Quality IndicatorsIQUARENCT01703689
Impact of Educational and Professional Supportive Interventions on Nursing Home Quality Indicators
A study testing Audit and Feedback and Cooperative Work in people with Quality Indicators and Physical Disability, run by Agence Régionale de la Santé - Midi Pyrénées at 175 sites in France.
Trial summary
Introduction: Efficacy of audit and feedback interventions on nursing home (NH)quality indicators is not well-established. The main objective: The main purpose of the IQUARE study was to examine the impact of two types of audit and feedback interventions on NH quality indicators and on residents dependence levels in a… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age
- Conditions the study is for
- Quality Indicators, Physical Disability
- What is being tested?
- Audit and Feedback and Cooperative Work
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 8,039 participants
- Where
- 175 sitesFrance
- Study dates
- May 2011to Mar 2013
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Nursing homes (NH) voluntarily accepted to participate in the study.
- NH residents of both sex
- Residents living in the NH for ≥ 30 days
- Residents and their general practitioner (GP) having received information about the study
- NH residents do not voluntarily decline to participate in the study
Who cannot join
- NH currently participating in another interventional study
- GP of NH residents refused participation in the study.
Trial locations and contacts
175 sites in 1 country.
175 sites in 1 country
France175 sites
EHPAD le parc ALBI
Albi, 81000
EHPAD Canarie Vieuzac
Argelès-Gazost, 65400
MAPAD Les Pradels
Assier, 46320
Les Jardins auscitains
Auch, 32000
Les jardins d´Agape
Auch, 32000
Saint Dominique
Auch, 32000
EHPAD Résidence Mutualiste La Pyrénéenne
Aureilhan, 65800
EHPAD Résidence Castelmouly
Bagnères-de-Bigorre, 65200
ONAC résidence paul oddo
Barbazan, 31510
Korian Les Ainés du Lauragais
Baziege, 31450
Notre Dame
Beaumont-de-Lomagne, 82500
Ehpad Sherpa
Belmont-sur-Rance, 12370
Le Pastel
Bessières, 31660
Le Pastourel
Bessières, 31660
Sainte-Cécile
Bessières, 31660
Emeraude
Blagnac, 31700
Résidence de Vinci
Blagnac, 31700
EHPAD St joseph de BRASSAC
Brassac, 81260
EHPAD Robert Durrieu
Bretenoux, 46130
M.R Orpea
Cahors, 46000
EHPAD La Cascade
Cajarc, 46160
Les Roses
Calmont, 31560
EHPAD Gai Logis
Capdenac-Gare, 12700
EHPAD La Croix Bleue
Capdenac-Gare, 12700
EHPAD le bosc Carmaux
Carmaux, 81400
Tour Tottier
Castelginest, 31780
La Cerisaie
Castelmaurou, 31180
Notre Dame du Bon Accueil
Castelnau-d´Estrétefonds, 31620
M.R St Luc - Castelnau Montratier
Castelnau-Montratier, 46170
Chic Ehpad C.H
Castelsarrasin, 82100
EHPAD Villégiale Saint Jacques CHIC - CASTRES/MAZAMET
Castres, 81100
MAPA Résidence St Astier
Catus, 46150
EHPAD Caylus - Val de Bonnette
Caylus, 82160
EHPAD Arc-En-Ciel
Cazals, 46250
Jeanne Penent
Cazères, 31220
Castelgirou
Cépet, 31620
ALLIANCE
Cologne, 32430
EHPAD St Laurent
Cruéjouls, 12340
EHPAD les arcades
Dourgne, 81110
EHPAD Saint-Philippe
Ercé, 09140
Saint-Joseph
Fronton, 31620
EHPAD St ANDRE CH de Gaillac
Gaillac, 81601
EHPAD St JEAN CH de Gaillac
Gaillac, 81601
EHPAD Accueil du Frère Jean
Galan, 65330
EHPAD La Baïse
Galan, 65330
Ch Gimont
Gimont, 32200
Foyer Pierre Bonhomme
Gramat, 46500
MR Charles de Gaulle
Gramat, 46500
MR Louis Conte
Gramat, 46500
EHPAD Saint Dominique
Gramond, 12160
Ehpad de Graulhet
Graulhet, 81300
Saint-Jacques
Grenade, 31330
Ste Sophie
Grisolles, 82170
EHPAD Résidence Zélia
Ibos, 65420
EHPAD Le Jonquère
Juillan, 65290
EHPAD Faux-Bourg Saint-Adrien
L'Isle-en-Dodon, 31230
Saint-Jacques
L'Isle-Jourdain, 32600
EHPAD Gustave Pédoya
La Bastide-de-Sérou, 09240
EHPADRouanet-Iché de LABASTIDE-ROUAIROUX
Labastide-Rouairoux, 81270
EHPADL'Oustal d'En Thibaud
Labruguière, 81290
M.R La Miséricorde
Lacapelle-Marival, 46120
EHPAD St vinçent de paul
Lacaune, 81230
Résidence du Lac
Lafrançaise, 82130
EHPAD résidence le grand champ
Lagrave, 81150
Les Causeries
Laguépie, 82250
Centre hospitalier du Pays d´Olmes - Laroques d´Olmes
Laroques d´Olmes, 09600
La Barbacane
Larrazet, 82500
MAPAD Les Ségalines
Latronquière, 46210
Résidence Paul et Lisa
Launaguet, 31140
Ehpad Les Quietudes
Lautrec, 81440
Centre hospitalier du Pays d´Olmes - Résidence du Touyre
Lavelanet, 09300
La Vendinelle
Le Cabanial, 31460
Ehpad Barrere
Lectoure, 32700
Ehpad Feral
Lectoure, 32700
Résidence Curtis
Léguevin, 31490
EHPAD L´Oasis
Livinhac-le-Haut, 12300
EHPAD La Madone
Lourdes, 65100
EHPAD Le Petit Jer
Lourdes, 65100
EHPAD Notre Dame des Grâces
Lugan, 12220
EHPAD Le Paginet
Lunac, 12270
MAPAD Les logis de l´Impernal
Luzech, 46140
EHPAD Le santoulis
Luzenac, 09250
EHPAD Saint Joseph
Marcillac-Vallon, 12330
Val de Gers
Masseube, 32140
EHPAD Le Clos du Raunier
Mazères, 09270
MR Beau Séjour
Mercuès, 46090
EHPAD du CH Millau - St Michel
Millau, 12100
EHPAD Les Charmettes
Millau, 12100
EHPAD Louise de Roquelaure
Mirepoix, 09500
EHPAD de MONESTIES
Monestiés, 81640
Ange Gardien
Montauban, 82000
Montauban - Ehpad Ushpa
Montauban, 82000
MR Saint Orens
Montauban, 82000
St Jean Marie Vianney
Montbeton, 82290
MR Sainte-Marie
Montcuq, 46800
M.R La Roseraie
Montfaucon, 46240
MR L´Etoile du Soir
Montredon, 46270
L´Hermitage
Montréjeau, 31210
EHPAD Rés. Parc de la Corette
Mur-de-Barrez, 12600
Le Barry
Muret, 31600
Résidence Marie-Antoinette
Muret, 31600
EHPAD Résidence les deux vallées
Nant, 12230
EHPAD Sainte Marie les Ursulines
Nant, 12230
EHPAD Résidence du Lac
Orleix, 65800
Centre Alzheimer Marie-Louise
Pechbonnieu, 31140
La Houlette
Pibrac, 31820
La Tranquilité
Pins-Justaret, 31860
Cité Saint Joseph
Plaisance Du Gers, 32160
Le Prat
Plaisance-du-Touch, 31830
Oasis-Palmeraie
Pointis-de-Rivière, 31210
EHPAD La résidence du Lac
Pont-de-Salars, 12290
L´Auta
Portet-sur-Garonne, 31120
EHPAD Résidence du petit bois
Pradines, 46090
M.R Les balcons du Lot
Prayssac, 46220
M.R Les Lavandes
Puy-l´Évêque, 46700
EHPAD la Maison Du Lac
Puygouzon, 81990
Résidence Isatis
Quint-Fonsegrives, 31120
EHPAD Hermitage et Terrasses de Rabastens
Rabastens, 81800
EHPAD Jean Baptiste Delfau
Réquista, 12170
EHPAD de Revel
Revel, 31250
EHPAD Les Rosiers
Rignac, 12390
Bel Adour
Riscle, 32400
EHPAD Bon Accueil
Rodez, 12000
EHPAD Julie Chauchard
Rodez, 12000
EHPAD Saint Cyrice
Rodez, 12000
EHPAD Saint Jacques du CH
Rodez, 12000
EHPAD Le clos de Siloe
Roquecourbe, 81210
EHPAD La Miséricorde
Saint-Affrique, 12400
Les Clos des Amandiers
Saint-Alban, 31140
EHPAD St Jean
Saint-Amans-des-Cots, 12460
Résidence de l´abbaye
Saint-Antonin-Noble-Val, 82140
Lavallée
Saint-Clar, 32380
EHPAD Les Galets d´Olt
Saint-Côme-d´Olt, 12500
Le Mas Saint-Pierre
Saint-Gaudens, 31800
L´Ensoleillade
Saint-Gaudens, 31800
EHPAD de l´Hôpital local
Saint-Geniez-d'Olt, 12130
Centre hospitalier Ariège Couserans
Saint-Girons, 09201
EHPAD Le Val d´Olt
Saint-Laurent-d'Olt, 12560
EHPAD Hector d´Ossun
Saint-Lizier, 09190
Les Rossignols
Saint-Lys, 31470
Maréchal Leclerc
Saint-Lys, 31470
Résidence La Joie de Vivre
Saint-Lys, 31470
EHPAD Clos St François
Saint-Sernin-sur-Rance, 12380
Ehpad Chez Nous
Saint-Sulpice, 81370
EHPAD Les grands chênes
Saïx, 81710
EHPAD Petite Plaisance SAVAGNAC
Salvagnac, 81630
EHPAD Vert Coteau
Saverdun, 09700
EHPAD Paul Ané
Seix, 09140
La Septfontoise
Septfonds, 82240
Ehpad Le Pre Fleuri
Serviès, 81220
EHPAD Sainte Marie
Siradan, 65370
EHPAD St Vinçent et Ste Croix
Sorèze, 81540
Les Tourelles
Toulouse, 31000
Maurice Garrigou
Toulouse, 31000
Plénitude Saint-Michel
Toulouse, 31000
Résidence Saint-Simon
Toulouse, 31035
La Cotonnière
Toulouse, 31200
Arc-en-Ciel
Toulouse, 31300
EHPAD Les Fontaines
Toulouse, 31300
La Pastellière
Toulouse, 31300
Orpéa Crampel
Toulouse, 31400
Caroline Baron
Toulouse, 31500
Le Grand Marquisat
Tournefeuille, 31170
Ehpad Belcantou
Trébas, 81340
EHPAD Résidence Les Rives du Pélam
Trie-sur-Baïse, 65220
EHPAD du Centre Hospitalier Des Deux Rives
Valence, 82400
M.R Résidence Valpré
Vayrac, 46110
EHPAD ND de Touscayrats
Verdalle, 81110
MR Saint Jacques
Verdun-sur-Garonne, 82600
EHPAD La Clairière - Les Acacias
Vic-en-Bigorre, 65500
Ch Vic-Fezensac
Vic-Fezensac, 32190
Le Château fleuri
Vic-Fezensac, 32190
EHPAD Sainte Claire
Villefranche-de-Rouergue, 12200
EHPAD Sud Rulhedu CH
Villefranche-de-Rouergue, 12200
Le Pin
Villeneuve-Tolosane, 31270
About this study
Official title: Impact of Either Audit and Feedback Only or Audit and Feedback Associated to Cooperative Work Meetings Between Hospital Geriatricians and Nursing Home Staff on Quality Indicators and Health Care Practices in Nursing Homes.
Introduction: Efficacy of audit and feedback interventions on nursing home (NH)quality indicators is not well-established.
The main objective: The main purpose of the IQUARE study was to examine the impact of two types of audit and feedback interventions on NH quality indicators and on residents dependence levels in a 18-month follow-up.
Read more
Study hypothesis: We hypothesised that audit and feedback associated to educational and professional supportive interventions are more efficacy in improving NH quality indicators than audit and feedback only.
Secondary objectives: Investigate the impact of the interventions on
- Residents:
- Functional decline rate
- Drug prescriptions (quantity and quality)
- Prevalence of adverse health outcomes (e.g., falls)
- NHs:
- Planning and implementation of therapeutic measures
Read the detailed description
IQUARE is a multicentric individually-tailored controlled trial comparing two types of audit and feedback interventions:
- audit and feedback associated to cooperative work meetings between hospital geriatricians and nursing home (NH) staff in a 6-month intervention (strong intervention)
- audit and feedback only (light intervention) Power statistics and sample size calculations indicated that each group should be composed of at least 2 500 individuals. The strong intervention will last 6 months and is composed of two face-to-face cooperative meetings (hospital geriatricians and NH staff). Data will be collected at baseline and in a 18-month follow-up.
- Conditions
- Quality Indicators, Physical Disability
- Being tested
- Audit and Feedback, Cooperative Work
- Keywords
- Quality indicators, quality of care, nursing home, long-term care unit, nursing home organisation, nursing home structure, disability, dependence, functional decline, functional impairment, older adults, elderly, audit and feedback, cooperative work, geriatrician, medication, hospitalisation, comorbidity
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Audit and FeedbackBehavioural
Descriptive statistics to each nursing home (NH) with regards to its own indicators of quality and residents' health status, and the same descriptive statistics on the sub-regional and regional levels were done to all NHs for comparative purposes.
Cooperative WorkBehavioural
Nursing homes (NH)in the strong intervention group had two half-day meetings of cooperative work with a hospital geriatrician to identify NHs' weaknesses regarding quality of care and to establish strategies for overcoming these weaknesses.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| strong intervention group (SIG) | Experimental | Nursing homes that received audit and feedback information on quality indicators and benefited of cooperative work meetings with hospital geriatricians Receives: Behavioral: Audit and Feedback; Behavioral: Cooperative Work |
| intervention group (LIG) | Active comparator | Nursing homes that only received audit and feedback information on quality indicators Receives: Behavioral: Audit and Feedback |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change from baseline in nursing home quality indicators at 18 months
Indicators of quality of care in 10 main outcomes: dementia (e.g.,prevalence of cognitive assessment), behavioural disturbances (e.g., prevalence of behavioural disturbances assessment), restraining (e.g., prevalence of restrained residents with a medical prescription for restraining), mood (e.g., prevalence of mood assessment), osteoporosis and falls (e.g., systematic analysis of fall records), nutrition (e.g., prevalence of residents who were weighed ≥ 3 times in the last 3 months), pressure ulcers (e.g., prevalence of residents who were evaluated for the risk of pressure ulcers), pain (e.g., prevalence of residents who were evaluated for pain among residents in end-of-life), medication (e.g., prevalence of re-evaluation of residents' drug prescriptions among residents who take psychotropic), and care and services (e.g., prevalence of hospitalisations in the emergency department in the last 12 months).
Measured: baseline and 18-month follow-up
Secondary outcomes (1)
Onset of dependence in activities of daily living from baseline to 18 months follow-up
Onset of dependence will be measured using the 6-item Katz ADL scale. Activities examined are: bathing, dressing, transferring, walking inside home, incontinence, and eating/drinking. Ability in executing each activity will be set as: "able to execute alone, without difficulty", "able to execute alone, with some difficulty", or "needing help to execute or unable to execute".
Measured: baseline and 18-month follow-up
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Oct 2012 (estimated)
- Study startMay 2011
- Primary completionJul 2011
- Study completionMar 2013
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Quality IndicatorsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 8,039 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Agence Régionale de la Santé - Midi Pyrénées
- Sponsor type
- Other government
- Collaborators
- Observatoire Régional de la Santé Midi-Pyrénées (ORSMIP)
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Yves Rolland, University Hospital, Toulouse
- Investigators
- Yves Rolland, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, La Grave- Casselardit University Hospital Centre, Service de Médecine Interne et Gérontologie Clinique - Gérontopôle
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01703689
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ARSMP.2010.1
- Acronym
- IQUARE
- Status last verified
- Jul 2016
- First submitted
- 27 Sep 2012
- Last updated
- 19 Jul 2016
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Dubucs X, de Souto Barreto P, Rolland Y. Organizational and environmental factors associated with transfers of nursing home residents to emergency departments. Eur Geriatr Med. 2018 Jun;9(3):339-346. doi: 10.1007/s41999-018-0059-x. Epub 2018 May 8.
PubMed 34654246Cool C, Cestac P, McCambridge C, Rouch L, de Souto Barreto P, Rolland Y, Lapeyre-Mestre M. Reducing potentially inappropriate drug prescribing in nursing home residents: effectiveness of a geriatric intervention. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2018 Jul;84(7):1598-1610. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13598. Epub 2018 May 14.
PubMed 29607568Laffon de Mazieres C, Lapeyre-Mestre M, Vellas B, de Souto Barreto P, Rolland Y. Organizational Factors Associated With Inappropriate Neuroleptic Drug Prescribing in Nursing Homes: A Multilevel Approach. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2015 Jul 1;16(7):590-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2015.01.092. Epub 2015 Mar 10.
PubMed 25769961
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Jul 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Impact of Either Audit and Feedback Only or Audit and Feedback Associated to Cooperative Work Meetings Between Hospital Geriatricians and Nursing Home Staff on Quality Indicators and Health Care Practices in Nursing Homes.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01703689
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IQUARE / ARSMP.2010.1
- Conditions
- Quality Indicators, Physical Disability
- Keywords
- Quality indicators, quality of care, nursing home, long-term care unit, nursing home organisation, nursing home structure, disability, dependence
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 8,039 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Agence Régionale de la Santé - Midi PyrénéesOther government
- Collaborators
- Observatoire Régional de la Santé Midi-Pyrénées (ORSMIP)
- Study start
- May 2011
- Primary completion
- Jul 2011 (actual)
- Study completion
- Mar 2013 (actual)
- First posted
- 10 Oct 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Introduction: Efficacy of audit and feedback interventions on nursing home (NH)quality indicators is not well-established.
The main objective: The main purpose of the IQUARE study was to examine the impact of two types of audit and feedback interventions on NH quality indicators and on residents dependence levels in a 18-month follow-up.
Study hypothesis: We hypothesised that audit and feedback associated to educational and professional supportive interventions are more efficacy in improving NH quality indicators than audit and feedback only.
Secondary objectives: Investigate the impact of the interventions on
- Residents:
- Functional decline rate
- Drug prescriptions (quantity and quality)
- Prevalence of adverse health outcomes (e.g., falls)
- NHs:
- Planning and implementation of therapeutic measures
Detailed description
IQUARE is a multicentric individually-tailored controlled trial comparing two types of audit and feedback interventions:
- audit and feedback associated to cooperative work meetings between hospital geriatricians and nursing home (NH) staff in a 6-month intervention (strong intervention)
- audit and feedback only (light intervention) Power statistics and sample size calculations indicated that each group should be composed of at least 2 500 individuals. The strong intervention will last 6 months and is composed of two face-to-face cooperative meetings (hospital geriatricians and NH staff). Data will be collected at baseline and in a 18-month follow-up.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| strong intervention group (SIG) | Experimental | Behavioral: Audit and Feedback, Behavioral: Cooperative WorkNursing homes that received audit and feedback information on quality indicators and benefited of cooperative work meetings with hospital geriatricians |
| intervention group (LIG) | Active comparator | Behavioral: Audit and FeedbackNursing homes that only received audit and feedback information on quality indicators |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Nursing homes (NH) voluntarily accepted to participate in the study.
- NH residents of both sex
- Residents living in the NH for ≥ 30 days
- Residents and their general practitioner (GP) having received information about the study
- NH residents do not voluntarily decline to participate in the study
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- NH currently participating in another interventional study
- GP of NH residents refused participation in the study.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Audit and FeedbackDescriptive statistics to each nursing home (NH) with regards to its own indicators of quality and residents' health status, and the same descriptive statistics on the sub-regional and regional levels were done to all NHs for comparative purposes. | Behavioural | intervention group (LIG), strong intervention group (SIG) |
| Cooperative WorkNursing homes (NH)in the strong intervention group had two half-day meetings of cooperative work with a hospital geriatrician to identify NHs' weaknesses regarding quality of care and to establish strategies for overcoming these weaknesses. | Behavioural | strong intervention group (SIG) |
Primary outcome
Change from baseline in nursing home quality indicators at 18 months
Time frame: baseline and 18-month follow-up
Indicators of quality of care in 10 main outcomes: dementia (e.g.,prevalence of cognitive assessment), behavioural disturbances (e.g., prevalence of behavioural disturbances assessment), restraining (e.g., prevalence of restrained residents with a medical prescription for restraining), mood (e.g., prevalence of mood assessment), osteoporosis and falls (e.g., systematic analysis of fall records), nutrition (e.g., prevalence of residents who were weighed ≥ 3 times in the last 3 months), pressure ulcers (e.g., prevalence of residents who were evaluated for the risk of pressure ulcers), pain (e.g., prevalence of residents who were evaluated for pain among residents in end-of-life), medication (e.g., prevalence of re-evaluation of residents' drug prescriptions among residents who take psychotropic), and care and services (e.g., prevalence of hospitalisations in the emergency department in the last 12 months).
1 secondary outcome
Onset of dependence in activities of daily living from baseline to 18 months follow-up
Time frame: baseline and 18-month follow-up
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Jul 2016.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34654246Dubucs X, de Souto Barreto P, Rolland Y. Organizational and environmental factors associated with transfers of nursing home residents to emergency departments. Eur Geriatr Med. 2018 Jun;9(3):339-346. doi: 10.1007/s41999-018-0059-x. Epub 2018 May 8.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 29607568Cool C, Cestac P, McCambridge C, Rouch L, de Souto Barreto P, Rolland Y, Lapeyre-Mestre M. Reducing potentially inappropriate drug prescribing in nursing home residents: effectiveness of a geriatric intervention. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2018 Jul;84(7):1598-1610. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13598. Epub 2018 May 14.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 25769961Laffon de Mazieres C, Lapeyre-Mestre M, Vellas B, de Souto Barreto P, Rolland Y. Organizational Factors Associated With Inappropriate Neuroleptic Drug Prescribing in Nursing Homes: A Multilevel Approach. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2015 Jul 1;16(7):590-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2015.01.092. Epub 2015 Mar 10.
Related trials for Quality Indicators
Not yet recruiting
Reducing Exposure With Air Cleaners and Technology
Asthma, COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease)
RecruitingObservational study
Evaluation of Quality Indicators in Patients Receiving Intensive Care and Their Influence on Outcome Indicators and Economic Indicators
Quality Indicators
Recruiting
Effects of a Dietary Supplement in Women With Late Perimenopause or Early Postmenopause
Perimenopause, Postmenopause
Recruiting
Identification of Pre-surgical Phenotypic Indicators Predictive of Quality of Life Trajectories in Obese Patients Following Bariatric Surgery
Obesity, Morbid, Obesity and Overweight
RecruitingObservational study
International Delphi Study to Develop Standardized Quality Criteria and a Rating Tool for Liver CEUS Image Quality Assessment
Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound, Ultrasonic Diagnosis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Yves Rolland, MD, PhD principal investigator
La Grave- Casselardit University Hospital Centre, Service de Médecine Interne et Gérontologie Clinique - Gérontopôle
175 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Audit and Feedback and Cooperative Work in people with Quality Indicators and Physical Disability, run by Agence Régionale de la Santé - Midi Pyrénées at 175 sites in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Jul 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 175 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change from baseline in nursing home quality indicators at 18 months (time frame: baseline and 18-month follow-up). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01703689, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Jul 2016.