AzTrials
AzTrials

Infection WoundNCT01707654

Repair of Infective Wound Associated With Nerve Defect in the Finger Using A Bipedicled Nerve Flap

A study testing Nerve flap in people with Infection Wound and Disruption of Nerve Repair, run by The Second Hospital of Tangshan at 1 site in China.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

A combination of soft tissue and digital nerve defects in the finger results in sensory loss of the finger pulp. Reconstruction of these combined injuries is difficult. When the neurocutaneous defect is associated with wound infection, reconstructive alternatives are more limited. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 16 to 55 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Infection Wound, Disruption of Nerve Repair
What is being tested?
Nerve flap
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
9 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
Jul 2008to Feb 2012
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 16 to 55 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child, Adult

Who may be able to join

  • an infective wound with exposed bone or tendon in the finger;
  • soft tissue defect involving proximal half of the middle phalanx, the proximal phalanx, or both;
  • associated digital nerve defect 1 to 4 cm in length;
  • single or double nerve defects; and
  • simultaneous repair of nerve and soft tissue defects.

Who cannot join

  • injury to the course of the pedicle or the donor site;
  • nerve defect less than 1 cm or larger than 4 cm in length;
  • occurrence of the defect in a region the flap is unable to reach, such as distal interphalangeal joint region, distal portion of the middle phalanx of the middle finger and the thumb;
  • no involvement of the digital nerve.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

China1 site
  • The Second Hospital of Tangshan

    Tangshan, Hebei, 063000

Other trials in China

About this study

A combination of soft tissue and digital nerve defects in the finger results in sensory loss of the finger pulp. Reconstruction of these combined injuries is difficult. When the neurocutaneous defect is associated with wound infection, reconstructive alternatives are more limited. From July 2008 to May 2010, a retrospective study was conducted with 9 consecutive postinfection patients who had the neurocutaneous defect of the finger following trauma. The purpose of this retrospective study is to report repair of the complicated infected wound in the finger using the bipedicled nerve flap and to evaluate the efficacy of this technique.

Read the detailed description

sensation of the flaps is assessed using static two-point discrimination (2PD) and Semmes-Weinstein monofilament (SWM) testing at final follow-up. The cold intolerance of the injured finger is measured using the self-administered Cold Intolerance Severity Score questionnaire that was rated into mild, moderate, severe, and extreme (0-25, 26-50, 51-75 and 76-100). Patients report their satisfaction with functional recovery of the injured finger according to the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire that was based on a 5-point response scale.

Being tested
Nerve flap
Keywords
defect;, dorsal branch of the proper digital nerve;, proper digital nerve;, finger sensory reconstruction.
Medical subject headings
Wound Infection

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Nerve flapDevice

    Based on the Teoh et al.'s technique, we combined the nerve graft into the bipedicled heterodigital arterialized island flap and used this composite flap tissue for reconstructing complicated infected wound in the finger.

Study groups in NCT01707654
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
nerve graftOtherSimultaneous repair of the infected wound and digital nerve defect in the finger using a bipedicled nerve flap including nerve graft from the dorsal branch of the digital nerve.
Receives: Device: Nerve flap

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. 2-point Discrimination Test

    The 2-point Discrimination Test determines the minimal distance at which a subject can sense the presence of two needles. The modified American Society for Surgery of the Hand guidelines were used to stratify Discriminator measurements (excellent <6 mm; good 6-10 mm; fair 11-15 mm; poor >15 mm. The test points were at the center of the radial or ulnar portion of the pulp. Each area was tested 3 times with a Discriminator (Ali Med, Dedham, MA). Two out of 3 correct answers were considered proof of perception before proceeding to another lower value. We stopped at 4 mm as a limit of 2PD and considered this normal. The assessments were performed at a single time point at the final follow up.

    Measured: 17-25 months

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Semmes-Weinstein (SW) Monofilament Test

    The test points were at the center of the radial or ulnar portion of the pulp. The donor site, i.e. radial- or ulnar-dorsal aspect of the middle phalanx of the donor digit, was also evaluated.

    Measured: 17-25 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted16 Oct 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study startJul 2008
  3. Primary completionMay 2010
  4. Study completionFeb 2012

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
9 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01707654
Sponsor's protocol ID
TSChen6017
Other IDs
HEBEI-J06451
Status last verified
Apr 2012
First submitted
12 Oct 2012
Last updated
21 Nov 2018

Publications

  • Chen C, Zhang X, Shao X, Gao S, Wang B, Liu D. Treatment of a combination of volar soft tissue and proper digital nerve defects using the dorsal digital nerve island flap. J Hand Surg Am. 2010 Oct;35(10):1655-1662.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2010.07.011.

    PubMed 20888502
  • Chen C, Tang P, Zhang L. Use of a bipedicled nerve flap taken from the dorsum of the digit for reconstruction of neurocutaneous defect in the adjacent finger. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2013 Oct;66(10):1322-9. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2013.06.001. Epub 2013 Jul 2.

    PubMed 23829956

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Nerve flap in people with Infection Wound and Disruption of Nerve Repair, run by The Second Hospital of Tangshan at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Nov 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 23 Oct 2013). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

2-point Discrimination Test (time frame: 17-25 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01707654, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Nov 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in