AzTrials
AzTrials

HIVDFANCT01705041

Preliminary Evaluation of a Point-Of-Care Liver Function Test

A study testing Diagnostics for All liver function test (LFT) in people with HIV and Tuberculosis, run by PATH at 1 site in Vietnam.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The proposed preliminary field evaluation will compare a point-of-care (POC) transaminase test with the standard of care test used in an HIV clinic at the Hospital for Tropical Diseases in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
HIV, Tuberculosis, Drug-Induced Liver Injury
What is being tested?
Diagnostics for All liver function test (LFT)
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
700 participants
Where
1 siteVietnam
Study dates
Jun 2012to Dec 2012
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Adult (>18 years old) patients receiving HIV treatment through the HTD clinic
  • Must be receiving routine scheduled ALT monitoring on day of enrollment
  • Willing to undergo finger-stick in addition to routine care
  • Must be able to provide informed consent.

Who cannot join

  • HIV-negative, or HIV-positive but not on treatment
  • Not receiving transaminase monitoring for routine care
  • Unable or unwilling to provide informed consent
  • Less than 18 years old

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Vietnam1 site
  • Hospital for Tropical Diseases

    Ho Chi Minh City

Other trials in Vietnam

About this study

Official title: Preliminary Field Evaluation of a Point-of-Care Transaminase Test

The proposed preliminary field evaluation will compare a point-of-care (POC) transaminase test with the standard of care test used in an HIV clinic at the Hospital for Tropical Diseases in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.

Read the detailed description

The DFA transaminase test provides rapid categorical measurement of ALT in a whole blood specimen taken via finger-stick. The test is based on the platform technology of "paper microfluidics" (also known as "patterned paper"), in which hydrophobic barriers are patterned into a sheet of paper in order to create microfluidic, hydrophilic paths within the paper, through which flow can be directed towards specific detection zones. The test is designed for visual color-coded readout in three ALT ranges ("bins") that correspond to the ranges of AST and ALT (<3x the upper limit of normal (ULN), 3-5x ULN, and >5x ULN) currently used for clinical management decisions per US TB and HIV treatment guidelines. The bin cutoffs are common to treatment guidelines used around the globe, including those used by the Vietnam Ministry of Health.

The colorimetric readout is designed to be read by eye using a visual "read guide" allowing the reader to make a semi-quantitative estimate or assign a categorical value into one of three bins. Alternatively, if the device is scanned (e.g. desk-top scanner) or photographed (e.g. cell phone or standard digital camera, see (9)) and read with image-analysis software, it should be possible to generate a quantitative result. Additionally, multiple control zones notify the user of insufficient sample volume, hemolysis, or damaged reagents.

The overall goal of this study is to conduct a preliminary field evaluation of an investigational transaminase test in a population at risk for DILI. The primary objectives are:

  1. Determine device accuracy by measuring the percent agreement of the categorical visual readout DFA transaminase test and the standard of care tests used in the HTD HIV clinic.
  2. Determine inter-operator variability.
  3. Determine device failure rate as defined by invalid test results.
Being tested
Diagnostics for All liver function test (LFT)
Medical subject headings
Tuberculosis, Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Diagnostics for All liver function test (LFT)Device

    Also called Diagnostics for All (DFA) liver function test (LFT), ALT, transaminase

    HIV clinic patients meeting targeted enrollment criteria will give fingerstick blood for use on investigational LFT in comparison to routine transaminase test performed at the clinic lab (gold standard)

Study groups in NCT01705041
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Diagnostics for All liver function test (LFT)ExperimentalHIV clinic patients meeting targeted enrollment criteria will give fingerstick blood for use on investigational LFT in comparison to routine transaminase test performed at the clinic lab (gold standard)
Receives: Device: Diagnostics for All liver function test (LFT)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. percent agreement with gold standard test

    Determine device accuracy by measuring the percent agreement of the categorical visual readout DFA transaminase test and the standard of care tests used in the HTD HIV clinic.

    Measured: at time of draw

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted12 Oct 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study startJun 2012
  3. Primary completionAug 2012
  4. Study completionDec 2012

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
700 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01705041
Sponsor's protocol ID
DFA LFT Study
Acronym
DFA
Status last verified
Jan 2013
First submitted
21 Aug 2012
Last updated
31 Jan 2013
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Diagnostics for All liver function test (LFT) in people with HIV and Tuberculosis, run by PATH at 1 site in Vietnam.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 Jan 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Vietnam. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

percent agreement with gold standard test (time frame: at time of draw). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 Jan 2013.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in