Hepatitis CPhase 1HCV004NCT01701336
Study of a Novel Therapeutic Vaccine Against Hepatitis C Using Ad6NSmut and MVA-NSmut in Chronically Infected Patients
A Phase 1 study testing Ad6NSmut, MVA-NSmut in people with Hepatitis C, run by ReiThera Srl at 2 sites in Italy.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether administration of recombinant IMPs Ad6NSmut and MVA-NSmut (experimental vaccines for hepatitis C) in HCV chronically infected patients in combination with the standard Interferon/ribavirin therapy is safe and induces an immunological response. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Hepatitis C
- What is being tested?
- Ad6NSmut, MVA-NSmut
- Type of treatment
- Vaccines
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 9 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesItaly
- Study dates
- Mar 2012to Feb 2013
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- HCV infected with genotype-1 infection, previously treated with PEG-IFN/RBV and belonging to one of the 2 categories (partial responder and relapsers) as described above
- Having terminated previous treatment at least 6 months before enrolment
- Adults aged 18 to 65 years (inclusive)
- Resident in or near the trial sites for the duration of the vaccination study
- Able and willing (in the Investigator's opinion) to comply with all study requirements
- For women of fertile age (with the exception of those not having heterosexual intercourses and of women with vasectomised partners) and for sexually active men (unless vasectomised), partners of sexually active women, to practice continuous effective contraception, adopting two effective contraceptive methods. Une of these methods must be a barrier contraception method (condom with spermicide, diaphragm or cervical cap). In this study oral contraceptive, considered as one of the two effective forms of contraception, may be used. These contraceptive methods must be used from the screening visit for the whole duration of study and for the 24 weeks following the latest dose of Ribavirin.
Show all 9Show fewer
- For women of fertile age a negative pregnancy test on the days of vaccination.
- Elevated serum ALT, defined as higher than ULN (41 U/L for males and 33 U/L for females) and not exceeding 10x ULN.
- Written informed consent
Who cannot join
- Participation in another research study involving an investigational product in the 30 days preceding enrolment, or planned use during the study period
- Prior recipients of a recombinant simian or human adenoviral vaccine
- Serum ALT lower than ULN (41 U/L for males and 33 U/L for females) or exceeding 10x ULN
- Advanced liver fibrosis
- Clinical, biochemical, ultrasonographic, or liver biopsy (histology) evidence of cancer or portal hypertension
- Any confirmed or suspected immunosuppressive or immunodeficient state, including HIV infection; asplenia; recurrent, severe infections and chronic (more than 14 days) immunosuppressant medication within the past 6 months (inhaled and topical steroids are allowed)
Show all 20Show fewer
- History of allergic disease or reactions likely to be exacerbated by any component of the vaccine, e.g., Kathon
- History of clinically significant contact dermatitis
- Any history of anaphylaxis in reaction to vaccination
- Pregnancy, lactation or willingness/intention to become pregnant during the study
- History of cancer (except basal cell carcinoma of the skin and cervical carcinoma in situ)
- Suspected or known current alcohol abuse as defined by an alcohol intake of greater than 42 units every week
- Current suspected or known injecting drug abuse
- In case of history of drug and/or alcool abuse, it is necessary the abuse was terminated at least two years before the enrollment.
- Seropositive for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)
- Seropositive for HIV (antibodies to HIV) at screening
- Any other significant disease, disorder or finding, which, in the opinion of the Investigator, may either put the patient at risk because of participation in the study, or may influence the result of the study, or the patient's ability to participate in the study
- Seropositive for human adenovirus 6 (Ad6) neutralising antibodies at titres >200 at screening
- Any other finding which in the opinion of the investigators would significantly increase the risk of having an adverse outcome from participating in the protocol
- Individuals who have had a temperature >38°C in the 3 days preceding vaccination.
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
Italy2 sites
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria di Pisa. Ospedale di Cisanello
Pisa, 56126
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana. Ospedale di Santa Chiara
Pisa, 56126
About this study
Official title: Phase Ib Study to Assess the Safety and Immunogenicity of a Novel HCV Vaccine, Based on the Sequential Injection of Ad6NSmut and MVA-NSmut, Given in Combination With PEG-Interferon Alfa Plus Ribavirin for Re-treatment of Chronic Hepatitis C
The purpose of this study is to determine whether administration of recombinant IMPs Ad6NSmut and MVA-NSmut (experimental vaccines for hepatitis C) in HCV chronically infected patients in combination with the standard Interferon/ribavirin therapy is safe and induces an immunological response.
Read the detailed description
An effective antiviral T cell response can mediate HCV viral control and induce the spontaneous resolution of HCV during primary infection. This observation strongly supports the case for the development of T cell induction strategies as a potential therapy for HCV. A hallmark of persistent HCV infection, when viral loads are high, is a weak and narrowly focused HCV specific T cell response, whereas in resolved infection with undetectable viral loads robust T cell responses are detected. A very potent immunization strategy might overcome this problem and induce a strong and diversified cell mediated immune response against HCV.
The rationale of using HCV vaccine in combination with PEG-IFN/RBV is supported both, by in vitro models and by mathematical models of HCV dynamics under antiviral therapy. Studies of viral dynamics suggested that HCV RNA kinetics result from the sum of two major actions or phases: inhibition of viral production and reduction of infected cells number. The mathematical model, relying on both HCV-RNA and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) measures after PEG-IFN/RBV therapy, suggests that the elimination of infected cells by the immune system could play a major role in sustaining viral reduction. This view is in accordance with the results of a recent study showing that IFN-γ, one of the cytokines secreted by CTLs (Cytotoxic T Lymphocyte) and NK (Natural Killer) cells, is able to inhibit HCV genomic and subgenomic replication in an "in vitro" model. In the mathematical description the parameter that represents the putative "non lytic" control of HCV replication during antiviral therapy is φ, resulting from the difference π-δ0, where π and δ0 are the time constant of the second phase decay of viraemia and of the infected cells, respectively. Interestingly, the median value of parameter φ, which is inversely related to the half-life of HCV-RNA molecules in the infected cells after phase 1, was significantly higher in sustained responders than in transient responders and non responders (NR). In addition, whereas the baseline HCV-RNA production was comparable in all patients regardless of their outcome, the median value of the residual HCV-RNA production during therapy was significantly higher in NR than in responders. This data support the hypothesis that to reach a sustained response and an efficacious control of the infection, the elimination of the infected cells is more relevant than a strong inhibition of viral production. All the above considerations support the hypothesis that vaccination might be a new therapeutic opportunity to a cohort of consecutive HCV genotype 1a and 1b infected patients who failed to respond to PEG-IFN/RBV therapy. Therefore a potent induction of T cell responses in chronically infected patients might be used in combination with the current antiviral therapy in order to achieve sustained response in previously partial responders or relapsers.
- Conditions
- Hepatitis C
- Being tested
- Ad6NSmut, MVA-NSmut
- Keywords
- Hepatitis, Hepatitis C, HCV, vaccine, adenovirus, MVA, T cells, ELISpot
- Medical subject headings
- Hepatitis C, Hepatitis, Adenoviridae Infections
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Ad6NSmut, MVA-NSmutBiological
Also called Ad6NSmut, MVA-NSmut
2 doses Ad6NSmut at week 0 and 4, then 2 doses of MVA-NSmut at weeks 8 and 12. PEG-IFN/RBV therapy starts at week 10 after first vaccination
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Unique Arm | Experimental | * Ad6NSmut
* MVA-NSmut
15 subjects receiving 2 doses Ad6NSmut at week 0 and 4, then 2 doses of MVA-NSmut at weeks 8 and 12. PEG-IFN/RBV therapy starts at week 10 after first vaccination Receives: Biological: Ad6NSmut, MVA-NSmut |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number and severity of adverse events
Safety is assessed by the frequency, incidence and nature of adverse events and serious adverse events arising during the study. Abnormal clinical findings from medical history, examination or blood, will be assessed as to their clinical significance. All AEs occurring during the study observed by the investigator or reported by the patient, whether or not attributed to study medication, will be reported in the CRF. All AEs that result in a patient's withdrawal from the study or that are present at the end of the study, will be followed up until a satisfactory resolution occurs, or until a non-study related causality is assigned.
Measured: 6 months
Secondary outcomes (1)
IFNγ ELISpot. Unit: IFNγ spot forming cells (SFC)/ million splenocytes
The primary assay to monitor vaccine immunogenicity is the IFNγ ELISpot. This is an established immunological assay to measure cell mediated immune response against HCV NS proteins. Immunogenicity data analysis will be based on tabulations of HCV NS-specific responses at times pointed out in the study visit flow chart. Analysis of immunogenicity data collected will be performed at the end of the study.
Measured: 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Oct 2012 (estimated)
- Study startMar 2012
- Primary completionOct 2012
- Study completionFeb 2013
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Hepatitis CStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 9 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- ReiThera Srl
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- European Commission
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Ferruccio Bonino, Prof., Study chair, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria. Università di Pisa. ItalyMaurizia Brunetto, Dr., Principal investigator, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria. Università di Pisa. Italy
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01701336
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- HCV004
- Other IDs
- 2010-022700-49
- Acronym
- HCV004
- Status last verified
- Aug 2013
- First submitted
- 28 Aug 2012
- Last updated
- 29 Aug 2013
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Aug 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Phase Ib Study to Assess the Safety and Immunogenicity of a Novel HCV Vaccine, Based on the Sequential Injection of Ad6NSmut and MVA-NSmut, Given in Combination With PEG-Interferon Alfa Plus Ribavirin for Re-treatment of Chronic Hepatitis C
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01701336
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- HCV004 / HCV004
- Conditions
- Hepatitis C
- Keywords
- Hepatitis, Hepatitis C, HCV, vaccine, adenovirus, MVA, T cells, ELISpot
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 9 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- ReiThera SrlIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- European Commission
- Study start
- Mar 2012
- Primary completion
- Oct 2012 (actual)
- Study completion
- Feb 2013 (actual)
- First posted
- 5 Oct 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to determine whether administration of recombinant IMPs Ad6NSmut and MVA-NSmut (experimental vaccines for hepatitis C) in HCV chronically infected patients in combination with the standard Interferon/ribavirin therapy is safe and induces an immunological response.
Detailed description
An effective antiviral T cell response can mediate HCV viral control and induce the spontaneous resolution of HCV during primary infection. This observation strongly supports the case for the development of T cell induction strategies as a potential therapy for HCV. A hallmark of persistent HCV infection, when viral loads are high, is a weak and narrowly focused HCV specific T cell response, whereas in resolved infection with undetectable viral loads robust T cell responses are detected. A very potent immunization strategy might overcome this problem and induce a strong and diversified cell mediated immune response against HCV.
The rationale of using HCV vaccine in combination with PEG-IFN/RBV is supported both, by in vitro models and by mathematical models of HCV dynamics under antiviral therapy. Studies of viral dynamics suggested that HCV RNA kinetics result from the sum of two major actions or phases: inhibition of viral production and reduction of infected cells number. The mathematical model, relying on both HCV-RNA and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) measures after PEG-IFN/RBV therapy, suggests that the elimination of infected cells by the immune system could play a major role in sustaining viral reduction. This view is in accordance with the results of a recent study showing that IFN-γ, one of the cytokines secreted by CTLs (Cytotoxic T Lymphocyte) and NK (Natural Killer) cells, is able to inhibit HCV genomic and subgenomic replication in an "in vitro" model. In the mathematical description the parameter that represents the putative "non lytic" control of HCV replication during antiviral therapy is φ, resulting from the difference π-δ0, where π and δ0 are the time constant of the second phase decay of viraemia and of the infected cells, respectively. Interestingly, the median value of parameter φ, which is inversely related to the half-life of HCV-RNA molecules in the infected cells after phase 1, was significantly higher in sustained responders than in transient responders and non responders (NR). In addition, whereas the baseline HCV-RNA production was comparable in all patients regardless of their outcome, the median value of the residual HCV-RNA production during therapy was significantly higher in NR than in responders. This data support the hypothesis that to reach a sustained response and an efficacious control of the infection, the elimination of the infected cells is more relevant than a strong inhibition of viral production. All the above considerations support the hypothesis that vaccination might be a new therapeutic opportunity to a cohort of consecutive HCV genotype 1a and 1b infected patients who failed to respond to PEG-IFN/RBV therapy. Therefore a potent induction of T cell responses in chronically infected patients might be used in combination with the current antiviral therapy in order to achieve sustained response in previously partial responders or relapsers.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Unique Arm | Experimental | Biological: Ad6NSmut, MVA-NSmut* Ad6NSmut * MVA-NSmut 15 subjects receiving 2 doses Ad6NSmut at week 0 and 4, then 2 doses of MVA-NSmut at weeks 8 and 12. PEG-IFN/RBV therapy starts at week 10 after first vaccination |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- HCV infected with genotype-1 infection, previously treated with PEG-IFN/RBV and belonging to one of the 2 categories (partial responder and relapsers) as described above
- Having terminated previous treatment at least 6 months before enrolment
- Adults aged 18 to 65 years (inclusive)
- Resident in or near the trial sites for the duration of the vaccination study
- Able and willing (in the Investigator's opinion) to comply with all study requirements
Key exclusion criteria (20 listed)
- Participation in another research study involving an investigational product in the 30 days preceding enrolment, or planned use during the study period
- Prior recipients of a recombinant simian or human adenoviral vaccine
- Serum ALT lower than ULN (41 U/L for males and 33 U/L for females) or exceeding 10x ULN
- Advanced liver fibrosis
- Clinical, biochemical, ultrasonographic, or liver biopsy (histology) evidence of cancer or portal hypertension
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Ad6NSmut, MVA-NSmutAlso: Ad6NSmut, MVA-NSmut2 doses Ad6NSmut at week 0 and 4, then 2 doses of MVA-NSmut at weeks 8 and 12. PEG-IFN/RBV therapy starts at week 10 after first vaccination | Biological | Unique Arm |
Primary outcome
Number and severity of adverse events
Time frame: 6 months
Safety is assessed by the frequency, incidence and nature of adverse events and serious adverse events arising during the study. Abnormal clinical findings from medical history, examination or blood, will be assessed as to their clinical significance. All AEs occurring during the study observed by the investigator or reported by the patient, whether or not attributed to study medication, will be reported in the CRF. All AEs that result in a patient's withdrawal from the study or that are present at the end of the study, will be followed up until a satisfactory resolution occurs, or until a non-study related causality is assigned.
1 secondary outcome
IFNγ ELISpot. Unit: IFNγ spot forming cells (SFC)/ million splenocytes
Time frame: 6 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Aug 2013.
Related trials for Hepatitis C
RecruitingObservational study
Evaluation of Patients With Liver Disease
Hepatitis D, Hepatitis C
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Elimination of Hepatitis C Virus Among Users of Substances
Hepatitis C in Substance Users
Not yet recruiting
Clinical Study to Evaluate the Performance of the INSTI® HCV Antibody Test for CLIA-Waived Use
HCV Infection
Not yet recruiting
Study to Evaluate the Performance of the INSTI® HCV Antibody Test for Point-of-Care Use in Individuals at Risk for HCV Infection or Presenting With Signs or Symptoms of HCV Infection
HCV Infection
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
People With CHC Who Achieved a Sustained Virological Response Following Therapy With Direct Acting Antiviral Agents
Diabetes Mellitus, Hepatitis C, Chronic
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Ferruccio Bonino, Prof. study chair
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria. Università di Pisa. Italy
Maurizia Brunetto, Dr. principal investigator
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria. Università di Pisa. Italy
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1 study testing Ad6NSmut, MVA-NSmut in people with Hepatitis C, run by ReiThera Srl at 2 sites in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 20 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Aug 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number and severity of adverse events (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Aug 2013.