AzTrials
AzTrials

EducationNCT01720017

Impact of Manikin Training on Airtraq Avant Learning Curve in Predicted Difficult Airways

A study testing Preclinical Manikin Training and Inservice Training in people with Education and Training, run by University of Wisconsin, Madison at 1 site in United States.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The overall purpose of this study is to assess the impact of preclinical airway manikin training using the Airtraq Avant and Wireless Monitor System under simulated difficult airway conditions (c-collar and swollen tongue) on the clinical learning curve of using the device/system in airways with predictors for… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Education, Training, Manikin
What is being tested?
Preclinical Manikin Training and Inservice Training
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
30 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Oct 2012to May 2014
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • anesthesia providers (i.e., anesthesia residents, anesthetists, and staff anesthesiologists)

Who cannot join

  • < 18 years of age
  • non-english speaking
  • unwilling to sign a study consent form
  • related financially or otherwise to the Airtraq Avant manufacturer will not be eligible.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics

    Madison, Wisconsin, 53792

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: The Impact of Airway Manikin Training on the Airtraq Avant and Wireless Monitor System Learning Curve in Airways With Predictors for Difficult Intubation

The overall purpose of this study is to assess the impact of preclinical airway manikin training using the Airtraq Avant and Wireless Monitor System under simulated difficult airway conditions (c-collar and swollen tongue) on the clinical learning curve of using the device/system in airways with predictors for difficult intubation.

The investigators hypothesize that the clinical learning curve in airways with predictors for difficult intubation will be shorter for study subjects (operators) who undergo preclinical manikin training under simulated difficult airway conditions compared to Study subjects (operators) who do not receive this training. The clinical learning curve is characterized by procedure times and first attempt success rates on successive uses of the Airtraq Avant and Wireless Monitor System in patients with at least one predictor for difficult intubation.

Read the detailed description

Tracheal intubation (placement of a breathing tube below the vocal cords into the trachea) is an essential skill for the anesthesia provider. Training on the use of new technology (i.e., procedural training), including video/optical laryngoscopy (e.g., the Airtraq Avant, Glidescope, and similar devices) usually occurs under the tutelage of learned practitioners, while caring for actual patients in the operating room, not during didactic sessions in a classroom. Although the use of airway trainers (manikins) has led to improved clinical learning curves for the use of some airway devices, it is not known if training on the use of the Airtraq Avant and Wireless Monitor System under simulated difficult airway conditions (c-collar and swollen tongue) will improve the learning curve of using the device/system clinically in in patients with at least one predictor of difficult intubation.

The specific aim of this study is to compare the clinical learning curve, characterized by procedure times and first attempt success rates on successive uses, of using the Airtraq Avant and Wireless Monitor System in patients with at least one predictor for diffcult intubation between anesthesia providers who receive preclinical airway manikin training under simulated difficult airway conditions (c-collar and swollen tongue) and those who do not. The subjects of this study are anesthesia providers enrolled in the study.

Secondary specific aims include assessing the impact of preclinical airway manikin training under simulated difficult airway conditions on glottic view grade, glottic view attainment maneuvers, ease of Airtraq Avant insertion, ease of tracheal tube insertion, mechanisms of tracheal tube insertion impediment, and perceived overall clinical usefulness in airways with predictors of difficult intubation.

Being tested
Preclinical Manikin Training, Inservice Training
Keywords
Airtraq, laryngoscope, airway, difficult, training, manikin

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Preclinical Manikin TrainingOther

    During the preclinical manikin training, each subject will perform 10 intubations in a manikin with a difficult airway simulated by swelling the manikin tongue and placing it in a cervical collar.

  • Inservice TrainingOther

    Inservice training will include review of a product information handout and a video demonstration.

Study groups in NCT01720017
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Inservice Training OnlyActive comparatorInservice training will include review of a product information handout and a video demonstration. Specific attention will be given to (1) describing each system component and its operation, (2) attaching the wireless camera head and coordinating channel selection with the monitor, (3) turning on the Airtraq Avant light and device preparation for use, (4) Airtraq Avant insertion into the patient's mouth and advancement into the hypopharynx (deep in the throat) to obtain a view of the vocal cords, (5) use of standard lift and rotation movements to optimize the vocal cord view, (6) tracheal tube advancement through the vocal cords tracheal intubation, (7) standard methods for confirmation of correct tracheal tube placement, (8) tracheal tube removal from the Airtraq Avant and the Airtraq Avant removal from the patient's mouth, and (9) disposal of the disposable blade and cleaning of the reusable optics insert.
Receives: Other: Inservice Training
Inservice and Manikin TrainingExperimentalStudy subjects in this group will receive the standard inservice training described above, as well as, preclinical manikin training on use of the Airtraq Avant and Wireless Monitor System in simulated difficult airway conditions (swollen tongue and cervical collar). During the preclinical manikin training, each subject will perform 10 intubations. Performance characteristics including attempts for successful Airtraq Avant insertion, glottic view obtained, ease of insertion, ease of tracheal intubation, time required for tracheal intubation, and attempts for successful tracheal intubation will be recorded for each intubation.
Receives: Other: Preclinical Manikin Training

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Intubation time

    Repeated measure of intubation efficiency using the Airtraq Avant and Wireless Monitor System in airways with at least one predictor of difficult intubation, defined as the time from placing the videolaryngoscope into the patient's mouth to passage of the tracheal tube balloon below the vocal cords.

    Measured: Within the first 3 minutes of 20 successive intubations.

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. First attempt success rate

    Cumulative measure of intubation success on first attempt over 20 successive uses of the Airtraq Avant and Wireless Monitor System in airways with at least one predictor of difficult intubation, defined as the ability to place a tracheal tube below a patient's vocal cords on the first attempt without removing the videolaryngoscope from the patient's mouth.

    Measured: Within the first 3 minutes of 20 successive intubations.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted1 Nov 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study startOct 2012
  3. Primary completionMay 2014
  4. Study completionMay 2014

Why it stopped: Difficulty was encountered with the subjects completing their required 20 intubations in patients with at least one predictor of difficult intubation.

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
30 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01720017
Sponsor's protocol ID
2012-0636
Status last verified
May 2014
First submitted
24 Oct 2012
Last updated
2 Oct 2015
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Preclinical Manikin Training and Inservice Training in people with Education and Training, run by University of Wisconsin, Madison at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Oct 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was stopped early (reason given: Difficulty was encountered with the subjects completing their required 20 intubations in patients with at least one predictor of difficult intubation.). Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Intubation time (time frame: Within the first 3 minutes of 20 successive intubations.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Oct 2015.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in