Unresectable or Metastatic MelanomaPhase 3NCT01721746
A Study to Compare BMS-936558 to the Physician's Choice of Either Dacarbazine or Carboplatin and Paclitaxel in Advanced Melanoma Patients That Have Progressed Following Anti-CTLA-4 Therapy (CheckMate 037)
A Phase 3 study testing BMS-936558, Dacarbazine and Carboplatin in people with Unresectable or Metastatic Melanoma, run by Bristol-Myers Squibb at 95 sites in 14 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of the study is to estimate the response rate and compare overall survival of patients taking BMS-936558 to those taking study physician's choice of either Dacarbazine or Carboplatin and Paclitaxel Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Unresectable or Metastatic Melanoma
- What is being tested?
- BMS-936558, Dacarbazine and Carboplatin
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 405 participants
- Where
- 95 sitesin 14 countries
- Study dates
- 21 Dec 2012to 29 Dec 2020
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Men \& women ≥ 18 years of age
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) 0-1
- Histologically confirmed Stage III (unresectable)/Stage IV melanoma
- Measurable disease by computed tomography (CT)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 criteria
- Objective evidence of disease progression (clinical or radiological) during or after at least 1 (V600 Wildtype) or at least 2 (V600 mutation positive) prior treatment regimens
- Pre-treatment fresh core, excision or punch tumor biopsy
- Archival Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor material if available
Who cannot join
- Any treatment in a BMS-936558 (Nivolumab) trial
- Subjects with condition requiring systemic treatment with either corticosteroids (> 10mg daily prednisone/equivalent) or other immunosuppressive medications within 14 days of study drug administration
- Active, known or suspected autoimmune disease
- Unknown BRAF status
- Active brain metastasis or leptomeningeal metastasis
- Ocular melanoma
- Prior therapy with anti programmed death-1 (anti-PD-1), anti programmed death-ligand 1 (anti-PD-L1) or anti-programmed death-ligand 2 (anti-PD-L2)
Trial locations and contacts
95 sites in 14 countries.
95 sites in 14 countries
United States32 sites
Network Office of Research and Innovation
Allentown, Pennsylvania, 18103
St. Luke'S Health System
Allentown, Pennsylvania, 18109
University Of Michigan Health System
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109
Winship Cancer Institute
Atlanta, Georgia, 30322
University Of Colorado
Aurora, Colorado, 80045
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02215
Dana Farber Cancer Institute
Boston, Massachusetts, 02215
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Boston, Massachusetts, 02215
Roswell Park Cancer Institute
Buffalo, New York, 14263
Levine Cancer Institute
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28204
University Hospitals
Cleveland, Ohio, 44106
Karmanos Cancer Institute
Detroit, Michigan, 48201
Duke University Medical Center
Durham, North Carolina, 27710
UCSD Moores Cancer Center
La Jolla, California, 92093
The Angeles Clinic & Research Institute
Los Angeles, California, 90025
University Of California - Los Angeles
Los Angeles, California, 90095
Mount Sinai Comprehensive Cancer Center
Miami Beach, Florida, 33140
Allina Health
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55407
Tennessee Oncology, PLLC
Nashville, Tennessee, 37203
Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center
Nashville, Tennessee, 37232
Yale University School Of Medicine
New Haven, Connecticut, 06520
NYU Clinical Cancer Center
New York, New York, 10016
MSKCC Clinical Laboratory at Nassau
New York, New York, 10065
Orlando Health, Inc
Orlando, Florida, 32806
Mayo Clinic
Phoenix, Arizona, 85054
Hillman Cancer Center
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15232
Providence Oncology And Hematology
Portland, Oregon, 97213
Huntsman Cancer Institute
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84112
San Francisco Oncology Associates
San Francciso, California, 94115
UCSF Comprehensive Cancer Center
San Francisco, California, 94143
Washington University School Of Medicine
St Louis, Missouri, 63110
H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute
Tampa, Florida, 33612
Germany12 sites
Local Institution
Buxtehude, 21614
Local Institution
Dresden, 01307
Local Institution
Essen, 45122
Local Institution
Frankfurt am Main, 60590
Local Institution
Hanover, 30625
Local Institution
Heidelberg, 69120
Local Institution
Kiel, D-24105
Local Institution
Lübeck, 23538
Local Institution
Magdeburg, 39120
Local Institution
Munich, 81675
Local Institution
Tübingen, 72076
Local Institution
Würzburg, Bavaria, 97080
Italy9 sites
Local Institution
Bari, 70124
Local Institution
Bergamo, 24127
Local Institution
Genova, 16132
Local Institution
Milan, 20133
Local Institution
Milan, 20141
Local Institution
Naples, 80131
Local Institution
Padova, 35128
Local Institution
Roma, 00144
Local Institution
Siena, 53100
France8 sites
Local Institution
Clermont-Ferrand, 63003
Local Institution
Lille, 59037
Hopital La Timone
Marseille, 13009
Local Institution
Nantes, 44093
Local Institution
Nice, 06200
Local Institution
Paris, 75010
Local Institution
Pierre-Bénite, 69310
Local Institution
Villejuif, 94805
Spain6 sites
Local Institution
Barcelona, 08036
Local Institution
Barcelona, 08908
Local Institution
Madrid, 28020
Local Institution
Madrid, 28041
Local Institution
Pamplona, 31192
Local Institution
Valencia, 46014
United Kingdom5 sites
Local Institution
London, SW3 6JJ
Local Institution
Manchester, Greater Manchester, M20 4BX
Local Institution
Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, NE7 7DN
Local Institution
Oxford, Oxfordshire, OX3 7LJ
Local Institution
Southampton, Hampshire, SO16 6YD
Belgium4 sites
Local Institution
Brussels, 1090
Local Institution
Brussels, 1200
Local Institution
Edegem, 2650
Local Institution
Leuven, 3000
Canada4 sites
Cross Cancer Institute
Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 1Z2
CHUM
Montreal, Quebec, H2X 3E4
Sir Mortimer B Davis - Jewish General Hospital
Montreal, Quebec, H3T 1E2
Princess Margaret Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2M9
Brazil3 sites
Local Institution
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 90035-903
Local Institution
Rio de Janeiro, 20220-410
Local Institution
São Paulo, 01321-001
Denmark3 sites
Aarhus Universitetshospital
Aarhus, 8000
Herlev Hospital
Herlev, 2730
Odense University Hospital
Odense, 5000
Netherlands3 sites
Local Institution
Amsterdam, 1066 CX
Local Institution
Groningen, 9713 GZ
Local Institution
Maastricht, 6229 HX
Austria2 sites
Local Institution
Innsbruck, 6020
Local Institution
Vienna, A-1090
Israel2 sites
Local Institution
Jerusalem, 91120
Local Institution
Ramat Gan, 52621
Switzerland2 sites
Local Institution
Lausanne, 1011
Local Institution
Zurich, 8091
About this study
Official title: A Randomized Open-Label Phase 3 Trial of BMS-936558 (Nivolumab) Versus Investigator's Choice in Advanced (Unresectable or Metastatic) Melanoma Patients Progressing Post Anti-CTLA-4 Therapy
The purpose of the study is to estimate the response rate and compare overall survival of patients taking BMS-936558 to those taking study physician's choice of either Dacarbazine or Carboplatin and Paclitaxel
- Conditions
- Unresectable or Metastatic Melanoma
- Being tested
- BMS-936558, Dacarbazine, Carboplatin, Paclitaxel
- Medical subject headings
- Melanoma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
BMS-936558Biological
DacarbazineDrug
Also called DTIC-Dome, DTIC
CarboplatinDrug
Also called Paraplatin, CBDCA
PaclitaxelDrug
Also called Onxol
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| BMS-936558 3 mg/kg (IV) | Experimental | BMS-936558 3 mg/kg solution for injection by intravenous (IV), every 2 weeks until documented disease progression, discontinuation due to toxicity, withdrawal of consent or the study ends Receives: Biological: BMS-936558 |
| Investigator's Choice (Dacarbazine or Carboplatin+Paclitaxel) | Active comparator | Dacarbazine: 1000mg/m2, Powder for IV solution, IV, every 3 weeks until documented disease progression, discontinuation due to toxicity, withdrawal of consent or the study ends
Carboplatin: Area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) 6, solution for injection, IV, every 3 weeks until documented disease progression, discontinuation due to toxicity, withdrawal of consent or the study ends
Paclitaxel: 175 mg/ m2, solution for injection, IV, every 3 weeks until documented disease progression, discontinuation due to toxicity, withdrawal of consent or the study ends Receives: Drug: Dacarbazine; Drug: Carboplatin; Drug: Paclitaxel |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Objective Response Rate (ORR)
Objective response rate (ORR) per Independent Review Committee (IRC) is defined as the number of participants with a best overall response (BOR) of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) divided by the number of randomized participants using RECIST 1.1
Measured: From date of randomization to the date of objectively documented progression, date of death, or the date of subsequent therapy (Up to approximately 38 months)
Overall Survival (OS)
Overall Survival (OS) was defined the time between the date of randomization to the date of death. For participants without documentation of death, OS was censored on the last date the participant was known to be alive. Unit of measure (months) is the median survival time.
Measured: Up to 96 months
Secondary outcomes (5)
Progression Free Survival (PFS)
Progression Free Survival (PFS) is defined as the time from randomization to the date of the first documented progression, as determined by the Independent Review Committee (IRC) using RECIST 1.1, or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. Participants who died without a reported progression were considered to have progressed on the date of their death. Participants who did not progress or die were censored on the date of their last evaluable tumor assessment before subsequent anti-cancer therapy. Unit of measure (months) is the median survival time.
Measured: From the date of randomization to the date of the first documented progression or death (Up to approximately 38 months)
Objective Response Rate (ORR) by Baseline PD-L1 Expression
Objective Response Rate (ORR) is defined as the number of participants with a Best Overall Response (BOR) of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) divided by number of randomized participants. PD-L1 expression evaluated for ORR.
Measured: From date of randomization to the date of objectively documented progression or the date of subsequent therapy (Up to approximately 38 months)
Overall Survival (OS) by PD-L1 Positive
Overall Survival (OS) by PD-L1 expression was defined the time between the date of randomization to the date of death. For participants without documentation of death, OS was censored on the last date the participant was known to be alive.
Measured: Up to 96 months
Overall Survival (OS) by PD-L1 Negative
Overall Survival (OS) by PD-L1 expression was defined the time between the date of randomization to the date of death. For participants without documentation of death, OS was censored on the last date the participant was known to be alive.
Measured: Up to 96 months
Mean Change From Baseline in Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL)
Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) was assessed with the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, which is the most commonly used quality-of-life instrument in oncology trials. The instrument's 30 items were divided among 5 functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), 9 symptom scales (fatigue, pain, nausea/vomiting, dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties), and a global health/quality of life scale. Raw scores for the EORTC QLQ-C30 were transformed to a 0-100 metric.
Higher scores for all functional scales and Global Health Status=better HRQoL Increase from baseline indicates improvement in HRQoL. Lower scores for symptom scales=better HRQoL Decline from baseline for symptom scales =improvement in symptoms compared to baseline.
A 10 point difference on a 100 point scale between treatments was considered clinically significant.
Measured: From Baseline (Day1) to second Follow-Up (Up to 96 months)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 Nov 2012 (estimated)
- Study start21 Dec 2012
- Primary completion16 Feb 2016
- Study completion29 Dec 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Unresectable or Metastatic MelanomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Bristol-Myers SquibbThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 405 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Bristol-Myers Squibb
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Bristol-Myers Squibb, Study director, Bristol-Myers Squibb
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01721746
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CA209-037
- Other IDs
- 2012-001828-35
- Status last verified
- Mar 2022
- First submitted
- 2 Nov 2012
- Last updated
- 19 Apr 2022
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Larkin J, Minor D, D'Angelo S, Neyns B, Smylie M, Miller WH Jr, Gutzmer R, Linette G, Chmielowski B, Lao CD, Lorigan P, Grossmann K, Hassel JC, Sznol M, Daud A, Sosman J, Khushalani N, Schadendorf D, Hoeller C, Walker D, Kong G, Horak C, Weber J. Overall Survival in Patients With Advanced Melanoma Who Received Nivolumab Versus Investigator's Choice Chemotherapy in CheckMate 037: A Randomized, Controlled, Open-Label Phase III Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2018 Feb 1;36(4):383-390. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.71.8023. Epub 2017 Jul 3.
PubMed 28671856Weber JS, D'Angelo SP, Minor D, Hodi FS, Gutzmer R, Neyns B, Hoeller C, Khushalani NI, Miller WH Jr, Lao CD, Linette GP, Thomas L, Lorigan P, Grossmann KF, Hassel JC, Maio M, Sznol M, Ascierto PA, Mohr P, Chmielowski B, Bryce A, Svane IM, Grob JJ, Krackhardt AM, Horak C, Lambert A, Yang AS, Larkin J. Nivolumab versus chemotherapy in patients with advanced melanoma who progressed after anti-CTLA-4 treatment (CheckMate 037): a randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015 Apr;16(4):375-84. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)70076-8. Epub 2015 Mar 18.
PubMed 25795410
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Apr 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized Open-Label Phase 3 Trial of BMS-936558 (Nivolumab) Versus Investigator's Choice in Advanced (Unresectable or Metastatic) Melanoma Patients Progressing Post Anti-CTLA-4 Therapy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01721746
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CA209-037
- Conditions
- Unresectable or Metastatic Melanoma
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 405 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Bristol-Myers SquibbIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 21 Dec 2012 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 16 Feb 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- 29 Dec 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 6 Nov 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 22 Mar 2017
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of the study is to estimate the response rate and compare overall survival of patients taking BMS-936558 to those taking study physician's choice of either Dacarbazine or Carboplatin and Paclitaxel
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| BMS-936558 3 mg/kg (IV) | Experimental | Biological: BMS-936558BMS-936558 3 mg/kg solution for injection by intravenous (IV), every 2 weeks until documented disease progression, discontinuation due to toxicity, withdrawal of consent or the study ends |
| Investigator's Choice (Dacarbazine or Carboplatin+Paclitaxel) | Active comparator | Drug: Dacarbazine, Drug: Carboplatin, Drug: PaclitaxelDacarbazine: 1000mg/m2, Powder for IV solution, IV, every 3 weeks until documented disease progression, discontinuation due to toxicity, withdrawal of consent or the study ends Carboplatin: Area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) 6, solution for injection, IV, every 3 weeks until documented disease progression, discontinuation due to toxicity, withdrawal of consent or the study ends Paclitaxel: 175 mg/ m2, solution for injection, IV, every 3 weeks until documented disease progression, discontinuation due to toxicity, withdrawal of consent or the study ends |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Men \& women ≥ 18 years of age
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) 0-1
- Histologically confirmed Stage III (unresectable)/Stage IV melanoma
- Measurable disease by computed tomography (CT)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 criteria
- Objective evidence of disease progression (clinical or radiological) during or after at least 1 (V600 Wildtype) or at least 2 (V600 mutation positive) prior treatment regimens
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Any treatment in a BMS-936558 (Nivolumab) trial
- Subjects with condition requiring systemic treatment with either corticosteroids (> 10mg daily prednisone/equivalent) or other immunosuppressive medications within 14 days of study drug administration
- Active, known or suspected autoimmune disease
- Unknown BRAF status
- Active brain metastasis or leptomeningeal metastasis
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| BMS-936558 | Biological | BMS-936558 3 mg/kg (IV) |
| DacarbazineAlso: DTIC-Dome, DTIC | Drug | Investigator's Choice (Dacarbazine or Carboplatin+Paclitaxel) |
| CarboplatinAlso: Paraplatin, CBDCA | Drug | Investigator's Choice (Dacarbazine or Carboplatin+Paclitaxel) |
| PaclitaxelAlso: Onxol | Drug | Investigator's Choice (Dacarbazine or Carboplatin+Paclitaxel) |
Primary outcome
Objective Response Rate (ORR)
Time frame: From date of randomization to the date of objectively documented progression, date of death, or the date of subsequent therapy (Up to approximately 38 months)
Objective response rate (ORR) per Independent Review Committee (IRC) is defined as the number of participants with a best overall response (BOR) of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) divided by the number of randomized participants using RECIST 1.1
Overall Survival (OS)
Time frame: Up to 96 months
Overall Survival (OS) was defined the time between the date of randomization to the date of death. For participants without documentation of death, OS was censored on the last date the participant was known to be alive. Unit of measure (months) is the median survival time.
5 secondary outcomes
Progression Free Survival (PFS)
Time frame: From the date of randomization to the date of the first documented progression or death (Up to approximately 38 months)
Objective Response Rate (ORR) by Baseline PD-L1 Expression
Time frame: From date of randomization to the date of objectively documented progression or the date of subsequent therapy (Up to approximately 38 months)
Overall Survival (OS) by PD-L1 Positive
Time frame: Up to 96 months
Overall Survival (OS) by PD-L1 Negative
Time frame: Up to 96 months
Mean Change From Baseline in Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL)
Time frame: From Baseline (Day1) to second Follow-Up (Up to 96 months)
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Apr 2022.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 28671856Larkin J, Minor D, D'Angelo S, Neyns B, Smylie M, Miller WH Jr, Gutzmer R, Linette G, Chmielowski B, Lao CD, Lorigan P, Grossmann K, Hassel JC, Sznol M, Daud A, Sosman J, Khushalani N, Schadendorf D, Hoeller C, Walker D, Kong G, Horak C, Weber J. Overall Survival in Patients With Advanced Melanoma Who Received Nivolumab Versus Investigator's Choice Chemotherapy in CheckMate 037: A Randomized, Controlled, Open-Label Phase III Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2018 Feb 1;36(4):383-390. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.71.8023. Epub 2017 Jul 3.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 25795410Weber JS, D'Angelo SP, Minor D, Hodi FS, Gutzmer R, Neyns B, Hoeller C, Khushalani NI, Miller WH Jr, Lao CD, Linette GP, Thomas L, Lorigan P, Grossmann KF, Hassel JC, Maio M, Sznol M, Ascierto PA, Mohr P, Chmielowski B, Bryce A, Svane IM, Grob JJ, Krackhardt AM, Horak C, Lambert A, Yang AS, Larkin J. Nivolumab versus chemotherapy in patients with advanced melanoma who progressed after anti-CTLA-4 treatment (CheckMate 037): a randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015 Apr;16(4):375-84. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)70076-8. Epub 2015 Mar 18.
- BMS Clinical Trial InformationLink provided by the sponsor.
- BMS Clinical Trial Patient RecruitingLink provided by the sponsor.
- Investigator Inquiry FormLink provided by the sponsor.
- FDA Safety Alerts and RecallsLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Unresectable or Metastatic Melanoma
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study With Combinations of Anti-LAG-3 and Anti-PD-1 Antibodies in Adult Participants With Advanced or Metastatic Melanoma (Harmony Head-to-Head)
Melanoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
A Study of ST-1898 for Unresectable or Metastatic Melanoma
Unresectable or Metastatic Melanoma
RecruitingPhase 2
BiCaZO: A Study Combining Two Immunotherapies (Cabozantinib and Nivolumab) to Treat Patients With Advanced Melanoma or Squamous Cell Head and Neck Cancer, an immunoMATCH Pilot Study
Clinical Stage III Cutaneous Melanoma AJCC v8, Clinical Stage III HPV-Mediated (p16-Positive) Oropharyngeal Carcinoma AJCC v8
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of IBI363 Monotherapy Compared to Pembrolizumab in Patients With Unresectable Locally Advanced or Metastatic Mucosal or Acral Melanoma Who Had Not Previously Received Systemic Therapy
Melanoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
A Beta-only IL-2 ImmunoTherapY Study
Advanced Solid Tumor, Unresectable Solid Tumor
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Bristol-Myers Squibb study director
Bristol-Myers Squibb
95 sites in 14 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing BMS-936558, Dacarbazine and Carboplatin in people with Unresectable or Metastatic Melanoma, run by Bristol-Myers Squibb at 95 sites in 14 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Apr 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 95 sites in United States, Germany, Italy, France, Spain and 9 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 22 Mar 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Objective Response Rate (ORR) (time frame: From date of randomization to the date of objectively documented progression, date of death, or the date of subsequent therapy (Up to approximately 38 months)). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01721746, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Apr 2022.