Traumatic Brain InjuryPhase 4NCT01712477
A Comparison of Propofol Versus Midazolam to Sedate Critically Brain Injury; Measurement of Cytokine Response and Assessment of Function
A Phase 4 study testing Intravenous sedation using propofol and Intravenous sedation with midazolam in people with Traumatic Brain Injury, run by Michigan State University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This is a prospective randomized controlled pilot study in traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients who are sedated with either propofol or midazolam to compare the cytokine response and neuropsychological outcomes with and without elevated blood alcohol levels. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Traumatic Brain Injury
- What is being tested?
- Intravenous sedation using propofol and Intravenous sedation with midazolam
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 1 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Nov 2011to Dec 2014
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Ages 18 Years or older
- Males or Females
- Primary diagnosis of TBI, subarachnoid hemmorhage (SAH), intracranial hemmorhage (ICH), stroke
- Requires mechanical ventilation
- Requires or is receiving continuous IV sedation
Who cannot join
- Glascow Coma Score (GCS) of 3 persisting from the scene with bilaterally fixed dilated pupils with no appreciable chance of survival
- The inability to identify a next of kin or guardian to give consent if patient unable to consent
- Pregnant
- Allergy or contraindication to propofol
- Allergy to contraindication to midalozam
- Status epilepticus
Show all 10Show fewer
- Current neuromuscular blockade
- Patient with a known hypersensitivity to propofol or midalozam
- Allergies to eggs, egg products, soybeans or soy products
- Acute narrow-angle glaucoma
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Propofol Versus Midazolam for Sedation in Mechanically Ventilated Critically Ill Patients Who Presented With Traumatic Brain Injury: Cytokine Response and Neuropsychological Assessment (IRRC#1201M)
This is a prospective randomized controlled pilot study in traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients who are sedated with either propofol or midazolam to compare the cytokine response and neuropsychological outcomes with and without elevated blood alcohol levels.
Sedation is part of the standard treatment in patients with a TBI and has been proposed as a neuroprotective intervention in head-injured patients. Sedative regimens, such as midazolam and propofol, are not standardized and it is unclear whether sedation has a significant impact on recovery and outcome. A review of propofol versus midazolam in mechanically ventilated patients shows evidence that both provide effective sedation but there is lack of data to support one sedative over the other.
Cytokines are released in response to tissue injury and act to generate a variety of physiologic responses. The cytokine elevation has been correlated with the extent of tissue injury. This study will compare the cytokine distribution patterns at specific posttraumatic time points in patients with a TBI sedated with either propofol or midazolam. Additional analysis will compare the cytokine response in patients whom had elevated blood alcohol levels with those with normal levels. Neuropsychological testing will also be performed to determine the extent of brain injury and recovery.
Read the detailed description
The purpose of this research is to compare the effectiveness, length of time from cessation of sedation till extubation, recovery time, duration of admission to the ICU, recovery of brain function, cytokine response, and complication rate of propofol versus midazolam when used for sedation in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) with or without elevated blood alcohol levels. Since this type of trauma patient will require significant medical care upon admission to the emergency room (ER) and the family will be concerned about the injuries, the patient and/or family will not be approached about the research study during this time. At the earliest possible time following neurointensive (NICU) or intensive care (ICU) admission, an informed consent will be obtained from the patient. Depending on the severity of the head injury, the patients may not be able to sign an informed consent. In this case, the consent will be obtained from next-of-kin or a legal guardian. No interventions or study research will be conducted on the patient until the consent is obtained.
Standard blood panels are drawn for every trauma patient regardless of whether or not the patient is a participant of the research protocol, including blood alcohol levels. During the trauma workup in ER, it is standard of care to draw an extra vial in case additional lab tests are needed. After consent is obtained, the research team will obtain the extra vial from the Sparrow Lab to perform cytokine and blood cell phenotype measurements for the research study. Typically 0.5-1.0 ml of whole blood is needed for these measurements and that can be taken from the standardized EDTA tube that is drawn on admission. This small amount of blood sample would otherwise be discarded. Plasma cytokines and cell phenobype IL-1, IL-3, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-17, TNF-¦Á, TGF-¦Â, G-CSF, GM-CSF, SCF, FGF, and IGF-II will be performed by Luminex-based mutiplex assay and ELISA. In addition to the ER analysis, left over blood will be used from the EDTA tubes at 24 hours, day 3 and day 7 after admission. These additional measurements will be taken from the routine morning laboratory blood draws which are done on all intubated patients to evaluate electrolytes. No additional blood will be drawn for the research and the study will only be using left over blood already drawn for standard of care labs that are done on all intubated patients.
Once consented, the patients will be randomized to treatment group by random allocation process using Research Randomizer (Urbaniak, G. C., \& Plous, S. Version 3.0 Computer software]. The patient and family will be blinded to which sedation is given. Nurses and physicians will not be blinded as they will be administering the sedatives. Although the patients will receive randomized sedation, these patients would be administered either propofol or midazolam even if they were not included in this research. The only modification for research purposes is the randomization of sedation medication by the randomizer rather than the physician. Currently, the providers in the research team do not have a preference of one type of sedation medication over the other.
Once randomized, patients allocated to the propofol group will be initiated with a 0.5-1 mg/kg i.v. bolus followed by repeated 10-20 mg doses at variable intervals (approximately 15 s, at the discretion of the physician/nurse) until an appropriate level of sedation will be achieved (NICU protocol), which will be subsequently titrated to achieve a target Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (+4 = combative to -5 = unarousable) (Sessler et al. The Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale.Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002; 166:1338-1344). Nurses will note pre-sedation levels based on the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale. While undergoing sedation, target sedation will be defined when the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale meets a score of -4 to -5. Patients randomized to the midazolam group will be initiated with 0.5-1.0 mg with incremental dosing at intervals of approximately 1-3 min until a level of sedation will be achieved at a target Richmond Agitation-Sedation scale sedation score (per NICU protocol).
Management of all trauma patients include a careful history taking for alcoholism with referral for further evaluation or treatment when indicated, and determination whether other drugs are also being used. All patients with an elevated alcohol level require a medical social service consultation and all patients with a TBI require a neuropsychology consultation, both consultations are standard of care. The neuropsychological testing conducted after extubation is also standard of care. The neuropsychological evaluations will be measured based on the following assessments: intellectual functioning, language processing, visuospatial processing, attention, concentration, verbal learning, memory, executive functioning, sensory, perception, motor, strength, and personal assessment. The level of impairment will be based on a scale from zero to seven. Data will be collected until the patient is discharged from the hospital. The clinical records from the neuropsychologist will be reviewed to analyze the progression of the patient's outcome. Similar to all trauma patients, the patients enrolled in this study will be offered continued care with neuropsychology as well as the option to withdrawal all care if competent to make independent decisions.
Throughout the study consciousness will be measured using the Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) from the time of presentation to the ER and two times each day until the patient is discharged from the NICU or ICU (routinely done on TBI patients). The Injury severity scores (ISS) will be recorded from admission (done on all trauma patients). Recovery of consciousness will be determined by measurement of the acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE) III modification of the Glasgow coma score to allow for scoring of the verbal component in intubated patients. Patients will be judged to be awake when the Glasgow coma score was > or = 12.
The following will be recorded from the Sparrow medical record for each patient: gender, age, sex, weight, primary diagnosis, significant co morbidities, blood alcohol level at admission, intracranial pressure measurements (standard of care for TBI patients), time of starting and finishing of the sedation, total amount of medications given, any restraint required, additional oxygen required, resuscitative measures required, time of transfer out of the unit, and time of discharge.
- Conditions
- Traumatic Brain Injury
- Being tested
- Intravenous sedation using propofol, Intravenous sedation with midazolam
- Medical subject headings
- Brain Injuries, Traumatic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Intravenous sedation using propofolDrug
Patients will be given intravenous sedation for treatment of traumatic brain injury requiring mechanical ventilation
Intravenous sedation with midazolamDrug
Also called Versed
patients with severe traumatic brain injury requiring mechanical ventilation and sedation will be sedated with midazolam
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intravenous sedation with propofol | Active comparator | Traumatic brain injured patient, already requiring sedation. Intervention is sedation with intravenous propofol during mechanical ventilation Receives: Drug: Intravenous sedation using propofol |
| Intravenous sedation with midazolam | Active comparator | Patients with traumatic brain injury requiring mechinical ventilation. Intervention is intravenous midazolam for sedation at variable doses to achieve adequite sedation levels Receives: Drug: Intravenous sedation with midazolam |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Neuropsychologic Outcome
Extent of functional deficits from underlying traumatic brain injury
Measured: 30 days
Secondary outcomes (1)
Cytokine Levels Correlating to Extent of Injury
cytokine levels will be measured to see if there is meaningful correlation between groups.
unable to correlate due to closure of study
Measured: 30 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Oct 2012 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2011
- Primary completionNov 2014
- Study completionDec 2014
Why it stopped: Difficulty in recruiting
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Traumatic Brain InjuryStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 1 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Michigan State University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Chet A Morrison, M.D., Principal investigator, Michigan State University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01712477
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- r039226
- Other IDs
- IRRC#1201M
- Status last verified
- Sep 2020
- First submitted
- 19 Oct 2012
- Last updated
- 10 Sep 2025
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Sep 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Propofol Versus Midazolam for Sedation in Mechanically Ventilated Critically Ill Patients Who Presented With Traumatic Brain Injury: Cytokine Response and Neuropsychological Assessment (IRRC#1201M)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01712477
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- r039226
- Conditions
- Traumatic Brain Injury
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Difficulty in recruiting
- Enrolment
- 1 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Michigan State UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Nov 2011
- Primary completion
- Nov 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 23 Oct 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 26 Jun 2025
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a prospective randomized controlled pilot study in traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients who are sedated with either propofol or midazolam to compare the cytokine response and neuropsychological outcomes with and without elevated blood alcohol levels.
Sedation is part of the standard treatment in patients with a TBI and has been proposed as a neuroprotective intervention in head-injured patients. Sedative regimens, such as midazolam and propofol, are not standardized and it is unclear whether sedation has a significant impact on recovery and outcome. A review of propofol versus midazolam in mechanically ventilated patients shows evidence that both provide effective sedation but there is lack of data to support one sedative over the other.
Cytokines are released in response to tissue injury and act to generate a variety of physiologic responses. The cytokine elevation has been correlated with the extent of tissue injury. This study will compare the cytokine distribution patterns at specific posttraumatic time points in patients with a TBI sedated with either propofol or midazolam. Additional analysis will compare the cytokine response in patients whom had elevated blood alcohol levels with those with normal levels. Neuropsychological testing will also be performed to determine the extent of brain injury and recovery.
Detailed description
The purpose of this research is to compare the effectiveness, length of time from cessation of sedation till extubation, recovery time, duration of admission to the ICU, recovery of brain function, cytokine response, and complication rate of propofol versus midazolam when used for sedation in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) with or without elevated blood alcohol levels. Since this type of trauma patient will require significant medical care upon admission to the emergency room (ER) and the family will be concerned about the injuries, the patient and/or family will not be approached about the research study during this time. At the earliest possible time following neurointensive (NICU) or intensive care (ICU) admission, an informed consent will be obtained from the patient. Depending on the severity of the head injury, the patients may not be able to sign an informed consent. In this case, the consent will be obtained from next-of-kin or a legal guardian. No interventions or study research will be conducted on the patient until the consent is obtained.
Standard blood panels are drawn for every trauma patient regardless of whether or not the patient is a participant of the research protocol, including blood alcohol levels. During the trauma workup in ER, it is standard of care to draw an extra vial in case additional lab tests are needed. After consent is obtained, the research team will obtain the extra vial from the Sparrow Lab to perform cytokine and blood cell phenotype measurements for the research study. Typically 0.5-1.0 ml of whole blood is needed for these measurements and that can be taken from the standardized EDTA tube that is drawn on admission. This small amount of blood sample would otherwise be discarded. Plasma cytokines and cell phenobype IL-1, IL-3, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-17, TNF-¦Á, TGF-¦Â, G-CSF, GM-CSF, SCF, FGF, and IGF-II will be performed by Luminex-based mutiplex assay and ELISA. In addition to the ER analysis, left over blood will be used from the EDTA tubes at 24 hours, day 3 and day 7 after admission. These additional measurements will be taken from the routine morning laboratory blood draws which are done on all intubated patients to evaluate electrolytes. No additional blood will be drawn for the research and the study will only be using left over blood already drawn for standard of care labs that are done on all intubated patients.
Once consented, the patients will be randomized to treatment group by random allocation process using Research Randomizer (Urbaniak, G. C., \& Plous, S. Version 3.0 Computer software]. The patient and family will be blinded to which sedation is given. Nurses and physicians will not be blinded as they will be administering the sedatives. Although the patients will receive randomized sedation, these patients would be administered either propofol or midazolam even if they were not included in this research. The only modification for research purposes is the randomization of sedation medication by the randomizer rather than the physician. Currently, the providers in the research team do not have a preference of one type of sedation medication over the other.
Once randomized, patients allocated to the propofol group will be initiated with a 0.5-1 mg/kg i.v. bolus followed by repeated 10-20 mg doses at variable intervals (approximately 15 s, at the discretion of the physician/nurse) until an appropriate level of sedation will be achieved (NICU protocol), which will be subsequently titrated to achieve a target Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (+4 = combative to -5 = unarousable) (Sessler et al. The Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale.Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002; 166:1338-1344). Nurses will note pre-sedation levels based on the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale. While undergoing sedation, target sedation will be defined when the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale meets a score of -4 to -5. Patients randomized to the midazolam group will be initiated with 0.5-1.0 mg with incremental dosing at intervals of approximately 1-3 min until a level of sedation will be achieved at a target Richmond Agitation-Sedation scale sedation score (per NICU protocol).
Management of all trauma patients include a careful history taking for alcoholism with referral for further evaluation or treatment when indicated, and determination whether other drugs are also being used. All patients with an elevated alcohol level require a medical social service consultation and all patients with a TBI require a neuropsychology consultation, both consultations are standard of care. The neuropsychological testing conducted after extubation is also standard of care. The neuropsychological evaluations will be measured based on the following assessments: intellectual functioning, language processing, visuospatial processing, attention, concentration, verbal learning, memory, executive functioning, sensory, perception, motor, strength, and personal assessment. The level of impairment will be based on a scale from zero to seven. Data will be collected until the patient is discharged from the hospital. The clinical records from the neuropsychologist will be reviewed to analyze the progression of the patient's outcome. Similar to all trauma patients, the patients enrolled in this study will be offered continued care with neuropsychology as well as the option to withdrawal all care if competent to make independent decisions.
Throughout the study consciousness will be measured using the Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) from the time of presentation to the ER and two times each day until the patient is discharged from the NICU or ICU (routinely done on TBI patients). The Injury severity scores (ISS) will be recorded from admission (done on all trauma patients). Recovery of consciousness will be determined by measurement of the acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE) III modification of the Glasgow coma score to allow for scoring of the verbal component in intubated patients. Patients will be judged to be awake when the Glasgow coma score was > or = 12.
The following will be recorded from the Sparrow medical record for each patient: gender, age, sex, weight, primary diagnosis, significant co morbidities, blood alcohol level at admission, intracranial pressure measurements (standard of care for TBI patients), time of starting and finishing of the sedation, total amount of medications given, any restraint required, additional oxygen required, resuscitative measures required, time of transfer out of the unit, and time of discharge.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intravenous sedation with propofol | Active comparator | Drug: Intravenous sedation using propofolTraumatic brain injured patient, already requiring sedation. Intervention is sedation with intravenous propofol during mechanical ventilation |
| Intravenous sedation with midazolam | Active comparator | Drug: Intravenous sedation with midazolamPatients with traumatic brain injury requiring mechinical ventilation. Intervention is intravenous midazolam for sedation at variable doses to achieve adequite sedation levels |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Ages 18 Years or older
- Males or Females
- Primary diagnosis of TBI, subarachnoid hemmorhage (SAH), intracranial hemmorhage (ICH), stroke
- Requires mechanical ventilation
- Requires or is receiving continuous IV sedation
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Glascow Coma Score (GCS) of 3 persisting from the scene with bilaterally fixed dilated pupils with no appreciable chance of survival
- The inability to identify a next of kin or guardian to give consent if patient unable to consent
- Pregnant
- Allergy or contraindication to propofol
- Allergy to contraindication to midalozam
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Intravenous sedation using propofolPatients will be given intravenous sedation for treatment of traumatic brain injury requiring mechanical ventilation | Drug | Intravenous sedation with propofol |
| Intravenous sedation with midazolamAlso: Versedpatients with severe traumatic brain injury requiring mechanical ventilation and sedation will be sedated with midazolam | Drug | Intravenous sedation with midazolam |
Primary outcome
Neuropsychologic Outcome
Time frame: 30 days
Extent of functional deficits from underlying traumatic brain injury
1 secondary outcome
Cytokine Levels Correlating to Extent of Injury
Time frame: 30 days
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Sep 2025.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Traumatic Brain Injury
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in Traumatic Brain Injury Epileptogenesis Project (TRACK-TBI EPI)
Traumatic Brain Injury, Post-traumatic Epilepsy
Enrolling by invitationPhase 1
Pilot Safety and Exploratory Efficacy of PSC-05 for the Treatment of Chronic Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
RecruitingObservational study
Intracranial Pressure Monitoring in Moderate Traumatic Brain Injury
Moderate Traumatic Brain Injury
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Nanopulse Laser Therapy
TBI (Traumatic Brain Injury)
RecruitingObservational study
Effect of Different Intravenous Fluids on Post-operative Chronic Subdural Hematoma Size and Recurrence
Chronic Subdural Hematoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Chet A Morrison, M.D. principal investigator
Michigan State University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Intravenous sedation using propofol and Intravenous sedation with midazolam in people with Traumatic Brain Injury, run by Michigan State University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Sep 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 26 Jun 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Neuropsychologic Outcome (time frame: 30 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Sep 2025.