AzTrials
AzTrials

Heart Failure, CongestivePhase 3CHARTNCT01698242

The Congestive Heart Failure Adherence Redesign Trial

A Phase 3 study testing Enhanced Training and Enhanced Education in people with Heart Failure, Congestive and Cardiovascular Diseases, run by Lynda Powell, PhD, MEd at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to test whether a culturally sensitive self-management (SM) intervention, compared to an education only control, will reduce all-cause hospital days in patients with mild to moderate heart failure and household income less than $30,000 per year. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Enhanced Training and Enhanced Education
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
320 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
May 2011to Dec 2015
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Inclusion Criteria (PCP) 1. Provider must be the health professional who is managing the potential patient enrollee's heart failure medication(s).
  • Participant has been diagnosed with Heart Failure (HF),
  • Self reported family income is less than $30,000/year,
  • Has experienced at least one hospitalization for acute, decompensated, HF within the previous 6 months based upon:
  • Being admitted for symptoms of HF (ex: peripheral edema, shortness of breath and fatigue), and
  • responding to anti-failure therapy such as diuretics and other anti-failure therapy such as ACE Inhibitors, ARBs, or Beta blockers.
Show all 13Show fewer
  • Has evidence of systolic dysfunction, defined by an ejection <50 by 1 of 3 methods: echocardiography, radiographic contrast ventriculography, or nuclear ventriculography; done within the last year.
  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Currently resides in Cook County, Illinois.
  • Speaks English or Spanish.
  • The primary care provider (PCP) has consented and has no more than 12 patients enrolled.
  • Completed the informed consent process.
  • Successfully completed the 30-day run-in period and study baseline visit

Who cannot join

  • Health providers will be excluded from enrollment if they are:
  • Still in their residency or training period,
  • A member of the CHART research staff.
  • Patients will be excluded from enrollment if they have:
  • 1. An uncertain 12-month prognosis.
  • Listed for imminent cardiac transplant.
  • Has an advanced directive of "Do not resuscitate".
  • Has uncertain 12-Month Prognosis, as adjudicated by the Principal Investigator

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Rush University Medical Center

    Chicago, Illinois, 60612

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Reduction in Hospitalizations in Low-Income Patients With Heart Failure

The purpose of this study is to test whether a culturally sensitive self-management (SM) intervention, compared to an education only control, will reduce all-cause hospital days in patients with mild to moderate heart failure and household income less than $30,000 per year.

Read the detailed description

The purpose of the CHART research study is to assess the value of a novel multi-level intervention for low-income patients recently hospitalized with heart failure relative to providing education alone (both strategies are described in detail in the Intervention section below). The investigators refer to their novel intervention strategy as 'Enhanced Training' and their education-only strategy the investigators refer to as 'Enhanced Education'. These two strategies of participant follow-up will be assessed and compared by analyzing patient's all-cause hospital days over a 2.5-year follow-up period (the investigators note that, for patients with heart failure, the average number of such all-cause hospital days over a 2.5-year period has tripled over the past 25 years). The Enhanced Training strategy aims to improve patient receipt of evidence-based therapy by: 1) activating patients using a culturally sensitive approach that might better resonate with the investigators predominantly urban, African-American and Hispanic, target population; 2) providing timely and useful information to the primary care provider; and 3) promoting effective communication between patients and their primary care provider. The Enhanced Education strategy is less intrusive and aims to provide patients and primary care providers with appropriate educational materials via mail. The primary aims of this research study are to determine if Enhanced Training and/or Enhanced Education will improve: patient adherence to drug therapy and salt restriction, health care provider adherence to evidence-based guidelines, and patient functional capacity and quality of life. Secondary aims will include assessing impact of the interventions on CRP and BNP, which are two key biomarkers of heart failure progression.

Being tested
Enhanced Training, Enhanced Education
Keywords
Heart failure, Self-Management, Behavioral Clinical Trial
Medical subject headings
Heart Failure, Cardiovascular Diseases, Heart Diseases

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Enhanced TrainingBehavioural

    PCP-Level: A PCP randomized to the Enhanced Training (ET) group will receive: 1) a full and pocket sized copy of the current AHA Heart Failure (HF) Guidelines; 2) a summary of their patient's data collected at baseline, 6-month, and 30-month in-person study visits; and 3) an invitation to complete the CHART-designed online course in HF management for CME credit.

    Patient Level: The ET patient-level intervention uses Community Health Workers (CHWs) to assist the patient in learning self-management behaviors to reduce the risk of hospitalization. The key objectives are to: improve heart failure knowledge; encourage use of HF management tools; and facilitate development of self-management skills. Each participant receives at least: six AHA educational mailings, six monthly home visits, and 18 phone calls by CHWs within the first six months of the intervention. The CHW then conducts monthly telephone visits for the subsequent two years (for a total of 30 months of follow-up).

  • Enhanced EducationBehavioural

    The Enhanced Education (EE) intervention follows a multi-level strategy in which both the patient and their PCP are intervened upon concurrently. The intervention provides nominal information through the mail. Randomization occurs at the PCP-level; patients are assigned to the EE group only if their PCP already has been randomized to this group.

    PCP Level: Upon randomization to the EE group each PCP will receive a full-sized copy of the current American Heart Association (AHA) Heart Failure Guidelines within thirty days after randomization.

    Patient Level: Upon their assignment to the EE group, patients will receive: Six AHA Tip-Sheet mailings (one Tip-Sheet to be mailed each of the first six months following group assignment); a telephone call, made by the CHART Research Assistant (RA), completed once during each of the first six months following group assignment and only to confirm that the patient received the Tip-Sheet mailing for that month.

Study groups in NCT01698242
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Enhanced TrainingExperimentalThe Enhanced Training intervention follows a multi-level strategy in which both the patient and their PCP are intervened upon concurrently. Randomization occurs at the PCP-level, that is, patients are assigned to the Enhanced Training group only if their PCP has been enrolled and randomized to this group. Descriptions of the intervention on the PCP-level and patient-level are provided in the intervention section.
Receives: Behavioral: Enhanced Training
Enhanced EducationActive comparatorThe Enhanced Education intervention follows a multi-level strategy in which both the patient and their PCP are intervened upon concurrently. The intervention strategy revolves around providing nominal information through the mail. Randomization occurs at the PCP-level; that is, patients are assigned to the Enhanced Education group only if their PCP already has been enrolled and randomized to this group. Description of the intervention on the PCP-level and patient-level is provided in the intervention section.
Receives: Behavioral: Enhanced Education

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Total number of all cause hospitalization days

    Participant's are queried quarterly concerning any hospitalizations occuring since the previous contact. These self-reported events are then confirmed via study adjudication of pertinent acquired hospital medical records. Analysis of the primary outcome will consist of comparing mean total number of all-cause hospitalization days between the two intervention groups. Analyses will also be performed with respect to the following pre-determined subgroups: (Primary Healthcare Provider subgroups) medical specialty, academic rank, "adherent" to evidence-based guidelines at baseline, and number of years since certification; (Patient Participant subgroups) age, gender, ethnicity, insurance status, years of education, health literacy, number of comorbidities, medication adherence at baseline, heart failure functional capacity, baseline BNP, presence of major stress and/or psychological trauma, perceived social support, number of years since first heart failure diagnosis, and self-efficacy

    Measured: Measured over the 30 month patient participant follow-up period

Secondary outcomes (16)
  1. Total number of heart failure related hospitalization days

    Participants are queried quarterly during the 30-month study follow-up period as to any hospitalizations that occurred since the previous study contact. These self-reported events are then determined to be heart failure related via study adjudication of pertinent acquired hospital medical records.

    Measured: measured over the 30 month patient participant follow-up period

  2. Health Care Costs

    Participant's are queried quarterly during study follow-up as to any hospitalizations, nursing home stays, or home health care episodes since the previous study contact. The costs of these self-reported events are then determined via study adjudication of collected hospital medical record. (costs of emergency room visits will be considered separately).

    Measured: Measured over the 30 monthstudy follow-up period

  3. Distance traveled during th Six-Minute Walk test

    The Six-Minute Walk test is a supervised patient performance measure used in heart failure assessment. Standard six-minute walk safety procedures are used to ensure participant safety during conduct of this test.

    Measured: This test is administered during in-person participant assessment visits conducted at baseline and at 6 and 30 months following treatment assignmentMeasured over/after 30 months

  4. The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire

    This questionnaire is a 23-item, self-administered questionnaire that quantifies physical function, symptoms, social function, self-efficacy, and quality of life for patients with heart failure. Scores range from 0 to 100 where higher scores indicate better function.

    Measured: This questionnaire is administered during participant assessments conducted at baseline and at 6 and 30 months following treatment assignment.

  5. Patient Medication Adherence

    Medication adherence will be assessed by tracking a single heart failure medication (an ACE, ARB, Beta-Blocker, or diuretic typically). Tracking will be done using a MEMS™ electronic pill monitoring cap from AARDEX and comparing the medication regimen observed to the regimen prescribed by their health care provider. To ensure participant safety, we have instituted a study protocol to help ensure participants' routine medication-taking behavior is not compromised by the use of an electronic pill cap device.

    Measured: Adherence is measured at baseline and at 6 and 30 months following treatment assignment

  6. CALS Food Frequency Questionnaire (Salt Intake)

    To determine salt intake over the past week, the CALS Food Frequency Questionnaire will be used. This questionnaire has been specially developed to focus on dietary items that are main sources of sodium. It is computer-scored and provides data on total sodium consumed and can track changes in sodium intake over time.

    Measured: This questionnaire is administered during participant assessments conducted at baseline and at 6 and 30 months following treatment assignment.

  7. Self-Efficacy of Heart Failure Self-Management

    The Self-Efficacy at Self-Management Scale directly assesses confidence in the use of the 5 specific self-management skills that are a target of the Enhanced Training intervention.

    Measured: This is a questionnaire that is administered during participant assessments conducted at baseline and at 6 and 30 months following treatment assignment.

  8. EQ-5D Visual Analog Scale (VAS) with Time Trade-Off (TTO) Utility Score

    The EQ-5D self-report questionnaire consists of a 5-item health state assessment (rated as 1=none, 2=some, 3=severe), to produce an index score. Responses to the health state items can be converted to a time trade-off (TTO) utility score, where 1 represents perfect health and 0 represents death (negative utilities are possible, representing states worse than death). A visual analog scale (VAS) can be applied, scored from 0 to 100, where higher scores are better. EQ-5D index score can be used to produce health utilities and to estimate quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained or lost.

    Measured: This is a questionnaire that is administered during participant assessments conducted at baseline and at 6 and 30 months following treatment assignment.

  9. Biomarkers of heart failure progression

    Two biomarkers are accessed via blood assays; High sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) and B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP). Plasma hs CRP, an inflammatory marker, is associated with worse heart failure outcomes. Heart failure treatment reduces hsCRP. B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) is a biomarker of myocyte stress. Standard safety procedures are used in performing the participant blood draw required for this measure.

    Measured: Assessed during in-person participant assessments conducted at baseline and at 6 and 30 months following treatment assignment.

  10. PHQ9 (Depression)

    The PHQ9 is comprised of 9 self-reported items answered in "Not at all = 0; Several days = 1; More than half the days = 2; Nearly every day = 3" format summed to yield score between 0-27. Higher score indicates more severe depression symptoms.

    Measured: This is a questionnaire that is administered during participant assessments conducted at baseline and at 6 and 30 months following treatment assignment.

  11. Past Stressor Events

    : This 10-item questionnaire assesses a list of major stressful life events, focusing on several important domains: severe illness, death of a loved one, family conflict/divorce, financial problems, and exposure to neighborhood or workplace violence, including sexual abuse and rape, assessed as Yes/No/Refusal responses.

    Measured: This is a questionnaire that is administered during participant assessments conducted at baseline and at 6 and 30 months following treatment assignment.

  12. Traumatic Stress Survey (Composite International Diagnostic Interview)

    A 11-item questionnaire assesses a list of Traumatic Stress life events , including: Being in a natural disaster, a serious accident, being attacked with or without a weapon, military combat or in a war zone, sexual abuse and rape, and other situations extraordinarily stressful situations. Responses are Yes/No/Don't Know/Refusal. If a participant indicates an event occurred the frequency is assessed with 4 possible responses from never=0, 1 time=1, 2-3 times =3, and 4 or more times = 4.

    Measured: This survey that is administered during participant assessments conducted at baseline and at 6 and 30 months following treatment assignment.

  13. PCL-Civilian Short Form

    This 6-item screen for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) was derived empirically from the PCL-C Questionnaire for use in primary care settings. It contains 2 items from each of 3 subscales that correlated most highly with the overall subscale score. The 3 subscales are: Re-Experiencing, Avoidance, and Hyper-Arousal. Respondents rate items on a 5-point scale (ranging from 1 = "Not at all" to 5 = "Extremely"). The short scale has been found to have good reliability and validity and is used as an indication of symptoms of PTSD.

    Measured: This is a questionnaire that is administered during participant assessments conducted at baseline and at 6 and 30 months following treatment assignment.

  14. Modified Global Adherence Indicator (mGAI3)

    This physician adherence indicator is based on prescribing the three pharmacological classes of HF medications (ACEI/ARB, beta-blockers, and aldosterone antagonists). This endpoint is assessed by reviewing the most recent pertinent outpatient medical record at each time point for each participant. The modified Global Adherence indicator (mGAI) is computed for each participant by calculating the proportion of indicated care (across three therapeutic classes). The higher mGAI indicates better adherence.

    Measured: This is assessed at baseline and at 6 and 30 months following participant treatment assignment.

  15. PCP Adherence to blood pressure goal

    For each enrolled PCP, the proportion of their patients participating in the study achieving blood pressure below 130/80 mm Hg during study assessments is computed.

    Measured: Patient participant blood pressure is assessed during in-person participant assessments conducted at baseline and at 6 and 30 months following treatment assignment.

  16. Total number of heart failure hospitalizations and emergency room visits.

    Total number of heart failure hospitalizations and heart failure emergency room visits, separately and combined, overall and by subgroups indicated above.

    Measured: Measured over the 30 month patient participant follow-up period.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted2 Oct 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study startMay 2011
  3. Primary completionDec 2015
  4. Study completionDec 2015

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
320 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01698242
Sponsor's protocol ID
10030801
Acronym
CHART
Status last verified
Apr 2016
First submitted
12 Jun 2012
Last updated
19 Apr 2016
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Calvin JE, Shanbhag S, Avery E, Kane J, Richardson D, Powell L. Adherence to evidence-based guidelines for heart failure in physicians and their patients: lessons from the Heart Failure Adherence Retention Trial (HART). Congest Heart Fail. 2012 Mar-Apr;18(2):73-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7133.2011.00263.x. Epub 2011 Nov 3.

    PubMed 22432552
  • Powell LH, Calvin JE Jr, Mendes de Leon CF, Richardson D, Grady KL, Flynn KJ, Rucker-Whitaker CS, Janssen I, Kravitz G, Eaton C; Heart Failure Adherence and Retention Trial Investigators. The Heart Failure Adherence and Retention Trial (HART): design and rationale. Am Heart J. 2008 Sep;156(3):452-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2008.05.011.

    PubMed 18760125
  • de Leon CF, Grady KL, Eaton C, Rucker-Whitaker C, Janssen I, Calvin J, Powell LH. Quality of life in a diverse population of patients with heart failure: BASELINE FINDINGS FROM THE HEART FAILURE ADHERENCE AND RETENTION TRIAL (HART). J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2009 May-Jun;29(3):171-8. doi: 10.1097/HCR.0b013e31819a0266.

    PubMed 19471136
  • Powell LH, Calvin JE Jr, Richardson D, Janssen I, Mendes de Leon CF, Flynn KJ, Grady KL, Rucker-Whitaker CS, Eaton C, Avery E; HART Investigators. Self-management counseling in patients with heart failure: the heart failure adherence and retention randomized behavioral trial. JAMA. 2010 Sep 22;304(12):1331-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.1362.

    PubMed 20858878
  • Rucker-Whitaker C, Flynn KJ, Kravitz G, Eaton C, Calvin JE, Powell LH. Understanding African-American participation in a behavioral intervention: results from focus groups. Contemp Clin Trials. 2006 Jun;27(3):274-86. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2005.11.006. Epub 2006 Jan 19.

    PubMed 16427365

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Enhanced Training and Enhanced Education in people with Heart Failure, Congestive and Cardiovascular Diseases, run by Lynda Powell, PhD, MEd at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 13 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Apr 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Total number of all cause hospitalization days (time frame: Measured over the 30 month patient participant follow-up period). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01698242, which also lists 5 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Apr 2016; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 30 Oct 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in