AzTrials
AzTrials

Persistent Atrial FibrillationBOCANCT01711047

Benefit of CFAE Ablation

A study testing Radiofrequency catheter Ablation in people with Persistent Atrial Fibrillation, run by Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust at 2 sites in United Kingdom.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The optimal strategy for catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation is not clearly defined. This study investigates if Complex Fractionated Atrial Electrogram (CFAE) ablation in addition to pulmonary vein isolation and linear ablations improves single procedural success rate over a 12 month follow up period. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 75 years
Conditions the study is for
Persistent Atrial Fibrillation
What is being tested?
Radiofrequency catheter Ablation
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
120 participants
Where
2 sitesUnited Kingdom
Study dates
Mar 2010to Aug 2013
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 75 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • persistent atrial fibrillation

Who cannot join

  • previous catheter or surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation
  • pregnancy

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

United Kingdom2 sites
  • Royal Bournemouth Hospital

    Bournemouth

  • John Radcliffe Hospital

    Oxford, OX3 9DU

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Official title: A Study to Investigate the Benefit Of Complex Fractionated Atrial Electrogram (CFAE) Ablation in Addition to Circumferential Pulmonary Vein and Linear Ablations in the Treatment of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation. (BOCA)

The optimal strategy for catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation is not clearly defined. This study investigates if Complex Fractionated Atrial Electrogram (CFAE) ablation in addition to pulmonary vein isolation and linear ablations improves single procedural success rate over a 12 month follow up period.

Being tested
Radiofrequency catheter Ablation
Keywords
catheter ablation, atrial fibrillation, pulmonary vein isolation, linear ablation, CFAE ablation
Medical subject headings
Atrial Fibrillation

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Radiofrequency catheter AblationProcedure or surgery

    In this arm, catheter ablation would be performed in the left atrium and would include pulmonary vein isolation and linear ablations (roof and mitral isthmus lines)

  • Radiofrequency catheter ablationProcedure or surgery

    In this arm, catheter ablation would be performed in the left atrium, including pulmonary vein isolation, linear ablations (roof and mitral isthmus lines) and Complex Fractionated Atrial Electrograms (CFAE) ablation.

Study groups in NCT01711047
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
PVI + Linear ablationActive comparatorArm A: patients have PVI and roof and mitral isthmus lines
Receives: Procedure: Radiofrequency catheter Ablation
PVI + linear ablation + CFAEActive comparatorArm B: patients have PVI + roof and mitral isthmus lines and CFAE ablation
Receives: Procedure: Radiofrequency catheter ablation

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Single procedural success rate (free from AF off anti-arrhythmic drugs)

    Measured: 12 MONTHS

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Multiple procedure success rate

    Measured: 12 months after last ablation

  2. Complication rate

    Measured: 30 days of procedure

  3. Percentage of AF termination

    This information will be recorded immediately after the procedure.

    Measured: Time 0

  4. recurrence of atrial fibrillation or organised atrial tachycardia

    Measured: 12 months after the last procedure

  5. Ablation time

    This information will be recorded immediately after the procedure.

    Measured: Time 0

  6. Procedure time

    This information will be recorded immediately after the procedure

    Measured: Time 0

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted22 Oct 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study startMar 2010
  3. Primary completionAug 2013
  4. Study completionAug 2013

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
120 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01711047
Sponsor's protocol ID
09/H0605/97
Acronym
BOCA
Status last verified
Oct 2017
First submitted
12 Oct 2012
Last updated
12 Oct 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Wong KC, Paisey JR, Sopher M, Balasubramaniam R, Jones M, Qureshi N, Hayes CR, Ginks MR, Rajappan K, Bashir Y, Betts TR. No Benefit of Complex Fractionated Atrial Electrogram Ablation in Addition to Circumferential Pulmonary Vein Ablation and Linear Ablation: Benefit of Complex Ablation Study. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2015 Dec;8(6):1316-24. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.114.002504. Epub 2015 Aug 17.

    PubMed 26283145

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Radiofrequency catheter Ablation in people with Persistent Atrial Fibrillation, run by Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust at 2 sites in United Kingdom.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Oct 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Single procedural success rate (free from AF off anti-arrhythmic drugs) (time frame: 12 MONTHS). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01711047, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Oct 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in