AzTrials
AzTrials

Rheumatoid ArthritisNCT01705730

A Non-Interventional Study of Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Treated With RoActemra/Actemra (Tocilizumab) in Monotherapy

An observational study of Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 17 sites in Belgium.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This observational study will evaluate the use and efficacy of RoActemra/Actemra (tocilizumab) in monotherapy in routine clinical practice in participants with rheumatoid arthritis. Eligible participants initiated on RoActemra/Actemra treatment according to the licensed label will be followed for 6 months. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Rheumatoid Arthritis
What is being tested?
tocilizumab
How many people
71 participants
Where
17 sitesBelgium
Study dates
31 Jul 2012to 12 Dec 2014
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Participants with rheumatoid arthritis initiating treatment with RoActemra/Actemra in monotherapy

Who may be able to join

  • Adult participants, >/= 18 years of age
  • Moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis according to the revised (1987) ACR criteria
  • Participants in whom the treating physician has made the decision to commence RoActemra/Actemra treatment in monotherapy in accordance with the local label and the reimbursement criteria indicating that RoActemra/Actemra can be given in monotherapy in case of methotrexate intolerance or where continued treatment with methotrexate is inappropriate; this can include participants who have received RoActemra/Actemra treatment within 8 weeks prior to the enrolment visit
  • Concomitant treatment with NSAIDs and/or corticosteroids is allowed

Who cannot join

  • Participants who have received RoActemra/Actemra more than 8 weeks prior to the enrolment visit
  • Participants who have previously received RoActemra/Actemra in a clinical trial or for compassionate use
  • Participants receiving concomitant DMARD treatment for rheumatoid arthritis at baseline (e.g. hydroxychloroquine, sulfasalazine, methotrexate, leflunomide, gold compounds, cyclosporine) will be excluded from the study
  • Participants who have received treatment with an investigational agent within 4 weeks (or 5 half-lives of the investigational agent, whichever is longer) before starting treatment with RoActemra/Actemra
  • Participants with a history of autoimmune disease or any joint inflammatory disease other than rheumatoid arthritis

Trial locations and contacts

17 sites in 1 country.

17 sites in 1 country

Belgium17 sites
  • ASZ Aalst

    Aalst, 9300

  • CH EpiCURA Site Ath

    Ath, 7800

  • CHU Brugmann (Victor Horta)

    Brussels, 1020

  • Hospital Erasme; Neurologie

    Brussels, 1070

  • Reumaclinic

    Genk, 3600

  • GHdC Site Saint-Joseph

    Gilly (Charleroi), 6000

  • Clinique Notre Dame de Grâce

    Gosselies, 6041

  • CH Jolimont - Lobbes (Jolimont)

    Haine-Saint-Paul, 7100

  • AZ Groeninge

    Kortrijk, 8500

  • Chr de La Citadelle

    Liège, 4000

  • Clinique Saint-Joseph

    Liège, 4000

  • CHU Ambroise Paré

    Mons, 7000

  • AZ Damiaan

    Ostend, 8400

  • Clinique St Pierre asbl

    Ottignies, 1340

  • AZ Delta (Campus Wilgenstraat)

    Roeselare, 8800

  • AZ Turnhout Sint Jozef

    Turnhout, 2300

  • Sint Augustinus Wilrijk

    Wilrijk, 2610

Other trials in Belgium

About this study

Official title: Mon-ACT: A Multi-center, Non-interventional Study in Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Patients Treated With Tocilizumab in Monotherapy

This observational study will evaluate the use and efficacy of RoActemra/Actemra (tocilizumab) in monotherapy in routine clinical practice in participants with rheumatoid arthritis. Eligible participants initiated on RoActemra/Actemra treatment according to the licensed label will be followed for 6 months.

Being tested
tocilizumab
Medical subject headings
Arthritis, Rheumatoid

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • tocilizumabDrug

    Also called Actemra

    Participants received tocilizumab monotherapy according to individualized physician-prescribed regimens.

Study groups in NCT01705730
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
TocilizumabParticipants with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) received tocilizumab monotherapy according to individualized physician-prescribed regimens.
Receives: Drug: tocilizumab

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of Participants on Tocilizumab Treatment at Month 6 After Treatment Initiation

    Measured: Month 6 after treatment initiation

Secondary outcomes (34)
  1. Percentage of Participants With Systemic Manifestations of RA at Baseline

    Systemic manifestations of RA included anemia, fatigue, conventional risk factors for cardiovascular disease, C-Reactive Protein (CRP) above upper limit of normal, rheumatoid nodules, rheumatoid vasculitis and interstitial lung disease. Participants were included if they experienced at least any one of the conditions.

    Measured: Baseline

  2. Number of Participants With Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (DMARDs) Intolerance and Inadequate Response

    Measured: Baseline

  3. Number of Participants With Inadequate Response to Other Biologics

    Measured: Baseline

  4. Time to Addition of Disease-Modifying Anti-rheumatic Drugs (DMARDs)

    The time to DMARD addition equals to the time (days) between tocilizumab start and first start date of DMARDs.

    Measured: Month 6

  5. Percentage of Participants Who Had DMARDs During Study

    Measured: Month 6

  6. Number of Participants With Dose Reductions

    Measured: 6 months

  7. Number of Participants With Starting Tocilizumab After Failing DMARDs

    Measured: Baseline

  8. Number of Participants With Starting Tocilizumab After Stopping Other Biologic Agents

    Measured: Baseline

  9. Time to Reduction/Withdrawal of Corticosteroids

    Measured: Month 6

  10. Number of Dose Modifications Per Participant at Month 6

    Number of dose modification per participant at Month 6 was reported.

    Measured: Month 6

  11. Mean Dosing Interval Per Participant at Month 6

    Measured: Month 6

  12. Percentage of Participants Discontinued From Tocilizumab for Safety Versus Efficacy

    Measured: Month 6

  13. Time for Restoration of Initial Dosing Regimen

    Measured: Month 6

  14. Percentage of Participants Who Were Not Adhering to Recommended Dosing Regimen

    Measured: Month 6

  15. Number of Participants Who Were Not Adhering to Recommended Management of AEs

    Measured: Month 6

  16. Percentage of Participants Still on Tocilizumab Monotherapy at Month 6

    Measured: Month 6

  17. Percentage of Participants With Reason for Choice of Monotherapy at Baseline

    Measured: Baseline

  18. Tender Joint Count (TJC)

    TJC was determined by examining 28 and 68 joints and identifying the joints that were painful under pressure or to passive motion. Tenderness was recorded on the joint assessment form at baseline, no tenderness = 0, tenderness = 1.

    Measured: Baseline, Month 3, 6

  19. Swollen Joint Count (SJC)

    SJC was determined by examining 28 and 66 joints and identifying when swelling was present. Swelling was recorded on the joint assessment form at baseline, no swelling = 0, swelling =1.

    Measured: Baseline, Month 3, 6

  20. Percentage of Participants With Disease Activity Score-28 (DAS28)

    DAS28 was calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joints count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (millimeter per hour [mm/hr]), and patient global assessment of disease activity (PGH) (measured on a 0 to 100 millimeter (mm) Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) where 0=no disease activity and 100=worst disease activity). DAS28 is a measurement of RA activity on a 0 to 10 scale: a score greater than (>) 5.1 indicates high disease activity; a score between 3.2 and 5.1 indicates moderate disease activity; a score of less than 3.2 indicates low disease activity; a score of less than (<) 2.6 is considered remission.

    Measured: Baseline, Month 3, 6

  21. Percentage of Participants With Good European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response at Month 3 and Month 6

    Clinical response assessed as per EULAR categorical DAS28 response criteria was defined as clinically meaningful improvement at a particular time point. EULAR response was based on change from baseline (CFB) in the DAS28 score and also on the actual DAS28 score at the time point so was more reflective of the current status of the participant. EULAR Good response: DAS28 <=3.2 and a CFB <-1.2. EULAR Moderate response: DAS28 >3.2 to ≤ 5.1 or a CFB < -0.6 to ≥ -1.2. EULAR No response: DAS28 ≤3.2 or CFB greater than or equal to (>=) -0.6, DAS28 >3.2 to <=5.1 or CFB>=-0.6 and DAS28 >5.1 or CFB >=-0.6. The DAS28 score was a measure of the participant's disease activity, based on the TJC (28 joints), SJC (28 joints), PGH, and ESR. DAS28 total scores ranged from 0 to approximately 10. Scores <2.6 = best disease control and scores >5.1 = worse disease control. A negative CFB indicated clinically meaningful improvement.

    Measured: Month 3, 6

  22. Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Response at Month 3 and Month 6

    ACR response was calculated based on total joint count evaluation (28 or 66/68 joint count) and other clinical and laboratory assessments. A positive ACR20 response required at least a 20% improvement (reduction) compared to baseline in swollen joint count (66 joints) and tender joint count (68 joints) and at least 3 of the following 5 assessments: patient's global assessment of pain, PGH, PhGH (all 3 assessed at 0 [good] to 100 mm [worst] VAS scale), participant assessment of disability measured by the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) (assessed on a 0 to 3 scale, where higher scores represented higher disease activity), Acute phase reactant (CRP or ESR). A reduction in the level of and acute phase reactants was considered an improvement. ACR50, ACR70, ACR90 require a 50%, 70%, 90% improvement from baseline respectively.

    Measured: Month 3, 6

  23. Percentage of Participants With Disease Activity According to Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Response

    CDAI is the numerical sum of 4 outcome parameters: TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, PGH and physician global assessment of disease activity (PhGH) assessed on 0-10 cm VAS; 0 = no disease activity and 10 = worst disease activity. CDAI total score = 0-76. CDAI <= 2.8 indicates clinical remission, >2.8 to 10 = low disease activity, >10 to 22 = moderate disease activity, and >22 = high (or severe) disease activity.

    Measured: Baseline, Month 3, 6

  24. Percentage of Participants With Disease Activity According to Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) Response

    The SDAI was a combined index for measuring disease activity in RA which reflected the numerical sum of five outcome parameters: TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, PGH and PhGH, assessed on 0-100 mm VAS where 0 = no disease activity and 100 = worst disease activity, and C-reactive protein (CRP). SDAI total score = 0-86. A SDAI score </= 3.3 represented clinical remission, a score of between 3.4 and 11.0 represented low disease activity, a score between 11 and 26.0 represented moderate disease activity and a score > 26.0 represented high (or severe) disease.

    Measured: Baseline, Month 3, 6

  25. Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Month 3 and Month 6

    The Patient Global Assessment of disease activity provides an overall assessment of how RA affects the participant using a visual analogue score, where 0 indicates they are managing very well and 100 indicates they are managing very poorly. A decrease in the score indicates improvement.

    Measured: Baseline, Month 3, 6

  26. Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Month 3 and Month 6

    The physician's global assessment of disease activity was assessed using a 0 to 100 mm horizontal VAS by the physician. The left-hand extreme of the line equals 0 mm, and is described as "no disease activity" (symptom-free and no arthritis symptoms) and the right-hand extreme equals 100 mm, as "maximum disease activity" (maximum arthritis disease activity). A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.

    Measured: Baseline, Month 3, 6

  27. Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) at Month 3 and Month 6

    The HAQ was a participant self-reported questionnaire for assessing the extent of a participant's functional ability. It consisted of 20 questions in 8 categories (dressing and grooming, rising, eating, walking, reach, grip, hygiene, and carrying out daily activities). Each question had 4 response options, ranging from 0=no difficulty; 1=some difficulty; 2=much difficulty; 3=unable to do. The HAQ scale was an average of all the scores and ranged from 0 to 3, where higher scores represented higher disease activity.

    Measured: Baseline, Month 3, 6

  28. Change From Baseline in VAS-Fatigue at Month 3 and Month 6

    The VAS-fatigue provides an overall assessment of the level of fatigue that the participant is experiencing using a visual analogue score, where 0 indicates no fatigue and 100 indicates extreme fatigue. A decrease in the score indicates improvement.

    Measured: Baseline, Month 3, 6

  29. Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of Pain at Month 3 and Month 6

    The Patient Global Assessment of pain provides an overall assessment of the severity of pain that the participant is experiencing using a visual analogue score, where 0 indicates no pain and 100 indicates unbearable pain. A decrease in the score indicates improvement.

    Measured: Baseline, Month 3, 6

  30. Change From Baseline in VAS-Morning Stiffness at Month 3 and Month 6

    Morning stiffness was defined by the time elapsed between the time of usual awakening (even if not in the morning) and the time the participant was as limber as he/she would be during a day involving typical activities. Morning stiffness was assessed on a 100 mm VAS, where 0= none and 100= very severe.

    Measured: Baseline, Month 3, 6

  31. Percentage of Participants With an Adverse Event (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), AEs of Special Interest (AESIs)

    An AE was considered any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease associated with the use of the study drug, whether or not considered related to the study drug. An Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) is any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, or results in a congenital anomaly/birth defect. AESI included- serious/medically significant infections; myocardial Infarction/acute coronary syndrome; gastrointestinal perforations; malignancies; anaphylaxis/hypersensitivity reactions; demyelinating disorders; stroke; serious/medically significant bleeding events; serious/medically significant hepatic events.

    Measured: Month 6

  32. Percentage of Participants With AEs Leading to Dose Modifications

    Measured: Month 6

  33. C-reactive Protein (CRP]) Level

    CRP is an acute phase reactant and is a measure of inflammation.

    Measured: Baseline, Month 3, 6

  34. Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) Level

    ESR is an acute phase reactant and is a measure of inflammation.

    Measured: Baseline, Month 3, 6

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted12 Oct 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study start31 Jul 2012
  3. Primary completion12 Dec 2014
  4. Study completion12 Dec 2014

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
71 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01705730
Sponsor's protocol ID
ML28269
Status last verified
Aug 2018
First submitted
10 Oct 2012
Last updated
4 Sep 2018

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 17 sites in Belgium.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Sep 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 17 sites in Belgium. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 4 Sep 2018). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of Participants on Tocilizumab Treatment at Month 6 After Treatment Initiation (time frame: Month 6 after treatment initiation). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Sep 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in