Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary DiseasePhase 3NCT01715298
NVA237 BID Versus Placebo Twelve-week Efficacy Study
A Phase 3 study testing NVA237 in people with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, run by Novartis Pharmaceuticals at 59 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The study serves to determine whether the treatment of patients with stable, symptomatic Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) with the investigational drug NVA237 is efficient and safe. The efficacy and safety of the drug will be tested against a placebo treatment. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 40 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
- What is being tested?
- NVA237
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 432 participants
- Where
- 59 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Nov 2012to Dec 2013
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 40 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
None listed.
Who cannot join
- Patients with a history of long QT syndrome, with a prolonged QTc measured during screening, or patients who have a clinically significant ECG abnormality at screening.
- History of malignancy of any organ system (other than localized basal cell carcinoma of the skin), treated or untreated, within the past 5 years, regardless of whether there is evidence of local recurrence or metastases.
- Pregnant or nursing (lactating) women. Women of childbearing potential unless using an effective method of contraception.
- Patients who in the judgment of the investigator, would be at potential risk if enrolled into the study.
- Patients who have a clinically significant concomitant disease at screening, including but not limited to clinically significant laboratory abnormalities, clinically significant renal, cardiovascular, neurological, endocrine, immunological, psychiatric, gastrointestinal, hepatic, or hematological abnormalities, or with uncontrolled diabetes, which could interfere with the assessment of the efficacy and safety of the study treatment.
- Patients with a body mass index (BMI) of more than 40 kg/m2.
Show all 9Show fewer
- Patients contraindicated for treatment with, or having a history of reactions/ hypersensitivity to anticholinergic agents, long and short acting beta-2 agonists, or sympathomimetic amines.
- Patients with any history of asthma, with onset of symptoms prior to age 40 years, or patients with a high blood eosinophil count during screening.
- Other protocol-defnied inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply.
Trial locations and contacts
59 sites in 1 country.
59 sites in 1 country
United States59 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
*See Various Dept.'s*, Arizona
Novartis Investigative Site
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87108
Novartis Investigative Site
Boulder, Colorado, 80304
Novartis Investigative Site
Brooklyn, New York, 11229
Novartis Investigative Site
Brooklyn, New York, 11234
Novartis Investigative Site
Chandler, Arizona, 85224
Novartis Investigative Site
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28207
Novartis Investigative Site
Cherry Hill, New Jersey, 08003
Novartis Investigative Site
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45231
Novartis Investigative Site
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45242
Novartis Investigative Site
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45245
Novartis Investigative Site
Columbus, Ohio, 43213
Novartis Investigative Site
Conyers, Georgia, 30094
Novartis Investigative Site
Denton, Texas, 76210
Novartis Investigative Site
East Providence, Rhode Island, 02914
Novartis Investigative Site
Evansville, Indiana, 47714
Novartis Investigative Site
Fall River, Massachusetts, 02720
Novartis Investigative Site
Fort Mill, South Carolina, 29707
Novartis Investigative Site
Fremont, Nebraska, 68025
Novartis Investigative Site
Fresno, California, 93726
Novartis Investigative Site
Fullerton, California, 92835
Novartis Investigative Site
Great Neck, New York, 11021
Novartis Investigative Site
Langhorne, Pennsylvania, 19047
Novartis Investigative Site
Lexington, Kentucky, 40509
Novartis Investigative Site
Lincoln, Nebraska, 68510
Novartis Investigative Site
Lynn Haven, Florida, 32444
Novartis Investigative Site
Massapequa, New York, 11758
Novartis Investigative Site
Medford, Oregon, 97504-8741
Novartis Investigative Site
Medford, Oregon, 97504
Novartis Investigative Site
Miami, Florida, 33173
Novartis Investigative Site
Midvale, Utah, 84047
Novartis Investigative Site
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55402
Novartis Investigative Site
New Windsor, New York, 12553
Novartis Investigative Site
New York, New York, 10003
Novartis Investigative Site
New York, New York, 10028
Novartis Investigative Site
North Dartmouth, Massachusetts, 02747
Novartis Investigative Site
Omaha, Nebraska, 68114
Novartis Investigative Site
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15243
Novartis Investigative Site
Plymouth, Minnesota, 55441
Novartis Investigative Site
Port Orange, Florida, 32127
Novartis Investigative Site
Portland, Oregon, 97213
Novartis Investigative Site
Pottstown, Pennsylvania, 19464
Novartis Investigative Site
Richmond, Virginia, 23219
Novartis Investigative Site
Richmond, Virginia, 23233
Novartis Investigative Site
River Forest, Illinois, 60305
Novartis Investigative Site
Rock Hll, South Carolina, 29732
Novartis Investigative Site
Saint Charles, Missouri, 63301
Novartis Investigative Site
San Antonio, Texas, 78229
Novartis Investigative Site
Skokie, Illinois, 60076
Novartis Investigative Site
South Burlington, Vermont, 05403
Novartis Investigative Site
St Louis, Missouri, 63128
Novartis Investigative Site
St Louis, Missouri, 63141
Novartis Investigative Site
Sunset, Louisiana, 70584
Novartis Investigative Site
Tacoma, Washington, 98405
Novartis Investigative Site
Tipton, Pennsylvania, 16684
Novartis Investigative Site
Wheat Ridge, Colorado, 80033
Novartis Investigative Site
Winter Park, Florida, 32789
Novartis Investigative Site
Yorba Linda, California, 92886-7921
Novartis Investigative Site
Yorba Linda, California, 92886
About this study
Official title: A 12-week Multi-center, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo Controlled Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of NVA237 in Stable COPD Patients
The study serves to determine whether the treatment of patients with stable, symptomatic Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) with the investigational drug NVA237 is efficient and safe. The efficacy and safety of the drug will be tested against a placebo treatment. The primary criterion to assess efficacy will be the difference between the serial lung function measurements of patients who have been treated for 12 weeks with NVA237 versus those that have received placebo treatment for 12 weeks. A serial lung function measurement (FEV1 testing) will be conducted and the "area under the curve" will be the measure for the ability to breathe.
- Conditions
- Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
- Being tested
- NVA237, Placebo
- Keywords
- Anticholinergic, Antimuscarinic, Chronic Obstructive Airway Disease, Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, COPD, LAMA, Lung Disease, Lung Diseases, Obstructive, Lung Function, Muscarinic receptor antagonist, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, Respiratory Tract Diseases
- Medical subject headings
- Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, Lung Diseases, Lung Diseases, Obstructive, Respiratory Tract Diseases
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
NVA237Drug
NVA237 (Glycopyrronioum bromide) as a powder for inhalation in single-dose capsules
PlaceboDrug
Placebo powder for inhalation in single-dose capsules (matching those for NVA237).
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| NVA237 | Experimental | NVA237 will be inhaled from a single-dose dry powder inhaler for a period of 12 weeks Receives: Drug: NVA237 |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Placebo will be inhaled from a single-dose dry powder inhaler for a period of 12 weeks Receives: Drug: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change From Baseline in Standardized Area Under the Curve for Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second Post Dosing
The standardized Area Under the Curve (AUC) for Forced Expiratory Volume in one second (FEV1) post dosing (FEV1 AUC) is measured at week 12 of treatment. Serial lung function measurements are taken at the following time points following dosing at week 12 to calculate the FEV1 AUC: 5 min, 15 min, 1:00 h, 2:00 h, 4:00 h, 6:00 h, 8:00 h, and 11:55 h after the morning dose.
The primary endpoint was the change from baseline in FEV1 AUC0-12h following the morning dose at Week 12 (defined as the mean FEV1 change from baseline (CFB) over 5 min to 11 h 55 mins divided by 11 h 50 mins). Where the FEV1 AUC is smaller than at baseline, a negative value can occur
Measured: Week 12
Secondary outcomes (15)
Change From Baseline in Standardized Area Under the Curve (AUC(0-12h)) for Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second Post Dosing
The standardized Area Under the Curve (AUC) for Forced Expiratory Volume in one second (FEV1) post dosing (FEV1 AUC) is assessed at day 1 of treatment. Serial lung function measurements are taken at the following various time points post dosing at day 1 to calculate the FEV1 AUC: 5 min, 15 min, 1:00 h, 2:00 h, 4:00 h, 6:00 h, 8:00 h, and 11:55 h after the morning dose.
.The endpoint was the change from baseline (CFB) in FEV1 AUC0-12h following the morning dose at day 1 (defined as the mean FEV1 change from baseline over 5 min to 11 h 55 mins divided by 11 h 50 mins). Where the FEV1 AUC is smaller than at baseline, a negative value can occur.
Measured: Day 1
Change From Baseline in Standardized Area Under The Curve for Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second for Different Time Spans Post Dosing
The standardized Area Under the Curve (AUC) for Forced Expiratory Volume in one second (FEV1FEV1) is assessed for different time spans (0-4 h, 4-8 h, 8-12 h) within the overall serial measurement post dosing (FEV1 AUCs Time Spans), at day 1 and at week 12 of treatment. Serial lung function measurements are taken at various the following time points post dosing on day 1 and at week 12 to calculate the FEV1 AUC for these different time spans: .5 min, 15 min, 1:00 h, 2:00 h, 4:00 h, 6:00 h, 8:00 h, and 11:55 h after the morning dose.
The endpoint was the change from baseline (CFB) in FEV1 AUC0-12h following the morning dose at day 1 or week 12, respectively, (defined as the mean FEV1 change from baseline over 5 min to 11 h 55 mins divided by 11 h 50 mins). Where the FEV1 AUC is smaller than at baseline, a negative value can occur.
Measured: Day 1 and Week 12
Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second at All Individual Timepoints
The Forced Expiratory Volume in one second (FEV1) assessments for all individual time points of the serial measurements on day 1 and at week 12 are analyzed. Time points of the serial lung function measurements are 5 min, 15 min, 1:00 h, 2:00 h, 4:00 h, 6:00 h, 8:00 h, and 11:55 h after the morning dose. The table indicates the percent change from baseline (CFB) in FEV1 and standard deviation in brackets. Where the FEV1 is lower than at baseline, a negative percent value can occur.
Measured: Day 1 and week 12
Mean Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second
Mean trough Forced Expiratory Volume in one second (FEV1) is assessed as the arithmetic mean of two FEV1 measurements, conducted within the last hour of a 24 hour period from a morning dose, either that of day 1 or at week 12 of treatment. The data is reported as the change from baseline (CFB), with the baseline being the arithmetic mean of the two pre-dose measurements (-45 min and -15 min) preceding the serial lung function measurements on Day 1
Measured: Day 1 and week 12
Change From Baseline in the Health Status Assessed by St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire
The health status, as reported by the patients, is assessed using the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ). The SGRQ is a 50 item scale assessing symptoms, patient activities and impact of the disease. Scores range from 0 to 100 units, with higher scores indicating more limitations. The assessment is based on total score as well as the percentage of patients with clinically significant improvement at week 12 versus day 1. A clinically meaningful improvement (MCID) in SGRQ is defined as a decrease of 4 or more units of the SGRQ scale in the total score, as compared to baseline (change from baseline).
Measured: Week 12
Breathlessness Assessed by Transition Dyspnea Index
Breathlessness at week 12 is measured using the interviewer-administered Transition Dyspnea Index (TDI). On day 1, breathlessness is assessed by the interviewer-administered Baseline Dyspnea Index (BDI). The change from BDI to TDI is assessed, with the TDI total score ranging from -9 to +9 units of the scale. The lower the score, the more deterioration in severity of dyspnea. Patients are considered to have clinically significant improvement (MCID) with the TDI score change versus BDI being equal to or greater than 1.
Measured: Week 12
Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Puffs of Rescue Medication Per Day
Patients report the number of puffs of rescue medication (salbutamol / albuterol) using an electronic diary. The use of rescue medication is analyzed as the change from baseline in the mean daily number of puffs used per patient over the 12 weeks treatment period. The baseline is calculated from the run-in epoch prior to randomization (mean number of puffs per day). A negative number indicates a reduction in the mean daily number of puffs of rescue medication.
Measured: Baseline and week 12
Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Days Without Rescue Medication Use
Patients report the number of puffs of rescue medication (salbutamol / albuterol) using an electronic diary. The use of rescue medication is analyzed as the change from baseline in the percentage of days without usage of rescue medication over the 12 weeks treatment period. The baseline is calculated as the percentage of days without usage of rescue medication from during the the run-in epoch prior to randomization.
Measured: Baseline and week 12
Change From Baseline in Daily Symptom Scores
Patients are reporting symptoms by using an electronic diary. The electronic diary has 9 symptom questions each morning and each evening. Each question can be answered with one of four pre-defined answers, corresponding to a unit value of 0-3, where 0 stands for the lowest and 3 for the most severe symptom experience. Symptom scores are calculated as the mean of the combined daily symptom scores (combined from morning and evening scores) for each patient over 12 weeks (Day 1 to week 12). The baseline is calculated from the run-in epoch prior to randomization. The change from baseline in the least squares mean daily symptom scores over the 12 week treatment period is provided. Where the mean daily symptom score over the 12 week treatment period is lower than the baseline, the result is negative. A negative result indicates an improvement in COPD symptom severity.
Measured: day 1 to week 12
Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Nights With "no Nighttime Awakenings"
Patients are reporting symptoms by using an electronic diary. The electronic diary has 9 symptom questions each morning and each evening. One of the symptom questions of the morning questionnaire relates to the number of awakenings due to COPD symptoms during the previous night. The answer with the lowest symptom score is "no waking due to symptoms." A night with "no nighttime awakening" is defined from diary data as any night where the patient did not wake up due to symptoms. The change from baseline in the percentage of nights with "no nighttime awakening" is calculated from the mean percentage of nights with this answer over the 12 week treatment period, with the baseline being The baseline is calculated from the run-in epoch prior to randomization.
Measured: Day 1 and week 12
Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Days With "no Daytime Symptoms"
Patients are reporting symptoms by using an electronic diary. The electronic diary has 9 symptom questions each morning and each evening. Each question can be answered with one of four pre-defined answers, corresponding to a unit value of 0-3, where 0 stands for the lowest and 3 for the most severe symptom experience. A day with "no daytime symptoms" is defined from diary data as any day where the patient has recorded in the evening no cough, no wheeze, no production of sputum, and no feeling of breathlessness (other than when running) during the past approximately 12 hours in the evening questionnaire. The change from baseline in the percentage of days with "no daytime symptoms" is calculated from the mean percentage of days with this answer over the 12 week treatment period, with the baseline being. The baseline is calculated from the run-in epoch prior to randomization.
Measured: Day 1 to week 12
Change From Baseline in Percentage of "Days Able to Perform Usual Daily Activities"
Patients are reporting symptoms by using an electronic diary. The electronic diary has 9 symptom questions each morning and each evening. One of the symptom questions of the evening questionnaire relates to the impact of COPD symptoms on the performance of usual daily activities ("Did your respiratory symptoms stop you performing your usual daily activities today"). The answer with the lowest symptom score is "not at all." A "day able to perform usual daily activities" is defined from diary data as any day where the patient was not prevented from performing their usual daily activities due to respiratory symptoms. The change from baseline in the percentage of "days able to perform usual daily activities" is calculated from the mean percentage of days with this answer over the 12 week treatment period, with the baseline beingThe baseline is calculated from the run-in epoch prior to randomization.
Measured: Day 1 to week 12
Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity at All Individual Timepoints
The Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)assessments for all individual time points of the serial measurements on day 1 and at week 12 are analyzed. Serial lung function measurements are taken at the following time points following dosing on Day 1 and at week 12: 5 min, 15 min, 1:00 h, 2:00 h, 4:00 h, 6:00 h, 8:00 h, and 11:55 h after the morning dose. For week 12 (day 85), the pre-dose measurements (-45 min and -15 min) and the trough measurements (23:15 h and 23:45 h post-dose) are included. The endpoints are the change from baseline in FVC following the morning dose on Day 1 and at Week 12. Where the FVC at any one timepoint is smaller than at baseline, a negative value can occur.
Measured: Day 1 and week 12
Change From Baseline in Mean Trough Forced Vital Capacity
Mean trough Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) is assessed as the arithmetic mean of two FVC measurements, conducted within the last hour of a 24 hours period from a morning dose, either that of day 1 or at week 12 of treatment (23:15 h and 23:45 h assessments). The endpoints are the change from baseline in trough FVC on Day 1 and at Week 12, with the mean of the -45 min and -15 min measurements on Day 1 as the baseline.
Measured: Day 1 and week 12
Change From Baseline in Morning and Nighttime Symptom Scores
Patients are reporting morning and nighttime symptoms by using an electronic diary. The electronic diary has 9 symptom questions each morning and each evening. Each question can be answered with one of four pre-defined answers, corresponding to a unit value of 0-3, where 0 stands for the lowest and 3 for the most severe symptom experience. Morning and nighttime symptoms scores for each patient over 12 weeks are reported and analyzed. Symptom scores are calculated as the mean of the symptom scores (morning symptom scores or nighttime symptom scores, respectively) for each patient over 12 weeks (Day 1 to week 12). The baseline is calculated from the run-in epoch prior to randomization. The outcome is calculated as the change from baseline in the morning and nighttime symptom scores, respectively. A negative number indicates a reduction in the symptom severity and is owed to the calculation of the change from baseline.
Measured: Day 1 to week 12
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Oct 2012 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2012
- Primary completionDec 2013
- Study completionDec 2013
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Novartis PharmaceuticalsThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 432 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Study director, Novartis Pharmaceuticals
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01715298
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CNVA237A2318
- Status last verified
- Mar 2015
- First submitted
- 24 Oct 2012
- Last updated
- 11 Mar 2015
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Kerwin E, Siler TM, Korenblat P, White A, Eckert JH, Henley M, Patalano F, D'Andrea P. Efficacy and Safety of Twice-Daily Glycopyrrolate Versus Placebo in Patients With COPD: The GEM2 Study. Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis. 2016 Mar 28;3(2):549-559. doi: 10.15326/jcopdf.3.2.2015.0157.
PubMed 28848879
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 Mar 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A 12-week Multi-center, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo Controlled Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of NVA237 in Stable COPD Patients
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01715298
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CNVA237A2318
- Conditions
- Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
- Keywords
- Anticholinergic, Antimuscarinic, Chronic Obstructive Airway Disease, Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, COPD, LAMA, Lung Disease
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 432 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Novartis PharmaceuticalsIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Nov 2012
- Primary completion
- Dec 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2013 (actual)
- First posted
- 26 Oct 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 11 Mar 2015
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The study serves to determine whether the treatment of patients with stable, symptomatic Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) with the investigational drug NVA237 is efficient and safe. The efficacy and safety of the drug will be tested against a placebo treatment. The primary criterion to assess efficacy will be the difference between the serial lung function measurements of patients who have been treated for 12 weeks with NVA237 versus those that have received placebo treatment for 12 weeks. A serial lung function measurement (FEV1 testing) will be conducted and the "area under the curve" will be the measure for the ability to breathe.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| NVA237 | Experimental | Drug: NVA237NVA237 will be inhaled from a single-dose dry powder inhaler for a period of 12 weeks |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: PlaceboPlacebo will be inhaled from a single-dose dry powder inhaler for a period of 12 weeks |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 40 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (0 listed)
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Patients with a history of long QT syndrome, with a prolonged QTc measured during screening, or patients who have a clinically significant ECG abnormality at screening.
- History of malignancy of any organ system (other than localized basal cell carcinoma of the skin), treated or untreated, within the past 5 years, regardless of whether there is evidence of local recurrence or metastases.
- Pregnant or nursing (lactating) women. Women of childbearing potential unless using an effective method of contraception.
- Patients who in the judgment of the investigator, would be at potential risk if enrolled into the study.
- Patients who have a clinically significant concomitant disease at screening, including but not limited to clinically significant laboratory abnormalities, clinically significant renal, cardiovascular, neurological, endocrine, immunological, psychiatric, gastrointestinal, hepatic, or hematological abnormalities, or with uncontrolled diabetes, which could interfere with the assessment of the efficacy and safety of the study treatment.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| NVA237NVA237 (Glycopyrronioum bromide) as a powder for inhalation in single-dose capsules | Drug | NVA237 |
| PlaceboPlacebo powder for inhalation in single-dose capsules (matching those for NVA237). | Drug | Placebo |
Primary outcome
Change From Baseline in Standardized Area Under the Curve for Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second Post Dosing
Time frame: Week 12
The standardized Area Under the Curve (AUC) for Forced Expiratory Volume in one second (FEV1) post dosing (FEV1 AUC) is measured at week 12 of treatment. Serial lung function measurements are taken at the following time points following dosing at week 12 to calculate the FEV1 AUC: 5 min, 15 min, 1:00 h, 2:00 h, 4:00 h, 6:00 h, 8:00 h, and 11:55 h after the morning dose. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline in FEV1 AUC0-12h following the morning dose at Week 12 (defined as the mean FEV1 change from baseline (CFB) over 5 min to 11 h 55 mins divided by 11 h 50 mins). Where the FEV1 AUC is smaller than at baseline, a negative value can occur
15 secondary outcomes
Change From Baseline in Standardized Area Under the Curve (AUC(0-12h)) for Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second Post Dosing
Time frame: Day 1
Change From Baseline in Standardized Area Under The Curve for Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second for Different Time Spans Post Dosing
Time frame: Day 1 and Week 12
Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second at All Individual Timepoints
Time frame: Day 1 and week 12
Mean Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second
Time frame: Day 1 and week 12
Change From Baseline in the Health Status Assessed by St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire
Time frame: Week 12
Breathlessness Assessed by Transition Dyspnea Index
Time frame: Week 12
Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Puffs of Rescue Medication Per Day
Time frame: Baseline and week 12
Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Days Without Rescue Medication Use
Time frame: Baseline and week 12
Change From Baseline in Daily Symptom Scores
Time frame: day 1 to week 12
Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Nights With "no Nighttime Awakenings"
Time frame: Day 1 and week 12
Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Days With "no Daytime Symptoms"
Time frame: Day 1 to week 12
Change From Baseline in Percentage of "Days Able to Perform Usual Daily Activities"
Time frame: Day 1 to week 12
Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity at All Individual Timepoints
Time frame: Day 1 and week 12
Change From Baseline in Mean Trough Forced Vital Capacity
Time frame: Day 1 and week 12
Change From Baseline in Morning and Nighttime Symptom Scores
Time frame: Day 1 to week 12
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 Mar 2015.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 28848879Kerwin E, Siler TM, Korenblat P, White A, Eckert JH, Henley M, Patalano F, D'Andrea P. Efficacy and Safety of Twice-Daily Glycopyrrolate Versus Placebo in Patients With COPD: The GEM2 Study. Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis. 2016 Mar 28;3(2):549-559. doi: 10.15326/jcopdf.3.2.2015.0157.
Related trials for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
RecruitingPhase 2
PRA-216 COPD Safety and Biomarker Study
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
RecruitingPhase 2
Phase 2b Efficacy and Safety Study of AERO-007, an Inhaled LABA+LAMA Combination for Nebulization Delivery in COPD Patients
COPD, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Firefighter's Longitudinal Airway and Respiratory Exposome/Multiome Study (FLARES)
Anosmia, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A Study to Evaluate Solrikitug in Participants With COPD (ZION)
COPD
RecruitingPhase 2
To Evaluate the Effect of EXPD-101/FXS7553 Compared With Placebo in Patients With COPD Over 52 Weeks of Treatment
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Novartis Pharmaceuticals study director
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
59 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing NVA237 in people with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, run by Novartis Pharmaceuticals at 59 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 0 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Mar 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 59 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 11 Mar 2015). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change From Baseline in Standardized Area Under the Curve for Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second Post Dosing (time frame: Week 12). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01715298, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Mar 2015.