Community MembersNCT01719965
Evaluation of Tak Community Advisory Board
An observational study of Community Members, run by University of Oxford at 1 site in Thailand.
Trial summary
A popular form of community engagement is for the researchers to interact with a Community Advisory Board. The Shoklo Malaria Research Unit has been working on the Thai-Burmese border for many years and has been informally engaging with the community for its healthcare and research initiatives, especially in the area… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any ageHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Community Members
- What is being tested?
- Interviews and Focus Group Discussions
- How many people
- 20 participants
- Where
- 1 siteThailand
- Study dates
- Oct 2012to Aug 2014
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Study population: Community members who work in Tak Province, Thailand.
Who may be able to join
- Health workers
- Worked in SMRU for at least 6 months
- Clinic assistants, medics or home visitors
- Researchers
- Worked in SMRU for at least 6 months
- Physician or scientist
Show all 11Show fewer
- CAB members
- Member of the CAB for at least 3 months
- Community members - Lived in the border area (area served by SMRU or Mae Sot) for at least 6 months
- Research subjects
- Participants who are currently enrolled in an SMRU study
Who cannot join
None listed.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Evaluation of the Tak Province Community Ethics Community Advisory Board: Interviews and Focus Group Discussions
A popular form of community engagement is for the researchers to interact with a Community Advisory Board. The Shoklo Malaria Research Unit has been working on the Thai-Burmese border for many years and has been informally engaging with the community for its healthcare and research initiatives, especially in the area of ethics and consent. In January 2009, community engagement was formalised with the establishment of the Tak Province Border Community Ethics Advisory Board (T-CAB). The T-CAB is the first of its kind as the investigators have not come across any set up of similar nature involving mobile and unstable populations residing along a porous border.
Three years on, SMRU questions if the T-CAB has been "successful" and if the current T-CAB model is the best model for this community. In order to evaluate the T-CAB, first an evaluation tool has to be developed as there are no off-the-shelf evaluation tools for CABs, then the evaluation will be carried out.
Read the detailed description
- Background
Research on the Thai-Myanmar border
Since 1986, the Shoklo Malaria Research Unit (SMRU) has provided basic healthcare and carried out research aimed at reducing the impact of multi-drug resistant malaria and other infectious diseases in the area on the border between Thailand and Myanmar. SMRU's main area of interest is in malaria, with special interest in children and pregnant women - the groups most at risk from malaria - and it has combined this research with the operation of antenatal clinics along the border. SMRU currently runs multiple free clinics for the Karen and Burman border population that would otherwise lack access to health care. The most distant clinic is about 120 km from the SMRU office in Mae Sot. Carrying out research and providing care along the border presents a range of unique practical and ethical challenges. This in part because the people who live near the border are mostly migrants or refugees from elsewhere in Myanmar who have, since the 1980s, moved to the border area to escape economic hardship and sometimes conflict and persecution. There are currently thought to be two million migrants from Myanmar living in Thailand (about 150 000 in refugee camps) and a further million 'internally displaced' people living near the border inside Myanmar, although numbers are difficult to verify. The vast majority of these people, who come from a very diverse range of different ethnic, religious, political and language groups, live in insecure, unsafe conditions and face a number of serious health difficulties.
Until 1995, SMRU focused its activities primarily in the refugee camps in the border area and a strong collaboration was established with non-govermental organisations (NGOs) to control malaria in the refugee population through the operation of "the Malaria Task Force" (MTF). This was largely successful and malaria is now a minor problem within the camps. As a consequence, whilst SMRU remains responsible for antenatal and obstetric care and the treatment of malaria patients in refugee camps such as Mae La, since 1995 it has increasingly extended its activities to reach out to the wider displaced populations who have little alternative access to malaria diagnosis and treatment or antenatal care. This is done in collaboration with the Thai Ministry of Public Health (MOPH) and in close collaboration with the district hospitals and the Tak provincial health authorities. In 2001-2003 the Tak Malaria Initiative, supported by the Bill \& Melinda Gates Foundation deployed the malaria control strategy developed by SMRU in the refugee camps to all 200 affected villages in the province's border districts with substantial success. When the funding from the Gates Foundation came to an end, the MOPH took over the program.
The border between Thailand and Myanmar is at the forefront of the global fight against malaria because it is on the frontline in the battle against the development and spread of resistance to anti-malarial drugs. Malaria parasites found here are some of the most drug-resistant on earth and their expansion and spread is a very real global threat (research has already demonstrated that the most drug-resistant malaria parasites found in Africa originated in South East Asia) . This is particularly urgent and important in the populations living along the border because there is published evidence that the malaria parasites may become tolerant even to the most advanced artemisinin combination therapies (ACTs) now at the forefront of global malaria treatment.
Rationale for the establishment of the community advisory board
There is widespread agreement on the need for community engagement in clinical research, particularly where the research involves minority groups and other vulnerable populations. However there has been little research on the effectiveness and challenges associated with different forms of engagement, and little or no evidence base on which to base engagement strategies.
A popular form of community engagement is for the researchers to interact with a Community Advisory Board. The Shoklo Malaria Research Unit has been working on the Thai-Burmese border for many years and has been informally engaging with the community for its healthcare and research initiatives, especially in the area of ethics and consent. In January 2009, community engagement was formalised with the establishment of the Tak Province Border Community Ethics Advisory Board (T-CAB). The T-CAB is the first of its kind as the investigators have not come across any set up of similar nature involving mobile and unstable populations residing along a porous border.
At the time of its establishment, the T-CAB had three main goals. The first of these was that, after a period of training - about diseases such as malaria and the nature and goals of research - it's members would be able to advise on whether a study is acceptable to and perceived as beneficial by, the communities in the region. The second was that, the T-CAB would play a key role in advising researchers on the ethical and operational aspects of proposed studies such as: informed consent procedures, fair compensation, risks and benefits, how to protect the confidentiality of research subjects, and so on. The third, aim was that the T-CAB would act as a 'bridge' between the communities and researchers. It would on the one hand, provide communities with an opportunity to express views on proposed research and to influence and direct research aims, and on the other, provide a means by which the researchers might feedback the results of the research to the community.
Three years on, SMRU questions if the T-CAB has been "successful" and if the current T-CAB model is the best model for this community. In order to evaluate the T-CAB, first an evaluation tool has to be developed as there are no off-the-shelf evaluation tools for CABs, then the evaluation will be carried out.
- Conditions
- Community Members
- Being tested
- Interviews and Focus Group Discussions
- Keywords
- Community Advisory Board, Focus Group Discussion, Interview, Community Engagement, Thailand
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Interviews and Focus Group DiscussionsOther
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Health Workers | * Worked in SMRU for at least 6 months
* Clinic assistants, medics or home visitors Receives: Other: Interviews and Focus Group Discussions | |
| Researchers | * Worked in SMRU for at least 6 months
* Physician or scientist Receives: Other: Interviews and Focus Group Discussions | |
| CAB members | - Member of the CAB for at least 3 months Receives: Other: Interviews and Focus Group Discussions | |
| Community members | - Lived in the border area (area served by SMRU or Mae Sot) for at least 6 months Receives: Other: Interviews and Focus Group Discussions | |
| Research subjects | - Participants who are currently enrolled in an SMRU study Receives: Other: Interviews and Focus Group Discussions |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Qualitative Assessment of Community Advisory Board. A summary of opinions raised in interviews.
Individual interviews and Focus Group Discussions. This is an observational study and the outcomes will be the comments the investigators receive from participants. The investigators will bring these views together and highlight general views and any particular points of note or problems identified by participants.
Measured: 90 Minutes
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Nov 2012 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2012
- Primary completionAug 2014
- Study completionAug 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Community MembersStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of OxfordThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Oxford
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01719965
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CTSG1201
- Status last verified
- Sep 2018
- First submitted
- 17 Oct 2012
- Last updated
- 10 Sep 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Sep 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluation of the Tak Province Community Ethics Community Advisory Board: Interviews and Focus Group Discussions
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01719965
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CTSG1201
- Conditions
- Community Members
- Keywords
- Community Advisory Board, Focus Group Discussion, Interview, Community Engagement, Thailand
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of OxfordUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Oct 2012 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Aug 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- Aug 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 1 Nov 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
A popular form of community engagement is for the researchers to interact with a Community Advisory Board. The Shoklo Malaria Research Unit has been working on the Thai-Burmese border for many years and has been informally engaging with the community for its healthcare and research initiatives, especially in the area of ethics and consent. In January 2009, community engagement was formalised with the establishment of the Tak Province Border Community Ethics Advisory Board (T-CAB). The T-CAB is the first of its kind as the investigators have not come across any set up of similar nature involving mobile and unstable populations residing along a porous border.
Three years on, SMRU questions if the T-CAB has been "successful" and if the current T-CAB model is the best model for this community. In order to evaluate the T-CAB, first an evaluation tool has to be developed as there are no off-the-shelf evaluation tools for CABs, then the evaluation will be carried out.
Detailed description
- Background
Research on the Thai-Myanmar border
Since 1986, the Shoklo Malaria Research Unit (SMRU) has provided basic healthcare and carried out research aimed at reducing the impact of multi-drug resistant malaria and other infectious diseases in the area on the border between Thailand and Myanmar. SMRU's main area of interest is in malaria, with special interest in children and pregnant women - the groups most at risk from malaria - and it has combined this research with the operation of antenatal clinics along the border. SMRU currently runs multiple free clinics for the Karen and Burman border population that would otherwise lack access to health care. The most distant clinic is about 120 km from the SMRU office in Mae Sot. Carrying out research and providing care along the border presents a range of unique practical and ethical challenges. This in part because the people who live near the border are mostly migrants or refugees from elsewhere in Myanmar who have, since the 1980s, moved to the border area to escape economic hardship and sometimes conflict and persecution. There are currently thought to be two million migrants from Myanmar living in Thailand (about 150 000 in refugee camps) and a further million 'internally displaced' people living near the border inside Myanmar, although numbers are difficult to verify. The vast majority of these people, who come from a very diverse range of different ethnic, religious, political and language groups, live in insecure, unsafe conditions and face a number of serious health difficulties.
Until 1995, SMRU focused its activities primarily in the refugee camps in the border area and a strong collaboration was established with non-govermental organisations (NGOs) to control malaria in the refugee population through the operation of "the Malaria Task Force" (MTF). This was largely successful and malaria is now a minor problem within the camps. As a consequence, whilst SMRU remains responsible for antenatal and obstetric care and the treatment of malaria patients in refugee camps such as Mae La, since 1995 it has increasingly extended its activities to reach out to the wider displaced populations who have little alternative access to malaria diagnosis and treatment or antenatal care. This is done in collaboration with the Thai Ministry of Public Health (MOPH) and in close collaboration with the district hospitals and the Tak provincial health authorities. In 2001-2003 the Tak Malaria Initiative, supported by the Bill \& Melinda Gates Foundation deployed the malaria control strategy developed by SMRU in the refugee camps to all 200 affected villages in the province's border districts with substantial success. When the funding from the Gates Foundation came to an end, the MOPH took over the program.
The border between Thailand and Myanmar is at the forefront of the global fight against malaria because it is on the frontline in the battle against the development and spread of resistance to anti-malarial drugs. Malaria parasites found here are some of the most drug-resistant on earth and their expansion and spread is a very real global threat (research has already demonstrated that the most drug-resistant malaria parasites found in Africa originated in South East Asia) . This is particularly urgent and important in the populations living along the border because there is published evidence that the malaria parasites may become tolerant even to the most advanced artemisinin combination therapies (ACTs) now at the forefront of global malaria treatment.
Rationale for the establishment of the community advisory board
There is widespread agreement on the need for community engagement in clinical research, particularly where the research involves minority groups and other vulnerable populations. However there has been little research on the effectiveness and challenges associated with different forms of engagement, and little or no evidence base on which to base engagement strategies.
A popular form of community engagement is for the researchers to interact with a Community Advisory Board. The Shoklo Malaria Research Unit has been working on the Thai-Burmese border for many years and has been informally engaging with the community for its healthcare and research initiatives, especially in the area of ethics and consent. In January 2009, community engagement was formalised with the establishment of the Tak Province Border Community Ethics Advisory Board (T-CAB). The T-CAB is the first of its kind as the investigators have not come across any set up of similar nature involving mobile and unstable populations residing along a porous border.
At the time of its establishment, the T-CAB had three main goals. The first of these was that, after a period of training - about diseases such as malaria and the nature and goals of research - it's members would be able to advise on whether a study is acceptable to and perceived as beneficial by, the communities in the region. The second was that, the T-CAB would play a key role in advising researchers on the ethical and operational aspects of proposed studies such as: informed consent procedures, fair compensation, risks and benefits, how to protect the confidentiality of research subjects, and so on. The third, aim was that the T-CAB would act as a 'bridge' between the communities and researchers. It would on the one hand, provide communities with an opportunity to express views on proposed research and to influence and direct research aims, and on the other, provide a means by which the researchers might feedback the results of the research to the community.
Three years on, SMRU questions if the T-CAB has been "successful" and if the current T-CAB model is the best model for this community. In order to evaluate the T-CAB, first an evaluation tool has to be developed as there are no off-the-shelf evaluation tools for CABs, then the evaluation will be carried out.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 5
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Health Workers | – | Other: Interviews and Focus Group Discussions* Worked in SMRU for at least 6 months * Clinic assistants, medics or home visitors |
| Researchers | – | Other: Interviews and Focus Group Discussions* Worked in SMRU for at least 6 months * Physician or scientist |
| CAB members | – | Other: Interviews and Focus Group Discussions- Member of the CAB for at least 3 months |
| Community members | – | Other: Interviews and Focus Group Discussions- Lived in the border area (area served by SMRU or Mae Sot) for at least 6 months |
| Research subjects | – | Other: Interviews and Focus Group Discussions- Participants who are currently enrolled in an SMRU study |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Community members who work in Tak Province, Thailand.
Key inclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Health workers
- Worked in SMRU for at least 6 months
- Clinic assistants, medics or home visitors
- Researchers
- Worked in SMRU for at least 6 months
Key exclusion criteria (0 listed)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Interviews and Focus Group Discussions | Other | CAB members, Community members, Health Workers, Research subjects, Researchers |
Primary outcome
Qualitative Assessment of Community Advisory Board. A summary of opinions raised in interviews.
Time frame: 90 Minutes
Individual interviews and Focus Group Discussions. This is an observational study and the outcomes will be the comments the investigators receive from participants. The investigators will bring these views together and highlight general views and any particular points of note or problems identified by participants.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Sep 2018.
Related trials for Community Members
Recruiting
A Restorative Justice-Based Lung Cancer Screening Decision-Making Support Intervention Tailored for Black Individuals to Increase Lung Cancer Screening Among Black Community Members, RESTORE Trial
Lung Carcinoma
Not yet recruiting
Network-Based Support to Help Community Coalition Members Choose and Use Strategies to Improve Child Health
Childhood Obesity, Evidence-Based Practice
Active, not recruiting
Your Health Matters! (Tu Salud ¡Si Cuenta!): Promoting Healthy Lifestyles in Latino Families
Family Member, Health Status Unknown
Active, not recruiting
The HOME Program for Individuals With Traumatic Brain Injury and Family Members
Brain Injuries, Traumatic
Recruiting
Training Community Members to be Coaches to Deliver the HealthyLifetime Program
Health Behaviors, Functional Decline
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Community Members, run by University of Oxford at 1 site in Thailand.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 11 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Sep 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Thailand. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Qualitative Assessment of Community Advisory Board. A summary of opinions raised in interviews. (time frame: 90 Minutes). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Sep 2018.