are many isolated but no comprehensive studies evaluating various genes that are either suppressed or enhanced by 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D [1,25(OH)2D]. It has been estimated that upwards of 2000 genes are directly or indirectly influence by 1,25(OH)2 D. To date, however, there have not been any genomic signatures identified in humans in response to correction of vitamin D deficiency. The goal of this pilot study is to determine whether or not vitamin D3 supplementation will affect biomarkers for calcium and bone metabolism, and how they alter gene expression biomarkers, especially genes related to the non-skeletal actions of vitamin D.

Being tested
400 IU vitamin D3, 2000 IU vitamin D3
Medical subject headings
Vitamin D Deficiency

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • 400 IU vitamin D3Dietary supplement

    Take 400 IU once/day for 2 months

  • 2000 IU vitamin D3Dietary supplement

    2000 IU vitamin D3 once/day for 2 months

Study groups in NCT01696409
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Arm A400 IU vitamin D3 once a day for 2 months
Receives: Dietary Supplement: 400 IU vitamin D3
Arm B2000 IU Vitamin D3 once/day for 2 months
Receives: Dietary Supplement: 2000 IU vitamin D3

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Gene Expression

    Measurement of mRNA levels from genes specific to bone, calcium, and non-skeletal functions.

    Measured: Baseline and Final Visits

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted1 Oct 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study startJul 2009
  3. Primary completionJun 2012
  4. Study completionJun 2012

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
11 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01696409
Sponsor's protocol ID
Vitamin D and Gene Expression
Status last verified
Apr 2017
First submitted
25 Jun 2012
Last updated
4 Apr 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Hossein-nezhad A, Spira A, Holick MF. Influence of vitamin D status and vitamin D3 supplementation on genome wide expression of white blood cells: a randomized double-blind clinical trial. PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e58725. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0058725. Epub 2013 Mar 20.

    PubMed 23527013

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Vitamin D Deficiency, run by Boston University at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Apr 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Gene Expression (time frame: Baseline and Final Visits). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01696409, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Apr 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in