Rheumatoid ArthritisPhase 2NCT01715896
A Study of Mavrilimumab Versus Anti Tumor Necrosis Factor in Subjects With Rheumatoid Arthritis
A Phase 2 study testing Golimumab 50 mg and Mavrilimumab 100 mg in people with Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by MedImmune LLC at 39 sites in 14 countries.
Trial summary
The primary objectives of this study is to explore the efficacy of mavrilimumab compared with golimumab in the treatment of adult subjects 18-80 years of age with moderate-to-severe active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who have an inadequate response to one or more conventional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Rheumatoid Arthritis
- What is being tested?
- Golimumab 50 mg and Mavrilimumab 100 mg
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 215 participants
- Where
- 39 sitesin 14 countries
- Study dates
- Mar 2013to Feb 2015
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age 18 through 80 years
- Written consent
- Diagnosis of adult onset Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) as defined by the 2010 American College of Rheumatology European League Against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) classification criteria
- Moderately active disease as defined by disease activity score in 28 joints C-reactive protein (DAS28[CRP]) greater than or equal to (>=) 3.2 at screening and DAS28 erythrocyte sedimentation rate(ESR) ≥ 3.2 at Day 1
- Inadequate response to one or more conventional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs)
- At least 4 swollen joints
- Inadequate response to one or two anti-TNF agents other than the study comparator, as defined by the protocol
- Receiving oral or injectable methotrexate, as defined by the protocol.
Who cannot join
- A rheumatic autoimmune disease or other inflammatory joint disease other than RA
- Previous treatment with biologic therapies other than anti-TNF for RA
- Treatment with other DMARDs or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), as defined by the protocol.
- Medical history as defined by the protocol.
Trial locations and contacts
39 sites in 14 countries.
39 sites in 14 countries
Israel5 sites
Research Site
Ashkelon
Research Site
Haifa
Research Site
Kfar Saba
Research Site
Petah Tikva
Research Site
Rehovot
United Kingdom5 sites
Research Site
Birkenhead
Research Site
Cambridge
Research Site
Edinburgh
Research Site
London
Research Site
Plymouth
Argentina3 sites
Research Site
Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires
Research Site
Córdoba
Research Site
San Miguel de Tucumán
Czechia3 sites
Research Site
Prague
Research Site
Uherské Hradiště
Research Site
Zlín
Hungary3 sites
Research Site
Baja
Research Site
Balatonfüred
Research Site
Budapest
Russia3 sites
Research Site
Kazan'
Research Site
Moscow
Research Site
Saint Petersburg
Slovakia3 sites
Research Site
Bardejov
Research Site
Bratislava
Research Site
Kosice - Saca
About this study
Official title: A Phase 2 Exploratory Study of Mavrilimumab Versus Anti-tumor Necrosis Factor in Subjects With Rheumatoid Arthritis
The primary objectives of this study is to explore the efficacy of mavrilimumab compared with golimumab in the treatment of adult subjects 18-80 years of age with moderate-to-severe active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who have an inadequate response to one or more conventional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and/or one or two anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents (excluding golimumab) for efficacy or safety reasons.
Read the detailed description
Despite the therapeutic improvements with recent biologic agents approved for rheumatoid arthritis (RA), there is still a significant unmet medical need for the treatment of subjects with this chronic disease to achieve a faster, more complete response, and higher rates of remission. The aim of the current study is to compare the efficacy and safety of a subcutaneous dose of mavrilimumab with a marketed treatment for RA (golimumab) in 120 adult subjects with moderate-to-severe active RA who have had an inadequate response to one or two anti-TNF agents with mavrilimumab. The design of the study was exploratory and not formerly statistically powered.
- Conditions
- Rheumatoid Arthritis
- Being tested
- Golimumab 50 mg, Mavrilimumab 100 mg
- Keywords
- Rheumatoid Arthritis, Golimumab, Mavrilimumab
- Medical subject headings
- Arthritis, Rheumatoid
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Golimumab 50 mgBiological
Participants received alternating doses of golimumab 50 mg (Weeks 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24) and placebo matched to mavrilimumab (Weeks 2, 6, 10, 14, 18, and 22) injections subcutaneously every 2 weeks for 24 weeks in combination with stable dose of methotrexate (7.5 to 25 mg per week) through oral or parenteral route.
Mavrilimumab 100 mgBiological
Also called CAM-3001
Participants received Mavrilimumab 100 mg injection subcutaneously every 2 weeks for 24 weeks in combination with stable dose of methotrexate (7.5 to 25 mg per week) through oral or parenteral route.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Golimumab 50 mg alternating with Placebo | Experimental | Participants received alternating doses of golimumab 50 milligram (mg) (Weeks 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24) and placebo matched to mavrilimumab (Weeks 2, 6, 10, 14, 18, and 22) injections subcutaneously every 2 weeks for 24 weeks in combination with stable dose of methotrexate (7.5 to 25 mg per week) through oral or parenteral route. Receives: Biological: Golimumab 50 mg |
| Mavrilimumab 100 mg | Experimental | Participants received Mavrilimumab 100 mg injection subcutaneously every 2 weeks for 24 weeks in combination with stable dose of methotrexate (7.5 to 25 mg per week) through oral or parenteral route. Receives: Biological: Mavrilimumab 100 mg |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved American College of Rheumatology 20 (ACR20) Responses at Day 169
The ACR20 was defined as greater than or equal to (>=) 20 percent (%) improvement, in: swollen joint count (SJC) and tender joint count (TJC) and >=20% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity (PGA); physician global assessment of disease activity (MDGA); self-assessed disability (disability index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire [HAQ]); and C-reactive protein (CRP). If CRP was missing and Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) was present then ESR was to be used.
Measured: Day 169
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved American College of Rheumatology 50 (ACR50) Responses at Day 169
The ACR50 was defined as >=50% improvement, in: SJC and TJC and >=50% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the HAQ); and CRP. If CRP was missing and ESR was present then ESR was to be used. The percentage of participants were calculated by logistic regression model method.
Measured: Day 169
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved American College of Rheumatology 70 (ACR70) Responses at Day 169
The ACR70 was defined as >=70% improvement, in: SJC and TJC and >=70% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the HAQ); and CRP. If CRP was missing and ESR was present then ESR was to be used. The percentage of participants were calculated by logistic regression model method.
Measured: Day 169
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Disease Activity Score of 28 Joints Using C-Reactive Protein (DAS28 [CRP]) Response at Day 169
The DAS28 (CRP) was calculated from the number of SJC and TJC using the 28 joints count, The DAS28(CRP) considers 28 of the 68 TJC and 28 of the 66 SJC and participant's global health (GH) using PGA of disease activity using the visual analogue scale (VAS) of 0 (= best), 100 (= worst) plus levels of CRP (milligram/Liter [mg/L]). Total score range: 0-9.4, higher score= more disease activity. DAS28 (CRP) less than (<) 3.2 = low disease activity, >=3.2 to 5.1 = moderate to high disease activity and <2.6= remission. Participants with score less than 2.6 were analysed. The percentage of participants were calculated by logistic regression model method.
Measured: Day 169
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score Improvement From Baseline and >= 0.25 at Day 169
The HAQ-DI: 20-item scale assessing participant-reported assessment of ability to perform tasks in 8 categories of daily living activities: dress/groom; arising, eating, hygiene, walking, reaching, grip, and errands/chores over past week. Each item was scored on 4-point scale from 0 to 3: 0=no difficulty; 1=some difficulty; 2=much difficulty; 3=unable to do. Overall score was computed as the sum of domain scores and divided by the number of domains answered. Total possible score range from 0 to 3; where 0 = least difficulty and 3 = extreme difficulty. Participants with change from baseline more than or equal to (>=) 0.25 were reported. The percentage of participants were calculated by logistic regression model method.
Measured: Day 169
Secondary outcomes (25)
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)
An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study drug and Day 169 that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pre-treatment state. TEAE and TESAE were reported as per relatedness and severity.
Measured: Baseline up to Day 169
Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Any medically significant change in laboratory evaluations were recorded as adverse events. Following parameters were analyzed for laboratory examination: hematology (leukocytosis, neutropenia, anaemia of chronic disease); serum chemistry (alanine aminotransferase, blood parathyroid hormone, gamma glutamyl transferase, hepatic enzyme, dyslipidaemia, hypercholesterolaemia, hyperglycaemia, hyperlipidaemia, hypertriglyceridaemia); urinalysis.
Measured: Baseline up to Day 169
Number of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Vital sign assessments included blood pressure, pulse rate, temperature, weight and respiration rate. Vital signs abnormalities reported as TEAEs were reported.
Measured: Baseline up to Day 169
Number of Participants With Pulmonary Function Test Values Below Threshold Values Based on Percent Change From Baseline at Day 85 and 169
Pulmonary function testing were performed by spirometry to assess forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), forced expiratory volume in 6 second (FEV6), forced vital capacity (FVC), and diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO). FEV1 was the maximal volume of air exhaled in the first second of a forced expiration from a position of full inspiration. FEV6 was the maximal volume of air exhaled in the six second of a forced expiration from a position of full inspiration. FVC was the volume of air which can be forcibly exhaled from the lungs after taking the deepest breath possible. DLCO is a pulmonary function test that measures the partial pressure difference between inspired and expired carbon monoxide. The percentage of predicted values of these pulmonary function tests were calculated based on decreases from baseline and categorized as more than (>) 20% reduction (RD) and absolute value (AV) less than (<) 80% predicted (PR).
Measured: Day 85 and 169
Dyspnea Score at Day 169
Borg dyspnea scale was a validated participant reported outcome assessing participant's perceived difficulty in breathing (dyspnea). The scale ranges from 0 (nothing at all) to 10 (maximal difficulty). Higher scores indicated greater difficulty in breathing.
Measured: Day 169
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score of 28 Joints Using C-Reactive Protein (DAS28 [CRP]) Score at Day 169
DAS28 (CRP) calculated swollen joint count (SJC) and tender joint count (TJC) using the 28 joints, general health (GH) using participant assessment of disease activity (participant rated arthritis activity using the numerical rating scale with 0 = best, 10 = worst), and CRP (milligram per liter [mg/L]). Total score range: 0-9.4, higher score= more disease activity. DAS28 (CRP) less than (<) 3.2 = low disease activity, greater than or equal to (>=) 3.2 to 5.1 = moderate to high disease activity and <2.6= remission.
Measured: Baseline and Day 169
Change From Baseline in Continuous American College of Rheumatology (ACRn) Score at Day 169
ACR score - continuous (ACRn) was defined as the minimum of the percentage improvement in TJC, SJC and the median of the percentage improvements in the other five components of the ACR criteria (participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; disability index of the HAQ; and CRP). Total score range was -100 to 100, where negative numbers indicated worsening and positive numbers indicated improvement. Mean indicates adjusted mean (Adj mean).
Measured: Baseline up to Day 169
American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Hybrid Score at Day 169
ACR Hybrid score was defined as the minimum of the percentage improvement in TJC, SJC and the median of the percentage improvements in the other five components of the ACR criteria (participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; disability index of the HAQ; and CRP). Total score range was -100 to 100, where negative numbers indicated worsening and positive numbers indicated improvement.
Measured: Day 169
Number of Participants Who Achieved DAS28 (CRP) Response by European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Category at Day 169
DAS28 (CRP) response by EULAR category were used to measure individual response as none, moderate, and good, depending on the extent of change from baseline and the level of disease activity reached. Good response: change from baseline >1.2 with baseline DAS28 (CRP) <3.2; moderate response: change from baseline >1.2 with baseline DAS28 (CRP) >=3.2 to less than or equal to (=<) 5.1 or change from baseline >=0.6 to =< 1.2 with baseline DAS28 (CRP) >=3.2 to =<5.1; no response: change from baseline <0.6 or change from baseline >=0.6 and =<1.2 with baseline DAS28 (CRP) >5.1.
Measured: Day 169
Number of Participants With DAS28 (CRP) Remission and Low Disease Activity at Day 169
DAS28 (CRP) calculated SJC and TJC using the 28 joints, GH using participant assessment of disease activity (participant rated arthritis activity using the numerical rating scale with 0 = best, 10 = worst), and CRP (mg/L). Total score range: 0-9.4, higher score= more disease activity. Remission was defined as less than 2.6 DAS28 (CRP) score. Low disease activity was defined as less than 3.2 DAS28 (CRP) score.
Measured: Day 169
Time to Onset DAS28 (CRP) Remission at Day 169
The DAS28 (CRP) was calculated from the number of SJC and TJC using the 28 joints count, The DAS28(CRP) considers 28 of the 68 TJC and 28 of the 66 SJC and participant's global health (GH) using PGA of disease activity using the VAS of 0 (= best), 100 (= worst) plus levels of CRP (mg/L). Total score range: 0-9.4, higher score= more disease activity. DAS28 (CRP) <3.2 = low disease activity, >=3.2 to 5.1 = moderate to high disease activity and <2.6= remission. Participants with score less than 2.6 were analysed. Onset of DAS28(CRP) remission ≤ 2.6 defined as the first study day in which the DAS28 score met the criteria.
Measured: Day 169
Duration of DAS28 (CRP) Remission at Day 169
The DAS28 (CRP) was calculated from the number of SJC and TJC using the 28 joints count, The DAS28(CRP) considers 28 of the 68 TJC and 28 of the 66 SJC and participant's global health (GH) using PGA of disease activity using the VAS of 0 (= best), 100 (= worst) plus levels of CRP (mg/L). Total score range: 0-9.4, higher score= more disease activity. DAS28 (CRP) <3.2 = low disease activity, >=3.2 to 5.1 = moderate to high disease activity and <2.6= remission. Participants with score less than 2.6 were analysed. Duration of DAS28(CRP) remission for each subject was defined as number of days from onset of remission to when the subject was no longer in remission.
Measured: Day 169
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Disease Activity Score of 28 Joints Using Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS28 [ESR]) < 2.6 at Day 169
The DAS28 (ESR) calculated SJC and TJC using the 28 joints, GH using participant assessment of disease activity (participant rated arthritis activity using the numerical rating scale with 0 = best, 10 = worst), and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (millimeters per hour [mm/hour]). Total score range: 0-9.4, higher score = more disease activity. DAS28 (ESR) <3.2 = low disease activity, >=3.2 to 5.1 = moderate to high disease activity and <2.6= remission. The percentage of participants were calculated by logistic regression model method.
Measured: Day 169
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) Remission at Day 169
The SDAI was the numerical sum of five outcome parameters: TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, patient global assessment and physician global assessment assessed on 0 - 10 centimetre (cm) VAS; and C-reactive protein (CRP) (milligram per deciliter [mg/dL]). The SDAI total score ranges from 0 to 86, where higher scores indicates greater affection due to disease activity. SDAI remission was defined as a score less than or equal to 3.3. The percentage of participants were calculated by logistic regression model method.
Measured: Day 169
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Remission at Day 169
The CDAI was the numerical sum of 4 outcome parameters: TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, patient global assessment and physician global assessment assessed on 0 - 10 cm VAS. The CDAI total score ranges from 0 to 76 where higher scores indicates greater affection due to disease activity. CDAI remission was defined as a score less than or equal to 2.8.
Measured: Day 169
Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) Remission at Day 169
The ACR/EULAR remission was defined as swollen joint count (0-66), tender joint count (0-68), CRP (mg/dL) and participant global assessment (0-10) all less than or equal to one.
Measured: Day 169
Mean Change From Baseline in Swollen and Tender Joint Count at Day 169
Number of swollen joints was determined by examination of 66 joints and identifying when swelling was present. The number of swollen joints was recorded on the joint assessment form, no swelling = 0, swelling =1. Number of tender joints was determined by examining 68 joints and identified the joints that were painful under pressure or to passive motion. The number of tender joints was recorded on the joint assessment form, no tenderness = 0, tenderness = 1. Mean here indicates adjusted mean.
Measured: Baseline and Day 169
Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Assessment of Pain at Day 169
Participants rated the severity of arthritis pain on a 0 to 100 millimeter (mm) Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), where 0 mm = no pain and 100 mm = most severe pain.
Measured: Baseline and Day 169
Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Disease Activity at Day 169
Participants responded to a question, "Considering all the ways your arthritis affects you, how are you feeling today?" by using a 0 - 100 mm VAS, where 0 = very well and 100 = very poorly.
Measured: Baseline and Day 169
Mean Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity (MDGA) at Day 169
Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis was measured by asking the physician to assess the participant's current arthritis disease activity by placing a vertical line on a 0 to 10 cm VAS, where 0 cm = very good and 10 cm = very bad.
Measured: Baseline and Day 169
Mean Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Day 169
HAQ-DI: participant-reported assessment of ability to perform tasks in 8 categories of daily living activities: dress/groom; arise; eat; walk; reach; grip; hygiene; and common activities over past week. Each item was scored on 4-point scale from 0 to 3: 0=no difficulty; 1=some difficulty; 2=much difficulty; 3=unable to do. Overall score was computed as the sum of domain scores and divided by the number of domains answered. Total possible score range from 0 to 3; where 0 = least difficulty and 3 = extreme difficulty.
Measured: Baseline and Day 169
Ratio of Change C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Day 169 to Baseline
The ratio of change from baseline for CRP was analyzed and reported. The CRP is a substance produced by the liver that increases in the presence of inflammation in the body. The test for CRP is a laboratory measurement for evaluation of an acute phase reactant of inflammation through the use of an ultrasensitive assay. A decrease in the level of CRP indicates reduction in inflammation and therefore improvement in underlying disease.
Measured: Baseline and Day 169
Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Day 169
ESR is a laboratory test that provides a non-specific measure of inflammation. The test assesses the rate at which red blood cells fall in a test tube. The farther the red blood cells have descended, the greater the inflammatory response.
Measured: Day 169
Serum Concentrations of Mavrilimumab
Serum concentrations after subcutaneous dose of mavrilimumab were calculated
Measured: Baseline, Day 8, 15, 29, 85, 141, and 169
Number of Participants Exhibiting Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADAs) to Mavrilimumab
Immunogenicity assessment included determination of anti-drug (mavrilimumab) antibodies in serum samples. ADA detection measured by using electrochemiluminescence assays.
Measured: Day 1 to Day 169
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 Oct 2012 (estimated)
- Study startMar 2013
- Primary completionNov 2014
- Study completionFeb 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Rheumatoid ArthritisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 215 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- MedImmune LLC
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Marius Albulescu, Study director, MedImmune Ltd
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01715896
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CD-IA-CAM-3001-1107
- Status last verified
- Sep 2016
- First submitted
- 16 Oct 2012
- Last updated
- 31 Oct 2016
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 31 Oct 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase 2 Exploratory Study of Mavrilimumab Versus Anti-tumor Necrosis Factor in Subjects With Rheumatoid Arthritis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01715896
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CD-IA-CAM-3001-1107
- Conditions
- Rheumatoid Arthritis
- Keywords
- Rheumatoid Arthritis, Golimumab, Mavrilimumab
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 215 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- MedImmune LLCIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Mar 2013
- Primary completion
- Nov 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- Feb 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 29 Oct 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 31 Oct 2016
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The primary objectives of this study is to explore the efficacy of mavrilimumab compared with golimumab in the treatment of adult subjects 18-80 years of age with moderate-to-severe active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who have an inadequate response to one or more conventional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and/or one or two anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents (excluding golimumab) for efficacy or safety reasons.
Detailed description
Despite the therapeutic improvements with recent biologic agents approved for rheumatoid arthritis (RA), there is still a significant unmet medical need for the treatment of subjects with this chronic disease to achieve a faster, more complete response, and higher rates of remission. The aim of the current study is to compare the efficacy and safety of a subcutaneous dose of mavrilimumab with a marketed treatment for RA (golimumab) in 120 adult subjects with moderate-to-severe active RA who have had an inadequate response to one or two anti-TNF agents with mavrilimumab. The design of the study was exploratory and not formerly statistically powered.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Golimumab 50 mg alternating with Placebo | Experimental | Biological: Golimumab 50 mgParticipants received alternating doses of golimumab 50 milligram (mg) (Weeks 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24) and placebo matched to mavrilimumab (Weeks 2, 6, 10, 14, 18, and 22) injections subcutaneously every 2 weeks for 24 weeks in combination with stable dose of methotrexate (7.5 to 25 mg per week) through oral or parenteral route. |
| Mavrilimumab 100 mg | Experimental | Biological: Mavrilimumab 100 mgParticipants received Mavrilimumab 100 mg injection subcutaneously every 2 weeks for 24 weeks in combination with stable dose of methotrexate (7.5 to 25 mg per week) through oral or parenteral route. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Age 18 through 80 years
- Written consent
- Diagnosis of adult onset Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) as defined by the 2010 American College of Rheumatology European League Against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) classification criteria
- Moderately active disease as defined by disease activity score in 28 joints C-reactive protein (DAS28[CRP]) greater than or equal to (>=) 3.2 at screening and DAS28 erythrocyte sedimentation rate(ESR) ≥ 3.2 at Day 1
- Inadequate response to one or more conventional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs)
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- A rheumatic autoimmune disease or other inflammatory joint disease other than RA
- Previous treatment with biologic therapies other than anti-TNF for RA
- Treatment with other DMARDs or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), as defined by the protocol.
- Medical history as defined by the protocol.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Golimumab 50 mgParticipants received alternating doses of golimumab 50 mg (Weeks 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24) and placebo matched to mavrilimumab (Weeks 2, 6, 10, 14, 18, and 22) injections subcutaneously every 2 weeks for 24 weeks in combination with stable dose of methotrexate (7.5 to 25 mg per week) through oral or parenteral route. | Biological | Golimumab 50 mg alternating with Placebo |
| Mavrilimumab 100 mgAlso: CAM-3001Participants received Mavrilimumab 100 mg injection subcutaneously every 2 weeks for 24 weeks in combination with stable dose of methotrexate (7.5 to 25 mg per week) through oral or parenteral route. | Biological | Mavrilimumab 100 mg |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved American College of Rheumatology 20 (ACR20) Responses at Day 169
Time frame: Day 169
The ACR20 was defined as greater than or equal to (>=) 20 percent (%) improvement, in: swollen joint count (SJC) and tender joint count (TJC) and >=20% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity (PGA); physician global assessment of disease activity (MDGA); self-assessed disability (disability index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire [HAQ]); and C-reactive protein (CRP). If CRP was missing and Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) was present then ESR was to be used.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved American College of Rheumatology 50 (ACR50) Responses at Day 169
Time frame: Day 169
The ACR50 was defined as >=50% improvement, in: SJC and TJC and >=50% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the HAQ); and CRP. If CRP was missing and ESR was present then ESR was to be used. The percentage of participants were calculated by logistic regression model method.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved American College of Rheumatology 70 (ACR70) Responses at Day 169
Time frame: Day 169
The ACR70 was defined as >=70% improvement, in: SJC and TJC and >=70% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the HAQ); and CRP. If CRP was missing and ESR was present then ESR was to be used. The percentage of participants were calculated by logistic regression model method.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Disease Activity Score of 28 Joints Using C-Reactive Protein (DAS28 [CRP]) Response at Day 169
Time frame: Day 169
The DAS28 (CRP) was calculated from the number of SJC and TJC using the 28 joints count, The DAS28(CRP) considers 28 of the 68 TJC and 28 of the 66 SJC and participant's global health (GH) using PGA of disease activity using the visual analogue scale (VAS) of 0 (= best), 100 (= worst) plus levels of CRP (milligram/Liter [mg/L]). Total score range: 0-9.4, higher score= more disease activity. DAS28 (CRP) less than (<) 3.2 = low disease activity, >=3.2 to 5.1 = moderate to high disease activity and <2.6= remission. Participants with score less than 2.6 were analysed. The percentage of participants were calculated by logistic regression model method.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score Improvement From Baseline and >= 0.25 at Day 169
Time frame: Day 169
The HAQ-DI: 20-item scale assessing participant-reported assessment of ability to perform tasks in 8 categories of daily living activities: dress/groom; arising, eating, hygiene, walking, reaching, grip, and errands/chores over past week. Each item was scored on 4-point scale from 0 to 3: 0=no difficulty; 1=some difficulty; 2=much difficulty; 3=unable to do. Overall score was computed as the sum of domain scores and divided by the number of domains answered. Total possible score range from 0 to 3; where 0 = least difficulty and 3 = extreme difficulty. Participants with change from baseline more than or equal to (>=) 0.25 were reported. The percentage of participants were calculated by logistic regression model method.
25 secondary outcomes
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)
Time frame: Baseline up to Day 169
Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Time frame: Baseline up to Day 169
Number of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Time frame: Baseline up to Day 169
Number of Participants With Pulmonary Function Test Values Below Threshold Values Based on Percent Change From Baseline at Day 85 and 169
Time frame: Day 85 and 169
Dyspnea Score at Day 169
Time frame: Day 169
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score of 28 Joints Using C-Reactive Protein (DAS28 [CRP]) Score at Day 169
Time frame: Baseline and Day 169
Change From Baseline in Continuous American College of Rheumatology (ACRn) Score at Day 169
Time frame: Baseline up to Day 169
American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Hybrid Score at Day 169
Time frame: Day 169
Number of Participants Who Achieved DAS28 (CRP) Response by European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Category at Day 169
Time frame: Day 169
Number of Participants With DAS28 (CRP) Remission and Low Disease Activity at Day 169
Time frame: Day 169
Time to Onset DAS28 (CRP) Remission at Day 169
Time frame: Day 169
Duration of DAS28 (CRP) Remission at Day 169
Time frame: Day 169
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Disease Activity Score of 28 Joints Using Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS28 [ESR]) < 2.6 at Day 169
Time frame: Day 169
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) Remission at Day 169
Time frame: Day 169
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Remission at Day 169
Time frame: Day 169
Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) Remission at Day 169
Time frame: Day 169
Mean Change From Baseline in Swollen and Tender Joint Count at Day 169
Time frame: Baseline and Day 169
Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Assessment of Pain at Day 169
Time frame: Baseline and Day 169
Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Disease Activity at Day 169
Time frame: Baseline and Day 169
Mean Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity (MDGA) at Day 169
Time frame: Baseline and Day 169
Mean Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Day 169
Time frame: Baseline and Day 169
Ratio of Change C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Day 169 to Baseline
Time frame: Baseline and Day 169
Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Day 169
Time frame: Day 169
Serum Concentrations of Mavrilimumab
Time frame: Baseline, Day 8, 15, 29, 85, 141, and 169
Number of Participants Exhibiting Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADAs) to Mavrilimumab
Time frame: Day 1 to Day 169
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 31 Oct 2016.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Rheumatoid Arthritis
RecruitingPhase 2
Study of PTC844 in Participants With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis
Rheumatoid Arthritis
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
An Ascending Dose Study of DKB903 in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) and Participants With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)
Rheumatoid Arthritis and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
R-2487 in Patients With Sjogren's Syndrome (SjD)
Sjogren's Syndrome, Sjögren
RecruitingPhase 1
A Trial in Healthy Adult Participants and Adults With Autoimmune Diseases to Test How HBM7020 is Tolerated and How it Behaves in the Body
Rheumatoid Arthritis, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Inhaled AP01 in Participants With Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis
Pulmonary Fibrosis, Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Marius Albulescu study director
MedImmune Ltd
39 sites in 14 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Golimumab 50 mg and Mavrilimumab 100 mg in people with Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by MedImmune LLC at 39 sites in 14 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 Oct 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 39 sites in Israel, United Kingdom, Argentina, Czechia, Greece and 9 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 31 Oct 2016). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved American College of Rheumatology 20 (ACR20) Responses at Day 169 (time frame: Day 169). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 Oct 2016.