AzTrials
AzTrials

Poisoning by Paraquat With Undetermined IntentPQNCT01709604

Role of CVVH in Patients With Acute Paraquat Poisoning

An observational study of Poisoning by Paraquat With Undetermined Intent, run by Ai Peng at 2 sites in China.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Paraquat poisoning is characterized by multiple organ failure and pulmonary fibrosis with respiratory failure. Accumulating evidence suggested that continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH) had a beneficial role in the treatment of multiple organ dysfunction. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 14 to 70 years
What is being tested?
CVVH and Standardized therapy regimens
How many people
110 participants
Where
2 sitesChina
Study dates
Oct 2012to Jun 2016
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 14 to 70 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: In-patients with acute paraquat poisoning

Who may be able to join

  • All patients recruited in this study should meet the requirements as follows:
  • history of exposure to Paraquat
  • concentration in urine or plasma from all patients who arrived at our hospital within 1 week of paraquat ingestion was more than 0.1 mg/L.
  • Patients with a light blue, navy blue or dark blue color in urine dithionite tests within 1 week of PQ ingestion, were classified as having PQ intoxication and were included in this study.
  • patients with acute organ dysfunction such as acute kidney injury, hepatic injury or pancreatic injury.

Who cannot join

  • Patients who had colorless urine PQ tests, who arrived at any hospital more than 24 h after intoxication, who had not orally ingested PQ or any other drug poisonings, who were younger than 14 years or older than 70 years, or who had been included in any previous control trials were excluded.

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

China2 sites
  • The division of nephrolgoy, Shanghai 10th people's hospital

    Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200072

  • The division of nephrology, Shanghai 10th people's hosptial

    Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200072

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: The Efficacy and Safety of Continuous Venovenous Hemofiltration in Patients With Severe Acute Paraquat Poisoning

Paraquat poisoning is characterized by multiple organ failure and pulmonary fibrosis with respiratory failure. Accumulating evidence suggested that continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH) had a beneficial role in the treatment of multiple organ dysfunction. The investigators hypothesized that CVVH might restore multiple organ function and reduce the high mortality rate of paraquat poisoning. To confirm it, an prospective clinical study would be carried out.

Read the detailed description

Paraquat (1,1 '-dimethyl-4,4'-bipyridylium dichloride) is widely used as a herbicide. Accidental or intentional ingestion of paraquat is common in many developing countries such as China, Sri Lanka and Korea because of easy access. The high mortality rate of paraquat is due to its high toxicity and the lack of effective treatments. Thus, the paraquat poisoning becomes one of major medical problem in the developing countries.

Paraquat poisoning is also one of major causes of death among young patients with acute poisoning in China. It is characterized by multiple organ failure and pulmonary fibrosis with respiratory failure. A growing body of evidence suggested that continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH) had a great beneficial role in the treatment of multiple organ dysfunctions. We hypothesized that CVVH might reduce the high mortality rate of paraquat poisoning via restoring the multiorgan function, such as acute hepatic lesion, acute kidney injury, acute lung injury and acute pancreatic injury. We expect to enroll 100 patients from our hospital within 1 week after oral intake of paraquat. All patients were divided into Group 1 and Group 2. Group 1 were treated with a standardized therapeutic regimen including stomach lavage, emergency haemoperfusion and drugs. Group 2 were accepted with standardized treatment plus CVVH. The aim of this prospective clinical study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of CVVH for the treatment of patients with paraquat poisoning. The survival rate, clinical manifestations and clinical parameters between these two groups were compared.

Being tested
CVVH, Standardized therapy regimens
Keywords
acute paraquat poisoning, hemoperfusion, continuous blood purification

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • CVVHProcedure or surgery

    Also called continuous renal replacement treatment(CRRT), continuous blood purification(CBP)

    Ultrafiltration at 35ml/h/Kg

  • Standardized therapy regimensProcedure or surgery

    Standardized therapy regimens included the followings:

    1. Remove all contaminated clothing
    2. Gastric lavage
    3. Receive activated charcoal as quickly as possible
    4. Hemoperfusion with activated charcoal(160g)
    5. Immunosuppression with methylprednisolone
    6. Antioxidants (glutathione,1.2 gram iv twice a day)
    7. Supportive care
Study groups in NCT01709604
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
continuous venovenous hemofiltrationContinuous venovenous hemofiltration(CVVH):blood access was achieved by placing a double lumen catheter in the femoral or internal jugular vein. Continuous diffusive solute transport is achieved by infusing a dialysis fluid that runs counter-current to blood at an ultrafiltration rate of 35 ml/h/Kg.
Receives: Procedure: CVVH
Standardized therapy regimensThe standardized therapy regimens included reduce absorption, accelerate the elimination and prevent the complications in patients with paraquat poisoning.
Receives: Procedure: CVVH; Procedure: Standardized therapy regimens

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Efficacy

    CVVH treatment efficacy was assessed by the following measurements:

    1. Mortality rate: compared the difference between standardized therapy and CVVH treatment.
    2. Number of organs involved in paraquat poisoning such as lung,kidney,liver and heart.
    3. Degree of organ injuries
    4. CT scan of lung
    5. Biomarkers:

    1)Oxidative stress: blood superoxide dismutase(SOD),malondialdehyde (MDA), superoxide dismutase (SOD), and catalase (CAT).

    2)Proinflammatory factors: interleukins(IL-2,IL-6,IL-8 and IL-10) 3)Kidney function:serum cystatin C and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and N-acetyl-β-(D)-glucosaminidase activity (NAG),kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1), Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin(NAGL) and urinary retinol-binding protein(RBP),etc.

    4)Heart damage markers: cTnT,MYO,creatine kinase-MB(CK-MB) and brain natriuretic peptide(BNP).

    Measured: at 6 months after paraquat poisoning

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Safety of CVVH for the treatment of patients

    Safety and tolerability were assessed by the followings.

    1. Changes from baseline in systolic blood pressure and mean artery pressure during CVVH treatment procedure.
    2. Number of participants with adverse events such as bleeding, respiratory failure,hypotension,shock,thrombosis,pulmonary embolism and death.

    Measured: at 2 weeks after paraquat poisoning

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted18 Oct 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study startOct 2012
  3. Primary completionJun 2016
  4. Study completionJun 2016

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
110 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01709604
Sponsor's protocol ID
20120830
Other IDs
8117192
Acronym
PQ
Status last verified
Jun 2016
First submitted
11 Oct 2012
Last updated
14 Jun 2016
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Poisoning by Paraquat With Undetermined Intent, run by Ai Peng at 2 sites in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Jun 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Efficacy (time frame: at 6 months after paraquat poisoning). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Jun 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in