AzTrials
AzTrials

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary DiseasePhase 3NCT01715298

NVA237 BID Versus Placebo Twelve-week Efficacy Study

A Phase 3 study testing NVA237 in people with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, run by Novartis Pharmaceuticals at 59 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The study serves to determine whether the treatment of patients with stable, symptomatic Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) with the investigational drug NVA237 is efficient and safe. The efficacy and safety of the drug will be tested against a placebo treatment. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 40 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
What is being tested?
NVA237
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
432 participants
Where
59 sitesUnited States
Study dates
Nov 2012to Dec 2013
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 40 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

None listed.

Who cannot join

  • Patients with a history of long QT syndrome, with a prolonged QTc measured during screening, or patients who have a clinically significant ECG abnormality at screening.
  • History of malignancy of any organ system (other than localized basal cell carcinoma of the skin), treated or untreated, within the past 5 years, regardless of whether there is evidence of local recurrence or metastases.
  • Pregnant or nursing (lactating) women. Women of childbearing potential unless using an effective method of contraception.
  • Patients who in the judgment of the investigator, would be at potential risk if enrolled into the study.
  • Patients who have a clinically significant concomitant disease at screening, including but not limited to clinically significant laboratory abnormalities, clinically significant renal, cardiovascular, neurological, endocrine, immunological, psychiatric, gastrointestinal, hepatic, or hematological abnormalities, or with uncontrolled diabetes, which could interfere with the assessment of the efficacy and safety of the study treatment.
  • Patients with a body mass index (BMI) of more than 40 kg/m2.
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Patients contraindicated for treatment with, or having a history of reactions/ hypersensitivity to anticholinergic agents, long and short acting beta-2 agonists, or sympathomimetic amines.
  • Patients with any history of asthma, with onset of symptoms prior to age 40 years, or patients with a high blood eosinophil count during screening.
  • Other protocol-defnied inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply.

Trial locations and contacts

59 sites in 1 country.

59 sites in 1 country

United States59 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    *See Various Dept.'s*, Arizona

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87108

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Boulder, Colorado, 80304

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Brooklyn, New York, 11229

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Brooklyn, New York, 11234

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Chandler, Arizona, 85224

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Charlotte, North Carolina, 28207

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Cherry Hill, New Jersey, 08003

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Cincinnati, Ohio, 45231

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Cincinnati, Ohio, 45242

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Cincinnati, Ohio, 45245

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Columbus, Ohio, 43213

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Conyers, Georgia, 30094

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Denton, Texas, 76210

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    East Providence, Rhode Island, 02914

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Evansville, Indiana, 47714

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Fall River, Massachusetts, 02720

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Fort Mill, South Carolina, 29707

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Fremont, Nebraska, 68025

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Fresno, California, 93726

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Fullerton, California, 92835

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Great Neck, New York, 11021

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Langhorne, Pennsylvania, 19047

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Lexington, Kentucky, 40509

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Lincoln, Nebraska, 68510

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Lynn Haven, Florida, 32444

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Massapequa, New York, 11758

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Medford, Oregon, 97504-8741

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Medford, Oregon, 97504

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Miami, Florida, 33173

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Midvale, Utah, 84047

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55402

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    New Windsor, New York, 12553

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    New York, New York, 10003

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    New York, New York, 10028

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    North Dartmouth, Massachusetts, 02747

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Omaha, Nebraska, 68114

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15243

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Plymouth, Minnesota, 55441

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Port Orange, Florida, 32127

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Portland, Oregon, 97213

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Pottstown, Pennsylvania, 19464

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Richmond, Virginia, 23219

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Richmond, Virginia, 23233

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    River Forest, Illinois, 60305

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Rock Hll, South Carolina, 29732

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Saint Charles, Missouri, 63301

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    San Antonio, Texas, 78229

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Skokie, Illinois, 60076

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    South Burlington, Vermont, 05403

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    St Louis, Missouri, 63128

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    St Louis, Missouri, 63141

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Sunset, Louisiana, 70584

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Tacoma, Washington, 98405

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Tipton, Pennsylvania, 16684

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Wheat Ridge, Colorado, 80033

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Winter Park, Florida, 32789

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Yorba Linda, California, 92886-7921

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Yorba Linda, California, 92886

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A 12-week Multi-center, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo Controlled Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of NVA237 in Stable COPD Patients

The study serves to determine whether the treatment of patients with stable, symptomatic Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) with the investigational drug NVA237 is efficient and safe. The efficacy and safety of the drug will be tested against a placebo treatment. The primary criterion to assess efficacy will be the difference between the serial lung function measurements of patients who have been treated for 12 weeks with NVA237 versus those that have received placebo treatment for 12 weeks. A serial lung function measurement (FEV1 testing) will be conducted and the "area under the curve" will be the measure for the ability to breathe.

Being tested
NVA237, Placebo
Keywords
Anticholinergic, Antimuscarinic, Chronic Obstructive Airway Disease, Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, COPD, LAMA, Lung Disease, Lung Diseases, Obstructive, Lung Function, Muscarinic receptor antagonist, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, Respiratory Tract Diseases
Medical subject headings
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, Lung Diseases, Lung Diseases, Obstructive, Respiratory Tract Diseases

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • NVA237Drug

    NVA237 (Glycopyrronioum bromide) as a powder for inhalation in single-dose capsules

  • PlaceboDrug

    Placebo powder for inhalation in single-dose capsules (matching those for NVA237).

Study groups in NCT01715298
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
NVA237ExperimentalNVA237 will be inhaled from a single-dose dry powder inhaler for a period of 12 weeks
Receives: Drug: NVA237
PlaceboPlacebo comparatorPlacebo will be inhaled from a single-dose dry powder inhaler for a period of 12 weeks
Receives: Drug: Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change From Baseline in Standardized Area Under the Curve for Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second Post Dosing

    The standardized Area Under the Curve (AUC) for Forced Expiratory Volume in one second (FEV1) post dosing (FEV1 AUC) is measured at week 12 of treatment. Serial lung function measurements are taken at the following time points following dosing at week 12 to calculate the FEV1 AUC: 5 min, 15 min, 1:00 h, 2:00 h, 4:00 h, 6:00 h, 8:00 h, and 11:55 h after the morning dose.

    The primary endpoint was the change from baseline in FEV1 AUC0-12h following the morning dose at Week 12 (defined as the mean FEV1 change from baseline (CFB) over 5 min to 11 h 55 mins divided by 11 h 50 mins). Where the FEV1 AUC is smaller than at baseline, a negative value can occur

    Measured: Week 12

Secondary outcomes (15)
  1. Change From Baseline in Standardized Area Under the Curve (AUC(0-12h)) for Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second Post Dosing

    The standardized Area Under the Curve (AUC) for Forced Expiratory Volume in one second (FEV1) post dosing (FEV1 AUC) is assessed at day 1 of treatment. Serial lung function measurements are taken at the following various time points post dosing at day 1 to calculate the FEV1 AUC: 5 min, 15 min, 1:00 h, 2:00 h, 4:00 h, 6:00 h, 8:00 h, and 11:55 h after the morning dose.

    .The endpoint was the change from baseline (CFB) in FEV1 AUC0-12h following the morning dose at day 1 (defined as the mean FEV1 change from baseline over 5 min to 11 h 55 mins divided by 11 h 50 mins). Where the FEV1 AUC is smaller than at baseline, a negative value can occur.

    Measured: Day 1

  2. Change From Baseline in Standardized Area Under The Curve for Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second for Different Time Spans Post Dosing

    The standardized Area Under the Curve (AUC) for Forced Expiratory Volume in one second (FEV1FEV1) is assessed for different time spans (0-4 h, 4-8 h, 8-12 h) within the overall serial measurement post dosing (FEV1 AUCs Time Spans), at day 1 and at week 12 of treatment. Serial lung function measurements are taken at various the following time points post dosing on day 1 and at week 12 to calculate the FEV1 AUC for these different time spans: .5 min, 15 min, 1:00 h, 2:00 h, 4:00 h, 6:00 h, 8:00 h, and 11:55 h after the morning dose.

    The endpoint was the change from baseline (CFB) in FEV1 AUC0-12h following the morning dose at day 1 or week 12, respectively, (defined as the mean FEV1 change from baseline over 5 min to 11 h 55 mins divided by 11 h 50 mins). Where the FEV1 AUC is smaller than at baseline, a negative value can occur.

    Measured: Day 1 and Week 12

  3. Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second at All Individual Timepoints

    The Forced Expiratory Volume in one second (FEV1) assessments for all individual time points of the serial measurements on day 1 and at week 12 are analyzed. Time points of the serial lung function measurements are 5 min, 15 min, 1:00 h, 2:00 h, 4:00 h, 6:00 h, 8:00 h, and 11:55 h after the morning dose. The table indicates the percent change from baseline (CFB) in FEV1 and standard deviation in brackets. Where the FEV1 is lower than at baseline, a negative percent value can occur.

    Measured: Day 1 and week 12

  4. Mean Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second

    Mean trough Forced Expiratory Volume in one second (FEV1) is assessed as the arithmetic mean of two FEV1 measurements, conducted within the last hour of a 24 hour period from a morning dose, either that of day 1 or at week 12 of treatment. The data is reported as the change from baseline (CFB), with the baseline being the arithmetic mean of the two pre-dose measurements (-45 min and -15 min) preceding the serial lung function measurements on Day 1

    Measured: Day 1 and week 12

  5. Change From Baseline in the Health Status Assessed by St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire

    The health status, as reported by the patients, is assessed using the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ). The SGRQ is a 50 item scale assessing symptoms, patient activities and impact of the disease. Scores range from 0 to 100 units, with higher scores indicating more limitations. The assessment is based on total score as well as the percentage of patients with clinically significant improvement at week 12 versus day 1. A clinically meaningful improvement (MCID) in SGRQ is defined as a decrease of 4 or more units of the SGRQ scale in the total score, as compared to baseline (change from baseline).

    Measured: Week 12

  6. Breathlessness Assessed by Transition Dyspnea Index

    Breathlessness at week 12 is measured using the interviewer-administered Transition Dyspnea Index (TDI). On day 1, breathlessness is assessed by the interviewer-administered Baseline Dyspnea Index (BDI). The change from BDI to TDI is assessed, with the TDI total score ranging from -9 to +9 units of the scale. The lower the score, the more deterioration in severity of dyspnea. Patients are considered to have clinically significant improvement (MCID) with the TDI score change versus BDI being equal to or greater than 1.

    Measured: Week 12

  7. Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Puffs of Rescue Medication Per Day

    Patients report the number of puffs of rescue medication (salbutamol / albuterol) using an electronic diary. The use of rescue medication is analyzed as the change from baseline in the mean daily number of puffs used per patient over the 12 weeks treatment period. The baseline is calculated from the run-in epoch prior to randomization (mean number of puffs per day). A negative number indicates a reduction in the mean daily number of puffs of rescue medication.

    Measured: Baseline and week 12

  8. Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Days Without Rescue Medication Use

    Patients report the number of puffs of rescue medication (salbutamol / albuterol) using an electronic diary. The use of rescue medication is analyzed as the change from baseline in the percentage of days without usage of rescue medication over the 12 weeks treatment period. The baseline is calculated as the percentage of days without usage of rescue medication from during the the run-in epoch prior to randomization.

    Measured: Baseline and week 12

  9. Change From Baseline in Daily Symptom Scores

    Patients are reporting symptoms by using an electronic diary. The electronic diary has 9 symptom questions each morning and each evening. Each question can be answered with one of four pre-defined answers, corresponding to a unit value of 0-3, where 0 stands for the lowest and 3 for the most severe symptom experience. Symptom scores are calculated as the mean of the combined daily symptom scores (combined from morning and evening scores) for each patient over 12 weeks (Day 1 to week 12). The baseline is calculated from the run-in epoch prior to randomization. The change from baseline in the least squares mean daily symptom scores over the 12 week treatment period is provided. Where the mean daily symptom score over the 12 week treatment period is lower than the baseline, the result is negative. A negative result indicates an improvement in COPD symptom severity.

    Measured: day 1 to week 12

  10. Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Nights With "no Nighttime Awakenings"

    Patients are reporting symptoms by using an electronic diary. The electronic diary has 9 symptom questions each morning and each evening. One of the symptom questions of the morning questionnaire relates to the number of awakenings due to COPD symptoms during the previous night. The answer with the lowest symptom score is "no waking due to symptoms." A night with "no nighttime awakening" is defined from diary data as any night where the patient did not wake up due to symptoms. The change from baseline in the percentage of nights with "no nighttime awakening" is calculated from the mean percentage of nights with this answer over the 12 week treatment period, with the baseline being The baseline is calculated from the run-in epoch prior to randomization.

    Measured: Day 1 and week 12

  11. Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Days With "no Daytime Symptoms"

    Patients are reporting symptoms by using an electronic diary. The electronic diary has 9 symptom questions each morning and each evening. Each question can be answered with one of four pre-defined answers, corresponding to a unit value of 0-3, where 0 stands for the lowest and 3 for the most severe symptom experience. A day with "no daytime symptoms" is defined from diary data as any day where the patient has recorded in the evening no cough, no wheeze, no production of sputum, and no feeling of breathlessness (other than when running) during the past approximately 12 hours in the evening questionnaire. The change from baseline in the percentage of days with "no daytime symptoms" is calculated from the mean percentage of days with this answer over the 12 week treatment period, with the baseline being. The baseline is calculated from the run-in epoch prior to randomization.

    Measured: Day 1 to week 12

  12. Change From Baseline in Percentage of "Days Able to Perform Usual Daily Activities"

    Patients are reporting symptoms by using an electronic diary. The electronic diary has 9 symptom questions each morning and each evening. One of the symptom questions of the evening questionnaire relates to the impact of COPD symptoms on the performance of usual daily activities ("Did your respiratory symptoms stop you performing your usual daily activities today"). The answer with the lowest symptom score is "not at all." A "day able to perform usual daily activities" is defined from diary data as any day where the patient was not prevented from performing their usual daily activities due to respiratory symptoms. The change from baseline in the percentage of "days able to perform usual daily activities" is calculated from the mean percentage of days with this answer over the 12 week treatment period, with the baseline beingThe baseline is calculated from the run-in epoch prior to randomization.

    Measured: Day 1 to week 12

  13. Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity at All Individual Timepoints

    The Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)assessments for all individual time points of the serial measurements on day 1 and at week 12 are analyzed. Serial lung function measurements are taken at the following time points following dosing on Day 1 and at week 12: 5 min, 15 min, 1:00 h, 2:00 h, 4:00 h, 6:00 h, 8:00 h, and 11:55 h after the morning dose. For week 12 (day 85), the pre-dose measurements (-45 min and -15 min) and the trough measurements (23:15 h and 23:45 h post-dose) are included. The endpoints are the change from baseline in FVC following the morning dose on Day 1 and at Week 12. Where the FVC at any one timepoint is smaller than at baseline, a negative value can occur.

    Measured: Day 1 and week 12

  14. Change From Baseline in Mean Trough Forced Vital Capacity

    Mean trough Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) is assessed as the arithmetic mean of two FVC measurements, conducted within the last hour of a 24 hours period from a morning dose, either that of day 1 or at week 12 of treatment (23:15 h and 23:45 h assessments). The endpoints are the change from baseline in trough FVC on Day 1 and at Week 12, with the mean of the -45 min and -15 min measurements on Day 1 as the baseline.

    Measured: Day 1 and week 12

  15. Change From Baseline in Morning and Nighttime Symptom Scores

    Patients are reporting morning and nighttime symptoms by using an electronic diary. The electronic diary has 9 symptom questions each morning and each evening. Each question can be answered with one of four pre-defined answers, corresponding to a unit value of 0-3, where 0 stands for the lowest and 3 for the most severe symptom experience. Morning and nighttime symptoms scores for each patient over 12 weeks are reported and analyzed. Symptom scores are calculated as the mean of the symptom scores (morning symptom scores or nighttime symptom scores, respectively) for each patient over 12 weeks (Day 1 to week 12). The baseline is calculated from the run-in epoch prior to randomization. The outcome is calculated as the change from baseline in the morning and nighttime symptom scores, respectively. A negative number indicates a reduction in the symptom severity and is owed to the calculation of the change from baseline.

    Measured: Day 1 to week 12

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted26 Oct 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study startNov 2012
  3. Primary completionDec 2013
  4. Study completionDec 2013

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
432 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01715298
Sponsor's protocol ID
CNVA237A2318
Status last verified
Mar 2015
First submitted
24 Oct 2012
Last updated
11 Mar 2015
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Kerwin E, Siler TM, Korenblat P, White A, Eckert JH, Henley M, Patalano F, D'Andrea P. Efficacy and Safety of Twice-Daily Glycopyrrolate Versus Placebo in Patients With COPD: The GEM2 Study. Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis. 2016 Mar 28;3(2):549-559. doi: 10.15326/jcopdf.3.2.2015.0157.

    PubMed 28848879

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing NVA237 in people with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, run by Novartis Pharmaceuticals at 59 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 0 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Mar 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 59 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 11 Mar 2015). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change From Baseline in Standardized Area Under the Curve for Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second Post Dosing (time frame: Week 12). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01715298, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Mar 2015.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in