PAINPAINCONTROLNCT01700517
Postoperatory Analgesia After Total Knee Arthroplasty
A study testing Spinal anesthesia, Femoral nerve block and sciatic nerves block in people with PAIN, run by Hospital Madre Teresa at 1 site in Brazil.
Trial summary
Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a worldwide realized procedure, with 600.000 surgeries performed per year in the United States, with a 673% increase estimated until 2030. Functional and pain management improvement is expected in 90% of patients, with 85% of them satisfied after the procedure. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 40 to 90 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- PAIN
- What is being tested?
- Spinal anesthesia, Femoral nerve block and sciatic nerves block
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 120 participants
- Where
- 1 siteBrazil
- Study dates
- Dec 2011to Oct 2012
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 40 to 90 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Inclusion criteria were considered: Patients with TKA indication, aged from 40 to 90 years, weight between 50 and 100 kg, body mass index between 18 - 36 and patients classified pre-operatory according to the American Anesthesia Association as ASA I or II.
Who cannot join
- Non-cooperative patients, with cognitive incapacity to answer pain VAS, neuromuscular or peripheral neuropathies, chronically using opioid or who didn´t want to take part of the study were taken as exclusion criteria.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Postoperatory Analgesia After Total Knee Arthroplasty Comparing Femoral and Sciatic-femoral Block
Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a worldwide realized procedure, with 600.000 surgeries performed per year in the United States, with a 673% increase estimated until 2030. Functional and pain management improvement is expected in 90% of patients, with 85% of them satisfied after the procedure.
Immediate postoperatory pain control is an important aspect to be considered. Patients submitted to TKA endure pain with variations between 40-80 (according to analog visual scale -AVS - which goes from zero to 100) during the immediate postoperatory, with slow decline in the first 24 hours. Pain classified as severe occurs in 60% and moderated in 30% of patients submitted to TKA during this period of time. Therefore adequate pain management allows an earlier rehabilitation, with a higher satisfaction rate and decrease the hospitalization period.
Read more
A multimodal control of pain can be reached by using non-steroidal anti-inflammatory, COX-2 anti-inflammatory inhibitors, peripheral nerve blocks and intra-articular anesthetics injections and decrease use of opioids given of potential collateral effects. Peripheral blockings are associated to the smallest rate of collateral effects and complications when compared to the spinal anesthesia and analgesia controlled by the patients. Studies comparing the effects of the femoral and sciatic-femoral blocking guided by ultrasonography for the analgesia control after TKA were not found.
The objective of this article is to evaluate the effect of femoral and sciatic-femoral block using ultrasonography by the analog visual scale (AVS) of pain in postoperatory of patients submitted to TKA, opioid consumption and complications associated to anesthesics procedures.
Read the detailed description
Inclusion criteria were considered: Patients with TKA indication, aged from 40 to 90 years, weight between 50 and 100 kg, body mass index between 18 - 36 and patients classified pre-operatory according to the American Anesthesia Association as ASA I or II. Non-cooperative patients, with cognitive incapacity to answer pain VAS, neuromuscular or peripheral neuropathies, chronically using opioid or who didn´t want to take part of the study were taken as exclusion criteria.
The patients were separated in three groups at randomized by a computer program:
Group A - control group - spinal anesthesia, Group B - femoral nerve block + procedure realized in group A and Group C - femoral and sciatic nerves block + procedure realized in group A.
All the anesthetics procedures were realized by the same anesthetist. The standard anesthesia for the procedure was spinal anesthesia with injection of 12 to 15 mg of 0.5% isobaric bupivacaine. Patients of the control group (group A) were submitted to spinal anesthesia with 0.5% isobaric bupivacaine, in isolation. Punctures in the femoral and popliteal areas were made to mask the femoral and sciatic block, respectively, with no infusion of any medication. The patients of the group B received, furthermore the standard anesthesia, the block of the femoral nerve guided by ultrasonography (Nemio 17 - Toshiba Systems Co. - Japan) and neurosimulation (Stimuplex HNS 12 - Braun - Germany) with 1 Hz stimulus frequency, 1.2 to 0.5 mA energy. The technique used was femoral area puncture, at the level of the crural fold of skin, with a 0.5% (125mg) ropivacaine associated to 75 mcg of clonidine. For the patients of the group C, in addition to the femoral blocking, the anesthesia of the sciatic nerve at the top of the popliteal fossae was realized, also guided by ultrasonography (Nemio 17 - Toshiba Systems Co. - Japan) and neurosimulation (Stimuplex HNS 12 - Braun - Germany) with 1 Hz stimulus frequency, 1.2 to 0.5 mA energy. 0.5% ropivacaine was injected associated to 75mcg clonidine. As an adjuvant for analgesia, all the patients received analgesic and anti-inflammatory permanently in postoperatory, with availability of opioids for rescue if needed. The necessity of its use and eventual complications were registered until hospital discharge.
The pain measurement was realized by the assistant author using a 10 points pain AVS (0, absence of pain, and 10 the worst imaginable pain) both ignoring which group the patient was part of. This measurement was realized during immediate pre-operatory, within 6, 12, 24, 48 hours after surgery.
Details of this study were approved by the Ethical Committee and written informed consent was obtained from each participant prior to the commencement of the study.
- Conditions
- PAIN
- Being tested
- Spinal anesthesia, Femoral nerve block, sciatic nerves block
- Keywords
- total knee arthroplasty, analgesia, ultrasonography
- Medical subject headings
- Pain, Agnosia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Spinal anesthesiaOther
spinal anesthesia
Femoral nerve blockOther
Femoral nerve block
sciatic nerves blockOther
sciatic nerves block
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| control group | Sham comparator | Spinal anesthesia with 0.5% isobaric bupivacaine, in isolation. Punctures in the femoral and popliteal areas were made to mask the femoral and sciatic block, respectively, with no infusion of any medication. Receives: Other: Spinal anesthesia |
| Femoral nerve block | Experimental | In addition to the spinal anesthesia, block of the femoral nerve guided by ultrasonography (Nemio 17 - Toshiba Systems Co. - Japan) and neurosimulation (Stimuplex HNS 12 - Braun - Germany) with 1 Hz stimulus frequency, 1.2 to 0.5 mA energy. The technique used was femoral area puncture, at the level of the crural fold of skin, with a 0.5% (125mg) ropivacaine associated to 75 mcg of clonidine. Receives: Other: Spinal anesthesia; Other: Femoral nerve block |
| sciatic nerves block | Experimental | In addition to the spinal anesthesia and femoral block, the anesthesia of the sciatic nerve at the top of the popliteal fossae was realized, also guided by ultrasonography (Nemio 17 - Toshiba Systems Co. - Japan) and neurosimulation (Stimuplex HNS 12 - Braun - Germany) with 1 Hz stimulus frequency, 1.2 to 0.5 mA energy. 0.5% ropivacaine was injected associated to 75mcg clonidine. Receives: Other: Spinal anesthesia; Other: Femoral nerve block; Other: sciatic nerves block |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Postoperatory Analgesia After Total Knee Arthroplasty Comparing Femoral and Sciatic-femoral Block
The objective of this article is to evaluate the effect of femoral and sciatic-femoral block using ultrasonography by the analog visual scale (AVS) of pain in postoperatory of patients submitted to TKA, opioid consumption and complications associated to anesthesics procedures.
To assure the double blindness, pain measurement was realized by the assistant author using a 10 points pain analog visual scale (0, absence of pain, and 10 the worst imaginable pain). Patient and researcher did not know at which group patient belongs. This measurement was realized during immediate pre-op, and 6, 12, 24 and 48 hours after surgery. After this the average of pain for each group was analyzed.
Measured: 48 HOURS
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 Oct 2012 (estimated)
- Study startDec 2011
- Primary completionJul 2012
- Study completionOct 2012
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for PAINStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 120 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hospital Madre Teresa
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Lucio Honorio de Carvalho Junior, PhD, PrincipalInvestigator, Hospital Madre Teresa
- Investigators
- LUCIO H CARVALHO, PhD, Principal investigator, HOSPITAL MADRE TERESA - UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE MINAS GERAISEDUARDO F TEMPONI, MD, Study director, MADRE TERESA´S HOSPITAL
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01700517
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- TKR-PAIN CONTROL
- Acronym
- PAINCONTROL
- Status last verified
- Mar 2013
- First submitted
- 25 Sep 2012
- Last updated
- 3 May 2013
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 May 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Postoperatory Analgesia After Total Knee Arthroplasty Comparing Femoral and Sciatic-femoral Block
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01700517
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PAINCONTROL / TKR-PAIN CONTROL
- Conditions
- PAIN
- Keywords
- total knee arthroplasty, analgesia, ultrasonography
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 120 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Hospital Madre TeresaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Dec 2011
- Primary completion
- Jul 2012 (actual)
- Study completion
- Oct 2012 (actual)
- First posted
- 4 Oct 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 3 May 2013
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a worldwide realized procedure, with 600.000 surgeries performed per year in the United States, with a 673% increase estimated until 2030. Functional and pain management improvement is expected in 90% of patients, with 85% of them satisfied after the procedure.
Immediate postoperatory pain control is an important aspect to be considered. Patients submitted to TKA endure pain with variations between 40-80 (according to analog visual scale -AVS - which goes from zero to 100) during the immediate postoperatory, with slow decline in the first 24 hours. Pain classified as severe occurs in 60% and moderated in 30% of patients submitted to TKA during this period of time. Therefore adequate pain management allows an earlier rehabilitation, with a higher satisfaction rate and decrease the hospitalization period.
A multimodal control of pain can be reached by using non-steroidal anti-inflammatory, COX-2 anti-inflammatory inhibitors, peripheral nerve blocks and intra-articular anesthetics injections and decrease use of opioids given of potential collateral effects. Peripheral blockings are associated to the smallest rate of collateral effects and complications when compared to the spinal anesthesia and analgesia controlled by the patients. Studies comparing the effects of the femoral and sciatic-femoral blocking guided by ultrasonography for the analgesia control after TKA were not found.
The objective of this article is to evaluate the effect of femoral and sciatic-femoral block using ultrasonography by the analog visual scale (AVS) of pain in postoperatory of patients submitted to TKA, opioid consumption and complications associated to anesthesics procedures.
Detailed description
Inclusion criteria were considered: Patients with TKA indication, aged from 40 to 90 years, weight between 50 and 100 kg, body mass index between 18 - 36 and patients classified pre-operatory according to the American Anesthesia Association as ASA I or II. Non-cooperative patients, with cognitive incapacity to answer pain VAS, neuromuscular or peripheral neuropathies, chronically using opioid or who didn´t want to take part of the study were taken as exclusion criteria.
The patients were separated in three groups at randomized by a computer program:
Group A - control group - spinal anesthesia, Group B - femoral nerve block + procedure realized in group A and Group C - femoral and sciatic nerves block + procedure realized in group A.
All the anesthetics procedures were realized by the same anesthetist. The standard anesthesia for the procedure was spinal anesthesia with injection of 12 to 15 mg of 0.5% isobaric bupivacaine. Patients of the control group (group A) were submitted to spinal anesthesia with 0.5% isobaric bupivacaine, in isolation. Punctures in the femoral and popliteal areas were made to mask the femoral and sciatic block, respectively, with no infusion of any medication. The patients of the group B received, furthermore the standard anesthesia, the block of the femoral nerve guided by ultrasonography (Nemio 17 - Toshiba Systems Co. - Japan) and neurosimulation (Stimuplex HNS 12 - Braun - Germany) with 1 Hz stimulus frequency, 1.2 to 0.5 mA energy. The technique used was femoral area puncture, at the level of the crural fold of skin, with a 0.5% (125mg) ropivacaine associated to 75 mcg of clonidine. For the patients of the group C, in addition to the femoral blocking, the anesthesia of the sciatic nerve at the top of the popliteal fossae was realized, also guided by ultrasonography (Nemio 17 - Toshiba Systems Co. - Japan) and neurosimulation (Stimuplex HNS 12 - Braun - Germany) with 1 Hz stimulus frequency, 1.2 to 0.5 mA energy. 0.5% ropivacaine was injected associated to 75mcg clonidine. As an adjuvant for analgesia, all the patients received analgesic and anti-inflammatory permanently in postoperatory, with availability of opioids for rescue if needed. The necessity of its use and eventual complications were registered until hospital discharge.
The pain measurement was realized by the assistant author using a 10 points pain AVS (0, absence of pain, and 10 the worst imaginable pain) both ignoring which group the patient was part of. This measurement was realized during immediate pre-operatory, within 6, 12, 24, 48 hours after surgery.
Details of this study were approved by the Ethical Committee and written informed consent was obtained from each participant prior to the commencement of the study.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| control group | Sham comparator | Other: Spinal anesthesiaSpinal anesthesia with 0.5% isobaric bupivacaine, in isolation. Punctures in the femoral and popliteal areas were made to mask the femoral and sciatic block, respectively, with no infusion of any medication. |
| Femoral nerve block | Experimental | Other: Spinal anesthesia, Other: Femoral nerve blockIn addition to the spinal anesthesia, block of the femoral nerve guided by ultrasonography (Nemio 17 - Toshiba Systems Co. - Japan) and neurosimulation (Stimuplex HNS 12 - Braun - Germany) with 1 Hz stimulus frequency, 1.2 to 0.5 mA energy. The technique used was femoral area puncture, at the level of the crural fold of skin, with a 0.5% (125mg) ropivacaine associated to 75 mcg of clonidine. |
| sciatic nerves block | Experimental | Other: Spinal anesthesia, Other: Femoral nerve block, Other: sciatic nerves blockIn addition to the spinal anesthesia and femoral block, the anesthesia of the sciatic nerve at the top of the popliteal fossae was realized, also guided by ultrasonography (Nemio 17 - Toshiba Systems Co. - Japan) and neurosimulation (Stimuplex HNS 12 - Braun - Germany) with 1 Hz stimulus frequency, 1.2 to 0.5 mA energy. 0.5% ropivacaine was injected associated to 75mcg clonidine. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 40 to 90 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Inclusion criteria were considered: Patients with TKA indication, aged from 40 to 90 years, weight between 50 and 100 kg, body mass index between 18 - 36 and patients classified pre-operatory according to the American Anesthesia Association as ASA I or II.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Non-cooperative patients, with cognitive incapacity to answer pain VAS, neuromuscular or peripheral neuropathies, chronically using opioid or who didn´t want to take part of the study were taken as exclusion criteria.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Spinal anesthesiaspinal anesthesia | Other | Femoral nerve block, control group, sciatic nerves block |
| Femoral nerve blockFemoral nerve block | Other | Femoral nerve block, sciatic nerves block |
| sciatic nerves blocksciatic nerves block | Other | sciatic nerves block |
Primary outcome
Postoperatory Analgesia After Total Knee Arthroplasty Comparing Femoral and Sciatic-femoral Block
Time frame: 48 HOURS
The objective of this article is to evaluate the effect of femoral and sciatic-femoral block using ultrasonography by the analog visual scale (AVS) of pain in postoperatory of patients submitted to TKA, opioid consumption and complications associated to anesthesics procedures. To assure the double blindness, pain measurement was realized by the assistant author using a 10 points pain analog visual scale (0, absence of pain, and 10 the worst imaginable pain). Patient and researcher did not know at which group patient belongs. This measurement was realized during immediate pre-op, and 6, 12, 24 and 48 hours after surgery. After this the average of pain for each group was analyzed.
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 May 2013.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for PAIN
Recruiting
Conventional and Nano-Metronidazole Irrigation With/Without Activation in Necrotic Teeth With Apical Periodontitis
Pulp Necrosis, Apical Periodontitis
Not yet recruiting
The Mechanism Underlying the Analgesic Effect of the Music of IBS Pain
Abdominal Pain/ Discomfort, Irritable Bowel Syndrome
RecruitingPhase 4
Nonopioid Pain Control Regimen After Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Traumatic Fractures
Opioid Use, Fractures, Bone
Enrolling by invitation
Efficacy of a Chronic Pain Treatment Prior to Gender-affirming Surgery
Pain Catastrophizing, Pain, Chronic
Not yet recruiting
Multicomponent Exercise and Pain Science Education for Fall Prevention in Older Adults With Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain (MovePainFall)
Chronic Pain, Musculoskeletal Pain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
LUCIO H CARVALHO, PhD principal investigator
HOSPITAL MADRE TERESA - UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE MINAS GERAIS
EDUARDO F TEMPONI, MD study director
MADRE TERESA´S HOSPITAL
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Spinal anesthesia, Femoral nerve block and sciatic nerves block in people with PAIN, run by Hospital Madre Teresa at 1 site in Brazil.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 May 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Brazil. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 3 May 2013). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Postoperatory Analgesia After Total Knee Arthroplasty Comparing Femoral and Sciatic-femoral Block (time frame: 48 HOURS). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 May 2013.