Alzheimer's DiseasePhase 4NCT01703702
Effectiveness of Florbetapir (18F) PET Imaging in Changing Patient Management and the Relationship Between Scan Status and Cognitive Decline
A Phase 4 study testing florbetapir (18F) in people with Alzheimer's Disease, run by Avid Radiopharmaceuticals at 57 sites in 3 countries.
Trial summary
This study is designed to determine the effectiveness of florbetapir (18F) in changing patient management and to evaluate the association between scan status and cognitive decline. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 50 to 90 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Alzheimer's Disease
- What is being tested?
- florbetapir (18F)
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 641 participants
- Where
- 57 sitesin 3 countries
- Study dates
- Oct 2012to Apr 2015
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 50 to 90 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients may be enrolled in the mild impairment (not demented) group if the following criteria are met:
- Males or females ≥ 50 to <= 90 years of age.
- Have cognitive decline verified by a study partner or cognitive impairment verified by the study physician.
- Have a study partner who provides separate consent and is willing to accompany the patient on all of the study visits.
- Have an MMSE score of 24 to 30 inclusive.
- Can tolerate a 10-minute PET scan.
Show all 19Show fewer
- Have the ability to cooperate and comply with all study procedures.
- Have an enrolling physician who has less than high confidence in their diagnosis for the patient related to the cognitive decline at the time of enrollment.
- Ability to provide informed consent for study procedures.
- Patients may be enrolled in the dementia group if the following criteria are met:
- Are males or females ≥ 50 to <= 90 years of age.
- Meet clinical criteria for dementia.
- Have a caregiver who provides separate consent and is willing to accompany the patient on all of the study visits.
- Have an MMSE score of 16 to 24 inclusive.
- Have not received a clinical examination and/or laboratory test results that strongly indicates a non-neurodegenerative cause for the patients cognitive impairment.
- Can tolerate a 10-minute PET scan.
- Have the ability to cooperate and comply with all study procedures.
- Have an enrolling physician who has less than high confidence in their diagnosis for the patient related to the cognitive decline at the time of enrollment.
- Ability to provide informed consent for study procedures. (If the patient is incapable of giving informed consent, the patient's legal representative may consent on behalf of the patient but the patient must still confirm assent. This person may serve as the study partner as well).
Who cannot join
- Patients will be excluded from enrollment if they:
- Have a current serious or unstable illness;
- The patient or enrolling physician knows the result of a previous amyloid imaging scan;
- The patient has a known brain lesion, pathology or alternative diagnosis that strongly explains the patient's clinical presentation;
- Are receiving any investigational medications, or have participated in a trial with investigational medications within the last 30 days;
- Have ever participated in an experimental study with an amyloid targeting agent (e.g. anti-amyloid immunotherapy, γ -secretase or β -secretase inhibitor) unless it can be documented that the patient received only placebo during the course of the trial;
Show all 13Show fewer
- Have had a radiopharmaceutical imaging or treatment procedure within 7 days prior to the study imaging session; or
- Are females of childbearing potential who are not surgically sterile, not refraining from sexual activity or not using reliable methods of contraception.
- Patients will also be excluded from enrollment if their enrolling physician:
- Does not consider Alzheimer's disease as a potential cause of the patient's cognitive decline.
- Is not the primary physician taking care of the patient with respect to the management of their cognitive impairment.
- Cannot categorize the patient as either: a) having a documented and completed evaluation for cognitive decline within the past 18 months old; or b) currently undergoing evaluation for cognitive decline.
- Is unwilling to suspend all testing and other evaluation procedures between the time of the baseline evaluation of the enrolling physician's diagnosis and management plan and the time the completion of the PET scan.
Trial locations and contacts
57 sites in 3 countries.
57 sites in 3 countries
United States21 sites
Research Site
Bennington, Vermont, 05201
Research Site
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115
Research Site
Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts, 02467
Research Site
Clearwater, Florida, 33756
Research Site
Durham, North Carolina, 27710
Research Site
Greensboro, North Carolina, 27405
Research Site
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89106
Research Site
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89128
Research Site
Miami Beach, Florida, 33140
Research Site
Orlando, Florida, 32806
Research Site
Patchogue, New York, 11772
Research Site
Phoenix, Arizona, 85006
Research Site
Phoenix, Arizona, 85054
Research Site
Providence, Rhode Island, 02903
Research Site
Providence, Rhode Island, 02906
Research Site
Quincy, Massachusetts, 02169
Research Site
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84108
Research Site
Scottsdale, Arizona, 85258
Research Site
Shreveport, Louisiana, 71130
Research Site
Sun City, Arizona, 85351
Research Site
West Palm Beach, Florida, 33407
France18 sites
Research Site
Amiens, 80054
Research Site
Bordeaux, 33076
Research Site
Bron, 69500
Research Site
Dijon, 21033
Research Site
Lille, 59037
Research Site
Marseille, 13385
Research Site
Montpellier, 34000
Research Site
Nancy, 54035
Research Site
Nantes, 44093
Research Site
Nice, 06003
Research Site
Paris, 75651
Research Site
Pessac, 33604
Research Site
Reims, 51092
Research Site
Rouen, 76031
Research Site
Strasbourg, 67098
Research Site
Toulouse, 31059
Research Site
Tours, 37044
Research Site
Villeurbanne, 69100
Italy18 sites
Research Site
Bergamo, 24127
Research Site
Brescia, 20125
Research Site
Brescia, 25123
Research Site
Florence, 50139
Research Site
Genoa, 16128
Research Site
Genoa, 16132
Research Site
Milan, 20122
Research Site
Milan, 20132
Research Site
Milan, 20133
Research Site
Milan, 20162
Research Site
Modena, 41126
Research Site
Monza, 20900
Research Site
Padova, 35128
Research Site
Parma, 43100
Research Site
Perugia, 06132
Research Site
Pisa, 56126
Research Site
Rome, 00133
Research Site
Rome, 00179
About this study
Official title: A Randomized, Multicenter, Multicountry Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Florbetapir (18F) PET Imaging in Changing Patient Management and to Evaluate the Relationship Between Florbetapir (18F) PET Scan Status and Cognitive Decline
This study is designed to determine the effectiveness of florbetapir (18F) in changing patient management and to evaluate the association between scan status and cognitive decline.
- Conditions
- Alzheimer's Disease
- Being tested
- florbetapir (18F)
- Medical subject headings
- Alzheimer Disease
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
florbetapir (18F)Drug
Also called 18F-AV-45, florbetapir F 18, AV-45, Amyvid
Single i.v. bolus injection of 370MBq (10 mCi) followed by saline flush, 50 minutes prior to imaging, 10 minute image duration
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Experimental | Subjects will receive florbetapir (18F) PET scans and physicians will have immediate access to PET scan results. Receives: Drug: florbetapir (18F) |
| Control | Experimental | Subjects will receive florbetapir (18F) PET scans but physicians will be blinded to PET scan results for 12 months Receives: Drug: florbetapir (18F) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Clinical and Diagnostic Change in Patient Management
Comparison of the percentage of patients who have a change in management from baseline to 3 months for patients who receive scan results immediately (intervention arm) and those who receive scan results 12 months later (control arm).
Measured: Baseline and 3 months
Change in ADAS-Cog 11 Total Score
Change from baseline in the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - cognitive subscale (ADAS-cog) 11 Score in patients with mild impairment by positive or negative florbetapir (18F) PET scan result (Aß+/Aß-). ADAS-Cog scores (range 0-70) indicate performance on a series of 11 cognitive tasks where 0 indicates the highest level of cognitive performance and 70 indicates the lowest level of cognitive performance. Change in ADAS-Cog scores were calculated by subtracting the baseline score from the 12 month score. A change in ADAS-Cog greater than 0 indicates a deterioration in cognitive performance whereas a change in ADAS-Cog less than 0 indicates improved cognitive performance.
Measured: Baseline and 12 months
Secondary outcomes (5)
Change in Patient's Clinical Diagnosis
Comparison of the percentage of patients who have a change in diagnosis from baseline to 3 months for patients in the intervention and control arms for whom the scan result was not predicted by the initial diagnosis.
Measured: Baseline and 3 months
Change in Diagnostic Confidence
Comparison of the percentage point change in the physician's diagnostic confidence from baseline to month 3 in the intervention and control arms for patients whose scan result was predicted by their baseline clinical diagnosis. Diagnostic confidence was recorded by the physician as a whole number percent from 0-100% and the change in confidence was calculated by subtracting the baseline confidence from the confidence recorded at the specified timepoint. Values greater than zero reflect increased diagnostic confidence; values less than zero reflect decreased diagnostic confidence.
Measured: Baseline and 3 months
Change in Patient Management: Advice/Counseling
Comparison of the percentage of patients in the intervention and control arms who have a change in management relating to advice and counseling from baseline to 3 months.
Measured: Baseline and 3 months
Change in Caregiver Self-efficacy
Comparison of the change in self-efficacy between intervention and control arms. Change in self-efficacy is defined as the difference between total score on the Fortinsky: Family caregivers' self-efficacy for managing dementia scale at Follow-up (3 months) and baseline. Self-efficacy for managing dementia is defined in terms of specific behaviors or tasks that can be learned, and that are highly relevant to daily management of the disease process. The scale consists of 10 questions, each with responses ranging from 1 (not at all certain) to 10 (very certain). The total score is calculated by summing the response for each item. The total score ranges from 10 to 100, with increasing scores representing increasing caregiver self-efficacy.
Measured: Baseline and 3 months
Change in Patient Management: Individual Categories
Compare the percentage of patients with a change from baseline in the individual patient management categories at 3 months in the interventional and control arms.The individual categories are: Major diagnostic tests, Alzheimer's/cognition medication, neuropsychological tests, physician follow-up for re-evaluation or specialist referral.
Measured: Baseline and 3 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Oct 2012 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2012
- Primary completionApr 2015
- Study completionApr 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Alzheimer's DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 641 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Avid Radiopharmaceuticals
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Eli Lilly and Company
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Chief Medical Officer, Study director, Avid Radiopharmaceuticals
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01703702
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 18F-AV-45-A18
- Status last verified
- Jul 2016
- First submitted
- 5 Oct 2012
- Last updated
- 17 Aug 2016
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Aug 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized, Multicenter, Multicountry Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Florbetapir (18F) PET Imaging in Changing Patient Management and to Evaluate the Relationship Between Florbetapir (18F) PET Scan Status and Cognitive Decline
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01703702
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 18F-AV-45-A18
- Conditions
- Alzheimer's Disease
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 641 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Avid RadiopharmaceuticalsIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Eli Lilly and Company
- Study start
- Oct 2012
- Primary completion
- Apr 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- Apr 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 10 Oct 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 17 Aug 2016
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study is designed to determine the effectiveness of florbetapir (18F) in changing patient management and to evaluate the association between scan status and cognitive decline.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Experimental | Drug: florbetapir (18F)Subjects will receive florbetapir (18F) PET scans and physicians will have immediate access to PET scan results. |
| Control | Experimental | Drug: florbetapir (18F)Subjects will receive florbetapir (18F) PET scans but physicians will be blinded to PET scan results for 12 months |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 50 to 90 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (19 listed)
- Patients may be enrolled in the mild impairment (not demented) group if the following criteria are met:
- Males or females ≥ 50 to <= 90 years of age.
- Have cognitive decline verified by a study partner or cognitive impairment verified by the study physician.
- Have a study partner who provides separate consent and is willing to accompany the patient on all of the study visits.
- Have an MMSE score of 24 to 30 inclusive.
Key exclusion criteria (13 listed)
- Have a current serious or unstable illness;
- The patient or enrolling physician knows the result of a previous amyloid imaging scan;
- The patient has a known brain lesion, pathology or alternative diagnosis that strongly explains the patient's clinical presentation;
- Are receiving any investigational medications, or have participated in a trial with investigational medications within the last 30 days;
- Have ever participated in an experimental study with an amyloid targeting agent (e.g. anti-amyloid immunotherapy, γ -secretase or β -secretase inhibitor) unless it can be documented that the patient received only placebo during the course of the trial;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| florbetapir (18F)Also: 18F-AV-45, florbetapir F 18, AV-45, AmyvidSingle i.v. bolus injection of 370MBq (10 mCi) followed by saline flush, 50 minutes prior to imaging, 10 minute image duration | Drug | Control, Intervention |
Primary outcome
Clinical and Diagnostic Change in Patient Management
Time frame: Baseline and 3 months
Comparison of the percentage of patients who have a change in management from baseline to 3 months for patients who receive scan results immediately (intervention arm) and those who receive scan results 12 months later (control arm).
Change in ADAS-Cog 11 Total Score
Time frame: Baseline and 12 months
Change from baseline in the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - cognitive subscale (ADAS-cog) 11 Score in patients with mild impairment by positive or negative florbetapir (18F) PET scan result (Aß+/Aß-). ADAS-Cog scores (range 0-70) indicate performance on a series of 11 cognitive tasks where 0 indicates the highest level of cognitive performance and 70 indicates the lowest level of cognitive performance. Change in ADAS-Cog scores were calculated by subtracting the baseline score from the 12 month score. A change in ADAS-Cog greater than 0 indicates a deterioration in cognitive performance whereas a change in ADAS-Cog less than 0 indicates improved cognitive performance.
5 secondary outcomes
Change in Patient's Clinical Diagnosis
Time frame: Baseline and 3 months
Change in Diagnostic Confidence
Time frame: Baseline and 3 months
Change in Patient Management: Advice/Counseling
Time frame: Baseline and 3 months
Change in Caregiver Self-efficacy
Time frame: Baseline and 3 months
Change in Patient Management: Individual Categories
Time frame: Baseline and 3 months
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Aug 2016.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Alzheimer's Disease
RecruitingPhase 2
Neuroplasticity Enhancement From Cognitive Training Reinforced by Psilocybin
Alzheimer's Disease
Not yet recruiting
Acupressure as Long-term Intervention to Slow the Progression of Early/Mild Alzheimer's Disease
Alzheimer's Disease
RecruitingObservational study
Effectiveness and Safety of Disease-Modifying Therapy for Alzheimer's Disease: A Multicenter Retrospective Study
Alzheimer's Disease (AD)
RecruitingPhase 3
A Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of KarXT + KarX-EC for the Treatment of Agitation Associated With Alzheimer's Disease (ADAGIO-1)
Alzheimer Disease
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Trontinemab in Cognitively Unimpaired Individuals at Risk for Progression to Symptomatic Alzheimer's Disease
Alzheimer's Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Chief Medical Officer study director
Avid Radiopharmaceuticals
57 sites in 3 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing florbetapir (18F) in people with Alzheimer's Disease, run by Avid Radiopharmaceuticals at 57 sites in 3 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 19 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Aug 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 57 sites in United States, France, Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 17 Aug 2016). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Clinical and Diagnostic Change in Patient Management (time frame: Baseline and 3 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Aug 2016.