Myelodysplastic SyndromesPhase 2NCT01718379
Lenalidomide in Subject With Low and Intermediate-1 Risk MDS and Without Chromosome 5 Abnormality.
A Phase 2 study testing Lenalidomide and Epoetin beta in people with Myelodysplastic Syndromes, run by Groupe Francophone des Myelodysplasies at 48 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
The goal of the present study is to assess, through a randomized phase II trial, the efficacy and safety of Lenalidomide with or without Epoetin beta in transfusion-dependent, ESA-resistant, IPSS low and intermediate-1 risk MDS patients without chromosome 5 abnormality. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Myelodysplastic Syndromes
- What is being tested?
- Lenalidomide and Epoetin beta
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 132 participants
- Where
- 48 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- Jul 2010to Jun 2016
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- MDS defined as
- Low or int-1 IPSS score
- Documented absence of chromosome 5 abnormality (del(5q) or -5 karyotype)
- De novo MDS, excluding therapy-related MDS AND
- Transfusion dependance (requirement of at least 4 units of RBC transfusions every 8 weeks )
- Resistance or loss of response to a previous treatment with Epoetin alpha/beta (at least 60,000 Units/w) or Darbepoetin (at least 250 µg/w), for at least 12 weeks
Show all 15Show fewer
- Ineligibility for allogeneic stem cell transplantation or intensive chemotherapy during the next 12 months
- ECOG performance status ≤ 2
- Age ≥ 18 years
- Life expectancy ≥ 3 months
- Adequate liver function (transaminases serum levels ≤ 3N)
- Adequate renal function (calculate creatinine clearance > 50 ml/min)
- Female subjects of chilbearing potential* must :
- Agree to use effective contraception without interruption throughout the study and for at least 4 weeks after the end of treatment
- Men must: Agree to not conceive during the treatment and to use effective contraception during the treatment period (including periods of dose reduction or temporary suspension) and during one week after end of treatment if their partner is of childbearing potential.
Who cannot join
- Active serious infection not controlled by oral or intravenous antibiotics
- Platelets less than 50 G/L
- Prior history of deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism
- Previous treatment by Thalidomide
- Treatment with any investigational antileukemic agent or chemotherapy at least 6 weeks prior to study entry and lack of full recovery from side effects due to prior therapy independent of when that therapy were given
- Rapidely progressive disease with copromised organ function judged to be life-threatening by the Investigator
Show all 13Show fewer
- Pregnant or lactating female
- Known human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection
- Known active hepatitis B and/or C virus infection
- Hypersensitivity or intolerance to Lenalidomide or any of the excipients
- Hypersensitivity to Epoetin beta or any of the excipients
- Uncontrolled arterial hypertension
- Any history of malignancy (other than myelodysplastic syndrome) unless the patient has remained disease free for more than 5 years
Trial locations and contacts
48 sites in 2 countries.
48 sites in 2 countries
France47 sites
Chu Amiens
Amiens, 80054
CHU Angers
Angers, 43033
Hematology Dpt, CH d'Avignon-305 rue Follereau-
Avignon, 84000
CH de la Cote Basque
Bayonne, 64 100
centre de Blois
Blois, 41016
Hopital Avicenne
Bobigny, 93009
Hematology Dpt, CHU Haut-Lévèque
Bordeaux, 33604
Hôpital Boulogne Sur Mer
Boulogne-sur-Mer, 62321
hôpital Morvan
Brest, 29609
CHU Clémenceau
Caen, 14033
CH de Carcassonne
Carcassonne, 11890
Hematology Dpt, CH René Dubos
Cergy-Pontoise, 95303
Hematology Dpt, Service d'Hématologie Clinique
CHU Albert Michallon, Grenoble, 38043
CHU de Clermont-Ferrand
Clermont-Ferrand, 63058
CH de Compiègne
Compiègne, 60321
Hematology Dpt, Hôpital Sud Francilien
Corbeil-Essonnes, 91100
hopital Henri Mondor
Créteil, 94010
CHU de Dijon
Dijon, 21034
Hematology Dpt, Hôpital Versailles
Le Chesnay, 78157
Hematology Dpt, CHU de Bicêtre
Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, Île-de-France Region, 94275
Hematology Dpt,CH Le mans
Le Mans, 72037
CHRU Huriez
Lille, 59037
Hopital Saint-Vincent de Paul
Lille, 59160
CHRU de Limoges
Limoges, 87046
Hematology Dpt, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud
Lyon, 69495
CH de Mantes-la-jolie
Mantes-la-Jolie, 78201
Institut Paoli Calmettes
Marseille, 13009
Hematology Dpt, CHU Brabois
Nancy, 54511
Hematology Dpt, CHU de nantes
Nantes, 44093
Hematology Dpt, CHU Archet
Nice, 06202
Hematology Dpt, CHU Caremeau
Nîmes, 30029
Hematology Dpt, CHR La Source orléans
Orléans, Orléans, 45067
Hematology Dpt, Hôpital la pitié-Salpétrière
Paris, 75013
Hematology Dpt, Hopital Saint Louis
Paris, 75475
Hopital Saint Antoine
Paris, 75571
Hematology Dpt, CHU Cochin
Paris, Île-de-France Region, 75679
centre René Huguenin
Paris Saint Cloud, 92210
Hematology Dpt, Hôpital Maréchal Joffre
Perpignan, 66046
Hôpital Jean Bernard
Poitiers, 86021
Hematology Dpt, Centre Hospitalier de la région d'Annecy
Pringy, 74374
CHRU de Reims
Reims, 51092
CHU Pontchaillou
Rennes, 35033
Centre Henri Becquerel
Rouen, 76038
CH de Saint Quentin
Sint Quentin, 02321
Chu Strasbourg
Strasbourg, 67098
Hematology Dpt, CHU PURPAN
Toulouse, 31059
Hematology Dpt, CH CHU Bretoneau
Tours, 37044
About this study
Official title: A Phase II Study Evaluating the Efficacy/Safety of Lenalidomide With or Without Epoetin Beta in Transfusion-dependent ESA-resistant Patients With IPSS Low- and Intermediate-1 Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes Without Chromosome 5 Abnormality.
The goal of the present study is to assess, through a randomized phase II trial, the efficacy and safety of Lenalidomide with or without Epoetin beta in transfusion-dependent, ESA-resistant, IPSS low and intermediate-1 risk MDS patients without chromosome 5 abnormality.
Patients will receive either Lenalidomide alone or Lenalidomide and Epoetin beta for 4 months. Responders will be eligible for maintenance treatment with cycles identical to the first cycles, until relapse occurs or until unacceptable toxicity.
Read the detailed description
This is a multi-center, open-label, randomized, Phase II study.
Patients will be treated either with arm A or B
- Arm A: Lenalidomide 10 mg/day for 21 days every 28 days for 4 courses.
- Arm B: Lenalidomide 10 mg/day for 21 days every 28 days for 4 courses combined with weekly subcutaneous injections of Epoetin beta (60,000 Units/w).
Evaluation of response at the end of 4 months according to IWG 2006 and IWG 2000 criteria.
Maintenance: responders will continue to follow the corresponding treatment arm until relapse occurs; non responders at Evaluation of response at the end of 4 months according to IWG 2006 and IWG 2000 criteria.
in arm A will be considered in failure of treatment and the introduction of Epoetin beta is at the discretion of the physician.
The patients will be followed every 3 months for 12 months
- Conditions
- Myelodysplastic Syndromes
- Being tested
- Lenalidomide, Epoetin beta
- Keywords
- Myelodysplasia
- Medical subject headings
- Myelodysplastic Syndromes, Anemia, Refractory, with Excess of Blasts
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
LenalidomideDrug
Also called Revlimid
Lenalidomide:10 mg per day during 21 days
Epoetin betaDrug
Also called NEORECORMON
Epoetin beta: 60,000 Units/week.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Arm A | Experimental | Lenalidomide 10 mg/day for 21 days every 28 days for 4 courses.
Evaluation of response at the end of 4 months according to IWG 2006 and IWG 2000 criteria.
Maintenance: responders will continue to follow the corresponding treatment arm until relapse occurs; non responders at cycle 4 in arm A will be considered in failure of treatment and the introduction of Epoetin beta is at the discretion of the physician.
The patients will be followed every 3 months for 12 months Receives: Drug: Lenalidomide |
| Arm B | Experimental | Lenalidomide 10 mg/day for 21 days every 28 days for 4 courses combined with weekly subcutaneous injections of Epoetin beta (60,000 Units/w).
Evaluation of response at the end of 4 months according to IWG 2006 and IWG 2000 criteria.
Maintenance: responders will continue to follow the corresponding treatment arm until relapse occurs; non responders at cycle 4 in arm A will be considered in failure of treatment and the introduction of Epoetin beta is at the discretion of the physician.
The patients will be followed every 3 months for 12 months Receives: Drug: Epoetin beta |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Comparing the efficacy of Lenalidomide alone to Lenalidomide with Epoetin beta in transfusion-dependent ESA-resistant
Primary outcome is a complete or partial response defined by the IWG 2006 criteria observed after 4 months of treatment. Comparison in the rate of response between the two groups will be performed with Chi-square test or if necessary Fisher exact test.
Same analyzes will be performed with the IWG 2000 response definition .
Measured: After 4 months of treatment
Secondary outcomes (1)
will be to assess the safety of Lenalidomide and of its combination with Epoetin beta
- Safety of Lenalidomide and of its combination with Epoetin beta: adverse events (type, frequency, severity) and relationship of adverse events to study drug
- % of major HI-E and minor HI-E after 4 courses according to IWG 2000 criteria
- Erythroid response duration
- Time to response
- Time to progression according to IPSS
- RBC transfusion independence
- Prognostic factors of response
- Survival
- Quality of life
Measured: After 2 months of treatment
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted31 Oct 2012 (estimated)
- Study startJul 2010
- Primary completionNov 2012
- Study completionJun 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Myelodysplastic SyndromesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 132 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Groupe Francophone des Myelodysplasies
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Celgene, Roche Pharma AG
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Andréa TOMA, MD, Principal investigator, Groupe Francophone des MyelodysplasiesFrançois Dreyfus, MD, Study director, Groupe Francophone des Myelodysplasies
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01718379
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- GFM-Len-Epo-08
- Status last verified
- Nov 2016
- First submitted
- 23 Oct 2012
- Last updated
- 8 Nov 2016
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Chesnais V, Renneville A, Toma A, Lambert J, Passet M, Dumont F, Chevret S, Lejeune J, Raimbault A, Stamatoullas A, Rose C, Beyne-Rauzy O, Delaunay J, Solary E, Fenaux P, Dreyfus F, Preudhomme C, Kosmider O, Fontenay M; Groupe Francophone des Myelodysplasies. Effect of lenalidomide treatment on clonal architecture of myelodysplastic syndromes without 5q deletion. Blood. 2016 Feb 11;127(6):749-60. doi: 10.1182/blood-2015-04-640128. Epub 2015 Dec 1.
PubMed 26626993
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Nov 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase II Study Evaluating the Efficacy/Safety of Lenalidomide With or Without Epoetin Beta in Transfusion-dependent ESA-resistant Patients With IPSS Low- and Intermediate-1 Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes Without Chromosome 5 Abnormality.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01718379
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- GFM-Len-Epo-08
- Conditions
- Myelodysplastic Syndromes
- Keywords
- Myelodysplasia
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 132 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Groupe Francophone des MyelodysplasiesUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Celgene, Roche Pharma AG
- Study start
- Jul 2010
- Primary completion
- Nov 2012 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jun 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 31 Oct 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of the present study is to assess, through a randomized phase II trial, the efficacy and safety of Lenalidomide with or without Epoetin beta in transfusion-dependent, ESA-resistant, IPSS low and intermediate-1 risk MDS patients without chromosome 5 abnormality.
Patients will receive either Lenalidomide alone or Lenalidomide and Epoetin beta for 4 months. Responders will be eligible for maintenance treatment with cycles identical to the first cycles, until relapse occurs or until unacceptable toxicity.
Detailed description
This is a multi-center, open-label, randomized, Phase II study.
Patients will be treated either with arm A or B
- Arm A: Lenalidomide 10 mg/day for 21 days every 28 days for 4 courses.
- Arm B: Lenalidomide 10 mg/day for 21 days every 28 days for 4 courses combined with weekly subcutaneous injections of Epoetin beta (60,000 Units/w).
Evaluation of response at the end of 4 months according to IWG 2006 and IWG 2000 criteria.
Maintenance: responders will continue to follow the corresponding treatment arm until relapse occurs; non responders at Evaluation of response at the end of 4 months according to IWG 2006 and IWG 2000 criteria.
in arm A will be considered in failure of treatment and the introduction of Epoetin beta is at the discretion of the physician.
The patients will be followed every 3 months for 12 months
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Arm A | Experimental | Drug: LenalidomideLenalidomide 10 mg/day for 21 days every 28 days for 4 courses. Evaluation of response at the end of 4 months according to IWG 2006 and IWG 2000 criteria. Maintenance: responders will continue to follow the corresponding treatment arm until relapse occurs; non responders at cycle 4 in arm A will be considered in failure of treatment and the introduction of Epoetin beta is at the discretion of the physician. The patients will be followed every 3 months for 12 months |
| Arm B | Experimental | Drug: Epoetin betaLenalidomide 10 mg/day for 21 days every 28 days for 4 courses combined with weekly subcutaneous injections of Epoetin beta (60,000 Units/w). Evaluation of response at the end of 4 months according to IWG 2006 and IWG 2000 criteria. Maintenance: responders will continue to follow the corresponding treatment arm until relapse occurs; non responders at cycle 4 in arm A will be considered in failure of treatment and the introduction of Epoetin beta is at the discretion of the physician. The patients will be followed every 3 months for 12 months |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (15 listed)
- MDS defined as
- Low or int-1 IPSS score
- Documented absence of chromosome 5 abnormality (del(5q) or -5 karyotype)
- De novo MDS, excluding therapy-related MDS AND
- Transfusion dependance (requirement of at least 4 units of RBC transfusions every 8 weeks )
Key exclusion criteria (13 listed)
- Active serious infection not controlled by oral or intravenous antibiotics
- Platelets less than 50 G/L
- Prior history of deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism
- Previous treatment by Thalidomide
- Treatment with any investigational antileukemic agent or chemotherapy at least 6 weeks prior to study entry and lack of full recovery from side effects due to prior therapy independent of when that therapy were given
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| LenalidomideAlso: RevlimidLenalidomide:10 mg per day during 21 days | Drug | Arm A |
| Epoetin betaAlso: NEORECORMONEpoetin beta: 60,000 Units/week. | Drug | Arm B |
Primary outcome
Comparing the efficacy of Lenalidomide alone to Lenalidomide with Epoetin beta in transfusion-dependent ESA-resistant
Time frame: After 4 months of treatment
Primary outcome is a complete or partial response defined by the IWG 2006 criteria observed after 4 months of treatment. Comparison in the rate of response between the two groups will be performed with Chi-square test or if necessary Fisher exact test. Same analyzes will be performed with the IWG 2000 response definition .
1 secondary outcome
will be to assess the safety of Lenalidomide and of its combination with Epoetin beta
Time frame: After 2 months of treatment
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Nov 2016.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 26626993Chesnais V, Renneville A, Toma A, Lambert J, Passet M, Dumont F, Chevret S, Lejeune J, Raimbault A, Stamatoullas A, Rose C, Beyne-Rauzy O, Delaunay J, Solary E, Fenaux P, Dreyfus F, Preudhomme C, Kosmider O, Fontenay M; Groupe Francophone des Myelodysplasies. Effect of lenalidomide treatment on clonal architecture of myelodysplastic syndromes without 5q deletion. Blood. 2016 Feb 11;127(6):749-60. doi: 10.1182/blood-2015-04-640128. Epub 2015 Dec 1.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Myelodysplastic Syndromes
RecruitingPhase 3
Phase III Study of Induction and Consolidation Chemotherapy With Venetoclax in Patients With Newly Diagnosed AML or MDS-EB-2
Acute Myeloid Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 1
Testing the Anti-cancer Drug, Cirtuvivint, and Its Combination With ASTX727 to Improve Outcomes in Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndromes
Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Myelodysplastic Syndrome
RecruitingObservational study
Natural History of Trisomy 8-Associated Autoinflammatory Disease (TRIAD) and Related Disorders
Trisomy 8 Mosaicism, Trisomy 8 Associated Autoinflammatory Disease
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Pacritinib, a Kinase Inhibitor of CSF1R, IRAK1, JAK2, and FLT3, in Adults and Pediatric Participants 12 Years of Age or Older With Myelodysplastic Syndromes or Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Neoplasms
Myelodysplastic Syndromes
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Trametinib in Treating Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Juvenile Myelomonocytic Leukemia
Juvenile Myelomonocytic Leukemia, Neurofibromatosis Type 1
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Andréa TOMA, MD principal investigator
Groupe Francophone des Myelodysplasies
François Dreyfus, MD study director
Groupe Francophone des Myelodysplasies
48 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Lenalidomide and Epoetin beta in people with Myelodysplastic Syndromes, run by Groupe Francophone des Myelodysplasies at 48 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 15 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Nov 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 48 sites in France, Monaco. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Comparing the efficacy of Lenalidomide alone to Lenalidomide with Epoetin beta in transfusion-dependent ESA-resistant (time frame: After 4 months of treatment). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01718379, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Nov 2016.