Partner Notification Following STI DiagnosisNCT01720641
Partner Notification Strategies for MSM in Peru
A study testing Internet, Referral Card and Internet and Referral Card in people with Partner Notification Following STI Diagnosis, run by University of California, Los Angeles at 1 site in Peru.
Trial summary
The goal of the proposed research is to assess new strategies for partner management and sexually transmitted infection (STI) control to reduce the spread of HIV-1 among men who have sex with men (MSM) in Latin America. The HIV epidemic in Peru remains concentrated within the core risk group of MSM. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, men only
- Conditions the study is for
- Partner Notification Following STI Diagnosis
- What is being tested?
- Internet, Referral Card and Internet and Referral Card
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 370 participants
- Where
- 1 sitePeru
- Study dates
- Aug 2012to Aug 2014
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Men only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- 18 years of age or older
- Male or biologically male at birth
- Sexual contact (oral or anal intercourse) with a male or male-to-female transgender partner in the past 12 months
- Diagnosis with syphilis infection
Who cannot join
- Under 18 years of age
- Unable to understand informed consent procedures
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Partner Notification Strategies for STI Control in Urban Peru
The goal of the proposed research is to assess new strategies for partner management and sexually transmitted infection (STI) control to reduce the spread of HIV-1 among men who have sex with men (MSM) in Latin America. The HIV epidemic in Peru remains concentrated within the core risk group of MSM. STI infection and re-infection are central to the continuation of the HIV epidemic among MSM in Peru. Development of improved strategies for partner notification and treatment will reduce the incidence and prevalence of STIs and ultimately reduce the incidence of HIV infection in this population. The first phase of this study used qualitative methods to explore attitudes and practices related to partner notification among MSM in Lima, Peru. Findings from the qualitative research were used to develop a quantitative survey instrument to assess partner notification decision-making processes and practices among MSM in Peru recently diagnosed with HIV or syphilis infection. Data from both quantitative and qualitative phases of the study have been used to develop a partner notification for MSM in Peru. Investigators plan to implement and assess the impact of the intervention on rates of partner notification following a diagnosis of syphilis among MSM in Lima, Peru. The investigators hypothesize that participants randomized to receive one or more partner notification tools will report a higher frequency of partner notification.
Read the detailed description
Specific Aim: To assess the efficacy of internet- and referral card-based partner notification tools for the improvement of partner notification outcomes among MSM in Lima, Peru. As attitudes and behaviors related to partner notification vary within specific behavioral, social, and clinical contexts, interventions designed to improve partner notification outcomes must address the same contextual determinants to be effective. Partner notification tools based on electronic distribution of anonymous notification messages and/or patient-delivered referral cards are expected to increase notification rates in specific contexts.
Hypothesis: Provision of partner notification tools based on electronic and printed resources will improve reported and observed partner notification outcomes by overcoming barriers to notification including limited contact information, fear of disclosure, stigma, and lack of informational resources. Notification outcomes and use of notification tools will vary according to strategies of interpersonal communication reflected in the specific behavioral, social, and biomedical contexts of the individual, the partnership, and the STI diagnosed.
Participants will be selected for participation in the study depending on the findings of the EPT/Partner Notification Screening Protocol. Participants in the EPT/Partner Notification Screening Protocol diagnosed with new syphilis infection will be eligible for enrollment in the Partner Notification protocol.
- Recruitment: Participants in the EPT/Partner Notification Screening Protocol who are diagnosed with syphilis based on physician interpretation of results of RPR assay and clinical history will be invited by the Study Counselor to participate in the Partner Notification Intervention Protocol.
II. Informed Consent: All potential subjects will receive an explanation of the study procedures and risks and benefits and asked to provide written Informed Consent. Participants will be given the opportunity to take the Informed Consent Document home for further review and decide at a later time if they wish to participate in the study.
III. Enrollment: Subjects who consent to participate in the Partner Notification Intervention Protocol will be randomized to either the experimental Partner Notification intervention or the Standard of Care (Partner Notification Counseling) arm.
IV Randomization: Eligible subjects who provide consent to participate will be randomly assigned to intervention or control groups using a random permuted block allocation (block size=7 in an alternating 4/3 ratio). Computer-generated randomization assignments will be stored in opaque, sealed envelopes opened at the time of allocation. Randomization assignments will be recorded and identified by the participant's numeric study code.
- Intervention Delivery. Participants assigned to the experimental Partner Notification intervention will be provided with standard partner notification counseling as well as 5 printed referral cards with information about syphilis infection and a referral sheet for the Spanish language version of the inSPOT internet-based partner notification service (www.inspot.org). Referral cards will include printed material informing the recipient that they may have been exposed to syphilis, and will provide information on syphilis infection, including local resources for testing and treatment. The inSPOT website is a free internet-based notification service that offers anonymous automated e-mail partner notification services following an STI diagnosis. Users of the system select a diagnosis as well as a standardized notification message which they can personalized with their name and other messages if they desire. The user then enters the e-mail address(es) of the person(s) they wish to notify and the system delivers an automated e-mail notification to the person advising them of their potential exposure to an STI and advising them to seek STI testing. The notification also includes the address of the inSPOT website which contains additional information on HIV/STIs, risks for transmission, and resources for testing and treatment. Participants will be instructed on how to use both tools to assist them in the partner notification process.
Participants randomized to the control arm will receive standard partner notification counseling by study staff, without any supplemental notification tools.
Following delivery of the intervention, an appointment will be scheduled for participants to return to the research site in 1 month.
VI. Follow-up Evaluation. All participants will be asked to return to the study site 1 month after enrollment and randomization. At the Follow-up evaluation, participants will complete a brief survey (Partner Notification Follow-up Survey).
VII. Survey: Participants will complete a brief follow-up survey assessing their general partner notification behavior as well as the actual notification and treatment outcome for each of their three most recent partners, as well as factors that impeded and/or promoted partner notification and treatment. Participants will be asked to specify whether each partner was notified, whether they received antibiotic treatment and/or sought STI testing, the participant's degree of certainty of the outcomes, and the reasons why each partner was or was not notified and/or treated.
VIII. Confirmation of Partner Notification: In order to provide independent confirmation of participant-reported notification status, study staff will ask participants for permission to conduct third party partner notification and confirmation of reported notification status. Participants will be asked for permission to contact their recent partner(s) by telephone or e-mail to confirm the notification outcome. Subjects will be informed that they are not obligated to provide contact information for any of their partners. Subjects will also be informed that if they provide contact information for their partner(s), study staff will contact the person using the contact information provided and notify the person only that someone they recently had sex with has been diagnosed with syphilis, provide information on local sites offering free or low cost testing for HIV and STIs, and answer any questions the partner might have. Subjects will be informed that study staff will not reveal the participant's name or other identifying information to their partner(s). If the participant provides contact information for their partner(s), study staff will contact the person and provide third-party partner notification using an IRB-approved script. After completing the partner notification process, study staff will ask the partner only if they had previously been notified by a partner about an STI diagnosis ("Yes/No"). Partners will not be asked for any additional information.
IX. Qualitative Evaluation. A randomly selected subgroup of participants in the Partner Notification Intervention Protocol will be invited to participate in individual interviews about the partner notification process. Each participant will be asked to participate in two interviews, one following randomization and one following the Follow-up Visit. Participants will complete a separate informed consent process for the individual interview and will receive additional compensation for their participation.
- Eligibility. A randomly selected subset of participants from the Partner Notification intervention protocol will be invited to participate in the individual qualitative interviews. Every fourth participant randomized will be invited to participate in an individual interview until reaching the projected qualitative study sample of 20 participants (10 each from the intervention and control arms). Participants will be asked to complete a separate informed consent document indicating their willingness to participate in a qualitative interview.
XI. Interview Conduct. Interviews will be conducted in Spanish in a private room by a trained interviewer. Interviews will be recorded and transcribed verbatim. Participants will be advised that they can stop the interview at any time and that they will be able to stop the tape and erase any response during the interview if they desire.
XII. Interview Content: Baseline interviews will focus on individual decision-making processes regarding partner notification in specific partnership contexts with a focus on the influence of: STI-related stigma and shame; the gender and sexual identity of participants and their partner(s); perceived power differentials within the partnership(s); patterns of communication within the partnership(s); and structural access to testing and treatment.
Follow-up interviews will discuss actual notification and treatment outcomes. Follow-up interviews will emphasize: barriers or catalysts to implementing notification decisions in specific partnership contexts; structural access to partner testing and treatment within local social, cultural, and economic contexts; and the effectiveness of the study's quantitative outcomes in accurately measuring participants' lived experiences.
Each interview is expected to last approximately 20-30 minutes. Audio recordings and transcripts of interviews will be identified by the participant's numeric study code and the date of the interview.
- Being tested
- Internet, Referral Card, Internet and Referral Card
- Keywords
- MSM, Transgender Women, Partner Notification, Syphilis, Peru
- Medical subject headings
- Syphilis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
InternetBehavioural
Referral and user instructions for Peru section of www.inspot.org partner notification website
Referral CardBehavioural
5 printed referral cards with information on syphilis signs, symptoms, diagnosis, treatment, and local resources.
Internet and Referral CardBehavioural
5 printed referral cards with information on syphilis signs, symptoms, diagnosis, treatment, and local resources; Referral and user instructions for Peru section of www.inspot.org partner notification website.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Control | No intervention | Standardized partner notification counseling |
| Internet Notification | Experimental | Standardized partner notification counseling and referral to internet-based partner referral website. Receives: Behavioral: Internet |
| Referral Card | Experimental | Standardized partner notification counseling and provision of 5 printed partner referral cards. Receives: Behavioral: Referral Card |
| Internet and Referral Card | Experimental | Standardized partner notification counseling and referral to internet-based partner referral website and provision of 5 printed partner referral cards. Receives: Behavioral: Internet and Referral Card |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Self-Reported Partner Notification
Participant self-report of recent partner notification at 14-21 days of follow-up.
Measured: 21 days
Secondary outcomes (1)
Investigator-confirmed Partner Notification
Participants who report notifying one or more of their three most recent partners will be asked for permission for the investigators to contact one or more of these partners to confirm notification outcomes. Partners who are successfully contacted and confirm prior partner notification will be defined as confirmed notifications.
Measured: 21 Days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 Nov 2012 (estimated)
- Study startAug 2012
- Primary completionAug 2014
- Study completionAug 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Partner Notification Following STI DiagnosisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of California, Los AngelesThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 370 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of California, Los Angeles
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH), Asociación Civil Impacta Salud y Educación, Peru
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Jesse Clark, University of California, Los Angeles
- Investigators
- Jesse L Clark, MD, MSc, Principal investigator, University of California, Los Angeles
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01720641
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- K23MH084611
- Other IDs
- IMP-478-2012, K23MH084611
- Status last verified
- Aug 2014
- First submitted
- 29 Oct 2012
- Last updated
- 6 Aug 2014
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Clark JL, Segura ER, Oldenburg CE, Salvatierra HJ, Rios J, Perez-Brumer AG, Gonzales P, Sheoran B, Sanchez J, Lama JR. Traditional and Web-Based Technologies to Improve Partner Notification Following Syphilis Diagnosis Among Men Who Have Sex With Men in Lima, Peru: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. J Med Internet Res. 2018 Jul 3;20(7):e232. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9821.
PubMed 29970355Braun HM, Segura ER, Lake JE, Gandhi M, Rios J, Villaran MV, Sanchez J, Lama JR, Clark JL. Individual and partnership factors associated with anticipated versus actual partner notification following STI diagnosis among men who have sex with men and/or with transgender women in Lima, Peru. Sex Transm Infect. 2018 Dec;94(8):607-610. doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2017-053292. Epub 2017 Nov 30.
PubMed 29191814
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Aug 2014. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Partner Notification Strategies for STI Control in Urban Peru
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01720641
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- K23MH084611
- Keywords
- MSM, Transgender Women, Partner Notification, Syphilis, Peru
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 370 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of California, Los AngelesUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH), Asociación Civil Impacta Salud y Educación, Peru
- Study start
- Aug 2012
- Primary completion
- Aug 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- Aug 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 2 Nov 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of the proposed research is to assess new strategies for partner management and sexually transmitted infection (STI) control to reduce the spread of HIV-1 among men who have sex with men (MSM) in Latin America. The HIV epidemic in Peru remains concentrated within the core risk group of MSM. STI infection and re-infection are central to the continuation of the HIV epidemic among MSM in Peru. Development of improved strategies for partner notification and treatment will reduce the incidence and prevalence of STIs and ultimately reduce the incidence of HIV infection in this population. The first phase of this study used qualitative methods to explore attitudes and practices related to partner notification among MSM in Lima, Peru. Findings from the qualitative research were used to develop a quantitative survey instrument to assess partner notification decision-making processes and practices among MSM in Peru recently diagnosed with HIV or syphilis infection. Data from both quantitative and qualitative phases of the study have been used to develop a partner notification for MSM in Peru. Investigators plan to implement and assess the impact of the intervention on rates of partner notification following a diagnosis of syphilis among MSM in Lima, Peru. The investigators hypothesize that participants randomized to receive one or more partner notification tools will report a higher frequency of partner notification.
Detailed description
Specific Aim: To assess the efficacy of internet- and referral card-based partner notification tools for the improvement of partner notification outcomes among MSM in Lima, Peru. As attitudes and behaviors related to partner notification vary within specific behavioral, social, and clinical contexts, interventions designed to improve partner notification outcomes must address the same contextual determinants to be effective. Partner notification tools based on electronic distribution of anonymous notification messages and/or patient-delivered referral cards are expected to increase notification rates in specific contexts.
Hypothesis: Provision of partner notification tools based on electronic and printed resources will improve reported and observed partner notification outcomes by overcoming barriers to notification including limited contact information, fear of disclosure, stigma, and lack of informational resources. Notification outcomes and use of notification tools will vary according to strategies of interpersonal communication reflected in the specific behavioral, social, and biomedical contexts of the individual, the partnership, and the STI diagnosed.
Participants will be selected for participation in the study depending on the findings of the EPT/Partner Notification Screening Protocol. Participants in the EPT/Partner Notification Screening Protocol diagnosed with new syphilis infection will be eligible for enrollment in the Partner Notification protocol.
- Recruitment: Participants in the EPT/Partner Notification Screening Protocol who are diagnosed with syphilis based on physician interpretation of results of RPR assay and clinical history will be invited by the Study Counselor to participate in the Partner Notification Intervention Protocol.
II. Informed Consent: All potential subjects will receive an explanation of the study procedures and risks and benefits and asked to provide written Informed Consent. Participants will be given the opportunity to take the Informed Consent Document home for further review and decide at a later time if they wish to participate in the study.
III. Enrollment: Subjects who consent to participate in the Partner Notification Intervention Protocol will be randomized to either the experimental Partner Notification intervention or the Standard of Care (Partner Notification Counseling) arm.
IV Randomization: Eligible subjects who provide consent to participate will be randomly assigned to intervention or control groups using a random permuted block allocation (block size=7 in an alternating 4/3 ratio). Computer-generated randomization assignments will be stored in opaque, sealed envelopes opened at the time of allocation. Randomization assignments will be recorded and identified by the participant's numeric study code.
- Intervention Delivery. Participants assigned to the experimental Partner Notification intervention will be provided with standard partner notification counseling as well as 5 printed referral cards with information about syphilis infection and a referral sheet for the Spanish language version of the inSPOT internet-based partner notification service (www.inspot.org). Referral cards will include printed material informing the recipient that they may have been exposed to syphilis, and will provide information on syphilis infection, including local resources for testing and treatment. The inSPOT website is a free internet-based notification service that offers anonymous automated e-mail partner notification services following an STI diagnosis. Users of the system select a diagnosis as well as a standardized notification message which they can personalized with their name and other messages if they desire. The user then enters the e-mail address(es) of the person(s) they wish to notify and the system delivers an automated e-mail notification to the person advising them of their potential exposure to an STI and advising them to seek STI testing. The notification also includes the address of the inSPOT website which contains additional information on HIV/STIs, risks for transmission, and resources for testing and treatment. Participants will be instructed on how to use both tools to assist them in the partner notification process.
Participants randomized to the control arm will receive standard partner notification counseling by study staff, without any supplemental notification tools.
Following delivery of the intervention, an appointment will be scheduled for participants to return to the research site in 1 month.
VI. Follow-up Evaluation. All participants will be asked to return to the study site 1 month after enrollment and randomization. At the Follow-up evaluation, participants will complete a brief survey (Partner Notification Follow-up Survey).
VII. Survey: Participants will complete a brief follow-up survey assessing their general partner notification behavior as well as the actual notification and treatment outcome for each of their three most recent partners, as well as factors that impeded and/or promoted partner notification and treatment. Participants will be asked to specify whether each partner was notified, whether they received antibiotic treatment and/or sought STI testing, the participant's degree of certainty of the outcomes, and the reasons why each partner was or was not notified and/or treated.
VIII. Confirmation of Partner Notification: In order to provide independent confirmation of participant-reported notification status, study staff will ask participants for permission to conduct third party partner notification and confirmation of reported notification status. Participants will be asked for permission to contact their recent partner(s) by telephone or e-mail to confirm the notification outcome. Subjects will be informed that they are not obligated to provide contact information for any of their partners. Subjects will also be informed that if they provide contact information for their partner(s), study staff will contact the person using the contact information provided and notify the person only that someone they recently had sex with has been diagnosed with syphilis, provide information on local sites offering free or low cost testing for HIV and STIs, and answer any questions the partner might have. Subjects will be informed that study staff will not reveal the participant's name or other identifying information to their partner(s). If the participant provides contact information for their partner(s), study staff will contact the person and provide third-party partner notification using an IRB-approved script. After completing the partner notification process, study staff will ask the partner only if they had previously been notified by a partner about an STI diagnosis ("Yes/No"). Partners will not be asked for any additional information.
IX. Qualitative Evaluation. A randomly selected subgroup of participants in the Partner Notification Intervention Protocol will be invited to participate in individual interviews about the partner notification process. Each participant will be asked to participate in two interviews, one following randomization and one following the Follow-up Visit. Participants will complete a separate informed consent process for the individual interview and will receive additional compensation for their participation.
- Eligibility. A randomly selected subset of participants from the Partner Notification intervention protocol will be invited to participate in the individual qualitative interviews. Every fourth participant randomized will be invited to participate in an individual interview until reaching the projected qualitative study sample of 20 participants (10 each from the intervention and control arms). Participants will be asked to complete a separate informed consent document indicating their willingness to participate in a qualitative interview.
XI. Interview Conduct. Interviews will be conducted in Spanish in a private room by a trained interviewer. Interviews will be recorded and transcribed verbatim. Participants will be advised that they can stop the interview at any time and that they will be able to stop the tape and erase any response during the interview if they desire.
XII. Interview Content: Baseline interviews will focus on individual decision-making processes regarding partner notification in specific partnership contexts with a focus on the influence of: STI-related stigma and shame; the gender and sexual identity of participants and their partner(s); perceived power differentials within the partnership(s); patterns of communication within the partnership(s); and structural access to testing and treatment.
Follow-up interviews will discuss actual notification and treatment outcomes. Follow-up interviews will emphasize: barriers or catalysts to implementing notification decisions in specific partnership contexts; structural access to partner testing and treatment within local social, cultural, and economic contexts; and the effectiveness of the study's quantitative outcomes in accurately measuring participants' lived experiences.
Each interview is expected to last approximately 20-30 minutes. Audio recordings and transcripts of interviews will be identified by the participant's numeric study code and the date of the interview.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Control | No intervention | –Standardized partner notification counseling |
| Internet Notification | Experimental | Behavioral: InternetStandardized partner notification counseling and referral to internet-based partner referral website. |
| Referral Card | Experimental | Behavioral: Referral CardStandardized partner notification counseling and provision of 5 printed partner referral cards. |
| Internet and Referral Card | Experimental | Behavioral: Internet and Referral CardStandardized partner notification counseling and referral to internet-based partner referral website and provision of 5 printed partner referral cards. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Male only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- 18 years of age or older
- Male or biologically male at birth
- Sexual contact (oral or anal intercourse) with a male or male-to-female transgender partner in the past 12 months
- Diagnosis with syphilis infection
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Under 18 years of age
- Unable to understand informed consent procedures
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| InternetReferral and user instructions for Peru section of www.inspot.org partner notification website | Behavioural | Internet Notification |
| Referral Card5 printed referral cards with information on syphilis signs, symptoms, diagnosis, treatment, and local resources. | Behavioural | Referral Card |
| Internet and Referral Card5 printed referral cards with information on syphilis signs, symptoms, diagnosis, treatment, and local resources; Referral and user instructions for Peru section of www.inspot.org partner notification website. | Behavioural | Internet and Referral Card |
Primary outcome
Self-Reported Partner Notification
Time frame: 21 days
Participant self-report of recent partner notification at 14-21 days of follow-up.
1 secondary outcome
Investigator-confirmed Partner Notification
Time frame: 21 Days
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Aug 2014.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 29970355Clark JL, Segura ER, Oldenburg CE, Salvatierra HJ, Rios J, Perez-Brumer AG, Gonzales P, Sheoran B, Sanchez J, Lama JR. Traditional and Web-Based Technologies to Improve Partner Notification Following Syphilis Diagnosis Among Men Who Have Sex With Men in Lima, Peru: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. J Med Internet Res. 2018 Jul 3;20(7):e232. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9821.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 29191814Braun HM, Segura ER, Lake JE, Gandhi M, Rios J, Villaran MV, Sanchez J, Lama JR, Clark JL. Individual and partnership factors associated with anticipated versus actual partner notification following STI diagnosis among men who have sex with men and/or with transgender women in Lima, Peru. Sex Transm Infect. 2018 Dec;94(8):607-610. doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2017-053292. Epub 2017 Nov 30.
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jesse L Clark, MD, MSc principal investigator
University of California, Los Angeles
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Internet, Referral Card and Internet and Referral Card in people with Partner Notification Following STI Diagnosis, run by University of California, Los Angeles at 1 site in Peru.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Aug 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Peru. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Self-Reported Partner Notification (time frame: 21 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01720641, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Aug 2014.