AzTrials
AzTrials

DeliriumIDEASNCT01720914

Instruments for Delirium Assessment Regarding to Analgesia Sedation and Ventilator Status

An observational study of Delirium, run by Charite University, Berlin, Germany at 2 sites in 2 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

In this prospective, multicenter observational study we assess the diagnostic validity of the following standard screening instruments for delirium regarding sedation, analgesia and ventilator status in critically ill patients: Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU (CAM-ICU) Intensive Care Delirium Screening… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Delirium
How many people
160 participants
Where
2 sitesin 2 countries
Study dates
Nov 2012to Dec 2015
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Male and female adult critically ill patients

Who may be able to join

  • Critically ill patient
  • Patient age > 18 years

Who cannot join

  • Neurosurgical patients
  • Severe brain injury, intracerebral bleeding, stroke
  • Inability to communicate due to anacusia or severe hearing loss
  • Insufficient language comprehension
  • Patients < 24 h total time of Intensive Care Unit stay
  • Deep sedation (RASS < -3) for ≥ 7 days during study participation

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 2 countries.

2 sites in 2 countries

Brazil1 site
  • Centro de Terapia Intensiva da Hospital Pro-Cardiaco

    Botafogo, Rio de Janeiro, RJ 22280-020

Other trials in Brazil

Germany1 site
  • Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, CVK/CCM, Charité -University Medicine

    Berlin, State of Berlin, 13353

Other trials in Germany

About this study

In this prospective, multicenter observational study we assess the diagnostic validity of the following standard screening instruments for delirium regarding sedation, analgesia and ventilator status in critically ill patients:

  • Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU (CAM-ICU)
  • Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist (ICDSC)
  • Nursing-Delirium-Screening-Scale (Nu-DESC)
Read more

The definite delirium diagnosis (definite in terms of reference standard) is made according to the criteria of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 4th Edition, text revised (DSM-IV-TR) published by the American Psychiatric Association (APA) which is the Gold Standard to diagnose delirium.

Primary research question: Does sedation, ventilator status and analgesia influence the sensitivity of delirium screening tools (DST)?

Conditions
Delirium
Medical subject headings
Delirium

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT01720914
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Critically ill patientNot described

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Sensitivity of the delirium screening/diagnosing tool "Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU (CAM-ICU)" regarding sedation and ventilator status.

    Used reference standard: DSM-IV TR criteria

    Measured: Participants will be followed in the 7-days sample period

  2. Sensitivity of the delirium-screening tool "Intensive-Care Delirium Screening Checklist(ICDSC)" regarding sedation and ventilator status.

    Used reference standard: DSM-IV TR criteria.

    Measured: Participants will be followed in the 7-days sample period

  3. Sensitivity of the delirium screening tool "Nursing Delirium Screening Scale (Nu-DESC)" regarding sedation and ventilator status.

    Used reference standard: DSM-IV TR criteria

    Measured: Participants will be followed in the 7-days sample period

Secondary outcomes (17)
  1. Specificity of the "Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU (CAM-ICU)", the "Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist (ICDSC)" and the "Nursing Delirium Screening Scale" regarding sedation and ventilator status.

    Used reference standard: DSM-IV-TR criteria.

    Measured: Participants will be followed in the 7-days sample period

  2. Calculation and Analysis of the positive predictive values of the assessed delirium-screening scales.

    Calculation of positive and negative predictive values of the "Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU (CAM-ICU)", the "Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist (ICDSC)" and the "Nursing Delirium Screening Scale" regarding sedation and ventilator status.

    Used reference standard: DSM-IV-TR criteria

    Measured: Participants will be followed in the 7-days sample period

  3. Incidence of delirium

    According to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV) and Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU (CAM-ICU)

    Measured: Participants will be followed in the 7-days sample period

  4. Incidence of Subsyndromale Delirium (SSD)

    According to Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist (ICDSC) and Nursing Delirium Screening Scale (Nu-DESC)

    Measured: Participants will be followed in the 7-days sample period

  5. Analgesia

    According to Numeric rating scale visually enlarged and laminated (NRS-V), Behavioural pain scale (BPS) and Behavioural pain scale not intubated (BPS-NI)

    Measured: Participants will be followed in the 7-days sample period:

  6. Ventilator status

    Clinical observation of A) whether an airway is used B)whether a patient is ventilated with a positive pressure ventilation or a high flow ventilation for more than 6 hours per day.

    Measured: Participants will be followed in the 7-days sample period

  7. Administered neuroleptics, cumulative

    Measured: Participants will be followed in the 7-days sample period

  8. Administered analgesics, cumulative

    Measured: Participants will be followed in the 7-days sample period

  9. Administered sedatives, cumulative

    Measured: Participants will be followed in the 7-days sample period

  10. Severity of illness

    according to Acute Physiology And Chronic Health score (APACHE 2), Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS 2) and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (SOFA)

    Measured: Participants will be followed in the 7-days sample period

  11. Antibiotics/infections

    Measured: Participants will be followed in the 7-days sample period

  12. ICU length of stay

    Measured: Participants will be followed for the duration of intensive care unit stay and hospital stay, an expected average of 4 weeks

  13. Duration of mechanical ventilation

    Measured: Participants will be followed for the duration of intensive care unit stay and hospital stay, an expected average of 4 weeks

  14. Discharge mode

    Measured: Participants will be followed for the duration of intensive care unit stay and hospital stay, an expected average of 4 weeks

  15. 28-day mortality

    Measured: Participants will be followed for the duration of intensive care unit stay and hospital stay, an expected average of 4 weeks

  16. Specificity of the "Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU (CAM-ICU)", the "Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist (ICDSC)" and the "Nursing Delirium Screening Scale" regarding analgesia.

    Used reference standard: DSM-IV-TR criteria.

    Measured: Participants will be followed in the 7-days sample period

  17. Sensitivity of the "Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU (CAM-ICU)", the "Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist (ICDSC)" and the "Nursing Delirium Screening Scale" regarding analgesia.

    Used reference standard: DSM-IV-TR criteria.

    Measured: Participants will be followed in the 7-days sample period

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted2 Nov 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study startNov 2012
  3. Primary completionDec 2013
  4. Study completionDec 2015

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
160 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01720914
Sponsor's protocol ID
IDEAS
Acronym
IDEAS
Status last verified
Dec 2015
First submitted
30 Oct 2012
Last updated
23 Dec 2015
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Nacul FE, Paul N, Spies CD, Sechting H, Hecht T, Dullinger JS, Piper SK, Luetz A, Balzer FS, Wernecke KD, Sa AK, Barros Ferreira da Costa C, Eymold L, Chenitir C, Weiss B. Influence of Sedation Level and Ventilation Status on the Diagnostic Validity of Delirium Screening Tools in the ICU-An International, Prospective, Bi-Center Observational Study (IDeAS). Medicina (Kaunas). 2020 Aug 13;56(8):411. doi: 10.3390/medicina56080411.

    PubMed 32823781

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Delirium, run by Charite University, Berlin, Germany at 2 sites in 2 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Dec 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in Brazil, Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Sensitivity of the delirium screening/diagnosing tool "Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU (CAM-ICU)" regarding sedation and ventilator status. (time frame: Participants will be followed in the 7-days sample period). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01720914, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Dec 2015; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 7 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in