ST-Elevation Myocardial InfarctionNCT01717573
Deferred Stent Trial in STEMI
A study testing Deferred stenting and Conventional treatment in people with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction, run by NHS National Waiting Times Centre Board at 1 site in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
During primary PCI, stent deployment and post-dilatation are associated with no-reflow. The mechanisms for no reflow include distal embolization of thrombus, enhanced thrombus formation and vascular spasm. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction
- What is being tested?
- Deferred stenting and Conventional treatment
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 101 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- Mar 2012to May 2013
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Rescue PCI
- Prolonged ischaemic time (> 12hours)
- Previous MI
- Age > 65
- Occluded artery (TIMI 0/1) at initial angiography
- Thrombus burden (TIMI grade 2+)
Show all 11Show fewer
- Long plaque/ stent length (> 24 mm)
- Severe coronary artery disease (e.g calcified artery)
- Small reference vessel diameter (< 2.5 mm)
- Persistent ST-elevation (> 50%) following reperfusion
- Index of microvascular resistance (IMR) > 40
Who cannot join
- Absence of normal coronary flow (TIMI 3)
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United Kingdom1 site
Golden Jubilee National Hospital
Clydebank, Glasgow, G81 4DY
About this study
Official title: Randomised Controlled Study to Assess Whether Deferred Stenting in Acute STEMI Patients Might Reduce the Incidence of No-reflow Versus Conventional Treatment With Immediate Stenting
During primary PCI, stent deployment and post-dilatation are associated with no-reflow. The mechanisms for no reflow include distal embolization of thrombus, enhanced thrombus formation and vascular spasm. No reflow is associated with risk factors such as prolonged duration of ischaemia, heavy thrombus burden, persistent ST elevation and long stent length. ACTIVE HYPOTHESIS: once normal antegrade flow has been re-established with initial aspiration thrombectomy and/or balloon angioplasty at the beginning of primary PCI, compared with usual care with direct stenting, a strategy of deferred stenting for 4 -16 hours to permit the beneficial effects of normalized coronary blood flow and anti-thrombotic therapies will reduce the incidence of no reflow in at-risk STEMI patients. DESIGN: In consecutive STEMI patients with risk factors for no reflow and who have given informed consent, when normal flow has been established (TIMI 3) by initial aspiration thrombectomy and/or balloon angioplasty, participants will be randomized to deferred stenting or usual care with direct stenting. All patients will receive dual anti-platelet therapy. Patients who are randomized to deferred stenting will receive intravenous glycoprotein IIbIIIa inhibitor and anti-coagulation with low molecular weight heparin. Patients who are screened and not eligible to be randomized will be prospectively entered into a registry. Study assessments for feasibility, safety and efficacy will be prospectively performed. An independent clinical event committee will review all serious adverse events. Study endpoints will be subject to core laboratory analyses. The study is intended to inform the design of a larger multicentre clinical trial.
- Conditions
- ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction
- Being tested
- Deferred stenting, Conventional treatment
- Keywords
- STEMI, No-reflow, Primary percutaneous intervention, Deferred stenting
- Medical subject headings
- ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Deferred stentingProcedure or surgery
Conventional treatmentProcedure or surgery
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Deferred stenting | Active comparator | During primary PCI in STEMI, when TIMI 3 flow has been re-established with guide-wire, aspiration thrombectomy and/or balloon angioplasty, stenting is then deferred for a period of 4-16 hours following reperfusion. During this time, patients remain in the Coronary Care Unit and will receive intravenous tirofiban and subcutaneous low molecular weight heparin (enoxaparin 1 mg/kg) Receives: Procedure: Deferred stenting |
| Conventional treatment | Sham comparator | Conventional treatment in STEMI, with immediate stenting Receives: Procedure: Conventional treatment |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Incidence of angiographic no-reflow/ slow-reflow (TIMI flow grade < 3) in the deferred and conventional treatment groups
Measured: Asessed during the 1st (both groups) and 2nd procedures (deferred group) (0-16 hours)
Secondary outcomes (12)
Extent of late microvascular obstruction (MVO) assessed by cardiac MRI
Measured: MRI 2-5 days post randomisation
Clinical events (hospitalisation for heart failure, re-infarction, cardiac death)
Measured: Assessed at index admission and 6-months
Degree of ST-segment resolution on ECG
Measured: ECG in cath-lab prior to reperfusion and again 60 mins post-reperfusion
TIMI coronary arter flow grade
Measured: At the beginning and end of the first procedure (for both groups) and at the beginning and end of the second procedure in the deferred group
Culprit vessel dimensions (QCA) and thrombus burden
Measured: Initial coronary angiogram (and 2nd angiogram in deferred group)
Change in LV ejection fraction
Measured: Cardiac MRI 2 days and 6-months post PCI
Index of microvascular resistance (IMR)
Measured: Assessed following stent deployment (initial procedure for the conventional group and 2nd procedure for the deferred group)
Corrected TIMI frame count
Measured: At the beginning and end of the first procedure (for both groups) and at the beginning and end of the second procedure in the deferred group
Angiographic tissue myocardial blush grade
Measured: Angiographic myocardial blush grade at the end of the first procedure (both groups) and at the end of the second procedure in the deferred group
Intra-procedural thrombotic events
Measured: Asessed during the 1st (both groups) and 2nd procedures (deferred group) (0-16 hours)
Degree of adverse remodelling (end-systolic and end-diastolic volume index)
Measured: Cardiac MRI at 6-months
Final infarct size and myocardial salvage
Measured: Assessed from cardiac MRI day 2-5 and cardiac MRI at 6months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 Oct 2012 (estimated)
- Study startMar 2012
- Primary completionNov 2012
- Study completionMay 2013
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for ST-Elevation Myocardial InfarctionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 101 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- NHS National Waiting Times Centre Board
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- British Heart Foundation, University of Glasgow, Health Sciences Scotland, Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Government
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Colin Berry, NHS National Waiting Times Centre Board
- Investigators
- Colin Berry, BSc PhD FRCP FACC, Principal investigator, Golden Jubilee National Hospital; University of Glasgow
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01717573
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Defer-PG-11-2-28474
- Status last verified
- Oct 2024
- First submitted
- 23 Oct 2012
- Last updated
- 29 Oct 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Carrick D, Oldroyd KG, McEntegart M, Haig C, Petrie MC, Eteiba H, Hood S, Owens C, Watkins S, Layland J, Lindsay M, Peat E, Rae A, Behan M, Sood A, Hillis WS, Mordi I, Mahrous A, Ahmed N, Wilson R, Lasalle L, Genereux P, Ford I, Berry C. A randomized trial of deferred stenting versus immediate stenting to prevent no- or slow-reflow in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (DEFER-STEMI). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 May 27;63(20):2088-2098. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.02.530. Epub 2014 Feb 27.
PubMed 24583294Gao H, Aderhold A, Mangion K, Luo X, Husmeier D, Berry C. Changes and classification in myocardial contractile function in the left ventricle following acute myocardial infarction. J R Soc Interface. 2017 Jul;14(132):20170203. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2017.0203.
PubMed 28747397
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Oct 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Randomised Controlled Study to Assess Whether Deferred Stenting in Acute STEMI Patients Might Reduce the Incidence of No-reflow Versus Conventional Treatment With Immediate Stenting
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01717573
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Defer-PG-11-2-28474
- Conditions
- ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction
- Keywords
- STEMI, No-reflow, Primary percutaneous intervention, Deferred stenting
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 101 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- NHS National Waiting Times Centre BoardUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- British Heart Foundation, University of Glasgow, Health Sciences Scotland, Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Government
- Study start
- Mar 2012 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Nov 2012 (actual)
- Study completion
- May 2013 (actual)
- First posted
- 30 Oct 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
During primary PCI, stent deployment and post-dilatation are associated with no-reflow. The mechanisms for no reflow include distal embolization of thrombus, enhanced thrombus formation and vascular spasm. No reflow is associated with risk factors such as prolonged duration of ischaemia, heavy thrombus burden, persistent ST elevation and long stent length. ACTIVE HYPOTHESIS: once normal antegrade flow has been re-established with initial aspiration thrombectomy and/or balloon angioplasty at the beginning of primary PCI, compared with usual care with direct stenting, a strategy of deferred stenting for 4 -16 hours to permit the beneficial effects of normalized coronary blood flow and anti-thrombotic therapies will reduce the incidence of no reflow in at-risk STEMI patients. DESIGN: In consecutive STEMI patients with risk factors for no reflow and who have given informed consent, when normal flow has been established (TIMI 3) by initial aspiration thrombectomy and/or balloon angioplasty, participants will be randomized to deferred stenting or usual care with direct stenting. All patients will receive dual anti-platelet therapy. Patients who are randomized to deferred stenting will receive intravenous glycoprotein IIbIIIa inhibitor and anti-coagulation with low molecular weight heparin. Patients who are screened and not eligible to be randomized will be prospectively entered into a registry. Study assessments for feasibility, safety and efficacy will be prospectively performed. An independent clinical event committee will review all serious adverse events. Study endpoints will be subject to core laboratory analyses. The study is intended to inform the design of a larger multicentre clinical trial.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Deferred stenting | Active comparator | Procedure: Deferred stentingDuring primary PCI in STEMI, when TIMI 3 flow has been re-established with guide-wire, aspiration thrombectomy and/or balloon angioplasty, stenting is then deferred for a period of 4-16 hours following reperfusion. During this time, patients remain in the Coronary Care Unit and will receive intravenous tirofiban and subcutaneous low molecular weight heparin (enoxaparin 1 mg/kg) |
| Conventional treatment | Sham comparator | Procedure: Conventional treatmentConventional treatment in STEMI, with immediate stenting |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Rescue PCI
- Prolonged ischaemic time (> 12hours)
- Previous MI
- Age > 65
- Occluded artery (TIMI 0/1) at initial angiography
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Absence of normal coronary flow (TIMI 3)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Deferred stenting | Procedure or surgery | Deferred stenting |
| Conventional treatment | Procedure or surgery | Conventional treatment |
Primary outcome
Incidence of angiographic no-reflow/ slow-reflow (TIMI flow grade < 3) in the deferred and conventional treatment groups
Time frame: Asessed during the 1st (both groups) and 2nd procedures (deferred group) (0-16 hours)
12 secondary outcomes
Extent of late microvascular obstruction (MVO) assessed by cardiac MRI
Time frame: MRI 2-5 days post randomisation
Clinical events (hospitalisation for heart failure, re-infarction, cardiac death)
Time frame: Assessed at index admission and 6-months
Degree of ST-segment resolution on ECG
Time frame: ECG in cath-lab prior to reperfusion and again 60 mins post-reperfusion
TIMI coronary arter flow grade
Time frame: At the beginning and end of the first procedure (for both groups) and at the beginning and end of the second procedure in the deferred group
Culprit vessel dimensions (QCA) and thrombus burden
Time frame: Initial coronary angiogram (and 2nd angiogram in deferred group)
Change in LV ejection fraction
Time frame: Cardiac MRI 2 days and 6-months post PCI
Index of microvascular resistance (IMR)
Time frame: Assessed following stent deployment (initial procedure for the conventional group and 2nd procedure for the deferred group)
Corrected TIMI frame count
Time frame: At the beginning and end of the first procedure (for both groups) and at the beginning and end of the second procedure in the deferred group
Angiographic tissue myocardial blush grade
Time frame: Angiographic myocardial blush grade at the end of the first procedure (both groups) and at the end of the second procedure in the deferred group
Intra-procedural thrombotic events
Time frame: Asessed during the 1st (both groups) and 2nd procedures (deferred group) (0-16 hours)
Degree of adverse remodelling (end-systolic and end-diastolic volume index)
Time frame: Cardiac MRI at 6-months
Final infarct size and myocardial salvage
Time frame: Assessed from cardiac MRI day 2-5 and cardiac MRI at 6months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Oct 2024.
- Results publication: PubMed 24583294Carrick D, Oldroyd KG, McEntegart M, Haig C, Petrie MC, Eteiba H, Hood S, Owens C, Watkins S, Layland J, Lindsay M, Peat E, Rae A, Behan M, Sood A, Hillis WS, Mordi I, Mahrous A, Ahmed N, Wilson R, Lasalle L, Genereux P, Ford I, Berry C. A randomized trial of deferred stenting versus immediate stenting to prevent no- or slow-reflow in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (DEFER-STEMI). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 May 27;63(20):2088-2098. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.02.530. Epub 2014 Feb 27.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 28747397Gao H, Aderhold A, Mangion K, Luo X, Husmeier D, Berry C. Changes and classification in myocardial contractile function in the left ventricle following acute myocardial infarction. J R Soc Interface. 2017 Jul;14(132):20170203. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2017.0203.
- Cardiology Department, Golden Jubilee National HospitalLink provided by the sponsor.
- British Heart FoundationLink provided by the sponsor.
- Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of GlasgowLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction
RecruitingObservational study
SuperSaturated Oxygen Comprehensive Observational Registry
STEMI - ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction, AMI
RecruitingPhase 4
Efficacy and Safety of a Half-dose Bolus of r-SAK Prior to Primary PCI in ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction
ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Evaluating SGLT2 Inhibitors for the Reduction of No-Reflow Phenomenon in Patients Undergoing PCI
No Reflow Phenomenon, Reperfusion Injuries, Myocardial
Recruiting
Reducing Slow/No-Reflow With Prophylactic High-Dose Intracoronary Adenosine Protocol in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction The REFLOW AMI Trial
ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI)
RecruitingObservational study
Breisgau PHENO-HEART MI
Myocardial Infarction, STEMI
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Colin Berry, BSc PhD FRCP FACC principal investigator
Golden Jubilee National Hospital; University of Glasgow
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Deferred stenting and Conventional treatment in people with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction, run by NHS National Waiting Times Centre Board at 1 site in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 11 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Oct 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Incidence of angiographic no-reflow/ slow-reflow (TIMI flow grade < 3) in the deferred and conventional treatment groups (time frame: Asessed during the 1st (both groups) and 2nd procedures (deferred group) (0-16 hours)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01717573, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Oct 2024.