Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Phase 3NCT01697696
Long Term Safety Study of NVA237 vs QAB149 in COPD Patients
A Phase 3 study testing NVA237 and Long-acting beta 2-agonist (LABA) in people with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), run by Novartis Pharmaceuticals at 61 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of the study is to provide long term safety data of NVA237. This study will assess the safety and tolerability of a single dose strength of NVA237. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 40 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
- What is being tested?
- NVA237 and Long-acting beta 2-agonist (LABA)
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 511 participants
- Where
- 61 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Oct 2012to Nov 2014
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 40 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Male or female patients with COPD according to GOLD 2011 who have signed informed consent.
- Patients with airflow limitation of 30-80% post-bronchodilator FEV1 at run-in.
- Current or ex-smokers with a smoking history of at least 10 pack years
- Patients with a mMRC score of at least 2 at run-in.
Who cannot join
- Patients contraindicated for muscarinic antagonist agents and beta-2 agonists
- Patients with a history of malignancy of any organ system, treated or untreated, within the last five years
- Patients with narrow-angle glaucoma, BPH or bladder-neck obstruction or moderate-severe renal impairment or urinary retention
- Patients who had a COPD exacerbation within 6 weeks prior to screening.
- Patients requiring long term oxygen therapy prescribed for more than 12 hr per day.
- Patients with a history of asthma.
Show all 14Show fewer
- Patients with an onset of respiratory symptoms, including COPD diagnosis, prior to 40 years of age.
- Patients with a blood eosinophil count of greater than 600 mm/3 during run-in
- Patients with concomitant pulmonary disease
- Patients with a history of certain cardiovascular co-morbid conditions
- Patients with a diagnosis of alpha-1 anti-trypsin deficiency
- Patients with active pulmonary tuberculosis
- Patients in the active phase of a pulmonary rehabilitation programme
- Other protocol-defined inclusion / exclusion criteria may apply
Trial locations and contacts
61 sites in 1 country.
61 sites in 1 country
United States61 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Biddeford, Maine, 04005
Novartis Investigative Site
Boerne, Texas, 78006
Novartis Investigative Site
Burke, Virginia, 22015
Novartis Investigative Site
Calabash, North Carolina, 28467
Novartis Investigative Site
Charleston, South Carolina, 29412
Novartis Investigative Site
Clearwater, Florida, 33765
Novartis Investigative Site
Columbia, South Carolina, 29204
Novartis Investigative Site
Columbus, Ohio, 43215
Novartis Investigative Site
Columbus, Ohio, 43235
Novartis Investigative Site
Couer D'Alene, Idaho, 83814
Novartis Investigative Site
Edina, Minnesota, 55435
Novartis Investigative Site
El Paso, Texas, 79902
Novartis Investigative Site
Eugene, Oregon, 97404-3233
Novartis Investigative Site
Florence, Kentucky, 41042
Novartis Investigative Site
Fort Collins, Colorado, 80528
Novartis Investigative Site
Fredericksburg, Virginia, 22401
Novartis Investigative Site
Fremont, Nebraska, 68025
Novartis Investigative Site
Fridley, Minnesota, 55432
Novartis Investigative Site
Glastonbury, Connecticut, 06033
Novartis Investigative Site
Greenville, South Carolina, 29605
Novartis Investigative Site
Greer, South Carolina, 29651
Novartis Investigative Site
Gulf Shores, Alabama, 36547
Novartis Investigative Site
Henderson, Nevada, 89014
Novartis Investigative Site
Hialeah, Florida, 33016
Novartis Investigative Site
Houston, Texas, 77043
Novartis Investigative Site
Houston, Texas, 77081
Novartis Investigative Site
Kingwood, Texas, 77339
Novartis Investigative Site
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89119
Novartis Investigative Site
Lebanon, New Hampshire, 03756
Novartis Investigative Site
Madisonville, Kentucky, 42431
Novartis Investigative Site
Manassas, Virginia, 20110
Novartis Investigative Site
Marion, Ohio, 43302
Novartis Investigative Site
Miami, Florida, 33165
Novartis Investigative Site
Miami, Florida, 33172
Novartis Investigative Site
Miami, Florida, 33175
Novartis Investigative Site
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55402
Novartis Investigative Site
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55407
Novartis Investigative Site
Mobile, Alabama, 36608
Novartis Investigative Site
New Orleans, Louisiana, 70119
Novartis Investigative Site
Newburgh, Indiana, 47630
Novartis Investigative Site
North Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, 29582
Novartis Investigative Site
Oakland Park, Florida, 33334
Novartis Investigative Site
Omaha, Nebraska, 68134
Novartis Investigative Site
Opelousas, Louisiana, 70570
Novartis Investigative Site
Oregon, Wisconsin, 53575
Novartis Investigative Site
Pensacola, Florida, 32503
Novartis Investigative Site
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19140
Novartis Investigative Site
Richmond, Virginia, 23225
Novartis Investigative Site
Richmond, Virginia, 23229
Novartis Investigative Site
Riverside, California, 92506
Novartis Investigative Site
San Antonio, Texas, 78229
Novartis Investigative Site
Stamford, Connecticut, 06902
Novartis Investigative Site
Tabor City, North Carolina, 28463
Novartis Investigative Site
Topeka, Kansas, 66606
Novartis Investigative Site
Tucson, Arizona, 85712
Novartis Investigative Site
Warwick, Rhode Island, 02886
Novartis Investigative Site
Waterbury, Connecticut, 06708
Novartis Investigative Site
Wheat Ridge, Colorado, 80033
Novartis Investigative Site
White River Junction, Vermont, 05009
Novartis Investigative Site
Worchester, Massachusetts, 01608
Novartis Investigative Site
Zanesville, Ohio, 43701
About this study
Official title: A Multi-center, Randomized, Double-blind, 52-week Study to Assess the Safety of NVA237 Compared to QAB149 in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Who Have Moderate to Severe Airflow Limitation
The purpose of the study is to provide long term safety data of NVA237. This study will assess the safety and tolerability of a single dose strength of NVA237.
- Being tested
- NVA237, Long-acting beta 2-agonist (LABA), Placebo
- Keywords
- COPD, NVA237, QAB149, glycopyrronium bromide
- Medical subject headings
- Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
NVA237Drug
NVA237 will be supplied in capsule form in blister packs for use in the Novartis Concept 1 SDDPI
Long-acting beta 2-agonist (LABA)Drug
QAB149 and matching placebo will be supplied in capsule form in blister packs for use in the Novartis Concept 1 SDDPI
PlaceboDrug
Placebo to match QAB149
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| NVA237 dose 1 | Experimental | NVA237 dose 1 Receives: Drug: NVA237 |
| Long-acting beta 2-agonist (LABA) | Active comparator | QAB149 Receives: Drug: Long-acting beta 2-agonist (LABA); Drug: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Participants Reporting Safety and Tolerability in Terms of Adverse Event (AE) Reporting Rate
Adverse events are defined as any unfavorable and unintended diagnosis, symptom, sign (including an abnormal lab finding), syndrome or disease which either occurs during study, having been absent at baseline, or, if present at baseline, appears to worsen. Serious adverse events are any untoward medical occurrences that result in death, are life threatening, require (or prolong) hospitalization, cause persistent or significant disability/incapacity, result in congenital anomalies or birth defects, or are other conditions which in judgments of the investigators represent significant hazards.
Measured: 52 weeks
Secondary outcomes (8)
Time to Treatment Discontinuation
Discontinuation rates are calculated using the Kaplan Meier method. The protocol allowed patients to discontinue outside the treatment window, hence we have a patient who discontinued at Day 388. Reasons for discontinuing treatment are Subject/guardian decision, Adverse event, Protocol deviation Lack of efficacy, Physician decision, Dosing error, Disease improvement under study, Pregnancy, Technical problems
Measured: 52 Weeks
Change From Baseline in Mean Forced Expiratory Volume (Average of the Two FEV1 Measurements 45 and 15 Minutes Pre-dose) in One Second at Week 52
Change from baseline in pre-dose trough FEV1 was analyzed using a repeated measures analysis of covariance model which contained treatment, baseline FEV1, visit, baseline smoking status, baseline ICS use, COPD severity and treatment by visit, visit by baseline FEV1 interactions. An unstructured variance-covariance error matrix was used .Pulmonary function assessments were performed using centralized spirometry according to international standards. Pre-dose trough FEV1 was defined as the mean of FEV1 at -45 min and -15 min before the morning dose at Week 52. Baseline FEV1 was defined as the mean of the pre-dose FEV1 at -45 min and -15 min on Day 1.
Measured: -45 min and -15 minutes baseline and at Week 52
Change From Baseline in Pre-dose Forced Expiratory Volume (FEV1) in One Second at All Post Baseline Timepoints
Pulmonary function assessments were performed using centralized spirometry according to international standards. Baseline FEV1 was defined as the average of the pre-dose FEV1 measured at -45 minutes (min) and -15 min at day 1.
Measured: -45 min and -15 minutes baseline and at Week 52
Change From Baseline in Pre-dose Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at All Post-baseline Timepoints
Pulmonary function assessments were performed using centralized spirometry according to international standards. Baseline FVC was defined as the average of the pre-dose FVC measured at -45 minutes (min) and -15 min at day 1.
Measured: -45 min and -15 minutes baseline and at Week 52
Change From Baseline in COPD Symptoms
The total symptom score was defined as the sum of individual cores for respiratory symptoms, cough, wheeze, amount of sputum, color of sputum, and reathlessness. Where a patient had a morning score and an evening score for an individual symptom on one particular day then the worst score was to be taken as the daily score for that symptom. Each symptom scale ranged from 0-3 where 0 was no symptoms and 3 was the worst. The total daily/daytime/nighttime symptom score consists of looking at the score for 6 symptoms and can therefore have a minimum score of 0 or a maximum of 18.
Measured: 52 weeks
Change From Baseline in COPD Symptoms
Percentage of days with 'no daytime symptoms' A day with 'no daytime symptoms' was defined from the diary data as any day where the patient had recorded in the evening no cough, no wheeze, no production of sputum and no feeling of breathlessness (other than when running) and no puffs of rescue medication during the past 12 hours (approximately 8 am to 8pm). However, a patient was not considered symptom free if they had used rescue medication that day even if his/her total daytime symptoms score was zero. Percentage of nights with 'no nighttime awakenings' A night with 'no nighttime awakenings' was defined from diary data as any night where the patient did not wake up due to symptoms. The total number of nights with 'no nighttime awakenings' over the treatment period was divided by the total number of nights where diary recordings had been made in order to derive the percentage nights with 'no nighttime awakenings'.
Measured: 52 weeks
Change From Baseline in Mean Daily Number of Puffs of Rescue Medication
The number of puffs of rescue medication taken in the previous 12 hours was recorded by the patients in the eDiary in the morning and evening. The total number of puffs of rescue medication per day over the 52 week treatment period was calculated and divided by the total number of days with non-missing rescue data to derive the mean daily number of puffs of rescue medication taken for the patient. If the number of puffs was missing for part of the day (either morning or evening), then a half day was used in the denominator. Change from baseline in number of puffs were analyzed using a linear mixed model which contained treatment, baseline number of puffs, baseline smoking status, baseline ICS use and COPD disease severity as fixed effects with center as a random effect
Measured: 52 weeks
Time to First COPD Exacerbation (Moderate or Severe).
COPD exacerbations are considered to be moderate if treatment with systemic corticosteroids and/or antibiotics was required. COPD exacerbations are considered to be severe if hospitalizations were required. Rates are calculated using the Kaplan Meier method.
Measured: 52 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 Oct 2012 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2012
- Primary completionNov 2014
- Study completionNov 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Novartis PharmaceuticalsThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 511 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Study director, Novartis Pharmaceuticals
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01697696
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CNVA237A2319
- Other IDs
- 2012-002728-34
- Status last verified
- Feb 2016
- First submitted
- 28 Sep 2012
- Last updated
- 16 Mar 2016
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Mahler DA, Gifford AH, Satti A, Jessop N, Eckert JH, D'Andrea P, Mota F, Banerjee R. Long-term safety of glycopyrrolate: A randomized study in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD (GEM3). Respir Med. 2016 Jun;115:39-45. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2016.03.015. Epub 2016 Mar 22.
PubMed 27215502
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Mar 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Multi-center, Randomized, Double-blind, 52-week Study to Assess the Safety of NVA237 Compared to QAB149 in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Who Have Moderate to Severe Airflow Limitation
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01697696
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CNVA237A2319
- Keywords
- COPD, NVA237, QAB149, glycopyrronium bromide
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 511 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Novartis PharmaceuticalsIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Oct 2012
- Primary completion
- Nov 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- Nov 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 2 Oct 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 16 Mar 2016
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of the study is to provide long term safety data of NVA237. This study will assess the safety and tolerability of a single dose strength of NVA237.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| NVA237 dose 1 | Experimental | Drug: NVA237NVA237 dose 1 |
| Long-acting beta 2-agonist (LABA) | Active comparator | Drug: Long-acting beta 2-agonist (LABA), Drug: PlaceboQAB149 |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 40 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Male or female patients with COPD according to GOLD 2011 who have signed informed consent.
- Patients with airflow limitation of 30-80% post-bronchodilator FEV1 at run-in.
- Current or ex-smokers with a smoking history of at least 10 pack years
- Patients with a mMRC score of at least 2 at run-in.
Key exclusion criteria (14 listed)
- Patients contraindicated for muscarinic antagonist agents and beta-2 agonists
- Patients with a history of malignancy of any organ system, treated or untreated, within the last five years
- Patients with narrow-angle glaucoma, BPH or bladder-neck obstruction or moderate-severe renal impairment or urinary retention
- Patients who had a COPD exacerbation within 6 weeks prior to screening.
- Patients requiring long term oxygen therapy prescribed for more than 12 hr per day.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| NVA237NVA237 will be supplied in capsule form in blister packs for use in the Novartis Concept 1 SDDPI | Drug | NVA237 dose 1 |
| Long-acting beta 2-agonist (LABA)QAB149 and matching placebo will be supplied in capsule form in blister packs for use in the Novartis Concept 1 SDDPI | Drug | Long-acting beta 2-agonist (LABA) |
| PlaceboPlacebo to match QAB149 | Drug | Long-acting beta 2-agonist (LABA) |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Participants Reporting Safety and Tolerability in Terms of Adverse Event (AE) Reporting Rate
Time frame: 52 weeks
Adverse events are defined as any unfavorable and unintended diagnosis, symptom, sign (including an abnormal lab finding), syndrome or disease which either occurs during study, having been absent at baseline, or, if present at baseline, appears to worsen. Serious adverse events are any untoward medical occurrences that result in death, are life threatening, require (or prolong) hospitalization, cause persistent or significant disability/incapacity, result in congenital anomalies or birth defects, or are other conditions which in judgments of the investigators represent significant hazards.
8 secondary outcomes
Time to Treatment Discontinuation
Time frame: 52 Weeks
Change From Baseline in Mean Forced Expiratory Volume (Average of the Two FEV1 Measurements 45 and 15 Minutes Pre-dose) in One Second at Week 52
Time frame: -45 min and -15 minutes baseline and at Week 52
Change From Baseline in Pre-dose Forced Expiratory Volume (FEV1) in One Second at All Post Baseline Timepoints
Time frame: -45 min and -15 minutes baseline and at Week 52
Change From Baseline in Pre-dose Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at All Post-baseline Timepoints
Time frame: -45 min and -15 minutes baseline and at Week 52
Change From Baseline in COPD Symptoms
Time frame: 52 weeks
Change From Baseline in COPD Symptoms
Time frame: 52 weeks
Change From Baseline in Mean Daily Number of Puffs of Rescue Medication
Time frame: 52 weeks
Time to First COPD Exacerbation (Moderate or Severe).
Time frame: 52 weeks
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Mar 2016.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 27215502Mahler DA, Gifford AH, Satti A, Jessop N, Eckert JH, D'Andrea P, Mota F, Banerjee R. Long-term safety of glycopyrrolate: A randomized study in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD (GEM3). Respir Med. 2016 Jun;115:39-45. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2016.03.015. Epub 2016 Mar 22.
Related trials for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
Active, not recruiting
Symptoms and Functions in Patients With COPD and Chronic Bronchitis Switching From CIG to THS
COPD, Smoking
Not yet recruitingPhase 2/3
An Open-Label Extension Study to Evaluate Inhaled Treprostinil SMI in Participants With Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (PH-COPD)
Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Not yet recruiting
The Aim of the Study is to Decipher the Alterations in Signalling Pathways of Skeletal Muscle Stem Cells (Satellite Cells (SCs)) in Individuals With COPD, as Well as to Examine the Effect of Exercise Training on SCs.
COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease), Sarcopenia in Elderly
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Study of Treprostinil Administered Via Soft Mist Inhaler (SMI) in Participants With Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (PH-COPD)
Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
A Study for GSK3862995B in Healthy Participants and Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Novartis Pharmaceuticals study director
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
61 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing NVA237 and Long-acting beta 2-agonist (LABA) in people with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), run by Novartis Pharmaceuticals at 61 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 14 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Mar 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 61 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 16 Mar 2016). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Participants Reporting Safety and Tolerability in Terms of Adverse Event (AE) Reporting Rate (time frame: 52 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01697696, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Mar 2016.