AzTrials
AzTrials

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary DiseasePhase 3NCT01709864

NVA237 Versus Placebo 12-week Efficacy Study

A Phase 3 study testing NVA237 in people with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, run by Novartis Pharmaceuticals at 54 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The study serves to determine whether the treatment of patients with stable, symptomatic Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) with the investigational drug NVA237 is efficient and safe. The efficacy and safety of the drug will be tested against a placebo treatment. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 40 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
What is being tested?
NVA237
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
440 participants
Where
54 sitesUnited States
Study dates
Nov 2012to Oct 2013
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 40 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients with stable, symptomatic Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) with airflow obstruction of level 2 and 3 according to the current Global initiative for chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) strategy (2011).
  • Patients with Forced Expiratory Volume in one second (FEV1) ≥ 30% and <80 % of the predicted normal, and FEV1/ Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) < 0.70 when measured 45 min after the inhalation of 84 µg ipratropium bromide.
  • Current or ex-smokers with at least 10 cigarette pack years smoking history.

Who cannot join

  • Patients with a history of long QT syndrome, with a prolonged QTc measured during screening, or patients who have a clinically significant ECG abnormality at screening.
  • History of malignancy of any organ system (other than localized basal cell carcinoma of the skin), treated or untreated, within the past 5 years, regardless of whether there is evidence of local recurrence or metastases.
  • Pregnant or nursing (lactating) women. Women of childbearing potential unless using an effective method of contraception.
  • Patients who in the judgment of the investigator, would be at potential risk if enrolled into the study.
  • Patients who have a clinically significant concomitant disease at screening, including but not limited to clinically significant laboratory abnormalities, clinically significant renal, cardiovascular, neurological, endocrine, immunological, psychiatric, gastrointestinal, hepatic, or hematological abnormalities, or with uncontrolled diabetes, which could interfere with the assessment of the efficacy and safety of the study treatment.
  • Patients with a body mass index (BMI) of more than 40 kg/m2.
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Patients contraindicated for treatment with, or having a history of reactions/ hypersensitivity to anticholinergic agents, long and short acting beta-2 agonists, or sympathomimetic amines.
  • Patients with any history of asthma, with onset of symptoms prior to age 40 years, or patients with a high blood eosinophil count during screening.
  • Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply.

Trial locations and contacts

54 sites in 1 country.

54 sites in 1 country

United States54 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    *See Various Dept.'s*, Arizona

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Amarillo, Texas, 79106-4165

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Arlington, Texas, 76012

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Arlington, Texas, 76014

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Beaumont, Texas, 77701

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Brandon, Florida, 33511

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Charleston, South Carolina, 29406-7108

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Charleston, South Carolina, 29407

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Charlotte, North Carolina, 28207

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Clearwater, Florida, 33756

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Columbia, South Carolina, 29201

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Dallas, Texas, 75251

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    DeFuniak Springs, Florida, 32435

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Easley, South Carolina, 29640

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Edgewater, Florida, 32132

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Fort Lauderdale, Florida, 33306

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Fountain Valley, California, 92708

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Fullerton, California, 92835

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Gaffney, South Carolina, 29340

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Greenville, South Carolina, 29615

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Hialeah, Florida, 33012

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Homewood, Alabama, 35209-6870

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Huntsville, Texas, 77340

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Jasper, Alabama, 35501

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Las Vegas, Nevada, 89104

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Las Vegas, Nevada, 89123

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Los Angeles, California, 90048

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Los Angeles, California, 90095

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Miami, Florida, 33136

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Miami, Florida, 33156

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Miami, Florida, 33173

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Miami, Florida, 33186

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Ninety Six, South Carolina, 29666

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Pensacola, Florida, 32503

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Pompano Beach, Florida, 33060

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Port Orange, Florida, 32127

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Raleigh, North Carolina, 27607

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Riverside, California, 92506

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Rock Hll, South Carolina, 29732

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    San Diego, California, 92117-4946

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    San Diego, California, 92120

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Sarasota, Florida, 34233

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Seneca, South Carolina, 29678

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Shelby, North Carolina, 28152

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Simpsonville, South Carolina, 29681

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    South Miami, Florida, 33143

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Spartanburg, South Carolina, 29303

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Summerfield, Florida, 34491

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Tamarac, Florida, 33321

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Tampa, Florida, 33603

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Tucson, Arizona, 85712

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Union, South Carolina, 29379

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Waco, Texas, 76712

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Winter Park, Florida, 32789

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A 12-week Multi-center, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo Controlled Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of NVA237 in Stable COPD Patients

The study serves to determine whether the treatment of patients with stable, symptomatic Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) with the investigational drug NVA237 is efficient and safe. The efficacy and safety of the drug will be tested against a placebo treatment.

The primary criterion to assess efficacy will be the difference between the serial lung function measurements of patients who have been treated for 12 weeks with NVA237 versus those that have received placebo treatment for 12 weeks. A serial lung function measurement (FEV1 testing) will be conducted and the "area under the curve" will be the measure for the ability to breathe.

Being tested
NVA237, Placebo
Keywords
Anticholinergic, Antimuscarinic, Chronic Obstructive Airway Disease, Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, COPD, LAMA, Lung Disease, Lung Diseases, Obstructive, Lung Function, Muscarinic receptor antagonist, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, Respiratory Tract Diseases
Medical subject headings
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, Lung Diseases, Lung Diseases, Obstructive, Respiratory Tract Diseases

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • NVA237Drug

    NVA237 (glycopyrronium bromide) as a powder for inhalation in single-dose capsules.

  • PlaceboDrug

    Placebo powder for inhalation in single-dose capsules (matching those for NVA237).

Study groups in NCT01709864
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
NVA237ExperimentalNVA237 will be inhaled from a single-dose dry powder inhaler for a period of 12 weeks
Receives: Drug: NVA237
PlaceboPlacebo comparatorPlacebo will be inhaled from a single-dose dry powder inhaler for a period of 12 weeks.
Receives: Drug: Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change From Baseline of Standardized Area Under the Curve (AUC) for Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) Post Dosing

    The standardized Area Under the Curve (AUC) for Forced Expiratory Volume in one second (FEV1) post dosing (FEV1 AUC) at week 12 of treatment. Serial lung function measurements are taken at various time points following dosing at week 12 to calculate the AUC.

    Measured: 12 weeks

Secondary outcomes (14)
  1. Change From Baseline in Trough FEV1 and Pre-dose Trough FEV1 by Visit

    Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in one second (FEV1) is the mean of FEV1 at 23h 15min and 23h 45min after the morning dose of the previous day. Pre-dose trough FEV1 is the mean of FEV1 at -45min and -15min before morning dose

    Measured: Day 2, 86 (trough) Day 15, 29, 57, 85 (pre-dose trough)

  2. Change From Baseline in FEV1 AUC (0-12H) at Day 1 and FEV1 AUC (0-4h), AUC (4-8h), AUC (8-12h) at Day 1 and Week 12 (Day 85)

    The standardized Area Under the Curve (AUC) for Forced Expiratory Volume in one second (FEV1) is assessed for different time spans within the overall serial measurement post dosing (FEV1 AUCs Time Spans), at day 1 and at week 12 of treatment. Serial lung function measurements are taken at various time points post dosing on day 1 and at week 12 to calculate the AUC for these different time spans.

    Measured: Day 1 and Week 12 (Day 85)

  3. Change From Baseline in the Health Status Assessed by St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire

    The health status, as reported by the patients, is assessed using the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ). The SGRQ is a 50 item scale assessing symptoms, patient activities and impact of the disease. Scores range from 0 to 100 units, with higher scores indicating more limitations. The assessment is based on total score as well as the percentage of patients with clinically significant improvement at week 12 versus day 1. A clinically meaningful improvement (MCID) in SGRQ is defined as a decrease of 4 or more units of the SGRQ scale in the total score, as compared to baseline (change from baseline).

    Measured: Week 12

  4. Percentage of Participants With a Clinically Important Improvement of >=4units in the SGRQ Total Score at Week 12

    The health status, as reported by the patients, is assessed using the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ). The assessment is based on total score as well as the percentage of patients with clinically significant improvement at week 12 versus day 1. A clinically significant improvement in SGRQ is defined as less than or equal to -4 change from baseline.

    Measured: Week 12

  5. Breathlessness Assessed by Transition Dyspnea Index (TDI) Focal Score at Week 12

    Breathlessness at week 12 is measured using the Transition Dyspnea Index (TDI). On day 1, breathlessness is assessed by the Baseline Dyspnea Index (BDI). Patients are considered to have clinically significant improvement with the TDI score change versus BDI being equal to or greater than 1. TDI focal score is based on three domains: functional impairment, magnitude of task and magnitude of effort. Each domain is scored from -3 (major deterioration) to 3 (major improvement) to give an overall TDI focal score of -9 to 9. Higher numbers indicate a better score.

    Measured: Week 12

  6. Change From Baseline of Daily Symptom Scores

    Patients reported symptoms using an electronic diary.The diary has 9 symptom questions each am and each pm. Each question can be answered w/1 of 4 pre-defined answers, with a unit value of 0-3, 0 is least \& 3 is most severe symptom.Symptom scores are calculated as the mean of combined daily symptom scores(combined from am \& pm)for each patient over 12 weeks. The baseline is calculated from the run-in epoch prior to randomization.The change from baseline is in LS mean daily symptom scores over the 12 weeks. If the mean score over the 12 weeks is lower than the baseline, result is (-).A neg. result indicates an improvement in COPD symptom severity. Patients may have met the min. response requirements for the night scores(am questions),but not for the day scores(pm questions)or vice versa, the # of patients analyzed can vary between both day \& night scores. Therefore, the # of patients analyzed for the combined daily symptom score can vary from the #s for individual day \& night scores.

    Measured: 12 weeks

  7. Change From Baseline of Morning and Nighttime Symptom Scores at Week 12

    Patients reported symptoms using an electronic diary.The diary has 9 symptom questions each am \& each pm.Each question can be answered w/1 of 4 pre-defined answers,with a unit value of 0-3, 0 is least \& 3 is most severe symptom.Symptom scores are calculated as the mean of the symptom scores(either the score assessed in am for the previous 12 hrs-referred to as nighttime scores,or the score assessed in pm for the previous 12 hrs-referred to as the daytime symptom score) for each patient over 12 weeks.The baseline is calculated from the run-in epoch prior to randomization.The change from baseline is in LS mean daily symptom scores over the 12 weeks. If the mean score over the 12 weeks is lower than the baseline, result is (-).A neg. result indicates an improvement in COPD symptom severity. the # of patients analyzed can vary between both day \& night scores. Therefore, the # of patients analyzed for the combined daily symptom score can vary from the #s for individual day \& night scores.

    Measured: 12 weeks

  8. Percentage of Nights With "no Nighttime Awakenings"

    Patients are reporting symptoms by using an electronic diary. A night with "no nighttime awakening" is defined from diary data as any night where the patient did not wake up due to symptoms. Percentage of no nighttime awakenings from Baseline up to 12 weeks.

    Measured: from Baseline up to 12 weeks

  9. Percentage of Days With "no Daytime Symptoms"

    Patients are reporting symptoms by using an electronic diary. A day with "no daytime symptoms" is defined from diary data as any day where the patient has recorded in the evening no cough, no wheeze, no production of sputum, and no feeling of breathlessness (other than when running) during the past approximately 12 hours. The percentage of days is calculated by the number of days with no daytime symptoms/total number of days with evaluable data X 100.

    Measured: from Baseline up to 12 weeks

  10. Percentage of "Days Able to Perform Usual Daily Activities"

    Patients are reporting symptoms by using an electronic diary. A "day able to perform usual daily activities" is defined from diary data as any day where the patient was not prevented from performing their usual daily activities due to respiratory symptoms.

    Measured: from Baseline up to 12 weeks

  11. The Average Number of Puffs of Rescue Medication Per Day

    Patients report the number of puffs of rescue medication (salbutamol / albuterol) using an electronic diary. The use of rescue medication is analyzed as the mean daily number of puffs used per patient over the 12 weeks treatment period.

    Measured: baseline and 12 weeks

  12. Percentage of Days Without Rescue Medication Use

    Patients report the number of puffs of rescue medication (salbutamol / albuterol) using an electronic diary. The use of rescue medication is analyzed as the percentage of days without usage of rescue medication over the 12 weeks treatment period. The baseline is calculated from the run-in epoch prior to randomization.

    Measured: 12 weeks

  13. Change From Baseline of Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at All Individual Timepoints at Day 1 and at Week 12 (Day 85)

    The Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) assessments for all individual time points of the serial measurements on day 1 and at week 12 are analyzed.

    Measured: Baseline, Day 1 and Week 12 (Day 85)

  14. Change From Baseline of Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) at All Individual Timepoints at Day 1 and at Week 12 (Day 85)

    The Forced Expiratory Volume in one second (FEV1) assessments for all individual time points of the serial measurements on day 1 and at week 12 are analyzed.

    Measured: Baseline, Day 1 and Week 12 (Day 85)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted18 Oct 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study startNov 2012
  3. Primary completionOct 2013
  4. Study completionOct 2013

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
440 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01709864
Sponsor's protocol ID
CNVA237A2317
Status last verified
Feb 2015
First submitted
16 Oct 2012
Last updated
4 Mar 2015
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing NVA237 in people with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, run by Novartis Pharmaceuticals at 54 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Mar 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 54 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 12 Feb 2015). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change From Baseline of Standardized Area Under the Curve (AUC) for Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) Post Dosing (time frame: 12 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Mar 2015.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in